RISK SPILLOVER AMONG HEDGE FUNDS: THE ROLE OF REDEMPTIONS AND FUND FAILURES – Klaus and Rzepkowski (2009) Discussed by Jingjing Xia
Brief Summary Analyze mortality patterns of hedge funds and identify risk spillover Use individual fund data from TASS ( ) Two channels: “bank” run; counterparty risk Apply binary logit model and semiparametric Cox (robustness check) 1) There is significant risk spillover between funds on failure probability; 2) Funds within the same investment style affected by both channels; 3) Funds across different investment style affected by redemption only; 4) Diversification reduces failure probability significantly. Contribution: few literatures; individual fund data
C1: Contagion? The model estimate correlation between failures of different hedge funds not unobserved factors that cause failure of one fund conditional the failure of others
C2: Data? Possible sampling bias: Before filter Alive and 5000 Graveyard; After filter – 2600 Alive and 2600 Graveyard. The total AUM of sample hedge funds is about 0.5 trillion USD (1/4) Is the sample representative? The time period of data goes from 1994 to Maybe better includes data after 2008 for contagion analysis (not authors’ fault)
C3: Model? Latent failure probability ? Endogeneity issue? Yearly dummy is used to capture the impact of common shocks? FIXED EFFECT IS FOR UNOBSERVABLE FACTORS! Redemption variable: better be dummy than ratio
C4: Diversification How diversification is defined? Geographic diversification and assets diversification. BUT No idea about investment values! 1% in India + 99% in US = diversified! May introduce other effects: geographic diversification – emerging market focus funds (may diversify across emerging countries); asset diversification – fixed income focus fund (may diversify across maturities and even countries)