Aem.cast.org Welcome to the September 17, 201 AIM webinar Making a Measurable Difference with Accessible Instructional Educational Materials Introductions:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
Purpose of Instruction
Academy 2: Using Data to Assess Student Progress and Inform Educational Decisions in Culturally Responsive RTI Models Academy 2: Culturally Responsive.
Growing Success Overview
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Audio: Dial Conference ID Navigating Your Way to AIM in the IEP: Who Needs AIM and Where Does AIM Fit? Joy.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Joan Breslin Larson Follow up webinar post Feb for AT Conference for AT Teams Hosted by Oklahoma.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Aem.cast.org These materials may be used for educational and informational purposes only. Credits must be maintained. When referencing, please provide.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
Aem.cast.org These materials may be used for educational and informational purposes only. Credits must be maintained. When referencing, please provide.
Accessible Educational Materials in 2015: The BASICS for Educators and Families Joy Zabala, Ed.D., Director of Technical Assistance.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Webinar—General Information Training will begin in a moment; all phone lines are currently muted.
AIM/NIMAS/NIMAC Coordinators Quarterly Teleconference Thursday, January 23, 2014 (Noon EDT, 11 CDT, 10 MDT, 9 PDT) Introductions: Please.
Status of State Systems for the Provision of NIMAS and AIM in 2012: Highlights of Preliminary Findings Joy Zabala, Joanne Karger and.
Consistency of Assessment
Improving Educational Participation and Outcomes for ALL Students with Universal Design for Learning and–for some–Special Education Services Joy Smiley.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Assessing Student Learning
Principles of Assessment
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Are We making a Difference
Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired (IESBVI)Conference October 8 th and 9 th, 2012 WELCOME!
The following materials were created for use in a webinar presented on October 5, 2010 under the auspices of the National Center on Accessible.
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students w/ Learning Problems.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
Aem.cast.org Accessible Educational Materials: Just in Time Basics for Educators and Families Joy Zabala, Ed.D., Director of Technical Assistance Diana.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
TRANSITION PLAN STAKEHOLDER GROUP CENTER FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EDUCATION.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Welcome to Making a Measurable Difference with Accessible Instructional Materials April 1, 2014 Introductions: In the chat text box.
Aem.cast.org Accessible Educational Materials in 2015: The BASICS for Educators and Families Joy Zabala, Ed.D., Director of Technical Assistance Diana.
GradeLiteracyInformational 450% 845%55% 1230%70%
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
UDL and Learners with More Intensive Support Needs Joy Smiley Zabala, Ed.D. Director of Technical Assistance CAST and the National Center on Accessible.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
Virginia WebEx Program Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Audio: Dial Conference ID Accessible Instructional Materials: The BASICS for Educators and Families Joy Zabala,
Accessible Educational Materials and the IEP. Introduction to the National Center for Accessible Educational Materials for Learning October 2014 to October.
Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) As a Curriculum Model
Aem.cast.org Welcome to the December 3, 2015 AIM webinar Acquiring Accessible Digital Materials: Just in Time! Introductions: In the chat text box on the.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS)
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
AEM in the IEP: Where do Accessible Materials and Technologies Fit
Is it Accessible. What Does that Mean. Joy Smiley Zabala, Ed. D
Preservice Teachers: Are You Ready for AEM?
Exploring and Using the new foundations of Education (3rd edition) Connection Chapters to promote Literacy Instruction Dr. Dawn Anderson from Western Michigan.
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Welcome to Module 4 of the AEM Center’s Online Learning Series
Sam Catherine Johnston, Senior TA Specialist National AEM Center
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

aem.cast.org Welcome to the September 17, 201 AIM webinar Making a Measurable Difference with Accessible Instructional Educational Materials Introductions: In the chat text box on the lower right of the Adobe Connect screen, please enter your name, state and primary role which interested you in attending this webinar (for example, parent, parent center, educator, etc). Also use the chat box for questions, comments, etc during the webinar. Audio Information: Audio for this webinar is available via phone bridge and via VOIP on the computer in “listen only” mode. When the audio is started by the leader (about 10 minutes before the hour), you will be prompted to choose how to connect. NOTE: If you are not prompted by 5 minutes before the hour, call in to and enter Conference ID If you elect to use the telephone dial-in or call back option for audio, PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOUR PHONE IS MUTED AND THAT THE AUDIO ON YOUR COMPUTER IS ALSO MUTED. If you elect to listen on the computer, PLEASE DO NOT DIAL IN ON THE TELEPHONE because your computer sound will be heard by everyone else on the telephone.

