LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank. Peter Godwin London South Bank University 2 February 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laura Snow SD Department of Education Office of Assessment and Technology Systems.
Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Queen’s Libraries User Surveys Selected information from the Faculty and Student surveys June 2002.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Reading LibQUAL+ Results The University of Chicago Library LibQUAL+™ Survey Supervisors’ Meeting June 16, 2004.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
LibQUAL+® Lite at UNT Presented By Diane Wahl Texas Library Association Annual Conference Houston, Texas April 2, 2009.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
E-learning in LIS education: satisfaction of part-time LIS students with Omega Marko Tot, young researcher Faculty of Humanities and Social Sceiences,
Information Literacy: more than just a library induction Michele Davies & Lori Havard (Library & Information Services)
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont Vermont Library Association College and Special Libraries Section Conference April 7, 2006 Selene.
IT Student Survey 2009 Your name here. Overview Over 1,400 responses were received. Students across all faculties, nationalities and years were represented.
TM Project web site Invited Address October, 2004 South Africa.
LibQUAL+ Process Overview Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
DIT STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 2010 Dr Rachel O Connor Mark Russell Campus Life & Student Retention Office DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
LibQUAL + Surveying the Library’s Users Supervisor’s Meeting March 17, 2004.
Asia Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education and Practice (A-LIEP) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore April 4, 2006 Bruce Thompson.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration Introduction to LibQUAL+ University of Westminster, London February 5, 2010 Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
LibQUAL at LSBU Peter Godwin 19 January LibQUAL at LSBU When did we use it? How did it work at LSBU? When did we get the results? What did we learn.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Web Site Usability Study John Gottfried Spring 2008.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
LibQUAL+ at Cranfield University Selena Lock LibQUAL+ International Results Meeting 17 th July 2006.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Philadelphia January, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Project URL – TM Score Norms 17 th Greek Academic Libraries Conference 24 September, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson, M. Kyrillidou.
LibQUAL The UK and London South Bank experience.
User Surveys Frances M. Brillantine Catholic University Law Library AALL, July 2008.
Learning from Pharmacy Distance Learners by By Rae Jesano, MSLS, AHIP, Linda Butson, MLn, MPH, AHIP, Mary Edwards, MSLIS, Health Science Center Libraries,
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration American Library Association Midwinter Meeting Denver, CO January 26, 2009 Presented by: MaShana Davis Technical Communications.
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
SBTeach Introduction School of Business Course Coordination System.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
® LibQUAL+ ® Implementation Procedures The Third Lodz [Poland] Library Conference Technical University of Lodz June, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Jacqui Dowd LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively University of Glasgow 24 th May 2010 LibQUAL+ & LibQUAL Lite at the University of Glasgow.
TM Project web site: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Seattle / London January, 2007 “ 22 Items and a Box ” Qualitative Grounding :
Your Online Software Training and Support Resource Welcome to.
LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank and a Lincolnshire man in Chicago.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Auckland, NZ April 5, 2005 Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Internet and Database Searching for Social Issues Joseph M. Compese Library Granada Hills Charter high School.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
LibQUAL 2006 at London South Bank
LibQUAL+® Survey Administration American Library Association
How to participate LibQUAL+
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
Score Norms 17th Greek Academic Libraries Conference
LibQUAL+™ Results Meeting
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont
LibQUAL+® Survey Administration
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank

Peter Godwin London South Bank University 2 February 2006

LibQUAL 2005… SCONUL experience issues London South Bank & LibQUAL LSBU experience

SCONUL experience : issues Obtaining addresses problematic Demographic data problems The smaller the sample the smaller the result Sampling was hard, and blanket increased response markedly Desirability of separating full and part time student responses

SCONUL experience : issues May need to have results and radar charts for particular sites UK libraries are used to more summaries and a commentary on results Difficulty of aligning our subjects with standard ARL disciplines Some concerns about US bias and exact wording of content and language

