Direct effects on shallow sedimentary communities Enhanced hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria Reduced shoot densities of eelgrass until 1993 Reduced clam density.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem Processes ECOSYSTEM DEFINITION
Advertisements

Environmental impacts of incidents SPEAKER NAME SPEAKER APPOINTMENT National Contingency Plan – Environment Group Training.
Long-Term Studies in Port Valdez, Alaska Long-Term Studies in Port Valdez, Alaska A. L. Blanchard, Howard. M. Feder, Carrie Parris and Hilary Nichols Institute.
Tide Pools By: Cianna Palomino & Alex Atkins Alex Atkins.
Food Webs Chapter 17.
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
Sea Otters and the Trophic Cascade Hypothesis indirect effects in complex food webs.
Big Idea 17: Interdependence
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY I: BIODIVERSITY Community: Any assemblage of populations [of plants and/or animals] in a given area or habitat.
© 2006 Thomson-Brooks Cole Chapter 16 Continental Shelves and Neritic Zone.
CHAPTER 5 By PresenterMedia.com Populations.
Introduction to Ecology
Section 13.2: Biotic and Abiotic Factors
Energy Flow & Nutrient Cycle Big bugs have little bugs upon their backs to bite ‘em Little bugs have lesser ones an so ad infinitum.
Basic Ecological Concepts and Terms Session 2: Rocky Shores Coastal Hazards Management Course Slide 2.1 Basic Ecological Concepts and Terms habitat ecosystem.
A biological community is an association of interacting populations
Energy Flow & Nutrient Cycle
Marine Fisheries Terms to Know Fishery – Refers to aspects of harvesting and managing aquatic organisms. Can refer specifically to a species being harvested,
20 Energy Flow and Food Webs. 20 Energy Flow and Food Webs Case Study: Toxins in Remote Places Feeding Relationships Energy Flow among Trophic Levels.
Population and Community Ecology
Wageningen IMARES is een samenwerkingsverband tussen Wageningen UR en TNO IMARES Ecological sensitivity in the Netherlands part of the North Sea J.A. van.
Unit: A Local Ecosystem Topic 4: Populations
Food Webs in the Ocean Andrew W Trites Marine Mammal Research Unit University of British Columbia Who eats whom and how much?
By: Madeline L Resources: earthjustice.org thinkquest.org
Contaminants in Fish and Wildlife National Park Service POPs and Air Toxics Workshop.
Populations Chapter 8.
Science1206 Final topics and review. 2 3 The atmosphere is a mixture of particles and gases which provides air, retains heat that warms the Earth, and.
Part 3: Chronic effects of decade-long contamination of key shoreline habitats and indirect interactions are important.
Top Down or Bottom Up? Bottom Up Control  resources control community N  V  H  P Top Down Control  Predators control the community N  V  H  P Top.
Estuary Productivity & Complexity Evaluating Human Impacts.
NAB Planning area Bristol Bay/Alaska Peninsula Avian Crossroads and Destination Bill Larned Chris Dau U S Fish and Wildlife Service.
Turn in: 1. Video Notes 2. Worksheets from yesterday 1.
Developing a Literature Database for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Elisabeth Ann Stull North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning.
Marine Ecosystem Structure and Organisms Ecosystem = A biotic community and its interaction with the abiotic environment. Flow of Energy and Cycling of.
Nearshore fish communities response to habitat variability Terril P. Efird School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Assessment of Bivalve Recovery on Treated Mixed-Soft Beaches in Western Prince William Sound Dennis C. Lees Littoral Ecological & Environmental Services.
Or Export of Secondary Production in Ecosystems.
Definitions Ecology defined by interactions and interconnections – with own species, other species, environment; organisms affect each other, environment;
Top Down or Bottom Up? Bottom Up Control  resources control community N  V  H  P Top Down Control  Predators control the community N  V  H  P Top.
Seagrass and Salt Marsh: Critical Coastal Habitats
Community Succession Universal process of directional change in vegetation during ecological time. –Recognized by a progressive change in the species composition.
Crude Awakenings Oil Spill Response and Recovery Workshop Sponsored by: The Prince William Sound Oil Spill Recovery Institute; Kenai Fjords National Park;
CausesEffectsSolutions Objective: Understand Causes, Effects, and Solutions of Pollution DO NOW: What do you know about the causes, effects and solution.
Wyatt Wall.  The 5 types of interactions between species are: Interspecific competition: species interact to get limited resources. Predation: when a.
Fisheries in the Seas Fish life cycles: Egg/sperm pelagic larvaejuvenile (first non-feeding – critical period – then feeding) (first non-feeding – critical.
Exxon Valdez oil spill [EVOS] legacy: Synthesis of long-term ecosystem responses Riki Ott, Charles H. “Pete” Peterson & Stanley “Jeep” Rice.
Honors Biology – Chapter 5
Intro to Ecology Notes QQ#1: What is Ecology?. What is Ecology? ▪The study of interactions among organisms and between organism and their environment,
Long term monitoring of nearshore habitats in the Gulf of Alaska: Why and How? James L. Bodkin USGS, Alaska Science Center USGS, Alaska Science Center.
Lucinda Jacobs, Ph.D. Marine Sciences in Alaska 2006 Symposium January 23, /6 Assessment of Resources and Services Injured by EVOS.
Management of Introduced Fishes Chapter 13. Reasons for Fish Introductions Increase local food supplies Enhance sport & commercial fishing Manipulate.
Confidence in Assessments Workshop in Anchorage, Alaska 26 and 27 March, 2008.
Summary of lecture 8 Habitat loss -----> fragmentation an increase in patch number a decrease in patch size increasing patch isolation higher edge:core.
A few more thoughts regarding predator prey / resource consumer dynamics and population regulation: Food webs From: Bolen and Robinson (2003)
Ecology Notes Mrs. Peters Spring 2011 Mrs. Peters Spring 2011.
Activity #17: Habitats.
Population Ecology Mrs. Gamari. Ecology  The study of the interaction between organisms and their environment (living and non-living).  Biotic – living.
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY I: BIODIVERSITY
Community Ecology Feral cat populations can be damaging to ecosystems. Why?
Habitat Fragmentation Process of breaking contiguous unit into smaller pieces; area & distance components.
Estuary, Marine Waters and Nearshore Indicators Presented to the Governor’s Forum on Monitoring, October 5, 2005 Sarah Brace, Puget Sound Action Team,
1 Food Webs Chapter Outline Community Webs  Complexity and Structure Keystone Species  Effects on Diversity Exotic Predators Mutualistic Keystones.
The influence of climate on cod, capelin and herring in the Barents Sea Dag Ø. Hjermann (CEES, Oslo) Nils Chr. Stenseth (CEES, Oslo & IMR, Bergen) Geir.
What questions do ecologists ask about communities? Structure Dynamics Function How many species? How do they compare in abundance? Who eats who? How do.
Population Ecology Ecology. What Factors Affect Population Growth? Millions of red crabs live in Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean. Each year, the.
EXXON VALDEZ OIL SPILL. When and What Happened? March 24, 1989 the oil tanker Exxon Valdez struck a reef in Prince William Sound, Alaska creating a hole.
Energy Flow & Nutrient Cycle Big bugs have little bugs upon their backs to bite ‘em Little bugs have lesser ones an so ad infinitum. Lecture 017.
1 Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Marine Birds and Marine Mammals Evaluations for Round 1 External Proposed MPA Arrays in the MLPA North Coast Study.
Ecology. What is ecology? The study of interactions between organisms and their environment Remember: Cell  Tissue  Organ  Organ System  Organism.
OIL SPILLS and their effect on marine life
Presentation transcript:

