Natural Disturbance and Environmental Assessments in the Oil Sands Region Linda Halsey April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Constructed Forested Wetland Development Using Successional (Performance) Trajectories Susan M. Carstenn Hawaii Pacific University Kaneohe, Hawaii.
Advertisements

Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems
Land and Water Use Part 2. Forestry Ecological Services 1. Providing wildlife habitat 2. Carbon sinks 3. Affecting local climate patterns 4. Purifying.
Population Numbers.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
Intact Forest Landscapes and Conservation Planning in Canada Prepared by: Ryan Cheng Global Forest Watch Canada.
- Description of scenarios -No treatment -Status quo -Resilience - Preliminary model results - Management and decision making in Envision.
Changes in Communities
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
Current Issues and Projects Regarding Beaver in Montana Steve Carpenedo Mt DEQ – Wetland Program.
Vegetation Soil, Landscape Hydrology Process for Assessing Proper Functioning Condition Vegetation Items.
Wood Supply and Wildlife Habitat Modelling Lesson 8 Presentation 2.
The Natural Disturbance Regime: Implications for Forest Management Glen W. Armstrong University of Alberta CIFFC Science Forum 4 November 1999.
Gopher Tortoise Minimum Viable Population and Minimum Reserve Size Workshop March 2013 Background Participants Process Findings Photo by Dirk J.
The adequacy of the existing reserve system for the protection of freshwater ecosystems Janet Stein Fenner School of Environment and Society.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Public Land for the Taking A Disturbing Tale. Outline What is native prairie and what remains? Of what value native prairie? Stewardship of native prairie.
World Forests Forests cover 30% of the world’s land surface.
Examples. Using FEPF to identify priority treatment areas based on soil erosion potential and critical fish habitat In the Bitterroot Valley, MT.
Wooded Boreal Fens: An Ecoregional Perspective David A. Locky Athabasca River Basin Research Institute.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Biomes & Succession. The biosphere is divided into regions called BIOMES that exhibit common environmental characteristics. Each biome is occupied by.
Biomes Definition: a major geographic region defined on the basis of dominant plant growth forms. Determinants: 1) Climate- particularly temperature and.
Evaluating Wildlife Habitats. How are habitats classified?  Tropical areas surround the equator and are characterized by warm temperatures year round.
1 The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
Planning for the expansion of biomass production in the Midwest: Remaining wildlife neutral JoAnn Hanowski Natural Resources Research Institute University.
Wetlands. What is a Wetland? Types of wetlands. – Marshes – Swamps – Bogs – Fens Types of wetlands. – Marshes – Swamps – Bogs – Fens Water saturated patches.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
The HIBECO Model Summary of final results Arild O. Gautestad*, Frans E. Wielgolaski*, Birger Solberg** and Ivar Mysterud* * Department of Biology, University.
Limits and Possibilities for Sustainable Development in Northern Birch Forests: AO Gautestad, FE Wielgolaski*, B Solberg**, I Mysterud* * Department of.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
Ecological rationale for determining buffer width Forest Ecosystem Management and Assessment Team (FEMAT) Report.
Managing Patch Edge Fuel Effects Fire Spread in a Fragmented Landscape By: Jacob J. LaCroix, Soung- Ryoul Ryu, Qinglin Li, Daolan Zheng, and Jiquan Chen.
Models in GIS A model is a description of reality It may be: Dynamic orStatic Dynamic spatial models e.g., hydrologic flow Static spatial models (or point.
AG-WL-3. Why do hunters establish food plots or use game feeders?
Succession Terrestrial Biomes Aquatic Biomes.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
How do plant communities change over time?
Habitat suitability based landscape optimization vs. expert rules in agricultural landscapes Lutz Tischendorf Elutis Modelling & Consulting Inc. January.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
1 Individual and Population Level Analysis and Validation of an Individual-based Trout Model Roland H. Lamberson Humboldt State University.
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
1.Define a landscape. What is the focus of Landscape Ecology. Notes 2. Discuss the role of spatial and temporal scale in affecting landscape composition,
Spatial distribution of mature and old forest Dave Daust, Feb 25.
The Effects of Spatial Patterns on Canopy Cover Estimated by FVS (Forest Vegetation Simulator) A Thesis Defense by Treg Christopher Committee Members:
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 20, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Unit 7 – Water Systems Section 2- Wetlands.
Chapter 13 Forests, Parks and Landscapes. Modern Conflicts over Forest Land and Forest Resources Silviculture: the the professional growing of trees Forests.
Silvicultural Systems for Mixedwood Management Phil Comeau Dept. of Renewable Resources University of Alberta.
Communities. Factors What are some abiotic factors that limit plant growth? What are some biotic factors that limit plant growth?
Agri-environmental indicators and GIS-based models - Instruments to assess sustainability of land use systems on regional level Karl-Otto Wenkel and Alfred.
Biomes and aquatic Ecosystems
Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow and Riparia
Wildlife Terms and Concepts
Forestry Miller—Chapter 23.
23rd London Group Meeting San Jose Costa Rica, th October 2017
Forestry – Logging Methods
Forestry Geography of Canada
Chapter 17 Land Resources.
Forest Ecosystem and Management
Biomes and aquatic Ecosystems
Species Diversity Comparison North and South Slopes
Prediction of Channel Response Areas due to Wildfire Disturbance using GIS and TauDEM Karen Williams GIS in Water Resources.
Ecological Restoration
Presentation transcript:

