1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Advertisements

UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
European ATFM From current operation towards the future Patrick Ky
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
TIM 8 and Action Plan 6 Colin Meckiff, Experimental Center Tom Proeschel, FAA Hdqtrs 30 October 2001.
Presented by United Arab Emirates MID ATM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (MAEP) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-15/PIA 1 Improve Traffic Flow Through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Ros Eveleigh & Eliana Haugg EUROCONTROL & DFS Episode 3 Brussels,
Episode 3 1 Episode 3 EX-COM D Final Report and Recommendations Operational and Processes Feasibility Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla CNS/ATM Simulation.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Development of a Closed-Loop Testing Method for a Next-Generation Terminal Area Automation System JUP Quarterly Review April 4, 2002 John Robinson Doug.
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Combining Techniques: Expert Groups, Gaming and Modelling Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla AENA Episode 3 Brussels,
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
27 June Traffic Flow Optimisation Rapporteur: Nicolas Durand, CENA.
1 DLR/EEC Total Airport Management Christoph Meier & Peter Eriksen European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
International Civil Aviation Organization Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen): Wx Integration Ray Moy New Weather Concept Development Branch FAA, Aviation Weather Division, ANG-C62.
12/01/2011 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIR TRAFFIC ORGANIZATION 1 Execution of Flow Strategies (XFS) (aka Go Button)
Copyright 2008 : ISA Software NAS-Wide Simulation Capabilities [RAMS Plus, CHILL/SIM-C] GMU – December 2008.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
SESAR Single European Sky Air traffic management Research
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-15/PIA 1 Improve Traffic Flow Through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
ComplexWorld PhD Project: Modeling Interlevel Relations within ATM Nataliya M. Mogles VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Presented to: NWS Aviation Weather Users By: Danny Sims, Manager of Traffic Flow Management Weather Programs, FAA Date: 18 November 2008 Federal Aviation.
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
1 1st ANNUAL WORKSHOP NAS-WIDE SIMULATION IN SUPPORT OF NEXTGEN: REQUIREMENTS AND CAPABILITIES Lance Sherry Center for Air Transportation Systems Research.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
NAS-WIDE Simulation Workshop December 10, 2008 Interagency Portfolio & Systems Analysis Division Yuri Gawdiak.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
F066-B © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau Agenda Item 1.
Air Systems Division GROUND ASAS EQUIPMENT Michel Procoudine Gorsky ASAS TN2 – Workshop 5 Toulouse 17th-20th September 2007.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
1 ILA Berlin - May 2008 Marc Brochard - EEC EPATS ATM General Requirements & relative issues to be solved.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Using Simulation in NextGen Benefits Quantification
FAA Support for DoD’s UAS AI Joint Test Joint University Program (JUP) TIM Al Schwartz, Modeling and Simulation Branch, ANG-C55 January 21, 2016.
1 EUROCONTROL S TRATEGIES FOR The ATM Strategy for the Years As from MATSE/6 decision (Jan. 2000): To cater for forecast increase in demand.
F066-B © 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Predictability and Uncertainty in Air Traffic Flow Management Len Wojcik, Josh Pepper,
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Enabling Team Supervisory Control for Teams of Unmanned Vehicles
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Presented by United Arab Emirates
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
Traffic Flow Optimisation Rapporteur: Nicolas Durand, CENA
Agenda Item 1 A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau.
Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva
AIXM and AIRM Analysis Results Summary.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason University “System Wide Modeling in Fast-time Simulation” Current and Future Capabilities FAA / EUROCONTROL Cooperative R&D Action Plan 9

2 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Research Objective Approach Scope Findings Questionnaire Sections Existing Capabilities Gaps in Capabilities Conclusions Needs Industry Participation Integration Issues

3 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation INTRODUCTION Action Plan 9 (AP9) – Air Traffic Modeling of Operational Concepts Research Objectives: Determine modeling capabilities of existing system wide tools Determine the availability of capabilities required for future system wide concepts Approach: TIM: Madrid, Spain, Nov , 2006 Interviews with model developers and subject matter experts Responses from 15 organizations and 28 subject matter experts 18 fast-time system wide modeling tools Document the research and the conclusions

4 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation SCOPE System wide is equivalent to: ­ Runway-to Runway operations (US) ­ Gate-to-Gate operations (Europe) Focus - System operations as opposed to economic, financial or political attributes of the ATM system, and - System wide modeling capabilities that ­ Capture propagation of a problem throughout the system ­ Support modeling of future operations, technologies and concepts.

