Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, 24-25 June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu Review of priority substances under the WFD Chemicals and Water Workshop European Environment Agency Copenhagen 6-7 December 2010 Helen.
Advertisements

European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Water.europa.eu Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Commission’s Communication A renewed vision for the pharmaceutical sector Peter Korytár European Commission – DG Environment Uppsala, 11 November 2009.
Advisory group on fruit and vegetables 7 March 2008
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 CMA developments and state.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
Sub-group on Prioritisation of Emerging Contaminants in Groundwater 1 st meeting - Introduction Dr. Benjamin Lopez (Fr. Geo. Survey) UBA - Bismarckplatz,
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Strategic Co-ordination Group meeting May 2011 Jorge Rodriguez.
1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European.
Upcoming EU Regulation on Invasive Alien Species European Commission DG Environment MEETING OF THE STRATEGIC CO-ORDINATION GROUP FOR THE WFD COMMON IMPLEMENTATION.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Organized under UNESCO-IHP International Initiative on Water Quality (IIWQ) Hosted by Federal Institute of Hydrology, Germany International Centre for.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Need for continuous exchanges on chemical monitoring issues, in the light of the on-going.
Outcome of the Workshop on PFOA organised by the Commission 4 th of May 2010 Christine Wistuba, DG ENV, D3.
Water.europa.eu Priority substances inventoryemissions, discharges and losses Priority substances inventory emissions, discharges and losses Working Group.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.
Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Groundwater Watch List Meeting
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Review of the WFD priority substances list
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007
Proposed EQS Directive
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
Inventory preparation for priority substances
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit
MSFD list of criteria elements
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
Chemical Monitoring Activity (CMA) ( )
MSFD list of criteria elements
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Priority substances Water Directors meeting Paris November 2008
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
EU Water Framework Directive
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances
Part I.
PRIORITY (HAZARDOUS) SUBSTANCES
WG E on Priority Substances
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Draft Mandate to request SCHER opinion on the TGD-EQS
13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
EU Water Policy and Legislation Recent developments and next steps
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero WFD Team Coordinator DG Environment, European Commission

Socopse Final Conference, Contents Priority substances: state of play Priority substances vs emerging substances Working with other related legislation (REACH, pesticides, biocides, …) Outlook

Socopse Final Conference, Legal framework Article 16 of WFD Article 8 of Directive 2008/105/EC (EQSD) Within the framework of the review of Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC, as provided for in Article 16(4) of that Directive, the Commission shall consider inter alia the substances set out in Annex III to this Directive for possible identification as priority substances or priority hazardous substances. The Commission shall report the outcome of its review to the European Parliament and to the Council by 13 January It shall accompany the report, if appropriate, with relevant proposals, in particular proposals to identify new priority substances or priority hazardous substances or to identify certain priority substances as priority hazardous substances and to set corresponding EQS for surface water, sediment or biota, as appropriate.

Socopse Final Conference, Prioritisation principles Significant risk to or via aquatic environment, including to surface waters used for drinking water Identification of risks through 1.Risk assessments under chemicals, pesticides or biocides legislation 2.Targeted risk assessment focusing only on toxicity to or via aquatic environment 3.Simplified risk-based assessment procedure based on scientific principles and taking into account intrinsic hazard monitoring data production volumes and/or use patterns.

Socopse Final Conference, Tier 1: risk assessments under chemicals, pesticides, biocides 97 finalised risk assessment reports under Existing Substances Regulation 793/93 (+24 drafts) 334 pesticides active substances in Annex I Directive 91/414/EEC 14 substances included in Annex I of Directive 98/8/EC on biocides Subsidiarity: Priority substances should be an EU wide problem, otherwise should be regulated at national/RBD level (as part of ecological status)

Socopse Final Conference, Tier 3: Simplified risk assessment 2001 priority list: COMMPS (Combined Monitoring-based and Modelling-based Priority Setting) New data collection COMMPS 1999 Monitoring risk ratio-based approach 2009 Nb Countries15 + Eureau28 + Vewin A priori non candidate substances Al, Br, Fe, NH3, Cyanides, DDT, phenols, etc. No Nb candidate substances 314 (water) 221 (sediment) Nb substances (manageable list) 95 (water) 60 (sediment) 317 Nb water analysis Nb sediment analysis Nb biota analysis