Natural Disturbance and Environmental Assessments in the Oil Sands Region Linda Halsey April 2012

Why Include Natural Disturbance in Assessments?? Driver = JRP Decision Report for the Joslyn North Mine (Jan 2011) JRP considered it a best practice for understanding cumulative effects would include future fire in the assessment of change to terrestrial habitat and wildlife Future fire modeling not included in EIAs to any extent prior to JRP Decision Report

Outline Temporal Considerations Methods - Assumptions - Spatial inclusion of natural disturbance in assessment - Aspatial inclusion of natural disturbance to generate range of natural variability Results Conclusions

Temporal Considerations Previous EIAs in the oil sands assumed static conditions to forest structure/age class Inclusion of future fire requires the recognition that forest structure/age class is dynamic –Forest ages –Fire results in stand replacement Proper and consistent use of temporal components critical to the assessment

Temporal Considerations Reference Condition –benchmark(s) for comparison purposes Case –assemblage of developments and activities Snapshot –point in time often defined by a specific Project milestone

Temporal Considerations INCREASING DEVELOPMENT Base Case Application Case Planned Development Case Predevelopment Condition Baseline Condition TIME BASED ON FRONTIER PROJECT MILESTONES Clearing begins Production Begins Stream Diversion Maximum Build-Out Closure

Temporal Considerations Predevelopment Conditions (No Anthropogenic Disturbance) Must include future forest fire to allow for true comparison of development effects Existing Conditions (Baseline) Does not include future forest fire

Temporal Considerations Predevelopment conditions were generated from 2008 data by assigning vegetation types to all disturbances on the landscape For temporal consistency with assessment cases predevelopment vegetation was aged to the appropriate snapshot (i.e., stands were grown to reflect the 2057 maximum build-out snapshot) and natural disturbance (i.e., fire) was added and forest age “reset” to 0 Years Existing conditions are at 2008 (not temporally consistent with predevelopment and assessment cases) Assessment completed relative to predevelopment not existing conditions

Methods - Assumptions 80 year fire cycle (i.e., 1/80 th of the study area burns each year) Fire size followed a log normal distribution (many small fires and few large fires) Forested vegetation cover classes all had an equivalent potential to burn (circular fires applied, fires can overlap) Ecosystem succession not considered (cover classes static with only structural stage changing for forested cover classes)

Methods – Spatial Application 100 spatial runs completed on the predevelopment landscape (i.e., no disturbance) with future fire applied following the stated assumptions to the Project snapshot chosen for assessment (i.e., maximum build- out 2057) For areas where fire occurred forest age class was reset to zero and then progressively aged. For areas where fire did not occur, forest age class was advanced Mean forest age of each spatial run determined for the study area

Methods – Spatial Application Spatial run closest to average mean age of all 100 spatial runs used in assessment Developments than applied to that average mean age predevelopment landscape by case Base Case Application Case PDC

