Ton Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands IUCr-Montreal Aug 11, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The MISSYM Family: Software for the detection of Missed or Pseudo Symmetry A.L.Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands.
Advertisements

PLATON, New Options Ton Spek, National Single Crystal Structure Facility, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Delft, Sept. 18, 2006.
PLATON TUTORIAL A.L.Spek, National Single Crystal Service Facility,
Structure Comparison, Analysis and Validation Ton Spek National Single Crystal Facility Utrecht University.
CIF, PLATON-2014, SHELXL-2014, VALIDATION & SQUEEZE
M.I.R.(A.S.) S.M. Prince U.M.I.S.T.. The only generally applicable way of solving macromolecular crystal structure No reliance on homologous structure.
M.I.R.(A.S.) S.M. Prince U.M.I.S.T.. The only generally applicable way of solving macromolecular crystal structure No reliance on homologous structure.
An Update on Current and New Structure Analysis Tools in PLATON Ton Spek, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
PLATON Validation and Analysis Tools Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Sevilla, 14-Dec-2010.
Disorder.
PLATON/CheckCIF Issues Ton Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands Bruker User Meeting UCSD, La Jolla, March 22-24, 2012.
Twinning. Like disorder but of unit cell orientation… –In a perfect single crystal, unit cells are all found in the same orientation. We can consider.
Small Molecule Example – YLID Unit Cell Contents and Z Value
PLATON/SQUEEZE Ton Spek Bijvoet Center Utrecht University, The Netherlands. PLATON Workshop Chicago, 24-July-2010.
Structure Outline Solve Structure Refine Structure and add all atoms
Planning under Uncertainty
Data Collection and Processing Using APEX2, SHELXTL and the Bruker PHOTON 100 Kevin J. Gagnon
A Brief Description of the Crystallographic Experiment
The PLATON Toolbox Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Kyoto, 20-Aug-2008.
Automatic Detection of Poor or Incorrect Single Crystal Structures A.L.Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands.
Structure Validation Challenges in Chemical Crystallography Ton Spek Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Madrid, Aug. 26, 2011.
Chem Once an apparently reasonable initial solution has been found, as indicated by a chemically reasonable electron density distribution, it can.
Chem Thermal Ellipsoids Remember that thermal ellipsoids can indicate problems with a refinement even when the R factors seem to indicate a reasonable.
Software Tools for the Analysis of Z’ > 1 Structures A.L.Spek, Utrecht University, National Single Crystal Service Facility The Netherlands. BCA-Meeting,
Data Flow SADABS sad.hkl sad.abs sad.prp name.ins name.hkl SAINTXPREPSMARTSHELX n.xxx p4p n.raw n._ls m.p4p copy to sad.p4p.
Data Flow SADABS sad.hkl sad.abs sad.prp name.ins name.hkl SAINTXPREPSMARTSHELX n.xxx p4p n.raw n._ls m.p4p copy to sad.p4p.
The System-S Approach to Automated Structure Determination: Problems and Solutions Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Automated Crystal Structure Validation Ton Spek, National Single Crystal Facility, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands Platon Workshop Chicago,
PLATON, AN OVERVIEW Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Platon Workshop Chicago, 24-July-2010.
The Crystallographic Information File (CIF) Description and Usage Ton Spek, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research Utrecht University Sevilla, 14-Dec
SYSTEM-S The Challenge of Automated Structure Determination Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Don't fffear the buccaneer Kevin Cowtan, York. ● Map simulation ⇨ A tool for building robust statistical methods ● 'Pirate' ⇨ A new statistical phase improvement.
Structure Validation in Chemical Crystallography Ton Spek, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. CCP4-Leeds, 5-Jan
Structure Validation in Chemical Crystallography Principles and Application Ton Spek, National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University SAB-Delft,
Charge flipping in superspace, Aperiodic 2006, Structure solution of modulated structures by charge flipping in superspace Lukas Palatinus EPFL.
Introduction to Longitudinal Phase Space Tomography Duncan Scott.
PLATON and STRUCTURE VALIDATION Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Goettingen, 13-Oct-2007.
Solving Centrosymmetric Crystal Structures in Non-Centrosymmetric Space Groups Michael Shatruk September 12, 2011.
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : DFT Plane Wave Pseudopotential versus Other Approaches CASTEP Developers’
Twinning Non-merohedral twinning Merohedral twinning.
On the Proper Reporting and Archival of Crystal Structure Data Ton Spek Utrecht University, NL (ACA2015-Philadelphia)
PLATON, A set of Tools for the Interpretation of Structural Results Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University,The Netherlands.
PLATON TUTORIAL A.L.Spek, National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
NUI, Galway X-Ray Diffraction Best Practice P. McArdle Feb Saving the X-ray Tube 2.Getting the most from your data 3.Large Unit Cell Parameter Problem.
Crystallographic Databases I590 Spring 2005 Based in part on slides from John C. Huffman.
© Janice Regan, CMPT 300, May CMPT 300 Introduction to Operating Systems Memory: Relocation.
Phasing Today’s goal is to calculate phases (  p ) for proteinase K using PCMBS and EuCl 3 (MIRAS method). What experimental data do we need? 1) from.
1. Diffraction intensity 2. Patterson map Lecture
The PLATON/TwinRotMat Tool for Twinning Detection Ton Spek National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Delft, 29-Sept-2008.
PLATON, A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool Ton Spek, National Single Crystal Service Facility, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
The PLATON Toolbox History and Applications Ton Spek Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Bruker User Meeting, UCSD La Jolla, March 22-24, 2012.
Quantum Mechanics/ Molecular Mechanics (QM/MM) Todd J. Martinez.
PLATON/SQUEEZE Ton Spek Bijvoet Center Utrecht University, The Netherlands. PLATON Course Utrecht, April 18, 2012.
Before Beginning – Must copy over the p4p file – Enter../xl.p4p. – Enter../xl.hkl. – Do ls to see the files are there – Since the.p4p file has been created.
--Experimental determinations of radial distribution functions --Potential of Mean Force 1.
Updates on Validation and SQUEEZE Ton Spek Utrecht University Bruker User Meeting Jacksonville (FL), Jan 19, 2016.
Today: compute the experimental electron density map of proteinase K Fourier synthesis  (xyz)=  |F hkl | cos2  (hx+ky+lz -  hkl ) hkl.
What is Needed for Proper Structure Validation and How to Act upon Validation ALERTS Ton Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands ACA-Denver, july 26, 2016.
The PLATON checkCIF and SQUEEZE Tools
(check)CIF, SHELXL-2014, SQUEEZE
What Makes a Crystal Structure Report Valid?
Ton Spek Utrecht University (NL) ECS4-School, Warsaw, July 2-7, 2017
Crystal Structure Validation with PLATON
Reduce the need for human intervention in protein model building
Why Crystal Structure Validation ?
The SQUEEZE Tool in PLATON and its use with SHELXL2013
OLEX2 – Disorder and Solvent Masks Louise Dawe
Theory- ZnSb & ZnAs. Subtracted charge density pictures.
Ton Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands Vienna –ECM
The PLATON/TwinRotMat Tool for Twinning Detection
Presentation transcript:

Ton Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands IUCr-Montreal Aug 11, 2014 The Extended PLATON/SQUEEZE Tool in the Context of Twinning and SHELXL2014 Ton Spek Utrecht University The Netherlands IUCr-Montreal Aug 11, 2014

SQEEZE DEVELOPMENT STARTED AROUND 1990 Problem: How to take the solvent contribution into account in L.S. - The Contoured Difference Density Fourier map showed infinite channels with continuous density rather than discrete maxima. - Peak search algorithms (such as implemented in SHELXL) will not always tell about this residual density since they attempt to model an atom like 3D ellipsoidal density distribution - How to handle and model this density in the structure refinement ? Our solution: The development of the BYPASS/SQUEEZE procedure.

SOLUTION AND RESULT Split-up Fc(total) = Fc(model) + Fc(solvent) Dark area: van der Waals volume for SF parameter model White area: solvent mask on difference map for Back-Fourier transform Result: R dropped from 9.6 to 4.5 % CSD(2014) Reports the use of SQUEEZE 13600 times

Development History Original development was based on SHELX76 P. van der Sluis & A.L.Spek (1990). Acta Cryst. C46, 883-886 and A46, 194-201 (BYPASS) Previously based on L.S. with SHELXL97 Drawback: need to subtract Fc(solv) from Fobs Current implementation around SHELXL2014 I(obs) no longer temporarily “corrected” for the solvent contribution. Handling of twinning in combination with solvent disorder now possible

SQUEEZE & SHELXL2014 SHELXL2014 includes the new instruction, ABIN, that instructs SHELXL to read an externally supplied .fab file that contains fixed contributions to the calculated structure factors PLATON/SQUEEZE supplies such a .fab file containing the disordered solvent contribution + embedded squeeze details The new SHELXL2014 CIF file with the embedded .res and .hkl makes the use of SQUEEZE much simpler and less complicated The recommended input files needed for a SQUEEZE job are a .cif and .fcf from a converged SHELXL2014 refinement job SQUEEZE generates _sq.ins, _sq.hkl & _sq.fab for SHELXL2014 Info on the use of SQUEEZE for archival and validation is automatically embedded in the CIF

Embedded SQUEEZE info at the end of the .fab file  h k l A(solv) B(solv) Void volume + electron count  Optimized peak list