Direct effects on shallow sedimentary communities Enhanced hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria Reduced shoot densities of eelgrass until 1993 Reduced clam density (littlenecks, butters) Sediment toxicity to amphipods and reduced densities of some amphipod taxa Reduction of abundance of seastar Dermasterias and helmet crab Telmessus

Indirect effects in shallow sedimentary communities Increases in oligochaetes and surface deposit- feeders (polychaetes) via enhanced microbial food and reduced invert predation Continued depression in clam recruitment to 1998 via absence of fine sediments moved down slope during pressurized washing Probable enhanced growth of demersal fishes Probable reduction in phytal eelgrass species

Direct effects in shallow subtidal rocky community Size distributions of dominant kelps imply mortality of adults in 1989 followed by rapid recolonization of juveniles in 3 systems Reduction in abundance of 2 seastars Dermasterias and Evasterias and helmet crab Telmessus, recovering by # 100 m -2 (+1SE) Telmessus cheiragonus Dermasterias imbricata Avg. density in shallow bays oiled unoiled

Indirect effects in shallow subtidal rocky community Enhanced abundances and sizes of green sea urchins on northern Knight where sea otters had not recovered by 1998, possibly inducing future trophic cascades Possible release of predation on prey of seastars and helmet crabs in kelp and seagrass communities

Resident nearshore fishes Direct acute effects –reduced abundance and biomass of intertidal fishes in 1990 with recovery well advanced by 1991 –parasite burden enhanced in some demersal fishes Direct effects of chronic exposure –hemosiderosis in intertidal fishes –P450 detoxification system induced in masked greenling Indirect effects –in shallow subtidal, juvenile cod and Arctic shanny increased by >100% at oiled sites perhaps in response to enhanced mytilid prey

Intertidal and shallow-spawning fishes - direct acute effects Premature hatch, larval abnormalities and elevated mortality in herring Egg mortality enhanced in pink salmon Possible egg mortality in sand lance and capelin, important forage fishes that deposit eggs in shallow sediments

Intertidal and shallow-spawning fishes - effects of chronic exposure Pink salmon egg mortality enhanced for at least 4 yrs due to exposure to weathered oil in streams. Possible genetic damage to pink salmon affecting their rate of straying and reproductive output Possible contribution of oiling stress to disease induction that led to 1993 herring crash, which has persisted for at least 8 more yrs

Summer foraging fishes in nearshore - direct acute & chronic effects Pink salmon - reduced growth in 1989 with smaller effect in 1990, likely lowering survival at sea Dolly Varden and cutthroat trout - reduced growth and possibly survival 1-3 yrs after EVOS Chum (and other?) salmon likely experience analogous effects of detoxification costs Induction of P450 detoxification system 1-3 yrs after EVOS in pink salmon, Dolly Varden, soles, and others

Shorebirds and seaducks - consumers of intertidal inverts –large numbers of oiled dead birds collected post spill –shoreline surveys show detectable declines in some taxa at oiled sites compared with unoiled control sites using a pre-spill survey in to control for spatial variability Direct acute effects of EVOS

Shorebirds - consumers of benthic invertebrates –black oystercatcher - fed chicks more oiled prey to achieve growth, fledged later, laid fewer eggs in second brood upon disturbance –nesting of black oystercatchers stable on unoiled Montague, while disrupted on oiled Green Island, recovering by 1993 –black oystercatcher - counts declined further from before recovering in Chronic exposure effects # of eggs (+ 1SE) 0 2 # of eggs laid in 2 nd nesting after loss of 1 st nest oiled unoiled

Seaducks - consumers of benthic inverts Indirect and chronic exposure effects –harlequin duck - lower adult female over-winter survival evident in , , –harlequin duck - winter counts still declining in western (oiled) compared to eastern PWS through –Barrow’s goldeneye - growing divergence in abundance between oiled and unoiled survey data through 1998 –harlequin duck in 1998 and Barrow’s goldeneye in elevated P4501A

Avian consumers of forage fish Direct acute effects –oiled dead birds of many species collected on shore –statistically detectable declines in 1989 Indirect and chronic effects –cormorants, mergansers, black-legged kittiwake, murres, pigeon guillemot, and loons show depressed counts through at least 1998 (1993 for loons) –pigeon guillemot shows lower nest productivity in with reduced availability of high-lipid forage fish like herring

Avian scavengers and omnivores in shoreline habitats Direct acute effects –reduction of 10% in PWS bald eagles in 1989 –reduction of northwestern crows in 1989 –PWS mortality of eagle eggs exposed to oil in 1989 Indirect and chronic effects –northwestern crows more concentrated on oiled Kenai shores in 1989 –over yrs PWS counts of bald eagles and glaucous-winged gulls are enhanced