aem.cast.org Making a Measurable Difference with Accessible Educational Materials Joy Zabala, Ed.D Director of Technical Assistance National AEM Center AND CAST

aem.cast.org Questions and Comments Don’t be shy! The only “foolish question” is the one that is not asked. 2

aem.cast.org Agenda Brief overview of AEM and data collection Evaluation of AEM systems Impact of AEM on student outcomes Potential measures connected to independence, participation, and progress

aem.cast.org Overview of AEM and Data Collection

aem.cast.org What are AEM? AEM (accessible educational materials) are materials that are designed or converted in a way that makes them usable across the widest range of student variability regardless of format (print, digital, graphical, audio, video). IDEA specifically focuses on accessible formats of print instructional materials. In relation to IDEA, the term AEM refers to print instructional materials that have been transformed into the specialized formats of braille, large print, audio, or digital text. 5

aem.cast.org Why Provide AEM? Provisions in the final regulations of IDEA 2004 require state and local education agencies to ensure that accessible formats of textbooks and related core instructional materials are provided to students with disabilities who need such materials in a timely manner. 34 C.F.R. §

aem.cast.org Why Provide AEM? “Timely access to appropriate and accessible instructional materials is an inherent component of [an LEA’s/SEA’s] obligation under [IDEA] to ensure: that FAPE is available for children with disabilities and that children with disabilities participate in the general education curriculum as specified in their IEPs.” Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), 71 Fed Reg

aem.cast.org Don’t forget Section 504 Prohibits discriminatory actions that deny comparable aids, benefits, and services. Requires aids, benefits, and services to be “equally effective” – must provide “an equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement….” 34 C.F.R. § 104.4(b) 8

aem.cast.org Why Collect Data on AEM? How many students in our state/district are receiving AEM? What kinds of disabilities do they have? Do our students receive the AEM they need at the time they need them for learning? How can we improve our AEM system? What is the relationship between AEM and other initiatives? Is AEM making a difference for our students who receive them? 9

aem.cast.org Two Purposes for Data Collection Category 1 Evaluation of the system used for providing AEM Category 2 Evaluation of the impact of AEM on student outcomes

aem.cast.org Data Category 1: Evaluation of AEM Systems

aem.cast.org AEM Quality Indicators 5 and 6… and their Critical Components quality-indicators.html A good place to start!

aem.cast.org Quality Indicator 5 The education agency develops and implements a systematic process to monitor and evaluate the equitable, timely provision of appropriate, high-quality materials in specialized formats. Intent: Data are collected that measure the degree to which instructional materials in specialized formats are 1) provided to students with all types of disabilities in an equitable manner, 2) provided at the same time as print formats and 3) of quality sufficient to support appropriate instruction and achievement.

aem.cast.org Critical Components for QI-5 Strategies for collecting data on all aspects of the system that include, but are not limited to: Timely identification of students Students served Disability categories served Formats provided Sources used o Timely delivery o Quality of materials (e.g., accuracy of coding and content, usability) Compliance with copyright in the management and use of digital materials

aem.cast.org Quality Indicator 6 The education agency uses data to guide changes that support continuous improvement in the selection, acquisition, and use of accessible instructional materials. Intent: Data are systematically analyzed to gauge effectiveness of current practice and are used to inform actions needed to improve future practice.

aem.cast.org Critical Components for QI-6 A specific plan for analyzing and using the data, including, but not limited to: Purpose for which the data will be used Audiences with whom the data will be shared Strategies for both quantitative and qualitative analysis Strategies that protect individual student identities Timeline for periodic review of data Timeline for implementation of data driven decisions

aem.cast.org Considerations Related to QI-6 What kinds of data could be included? Whether student receives AEM Whether student falls under copyright exemption (disability category) What are the benefits? Number of students receiving AEM across school/district/state Disaggregation of AEM data by disability category, free/reduced lunch status, racial/ethnic group

aem.cast.org Incorporation of AEM Prompts into the IEP Questions/prompts about AEM could be added to the IEP: Can the student use the instructional materials used by other students in the same format? Does the student require AEM? Does the student fall under a copyright exemption? Which disability category classification? For which subjects will the student receive AEM? What are the specific texts and specialized formats that will be provided?

