Pan-STARRS The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Stefanie Phleps (MPE Garching, Decrypting the Universe, Edinburgh,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Mock Universe Cosmological nbody dark matter simulations + Galaxy surveys (SDSS, UKIDSS, 2dF) Access to mock catalogues through VO Provide analysis.
Advertisements

Selecting Supernovae for Cosmology
Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University Shaun Cole for Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Cosmological simulations.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
KIDS compared to PanSTARRS: specs and status
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
Cosmology Zhaoming Ma July 25, The standard model - not the one you’re thinking  Smooth, expanding universe (big bang).  General relativity controls.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Measuring the local Universe with peculiar velocities of Type Ia Supernovae MPI, August 2006 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.
Relating Mass and Light in the COSMOS Field J.E. Taylor, R.J. Massey ( California Institute of Technology), J. Rhodes ( Jet Propulsion Laboratory) & the.
Cosmological constraints from models of galaxy clustering Abstract Given a dark matter distribution, the halo occupation distribution (HOD) provides a.
Astro-DISC: Astronomy and cosmology applications of distributed super computing.
Type Ia Supernovae on a glass: The bread and butter of peculiar velocities Lunch meeting Aarhus, March 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute.
X-ray Optical microwave Cosmology at KIPAC. The Survey 5000 square degrees (overlap with SPT and VISTA) Five-band (grizY) + VISTA (JHK) photometry to.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
30/6/09 Unity of the Universe 1. Michael Drinkwater for the team Australia: Blake, Brough, Colless, Couch, Croom, Davis, Glazebrook, Jelliffe, Jurek,
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
Cosmic Structures: Challenges for Astro-Statistics Ofer Lahav Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London * Data compression – e.g. P(k)
Constraining the Dark Side of the Universe J AIYUL Y OO D EPARTMENT OF A STRONOMY, T HE O HIO S TATE U NIVERSITY Berkeley Cosmology Group, U. C. Berkeley,
Lecture Outlines Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 25.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Introduction to the modern observational cosmology Introduction/Overview.
Measuring dark energy from galaxy surveys Carlton Baugh Durham University London 21 st March 2012.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
Bulk Flows, and Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Niels Bohr Summer Institute, August 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics.
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
Yanchuan Cai ( 蔡彦川 ) Shaun Cole, Adrian Jenkins, Carlos Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University May 31, 2008, NDHU, Taiwan ISW Cross-Correlation.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
G. Miknaitis SC2006, Tampa, FL Observational Cosmology at Fermilab: Sloan Digital Sky Survey Dark Energy Survey SNAP Gajus Miknaitis EAG, Fermilab.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
VST ATLAS: Requirements, Operations and Products Tom Shanks, Nigel Metcalfe, Jamie McMillan (Durham Univ.) +CASU.
Simulating the SZ Sky Predictions for Upcoming Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Galaxy Cluster Surveys Eric J. Hallman CASA, University of Colorado 16 February,
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
6dF Workshop April Sydney Cosmological Parameters from 6dF and 2MRS Anaïs Rassat (University College London) 6dF workshop, AAO/Sydney,
Zheng I N S T I T U T E for ADVANCED STUDY Cosmology and Structure Formation KIAS Sep. 21, 2006.
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
J. Jasche, Bayesian LSS Inference Jens Jasche La Thuile, 11 March 2012 Bayesian Large Scale Structure inference.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
Luminous Red Galaxies in the SDSS Daniel Eisenstein ( University of Arizona) with Blanton, Hogg, Nichol, Tegmark, Wake, Zehavi, Zheng, and the rest of.
Dept. of Astronmy Wide Field Surveys and Astronomical Discovery Space A. Lawrence / Astro-ph: Byeon Jae Gyu.
Goals for HETDEX Determine equation of state of Universe and evolutionary history for dark energy from 0
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Chapter 25 Galaxies and Dark Matter. 25.1Dark Matter in the Universe 25.2Galaxy Collisions 25.3Galaxy Formation and Evolution 25.4Black Holes in Galaxies.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Pan-STARRS The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Stefanie Phleps (MPE Garching, Decrypting the Universe, Edinburgh, October 25 th 2007

General information: Where, who, why, what? Pan-STARRS is developed by the University of Hawaii, partially funded by the US Airforce One day Pan-STARRS will be a system of four 1.8m telescopes that will survey the entire visible sky (3  ) in five filters every five nights New technology wide-field camera, FOV is 7 sqdeg with 0.3” pixels, tip-tilt correction on the chip!

Possible telescope design

Pan-STARRS1: The prototype One 1.8m telescope Built on Haleakala (on Maui, Hawaii) PS1 will allow us to test all the technology that is being developed for Pan- STARRS, including the telescope design, the cameras and the data reduction software. PS1 will be used to make a full-sky survey

The camera Consists of an array of 64x64 CCDs Each CCD has 600x600 pixels A total of 1.4 Gigapixels spread over 40x40 centimeters Orthogonal transfer allows for a shift of the image during the observation -> tip-tilt correction on the chip Expected data flow: 50Tbytes/month

The camera

First light on 22 nd of August!

The famous Bonn-Shutter

Length: m Width: 63.2 cm Depth: 5 cm Shutter aperture: 48 x 48 cm Mass: 30 kg Has to open and close up to a million times! Shortest possible exposure: 300  sec Homogeneity of exposure: 0.3% at 0.2sec

The filter system: grizy g r i z y Pan-STARRS will be a very red survey Good photometric redshifts only for red galaxies (LRGS -> similar to SLOAN) For studies of galaxy properties have to combine with other surveys

The PS1 Surveys 3  steradian Survey Medium Deep Survey Solar System Sweet Spot Survey Stellar Transit Survey Deep Survey of M31

The PS1 Surveys 3  steradian Survey Medium Deep Survey Solar System Sweet Spot Survey Stellar Transit Survey Deep Survey of M31

The 3  Survey Survey the entire visible sky (from Hawaii) Earth-bound all-sky survey In five filters 56% of total observing time Every field will be visited 4 times in each band pass Median redshift: z~0.7

The Medium Deep Survey 10 GPC1 footprints distributed uniformly across the sky (optimized for SnIa studies) Nightly depth chosen to detect SnIa at z=0.8 Stacks constitute 84 square degrees Facilitates detection of L* galaxies at z=1.8

Key science projects 1. Populations of objects in the Inner Solar System 2. Populations of objects in the Outer Solar System (Beyond Jupiter) 3. Populations in the Local Solar Neighborhood, the Low Mass IMF, and Young Stellar Objects 4. Search for Exo-Planets by dedicated Stellar Transit Surveys 5. Structure of the Milky Way and the Local Group 6. A dedicated deep survey of M31 7. Massive Stars and Supernovae Progenitors 8. Transients 9. Galaxies and galaxy evolution in the local universe 10. Active Galactic Nuclei and High Redshift Quasars 11. Cosmological lensing 12. Large Scale Structure

Key science projects 1. Populations of objects in the Inner Solar System 2. Populations of objects in the Outer Solar System (Beyond Jupiter) 3. Populations in the Local Solar Neighborhood, the Low Mass IMF, and Young Stellar Objects 4. Search for Exo-Planets by dedicated Stellar Transit Surveys 5. Structure of the Milky Way and the Local Group 6. A dedicated deep survey of M31 7. Massive Stars and Supernovae Progenitors 8. Transients 9. Galaxies and galaxy evolution in the local universe 10. Active Galactic Nuclei and High Redshift Quasars 11. Cosmological lensing 12. Large Scale Structure

Key project 12: Large Scale Structure (PIs: S. Cole and S. Phleps) Input: –Redshift catalogues –realistic Pan-STARRS mocks Science projects: –BAOs and cosmological parameters –Clustering as a function of X –Higher Order Statistics –Galaxy Clusters –CMB foregrounds

19 Redshift catalogues (Coordinated by R. Saglia and D. Wilman) Accurate multiband seeing-matched photometry Photometric redshifts (goal:  z <3% for LRGs) –Supplementing Pan-STARRS grizy with other wavelength information (where available) –Calibrate photometric redshifts with spectroscopic redshifts (over full range of Galactic extinction) Surface photometry Completeness maps (depth and coverage as function of coordinates) Saglia, Wilman, Bender, Meneux, Drory, Lerchster, Seitz, Szalay, Metcalfe, ….