SCONUL experience : lessons LibQUAL is easy to administer and support is good LibQUAL instrument has more respectability than home-grown surveys Most places were not too surprised at their results, but detailed questions gave far more data People adjust their expectations according to the environment Users don’t care what we wear

SCONUL experience : lessons Users’ desire for journals, books and learning materials is insatiable The things we care most about are not necessarily what they care most about Comparative data in UK available for the first time At least half participants have said they will use LibQUAL again

SCONUL experience : lessons The results for SCONUL cohort 2004 were more critical than 2003 due to Different participants? Increasing expectations as students have to pay more themselves

London South Bank and LibQUAL London South Bank University –2003 = 276 –2004 = 568 –2005 = 766

London South Bank University Central London new University 16,388 staff and students Founded in 1892 as Borough Polytechnic, Joined 4 other colleges to become South Bank Polytechnic in 1970 Became South Bank University in 1992 and London South Bank University in 2003

London South Bank University 42% male, 52% female 62% are 25 and over 47.5% are part-time 74.5% undergraduate, 22% postgraduate By country of origin 41% are from overseas 40% are white and 60% ethnic minorities

London South Bank University 17% Arts and Human Sciences 32% Health and Social Care 21.5% Engineering, Science and Built Environment 24% Business, Computing and Information Management

LSBU experience option problematic but has improved this year Participation has increased each year. No survey fatigue! A good incentive is essential Promotion of the survey around the buildings is productive Surprising number fill in a printed version

LSBU experience 2003 was a pilot and detailed results had to be treated with caution 2004 was valid and showed some improvements in satisfaction 2005 showed marked improvement, with all positive undergraduate adequacy mean scores

LSBU 2003 experience After 2003 survey we : redecorated the main library installed new book shelves put in a new Library Management System

LSBU 2004 experience After the 2004 survey we redesigned our Web site made off-campus access easier used “floorwalkers” at crucial times of the year to answer queries and help students navigate the building improved guiding and maps prioritised shelf tidying using special team of shelvers with mandatory shelf tidying each week for all staff prioritised purchase of core above optional items on reading lists

Some findings from 2005 Daily usage of our Library Web site continues to lag behind SCONUL Adequacy means for LSBU IC-3, IC-4, IC-4 and IC-8 are consistently above SCONUL LSBU Library as Place adequacy means are all above SCONUL Concern over availability of subject help: PGs particularly critical LSBU student survey question on library satisfaction mirrors improvement shown by LibQUAL

LSBU 2005 experience After 2005 survey we have : Revised our Web site to make it easier to navigate Marketed our services to PG students inc. special guide and fliers Built on success of 2004 with book supply by pushing harder for supply of reading lists from key areas Building on 2004 experience with staff available on top floor at start of Semester 1 to help students navigate the building Piloted a new help desk on journal floor at peak times in

LSBU experience Surveys are dynamic processes and views do change The instrument is comprehensive but is long and off- putting to fill in Provides excellent information on user satisfaction but needs to be supplemented by our own snap surveys on particular issues e.g.last year use of our LIS Web Site Comments in the box are very valuable and supplement the statistical information Focus Groups can follow up areas of concern

Comments “Generally, staff are helpful but some are very hostile indeed” (PG Social Science female student 23-30) “Compared with other University libraries it is a fine place to find information to learn and work” (UG Social Science male student 18-22)

Comments “Better work in here than 2 years back. Keep up the good work” ( UG Business Male student 23-30) “It is improving but some staff is still very rood especially gards” (UG ArtsMan/Media/ English female student 23-30)

What did I learn in Chicago? Libraries both sides of the Atlantic share many of the same problems and can learn from one another LibQUAL is an instrument which can be used internationally

What have I learned? “Only customers judge quality ; all other judgements are essentially irrelevant” (Zeithaml,V.A. Parasuman, A., Berry.L.L. “Delivering quality”)