Methods – Aspatial Application (RNV) Generated RNV for forested cover classes by considering only natural disturbance (i.e., fire) Twenty runs completed using a Monte Carlo simuation for a 300-year period with the first 100 years being discarded to ensure decoupling from existing conditions

Methods – Aspatial Application (RNV) Average age for forested cover class (weighted by landscape distribution) and the upper and lower 95% confidence limits of age were determined Spatial representation of RNV was generated for the upper and lower 95% confidence limits using the 100 natural disturbance simulations RNV used in effects classification Application Case “B” outside RNV Predevelopment RNV Application Case “A” inside RNV

Methods – Additional Considerations Inclusion of timber harvesting for full life of Project Inclusion of progressive reclamation for regional developments

Results Examples of wildlife habitat responses to future fire modeling for several Species at Risk: Canada warbler (species that prefer older more structurally complex areas) Wood bison (species that prefer younger more open areas) Western toad (species that prefers open wetlands)

Results – Canada Warbler Mixedwood vegetation types that are dominated by deciduous tree species with a tall (2.5 m to 3.5m), thick shrubby understory composed of deciduous shrub species are preferred Mature tree stands (structural stages 6 and 7) or greater than 120 years old are preferred because of higher abundance of understory as are moist riparian areas and moist woodlands Different disturbance types lower habitat suitability rankings within 150 to 300 m of the disturbance

Results – Canada Warbler High and Moderate Habitat Availability (ha) Change from Predevelopment Change Relative to Range of Natural Variability Predevelopment Conditions170,315N/A Existing Conditions164, %Change within RNV Base Case135, %Change within RNV Application Case118, %-6.4% PDC117, %-7.2% High and moderate habitat availability consistently drops as development increases Range of natural variability at 5% confidence interval has an area of 129,540 ha or -23.9% of predevelopment

Results – Wood Bison High and moderate habitat suitability for wood bison represented generally by younger forests, shrublands and grasslands/wetlands that support grasses and sedges Different disturbance types lower habitat suitability rankings within 100 to 200 m of the disturbance

Results – Wood Bison High and Moderate Habitat Availability (ha) Predevelopment Conditions13,814 Existing Conditions11,992 Base Case13,562 Application Case9,173 PDC9, % change -33.6% change Existing conditions have less high and moderate habitat availability than the assessment cases due to: Simulated future fires for predevelopment and assessment cases resulting in younger structural stages being present Inclusion of progressive reclamation and young forests for cases Decrease in fragmentation and Zones of Influence with addition of mines for cases -13.2% change Habitat availability declines as expected with increasing development RNV not considered as aspatial simulations resulted in an average forest age for relevant cover classes that was illogical (i.e., function of snapshot not being decoupled from existing conditions)

Results – Western Toad All standing and flowing water cover classes (excluding the Athabasca River), including open fen and marsh vegetation cover class polygons, were assumed to offer suitable breeding habitat and are therefore given high ratings. Vegetation cover classes with adequate moisture and high ground and shrub cover were assumed to provide suitable terrestrial habitat. Cover classes within 1000 m of breeding habitat had increased habitat suitability Different disturbance types lower habitat suitability rankings within 50 to 400 m of the disturbance

Results – Western Toad High and Moderate Habitat Availability (ha) Change from Predevelopment Predevelopment Conditions756,969N/A Existing Conditions631, % Base Case635, % Application Case605, % PDC572, % Slight increase between existing conditions and base case reflects progressive reclamation and increase in areas of open water No change in habitat rankings associated with fire as open and shrubby wetlands static (i.e., range of natural variability not included)

Conclusions Frontier Oil Sands Mine first assessment to include natural disturbance as part of cumulative effects assessment for terrestrial habitat and wildlife species Clear need to ensure proper use of temporal conditions Old growth dependent species results are logical Young forest dependent species results not inherently logical Limitations: Only of relevance to species that have a high dependency on habitat types related to forest age class Spatial inclusion of fire highly dependent on existing conditions and length of snapshot time Acknowledgements: Teck Resources Limited, Owner and Applicant of the Frontier Oil Sands Mine Project