20 Realistic mocks (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch and C. Frenk) Different mock catalogues: –A 7 square degree PS1 footprint synthetic sky Redshifts, apparent magnitudes, structure parameters, but no clustering –Timeslize galaxy catalogues (realistic clustering at fixed redshifts) –Galaxy lightcones (with evolution of clustering along the line of sight)

21 LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with –Projected correlation functions –Angular correlation functions in z slizes –Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

22 LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with –Projected correlation functions –Angular correlation functions in z slizes –Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

23 LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with –Projected correlation functions –Angular correlation functions in z slizes –Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

24 LSS and BAOs (Coordinated by S. Cole, S. Phleps and A. Szalay) Use the acoustic oscillations in the galaxy distribution as a standard ruler to measure the equation of state of dark energy with –Projected correlation functions –Angular correlation functions in z slizes –Power spectra (spherical harmonics decomposition) Compare with models/theoretical predictions and infer w

25 Requirements (from the ESA/ESO Cosmology Report) 1% error in distance gives 5% error in w For a spectroscopic survey minimum volume is 5 h -3 Gpc 3 Typical number of galaxies: N = 2*10 6 Blake and Bridle 2005: for photometric redshifts need a factor of 10 more (to make up for redshift smearing)

26 Measuring the acoustic peak in Pan-STARRS We have area! -> 3  =30000 sq.deg In order to calculate clustering statistics we need good redshifts (  z /(1+z) select luminous red galaxies (LRGs) Expect to find about LRGs with I<23, 0.2<z<1 We will be able to measure w to 3-5%

27 Potential difficulties LRGs is a huge number of galaxies -> computationally challenging –run the codes in parallel on the Beowulf cluster –additionally use a tree code or adaptive grid Have to understand systematics: –Influence of redshift errors and varying depth across the sky on measurements –nonlinear biasing on large scales –shift of acoustic peak (see Smith et al. 2007, astro- ph/ –very large angles -> distant observer approximation not valid any more

28 Clustering as a function of X (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch, S. Phleps) Analyse clustering statistics as a function of –Luminosity –Colour –Stellar mass –Star formation rate Compare with models based on –Halo occupation distribution –Conditional luminosity function –Semi-analytics

29 Clustering as a function of X (Coordinated by F. van den Bosch, S. Phleps) And learn something about –How galaxies trace the underlying dark matter density field (biasing) –How the environment (the local overdensity) influences the galaxies’ properties

30 Higher order statistics (Coordinated by I. Szapudi) Complementary information from –Three-point correlation function –Bi-spectrum –Scaling indices –Minkowsky functionals –Count-in-cells –Void probability function Put constraints on non-Gaussianity of distribution and initial conditions as well as (non- linear) biasing and Put constraints on cosmological parameters (e.g.  8 )

31 CMB foregrounds (Coordinated by J. Peacock and C. Frenk) Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect Rees-Sciama Sunyaev-Zeldovich Lensing

32 Galaxy clusters (Coordinated by R. Bower and H. Böhringer) Cluster catalogue (using a matched filter technique) Measurement of LSS and constraints on cosmological parameters Constraints on galaxy formation theories and role of environment on galaxy properties Probe thermodynamics and metal enrichment history of intracluster/group medium Lensing: provide a source list of gravitational telescopes for constraining cosmological distance scale and properties of background objects

33 Summary Pan-STARRS 1 will survey 3  of the sky in five filters for 3.5 years Expect about 10 7 LRGs up to z=1 with redshift accuracy of ~3% Huge number of science applications Particularly interesting for cosmology: LSS and BAOs: will be able to measure w with 3% accuracy

34 The acoustic peak: a first simulation 3 N particles ~ 3 Million, 45 degrees x 45 degrees