Socopse Final Conference, Tier 3: Simplified risk assessment Monitoring- based ranking Modelling- based ranking Establishment of the manageable list Establishment of the universe of chemicals Central database data collection preparation and treatment Assessment of exposure and hazard Scoring Application of fugacity modelling 1 st Expert review (de-selection criteria) List of substances  Consideration of risk ratio and other criteria 2 nd Expert review (de-selection criteria) Evaluation of exposure and effects data Application of prioritisation algorithm List of substances  1 st Expert review (de-selection criteria) Final list of substances Monitoring data provide an excellent basis, from direct observation, to get information on European environmental conditions. However, monitoring data cannot be used as the single scoring method because the available information is incomplete and only covers a set of substances which were considered "relevant" in the past. Thus, the current monitoring information is biased by previous decisions on which substances should be monitored. (…) Therefore, it is important to incorporate a second system, to allow inclusion in the final list, of substances with a high potential risk for aquatic organisms for which no monitoring information is available to date. Opinion of CSTEE on COMMPS

Socopse Final Conference, Additional substances of concern Directive 2008/105/EC Annex III substances (13) Existing substances regulation PBTs (27) REACH Substances of Very High Concern SVHC (16) ECHA recommended recently 7 of them for authorisation Persistent Organic Pollutants POPs Others: OSPAR priority, pharmaceuticals, etc

Socopse Final Conference, Historical pollutants PCBs, dioxins Heavily regulated since years Still causing problems due to PBT properties There are arguments in favour of listing them as priority substances Trigger for action From a regulatory point of view, the reason for including these chemicals in the list is the need for assessing the effectiveness of existing measures and the evolution of water quality as a consequence of the measures. (CSTEE 1999)

Socopse Final Conference, EQS setting EQS Technical Guidance in final draft stage Testing period over next months To be finalised by the end of 2009 Water – sediment – biota

Socopse Final Conference, Priority vs emerging substances Not monitored Not regulated WFD article 16: significant risk to or via aquatic environment There is no place for emerging pollutants if risk is not demonstrated – e.g. presence is not enough RESEARCH (e.g. NORMAN network, Modelkey) REACH

Socopse Final Conference, Scarcity of monitoring data Analysed Fraction   Analysis   Fish - Fish Liver15 Mussel - Mussel Whole9 Sediment - Fraction <2mm (whole)62 Water - Whole water with no separation of liquid and SPM phases 42 Example: PFOS Annex III Directive 2008/105/EC

Socopse Final Conference, Quality of monitoring data Example: Triphenyltin compounds MatrixFraction Nb of total analysis Analysis for which LOD>2*PNEC NbPercentage WaterWhole water ,8% Number of analysis with both LoD and LoQ611

Socopse Final Conference, Control measures WFD Article 16(6) Commission proposal in 2006: existing measures at Community level should be sufficient to achieve the objectives – this needs to be looked at Revision of river basin management plans: pressures – status – measures Activity on emissions under WG E Priority Substances Research projects (like SOCOPSE)

Socopse Final Conference, Working with other legislation REACH Registration dossiers Annex XV dossiers (SVHC) Evaluations Pesticides & biocides Authorisations for use WFD as downstream safety net to ensure measures taken to mitigate the risk are efficient – and providing a feedback mechanism to those other policies in case further product controls are needed

Socopse Final Conference, Outlook Overall methodology for WFD article 16 Community action to be consolidated, to be used in future updates, including relationship with other legislation Progressively evolving in the future Improve information base Chemical monitoring in Member States (Commission Directive on QA/QC to be adopted in July 2009) REACH (ecotoxicological data, use patterns) Effectiveness of measures: RBMP cycle Emerging substances Research (Socopse, ScorePP, Modelkey, Neptune, …)

Socopse Final Conference, Thank you for your attention water.europa.eu