aem.cast.org AEM-Related Components of the IEP Present LevelsConsider whether the student is able to access and derive meaning from instructional materials. Annual GoalsConsider how AEM can help the student reach his/her IEP goals in order to be involved and progress in the general education curriculum. Special Education & Related Services, Supplementary Aids & Services, Program Modifications, and Supports Consider the supports that will help the student use AEM and how AEM can help the student be involved and progress in the general education curriculum. Special FactorsConsider AEM in relation to assistive technology (AT) and braille instruction for students who are blind or have visual impairments. Transition Services and Postsecondary Goals Consider how the student will learn how to advocate for his/her own needs in relation to AEM.

aem.cast.org Connecting AEM to SPP/APR State Performance Plan (SPP) – evaluates state’s implementation of Part B of IDEA and describes how the state will improve such implementation. Annual Performance Report (APR) – reports on state’s annual performance in meeting targets in its SPP. l

aem.cast.org State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) and AEM Shift in emphasis of the U.S. Department of Education from compliance to results. Relationship between AEM and performance on various indicators

aem.cast.org Indicators with a Connection to AEM Graduation Rate Dropout Rate Assessment Suspension/Expulsion LRE Parent Involvement Secondary Transition

aem.cast.org Data Category 2: Impact of AEM on Student Outcomes

aem.cast.org What kinds of outcomes data should we be collecting? How can we display the data in ways to help inform subsequent instruction? How is the information being disseminated? What collaborations are in place and should others be initiated? Questions to think about

aem.cast.org Cycle of Access, Involvement, and Progress in the General Education Curriculum (IDEA 1997)

aem.cast.org Connection to AEM AccessIndependence InvolvementParticipation ProgressAcademic and Social Progress toward College and Career Readiness

aem.cast.org Why It’s Difficult to Collect AEM-Related Outcomes Data Difficult to show cause and effect Difficult to parse out impact of contextual factors (e.g., teaching and environment) May take a long time to see actual change; providing AEM, by itself, may not result in immediate change Changes may occur in areas that are difficult to measure (e.g., student’s confidence as a learner)

aem.cast.org Some Initial Thoughts about AEM-related Outcomes Data (1)Progress Monitoring (Ideal) Document trajectory of student performance over time (data points can be depicted in a line graph). Use existing, validated measures – e.g., scales of reading comprehension, content knowledge acquisition, self-confidence, motivation to learn, etc. Draft a new rubric to measure various indicators. Empower teachers, students and families by helping them monitor ongoing progress.

aem.cast.org Other Ideas for AEM-related Outcomes Data (2) Survey of Teacher Perspectives on Impact Administered once or several times (comparing results). Shows perspectives on AEM in relation to one child or multiple children. Helps capture context associated with teaching and classroom environment. Can be used as a self-reflection tool to help the teacher improve subsequent instruction.

aem.cast.org Other Ideas for AEM-related Outcomes Data (3) Survey of Student and/or Family Perspectives Administered once or several times to measure change. Captures views of stakeholders with greatest investment. Helps build self-awareness among students. (4) Classroom Observations Rubric to observe how students are interacting with AEM and participating in class. Captures context of classroom environment. May be particularly effective in documenting changes over time.

aem.cast.org Potential Measures Connected to Change Over Time Independence Participation Progress

aem.cast.org Independence… Student’s ability to use AEM and accessible technology independently When using AEM, does the student need: A great deal of assistance Some assistance No assistance or very little assistance

aem.cast.org Independence… Student’s ability to complete assignments/activities independently In completing assignments/activities, does the student demonstrate: No change or very little change in independence Some improvement in independence Substantial improvement in independence

aem.cast.org Participation… Student’s ability to stay focused and remain on task Does the student demonstrate: No change at all or very little change Some improvement Substantial improvement Student’s active participation in class discussions Student’s demonstration of understanding of what he/she is reading Student’s interest in what he/she is learning

aem.cast.org Progress… Student’s grades, performance on assessments, behavior Does the student demonstrate: No change at all or very little change Some improvement Substantial improvement Student’s attitude toward school or self-confidence as a learner Student’s active participation in the transition planning process

aem.cast.org 36

aem.cast.org Join us on September 29th! Acquiring Accessible Digital Materials: What to Look For! What to Ask For! Tuesday, September 29, :00-3:00 EDT 37

aem.cast.org We’re always just a fingertip away! Joy Zabala AEM Team

aem.cast.org 1-Minute Evaluation Thank you for joining us! Please take a few moments to complete a brief survey, which is intended to gather information about the quality, relevance, and usefulness of the webinar you just attended. Your responses are completely confidential.