5 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation INTERVIEW: QUESTIONNAIRE SECTIONS General Modeling Information Airspace Flight Schedule & Trajectories Separation – Tactical Control Traffic Flow Management (TFM) Airports Aircraft Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Environment Infrastructure Human Performance Software – Architecture and Programming

6 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation FINDINGS: EXISTING CAPABILITIES General Modeling Information Discrete event, continuous time, agent-based, and analytical tools Stochastic processes or working toward stochastic elements Capacity, delay, and efficiency primary focus - Airspace - Most considered sectors as resources others more detailed - Sector capacity typically modeled using MAP values Flight Schedules and Trajectories ­ Traffic defined by: ­ schedules ­ filed flight plans ­ as-flown trajectories ­ great circle routes ­ 4D trajectories: pre-processing vs. run-time adjustments ­ Some considered uncertainty in 4D positions

7 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation FINDINGS: EXISTING CAPABILITIES (Cont.) Separation – Tactical Control (varied in models) Conflict detection and resolution Capacity-demand imbalances Flight re-routing Traffic Flow Management: ­ Departure Time Management (mostly European tools) ­ Ground Delay and Ground Stop Programs ­ In-trail restrictions, metering and sequencing (limited) ­ Re-routing around severe weather cells (limited) Airports ­ High-level vs. detailed capabilities ­ Departure sequencing and delay Aircraft ­ Varying levels of fidelity of aircraft performance characteristics modeling ­ Aircraft performance as a function of on-board equipage

8 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation FINDINGS: EXISTING CAPABILITIES (Cont.) Collaborative Decision Making AOC’s/Pilots Flight slot swapping (pre-processing) Environmental Concerns - Only via post-processing Infrastructure - Failure rates via impact on capacity limitations Human Performance - Controller workload: task allocation and time-on-task Software – Architecture and Programming - Maturity of the tools - Validation and verification - Integration of new capabilities - Connectivity between tools

9 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation FINDINGS: GAPS IN CAPABILITIES Objective sector capacity evaluation as a function of: ­ Human performance ­ Traffic complexity ­ Separation standards ­ Weather Ability to distinguish operational and procedural differences across ­ Domains and airspace segments (en route, terminal, approach/departure, etc.) ­ Different categories of flights (IFR vs. VFR, equipage based performance, etc.) ­ Different categories of airspace (PBA)

10 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation FINDINGS: GAPS IN CAPABILITIES (Cont.) Propagation of impacts from one restriction to another (including CDM) Conflict detection and resolution Capacity-demand imbalances (MAP’s, in-trail restrictions, LOA’s, etc.) Flight re-routing (SUA’s, congestion, weather, etc.) Propagation of impacts from one resource to another ­ Both from ground to air, and air to air resource ­ Supporting infrastructure and its requirements ­ System errors, update rates, failures and outages ­ Incorporation of stochastic processes and behaviors ­ Uncertainty in aircraft 4D position ­ Non-compliance with the expected user behavior (e.g. 4D contract and TMI) Future concepts of interest (examples) ­ Dynamic Sectorization ­ Multi Sector Planner ­ Trajectory Based Operations

11 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation FINDINGS: GAPS IN CAPABILITIES (Cont.) Standardized performance measures and indicators to facilitate repeatability and cross-comparison of the outcomes Optimization capabilities, including both individual trajectory and flow or system wide optimized solutions Environmental considerations, restrictions, and trade-offs Other considerations ­ Sensitivity analysis ­ Validation and verification ­ Difficulty of integration of new capabilities and disconnectivity between tools

12 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation SOME ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS Providing Insights vs. Predictions of Future Required level of detail Flexibility Industry Participation Needed Aircraft performance chars. (manufacturers, air carriers, etc.) ­ 4D trajectory building ­ Fuel burn CDM ­ Airline goals ­ Re-routing negotiations

13 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation CONCLUSIONS Ba lance between too much and too little detail is important Flexibility is crucial ­ Desired level of fidelity as a function of modeling objective ­ Do not focus on generating outcomes and data-drilling capabilities ­ Focus on providing novel analytical capabilities while ensuring consistency Plug-and-play capabilities ­ Flexible modeling environment ­ Harmonious modeling components

14 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation Contact Information Albert Schwartz, FAA