CONNECTING STUDENTS TO CULTURE, CAREERS, AND COMMUNICATIONS A SYSTEM FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Technology Leadership
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Gifted and Talented: Self review Presented 28 Sept 4.15 – Webinar 3 of a series of 4 Carolyn English LEARNING MEDIA.
Timberlane Regional School District
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Preparing Leaders for Florida’s Most Challenging Schools Florida Department of Education.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
As you arrive... Log in to ovecisln.wikispaces.com Log in to ovecisln.wikispaces.com ISLN participants!
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Title I Directors’ Meeting Regions 5 and 7 Update on the Race to the Top September 8, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
Literacy and Numeracy Partnership Project Curriculum Partnerships LITERACY and NUMERACY PARTNERSHIP PROJECT Gavin Power – Consultant Principal, Literacy.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
Using data for instructional decision-making
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

CONNECTING STUDENTS TO CULTURE, CAREERS, AND COMMUNICATIONS A SYSTEM FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS

TODAY’S LEARNING TARGET I can identify four pillars for an effective Program Review System. Essential Questions: What type of a structure will facilitate a sustainable system for increasing student achievement? How do you adequately promote the need for a well-rounded student?

A SCHOOL WIDE APPROACH Lincoln County High School’s journey for improving is a school-wide approach with the intent for a natural inclusion of program reviews. Every teacher…Every class…On-going…All year!

SCHOOL COUNCIL CONNECTIONS: Demonstrator 1. Policies and Monitoring School leadership provides adequate resources, facilities, space and instructional time to support high quality writing instructional programs. No implementationNeeds Improvement Proficient/Meets Expectations Distinguished a)School council/leadership does not have policies in place to ensure that writing concepts are taught throughout the school and across the curriculum. a)School council/leadership establishes policies to ensure that writing concepts are taught throughout the school and across the curriculum. a)School council/leadership ensures that writing concepts are taught throughout the school and across the curriculum as established in policy. a)School council/leadership monitors and evaluates the teaching of writing concepts throughout the school and across the curriculum as established in policy. b.) School council/leadership plans the annual school budget with little consideration for allocation of writing resources. b)School council/leadership and select teachers are included in the planning of the annual school budget with some consideration of allocation of resources for writing. b.) School council/leadership and teachers participate in the planning of the annual school budget with clear consideration of allocation of resources for writing. b.) School council/leadership and teachers across contents actively participate in the planning of the annual school budget to ensure adequate and quality materials, equipment, space and technology are available to implement school wide writing program. c.) School council/leadership never or rarely allocates time and resources to implement the writing program. c)School council/leadership allocates time and resources to implement the writing program, but these are not equitable to other content areas c.) School council/leadership allocates equitable time and resources to implement the writing program. c.) The school council/leadership meets with teacher leaders when planning for the allocation of time and resources to implement the writing program. d.) There are no policies in place to assess assignment of staff to meet literacy needs. d.) School councils establish policies for the assignment of staff. d.) Decisions related to staff assignment are based on the established policies that include student literacy needs and teacher certification. d.) Decisions related to assignment of staff are made based on needs of students, teacher certification and other data (e.g., ILP) and teacher professional development experience (e.g., participation in National Writing Project ).

FOUR PILLARS THAT HOLD IT ALL TOGETHER Program Reviews Process Storage Monitoring Timeline

PILLAR #1: PROCESS Writing Program Review Program Review Team Lead A/H Standard / Indicator Leads Department Reps. ELAMathPL/CSScienceSS

WHAT DOES THE DOCUMENTATION LOOK LIKE? LCHS Documentation Form The evidence Leadership Evidence

PILLAR #2: STORAGE Technology Our choice is SkyDrive

SPECIFIC PROGRAM REVIEW FOLDER (3)

STANDARD/DEMONSTRATOR FOLDERS

INDICATOR FOLDERS:

MONTHLY FOLDERS:

PILLAR #3: MONITORING Support Feedback Rubric Monitoring Tool

PILLAR #4: TIMELINES Aug.Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. March April May

Writing. Standard 4. Demonstrator 1. Policies and Monitoring School leadership provides adequate resources, facilities, space and instructional time to support high quality writing instructional programs. No implementationNeeds ImprovementProficient/Meets ExpectationsDistinguished a)School council/leadership does not have policies in place to ensure that writing concepts are taught throughout the school and across the curriculum. a)School council/leadership establishes policies to ensure that writing concepts are taught throughout the school and across the curriculum. a)School council/leadership ensures that writing concepts are taught throughout the school and across the curriculum as established in policy. School council/leadership monitors and evaluates the teaching of writing concepts throughout the school and across the curriculum as established in policy.

WHAT AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM HAS DONE FOR LCHS… “We have to get to a place of learning before we can have a place to celebrate.” ~ ACES Celebration Student Group

Contact Information: Stacy Story Lincoln County High School Mark Gorton Lincoln County High School