Overview of the RIA Process - Bryan Hubbell. 2 Goals of an RIA Provide national estimates of costs and benefits of fully attaining current and proposed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Advertisements

Bayesian Health Technology Assessment: An Industry Statistician's Perspective John Stevens AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood Bayesian Statistics Focus Team Leader.
Simplified Risk Management Planning for A Risk Management Process Overview presentation, which should take about.
ITIL: Service Transition
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Application of air quality strategies of Western Europe for modeling of the transboundary air pollution impact on the Russian Federation with the GAINS.
CBIIT Quality Assurance Process Preston Wood NCI CBIIT Government Quality Representative (GQR) January 2014 RS.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process Chapter 10.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
Evaluating the Health Benefits of Air Pollution Reductions: Recent Developments at the U.S. EPA Bryan J. Hubbell U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning.
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
EIA: A framework for ESDM. EIA: A Framework for ESDM. Visit Defining EIA Environmentally Impact Assessment is A formal process for.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
CP methodology adapted to UNFCCC Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 9.A United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry.
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
Project planning and Management By Fouad CSI1. MODULE III: PROJECT LIFE CYCLE Project Life Cycle A project life cycle is the series of phases that a project.
Economic Analysis Framework Test Application Draft Results Economic Analysis Forum BBC Research & Consulting December 16, 2004.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
BART Control Analysis WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code MS Project Management Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis Lecture # 25.
Measuring Efficiency CRJS 4466EA. Introduction It is very important to understand the effectiveness of a program, as we have discovered in all earlier.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
Chapter 14: Using the Scalable Decision Process on Large Projects The process outlined is meant to be scaleable. Individual steps can be removed, changed,
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Writing the IEE (EPTM Chapter 4). EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 Writing the IEE IEE Review  Used when at least one screening outcome is “IEE.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 5 Defining the Problem and.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
Slide number 1 Better Regulation Executive What can and should be measured? Improving measures of policy burdens through better Impact Assessment Making.
Recall The Team Skills 1. Analyzing the Problem (with 5 steps) 2. Understanding User and Stakeholder Needs 3. Defining the System A Use Case Primer Organizing.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA). As corporations seek to improve their environmental performance they require new methods and tools. LCA is one such tool.
TF HTAP, TF IAM, Vienna, February HTAP-GAINS scenario analysis: preliminary exploration of emission scenarios with regard to the benefits of global.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Comparison of NAAQS RIA and Risk Assessments - Bryan Hubbell.
Adaptive Integrated Framework (AIF): a new methodology for managing impacts of multiple stressors in coastal ecosystems A bit more on AIF, project components.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
ESI Alternate Economic Study Process E-RSC Meeting October 21, 2010.
Wood Smoke: Monetizing Health Benefits Regional Technical Forum August 23, 2013.
1 Systems Analysis & Design 7 th Edition Chapter 2.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
A Decision Framework for Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs Using Health Benefit Analysis Ying Li University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Develop Schedule is the Process of analyzing activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create the project schedule.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
ITIL: Service Transition
Scrutiny of RIAs Problem Definition and Objectives
What is a Learning Collaborative?
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Determining and Scaling Habitat Services
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Improve Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
Unit 6: Application Development
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
5. Impact Assessment World Café: Social impact assessment
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Overview
Environmental objectives and target setting
COMMUNITY FORUM ROLL- OVER BUDGET JANUARY 16, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the RIA Process - Bryan Hubbell

2 Goals of an RIA Provide national estimates of costs and benefits of fully attaining current and proposed NAAQS Analyze proposed standard(s) and at least one more and one less stringent standard Where appropriate, provide health-based cost- effectiveness analysis and probabalistic uncertainty analysis As needed, provide analyses to meet requirements of other executive orders, e.g. children’s health, UMRA, etc.

3 What is the Scope of the RIA? Definition of current and future baselines – generally use on the books controls as baseline, have not focused on examining the impacts of alternate baselines Projection of inputs to future analysis year (usually year of expected full implementation) – we typically do not have enough resources to estimate benefits and costs for each year of implementation Selection of controls – focus is on using known controls first to reduce potential uncertainties Estimation of costs – we have tools to estimate both direct compliance costs and changes in economic output (through CGE modeling) Estimation of impacts – focus has been on human health, but we have tools for limited welfare impacts assessment when time and resources are available Valuation of impacts – we use benefits transfer methods because of the high time and resource requirements to conduct primary valuation research

4 What is Outside the Scope? Estimation of net present value of implementing the standard Full estimation of technological change Fully quantified probabilistic estimation of costs and benefits CGE modeling of benefits Full estimation of non-health benefits (missing most ecosystem benefits) Fully dynamic modeling of impacts of CGE results on emissions Speculation on emissions control strategies outside of the U.S.

5 What is the Timeline? Generally we have between 6 months and a year to complete the proposal RIA and 9 months to complete the final RIA Emissions and AQ modeling can take up to a month per run, so control strategy selection has to begin early in the process However, control strategy selection can only begin once the baseline AQ modeling has been completed Control strategy selection can take from one to several weeks depending on the complexity of the analysis Compliance cost estimation proceeds directly from control strategy selection Benefits analysis based on AQ modeling takes days to around a week In recent RIA’s, a significant time element related to extrapolated costs and benefits has been added – this portion of the analysis can take many weeks due to the need for additional sensitivity modeling Analysis of results and writeup proceeds along with the analysis, but usually requires at least 2 weeks to complete after the final results have been produced Interagency review can take several months Example schedule for final Ozone NAAQS is provided on the following slide

6 Example Schedule for Final O3 NAAQS We had a compressed schedule of 7 months because of delays in completing the proposal RIA Note that because we knew from the proposal analysis that we would not attain with maximum available known controls, we were able to start with the control case before the baseline was modeled Not included in this schedule, but planned for the RIA is an analysis of health based cost-effectiveness and an assessment of impacts associated with potential reductions in UV-b screening

7 Components of the RIA