How to SQUEEZE with SHELXL2014 Refine a non-solvent model with name.ins & name.hkl (Include ACTA record) . Run PLATON/SQUEEZE, based on name.cif & name.fcf from 1 as ‘platon –q name.cif’. Continue SHELXL refinement with the files name_sq.ins, name_sq.hkl & name_sq.fab from 2 as ‘shelxl name_sq’ Inspect the .lis & .lst files and Validate

The ‘NEXTRA’ Issue One of the issues that needs to be addressed is the number of additional parameters to be added in the calculation associated with SQUEEZE on the SHELXL L.S. command. The default value is set to: (E x n) / (Z x m) where E = the number of recovered electrons in the unit cell Z = the number of asymmetric units m = the number of electrons in a CH2 fragment (=8) n  = the number of parameters usually refined for a CH2 fragment (=9) This formula has the nice property that it vanishes when there is no residual density in the void

SQUEEZE EXAMPLES In case of unclear solvent disorder, both a disorder model with constraints/restraints and a SQUEEZE calculation should be attempted and their results compared Following are SQUEEZE examples without and with additional twinning complications Both examples are based on good data Note: Electron counting requires good data

EXAMPLE: PROBLEM: CONVERGENCE AT R = 10%

MODEL the Residual Density as Disordered CH2Cl2

Convergence at R = 4%, Significant residual density

Difference Maps based on Modelled CH2Cl2 Model without CH2CL2 R = 0.095 Diff. Map +/- CH2Cl2 Diff.Map + CH2Cl2 Clean Difference Map Model with CH2Cl2 SQUEEZE R = 0.044 R = 0.033

Result Summary

Disordered Solvent + Twinning Refinement protocol with SHELXL2014 and SQUEEZE Step 1: SHELXL refinement based a name.ins (that should include ‘ACTA’, ‘LIST 8’, ‘BASF’ and ‘HKLF5’ records) and a name.hkl file [merohedral: BASF/TWIN] Step 2: Run SQUEEZE with the name.cif and name.fcf files produced in Step 1 (i.e. run: platon –q name.cif) Step 3: Continue SHELXL refinement with the files name_sq.ins, name_sq.hkl and name_sq.fab produced by PLATON in step 2  name_sq.cif & name_sq.fcf Note: The name_sq.fab file contains the solvent contribution to the SF and the details of SQUEEZE name_sq_sqz contains optimized diff.map peaklist

SQUEEZE2014 Example: Coordination Compound Acetonitril Model: R = 0.0323, wR2 = 0.0889, rho(max) = 1.34 e/A-3 Space Group P21 Z = 4, Z’ = 2 60:40 Twin Twin axis: (0 0 1) 150 K Twinabs hklf5 data Acetonitril solvate Step 1 (SHELXL2014)  R1 = 0.047, wR2 = 0.1445 Step 2 (SQUEEZE)  188 electrons found in unit cell Step 3 (SHELXL2014)  R1 = 0.0275, wR2 = 0.0679, S = 1.064

Final ORTEP (R = 0.0275)  F-Disorder SQUEEZE RESULT

SQUEEZE optimizes the Difference map by Fourier Recycling SQUEEZE optimizes the Difference map by Fourier Recycling. Refinement is done with SHELXL SQUEEZE + L.S. Recycling is rarely needed but can be done as: platon –q3 name.cif (by calling SHELXL from within PLATON)

Requirements There should be no residual unresolved density in the discrete model region of the structure because of its impact on the difference map in the solvent region. The data set should be reasonably complete and with sufficient resolution [i.e. sin(theta)/lambda >0.6]. Low temperature data help a lot. There should be no unresolved charge balance issues that might effect the chemistry involved (e.g. The valency of a metal in the ordered part of the structure)

Limitations The reported electron count in the solvent region is meaningful only with the supply of a complete and reliable reflection data set The SQUEEZE technique can not handle properly cases of coupled disorder effecting both the model and the solvent region. The solvent region is assumed not to contain significant anomalous scatterers (Friedels averaged) Designed for ‘small molecule structures’ Using SQUEEZE as part of the MOF soaking method where the interest lies in the solvent region can be very tricky and should be done with extreme care

Suggestions & Comments (with data) are welcome: send to a.l.spek@uu.nl PLATON runs from a terminal window under LINUX, MAC-OSX and MS-Windows (Louis Farrugia’s, UK) (http://www.cryst.chem.uu.nl/spek) (http://www.platonsoft.nl/xraysoft) (including a copy of this presentation) Suggestions & Comments (with data) are welcome: send to a.l.spek@uu.nl Thank You

LISTING OF FINAL SQUEEZE CYCLE RESULTS

Informal Theory of the SQUEEZE Procedure M = Ordered S = Solvent Iterate (Initially Solvent Free ElectronCount 24