Marine mammals of shoreline habitats Direct acute effects of EVOS –sea otter - over 1,000 oiled corpses recovered, representing an estimated 2,800-5,000 mortalities from encounter with oil –harbor seal - direct mortality estimated at about 300 individuals in PWS alone –Steller sea lion - likely mortalities from same mechanism (inhalation of toxic fumes) that affected seals c Bakhtin

Marine mammals of shoreline habitats Indirect and chronic exposure effects –sea otter juveniles over-winter mortality higher in oiled areas in and –sea otter carcass counts show high prime age mortality for at least 5 yrs following EVOS –sea otter counts not yet recovered in PWS, especially northern Knight Island –P450 detoxification system induced in sea otters in c Bennett

Marine mammals of shoreline habitats Indirect and chronic exposure effects (cont’d) –harbor seal molt counts have not initiated convergence in PWS through at least 1997 –river otters had larger home ranges in oiled areas, greater abandonment of latrine sites 1990 –reduction of blood hemoglobin in river otters, diminishing oxygen delivery, diving ability –elevated haptoglobin counts in river otters through 1991

Indirect, chronic, delayed effects Abundant evidence of their existence from controlled field sampling over yrs Loss of biogenic habitat –Fucus, mussels, eelgrass Tend to move up the food chain –organic enrichment of the food chain –sublethal effects of ingesting contaminated foods with reproductive and population impacts –loss of forage fish prey

Indirect, chronic, delayed effects –increases in size and abundance of sea urchins on northern Knight probably reflects reduced predation by sea otters and may lead to localized overgrazing of kelps and loss of fish habitat –reduction of harbor seals and sea lions may be causing transient killer whales to switch to sea otters with dramatic ecosystem implications Possible top-down effects

Ecotoxicity requires a context of the web of interacting species No species is independent of others –habitat –prey –predator Ecosystem engineers - species that provide important structural habitat (kelps, seagrasses) Keystone species – those with disproportionate controlling influence on community composition (sea otters, herring)

Changing paradigms of oil impacts to shoreline communities Old dogma - Short generation times of plants and invertebrates and rapid weathering of oil on shore leads to rapid recovery New recognition after EVOS –strong interspecific interactions create cascades of delayed effects over many years - keystone species and habitat engineers –preemption of space can inhibit recovery –sensitive taxa (crustaceans) and oil persistence in protected sediments slow recovery for yrs

Shifting paradigms in ecotoxicology New 1990’s realizations - –persistent biologically available 3-5 ring PAHs from oil in protected habitats is toxic with chronic impacts for yrs –strong interspecific interactions, including top-down trophic cascades, biogenic habitat provision, and competition, induce indirect and delayed effects for yrs Old 1970’s approach - based on lab bioassays of acute mortality of individual species to short-lived water-soluble fraction of oil (mostly BTEX plus napthalene)

Limitations of old dogma underlying ecotoxicity risk assessment Based solely on short-term acute toxicity in lab Typically assesses only one mechanism (eg, exposure to WSF – water-soluble fraction) Treats species as independent, not linked through food web or habitat responses

Extrapolates from few lab-rat species to species taxonomically similar but potentially different in ecology and physiology Includes no effects of chronic exposure, delayed impacts, or interactions among species Includes no sub-lethal impacts on growth, development, or reproduction – all of which can translate to population consequences Limitations of old dogma underlying ecotoxicity risk assessment

Problems with field-based empirical assessment approach Expensive to conduct – who should pay? Study design begets conclusions – who should design the study? Typically lack before data – but rigorous study designs are still possible Time-consuming to capture indirect, chronic, and delayed effects – but necessary High uncertainty because complex mix of mechanisms not all elaborated – who should bear the burden of proof?

Implications for future oil spills Omission of indirect, chronic, delayed effects in ecotoxicity risk models amounts to a large understatement of oil spill impacts Predictive ability of such indirect effects by ecological science lies far in the future, although some strong interactions can be confidently predicted