 Documentation Requirement  All records should contain sufficient detail to sustain an audit and be clear enough to be read and understood by persons.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.

Advertisements

LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance

Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.

Joe White (608) Wayne Chase (608) WisDOT Materials Management Section 1.

Ensuring Better Services and Fair Value “Introduction and roadmap to implementation of ISO in Zambia’s water utilities” Kasenga Hara March 2015.

More CMM Part Two : Details.

Legal Defensibility in the Laboratory To Protect and Enhance Kentucky’s Environment KWWOA April 17, 2013.

1 1 Chapter 1 Specimen Management Professor A. S. Alhomida Disclaimer The texts, tables and images contained in this course presentation (BCH 376) are.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.

Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program

Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)

Quality Assurance Copyright, 2002 © Jerzy R. Nawrocki Quality Management Auxiliary.

Notice of Compliance Audit

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy

D. Keane June Internal Quality Audits (4.14) -ISO Requirements for Internal Audits -The Audit Process -Templates for Meeting Requirements.

 Quality Management Program (QMP) Review  HTCP Program  IRI News.

Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.

Keith H. Lundin, Quality Unit-BTS.  Team Mission  Materials Certification Lean Team  Current Status  Materials Certification Issues  Materials Certification.

Internal Auditing for Small Laboratories

1 8/29/2015WisDOT BTS MMS.  MIT – Materials Information Tracking (Field Version) Used by WisDOT/Consultant/& Municipal staff in the field to enter a.

11/7/2008 Wisconsin Department of Transportation Bureau of Technical Serviices 1 QMP Specifications QMP base aggregate QMP base aggregate Review and comment.

 Importance of Material Coordinators  Spec Requirement  CMM Requirement  General Description of Training  Materials Coordinator Learning Objectives.

November 27, 2007Pebble Project Agency Meetings Pebble Project Data Management Data Management Responsibilities Ensure complete and accurate field and.

MATTHEW MATKOVICH MINE EQUIPMENT COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST QUALITY ASSURANCE & MATERIALS TESTING DIVISION MSHA – APPROVAL & CERTIFICATION CENTER 30CFR, PART.

1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 System evaluation and sampling – first.

FHWA Perspective on Risk and Other Highlights. GROW AMERICA Proposal Administration’s Proposal 6 Years in length $317 billion for highways and bridges.

FieldManager ® Contractor Read-Only David Castleberg, PE Wisconsin Department of Transportation Bureau of Project Development Contractor/Engineer Conf.,

Allen Hughes State Materials Office

Approach for Establishing a World Class Test Laboratory Practice “Or How to Do It Right The First Time” Insight 1, Inc.

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT More commonly know as CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION “the process that provides the oversight required to ensure that both parties follow.

1 Procurement. 2 Overview Every municipality should keep procurement records that allow an auditor or other interested party to track the specific nature.

Data Validation (DV) What is DV? Who conducts DV Why conduct DV? How is DV done? When is DV? Common Fails Suggestions Expectations.

2014 NCR Construction Conference Materials Presentation John Brophy Jeff Michalski

Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.

BEAUFORT COUNTY INSPECTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION SERVICE.

Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.

WSDOT Design Build Contracting – an innovative partnership Society of American Military Engineers September 16, 2014 Phil Fordyce, P.E. WSDOT.

REVISED May 2009STATE MATERIALS OFFICE Goals in this Session To understand:  The Sampling & Testing process  The Project Certification process  The.

1 Restructuring EPA’s Stationary Source Audit Program (SSAP) Allowing Private Providers to Supply Audit Samples.

BOS – Structures Maintenance Fabrication Initiative Richard Marz, PE Chief, Structures Maintenance WisDOT – Bureau of Structures.

There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY

Webinar FSSC audit report 7th september 2015

1. 2  QMP Summary Templates in 2015 Pantry. QC Tester Names included on QMP Summary Reports (155). Quantities need to be included on QMP Summary Reports.

INTRODUCING S HILUV ENERGY IS OUR POWER!. W HO WE ARE ? SHILUV is a company that represents professional engineers in energy related fields of construction.

OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.

Tracking Assets Spot Audit Inventory Accounting The University of Texas at Austin.

Thanks for giving me an opportunity to share with you our process for controlling media and other supplies. Disclaimer: We are not yet accredited to ISO.

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Part 265: Data Collection and Reporting.

Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.

Validation Audits: +5 Program Summary Of the 57 audits: –37 (65%) - score of 100 –17 (30%) - score of 80 or 60 –2 (3.5%) - score of 40 or 20 –1.

Oncology Patient Enrollment Network OPEN Quality Assurance Lucille Patrichuk OPEN Implementation Manager OPEN Conference September 18, 2008.

2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.

Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !

Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006

Module 7 Verify WSP Session structure Definition Actions Outputs

Construction Management

Educators Health Alliance

Quality Control SOP 3.12 Release Date: 08/10/2015.

VeriCon Quality Certification Scheme

Emulsion Task Force Meeting

Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments

Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes

HART Technologies Process Overview

Americas Aerospace Quality Group Registration Management Committee

TNI 2016 – Internal Audits BACWA Lab Committee ~ August 8, 2018.

Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments

Office of State-Issued Identification Support ― June 20, 2012

ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH

Presentation transcript:

 Documentation Requirement  All records should contain sufficient detail to sustain an audit and be clear enough to be read and understood by persons not associated with the project. 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

 Contractor Testing Documentation  Important elements for sampling and testing documents o Verify Qualified laboratory utilized for testing o Identify Qualified sampler and tester (complete name, first and last) o Identify specified material type o Verify aggregate quality/source identification o Verify sampling and testing schedule 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

 Materials Certifications Documentation  Review Materials Tracking System (MTS) data  Confirm required certification documents have been supplied and referenced  Review Materials Certifications Documentation for specified compliance in accordance with the CMM 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

 WisDOT Verification Testing  Review Materials Tracking System data  Confirm Verification testing was conducted and documented as specified 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

 2012 Contractor QC Data  Tests missing or not documented  Required forms not used or presented  Worksheet information missing- full names, project ID, quantities, Lab ID etc.  Project administrators had to go back to contractors to get incomplete or missing documents 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

 Materials Certifications and Documentation  June 2008 o 86.0%- missed 8 of 56 required  November 2009 o 91.0% -missed 5 of 57required  November 2010 o 86.0 % - missed 12 of 79 required  September 2011 o 98.0 %-missed 2 of 103 required  December 2012 o 91.9 % - Missed 10 of 124 required  November 2013 o 100 % - Missed 0 of 55 required 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

 Verification Testing  June 2008 o 79.0% (97% if Companion Cylinders not included)  November 2009 o 93.0 % -missed 15 of 217 required tests or test sets  November 2010 o 96.0 % - missed 4 of 105 required tests or test sets  September 2011-Preliminary results o 93.1% -missed 19 of 277 required tests or test sets (98.0% if Companion Cylinders not included)  December 2012 o 93.3% - missed 22 of 329 required tests or test sets  December (Preliminary Findings) o 95.1% - missed 7 of 144 required tests or test sets 10/23/2015WisDOT BTS MMS

Keith H. Lundin Quality Assurance Unit Bureau of Technical Services Division of Transportation System Development Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation Cell: FAX: