FIM Regularity for Gaussian Semi-Blind(SB) MIMO FIR Channel Estimation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Underwater Acoustic MIMO Channel Capacity
Advertisements

MIMO Communication Systems
1 12. Principles of Parameter Estimation The purpose of this lecture is to illustrate the usefulness of the various concepts introduced and studied in.
Channel Estimation for Mobile OFDM
Semi-Blind Equalization for OFDM using Space-Time Block Coding and Channel Shortening Alvin Leung Yang You EE381K-12 March 04, 2008.
Implement a 2x2 MIMO OFDM-based channel measurement system (no data yet) at 2.4 GHz Perform baseband processing and digital up and down conversion on Nallatech.
Volkan Cevher, Marco F. Duarte, and Richard G. Baraniuk European Signal Processing Conference 2008.
ISSPIT Ajman University of Science & Technology, UAE
AGC DSP AGC DSP Professor A G Constantinides© Estimation Theory We seek to determine from a set of data, a set of parameters such that their values would.
Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems
Doc.:IEEE /0206r0 Submission January 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Pilot Design for OFDM PHY for aj(45 GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Receiver Performance for Downlink OFDM with Training Koushik Sil ECE 463: Adaptive Filter Project Presentation.
QUASI MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD BLIND DECONVOLUTION QUASI MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD BLIND DECONVOLUTION Alexander Bronstein.
12- OFDM with Multiple Antennas. Multiple Antenna Systems (MIMO) TX RX Transmit Antennas Receive Antennas Different paths Two cases: 1.Array Gain: if.
Doc.: IEEE /1536r1 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. November 2011 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ah Date: Authors: Slide1.
Adaptive Signal Processing
MIMO Multiple Input Multiple Output Communications © Omar Ahmad
-1- ICA Based Blind Adaptive MAI Suppression in DS-CDMA Systems Malay Gupta and Balu Santhanam SPCOM Laboratory Department of E.C.E. The University of.
Rake Reception in UWB Systems Aditya Kawatra 2004EE10313.
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Blind Beamforming for Cyclostationary Signals
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Deterministic vs. Random Maximum A Posteriori Maximum Likelihood Minimum.
Least SquaresELE Adaptive Signal Processing 1 Method of Least Squares.
1 Advances in the Construction of Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs John Rose 1 Michiel Bliemer 1,2 1 The University of Sydney, Australia 2.
Method of Least Squares. Least Squares Method of Least Squares:  Deterministic approach The inputs u(1), u(2),..., u(N) are applied to the system The.
CHANNEL ESTIMATION FOR MIMO- OFDM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PRESENTER: OYERINDE, OLUTAYO OYEYEMI SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR S. H. MNENEY AFFILIATION:SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL,
CNIT-Polimi, Newcom Cluster 2 Meeting, Barcelona 9-10 March 2005 CNIT-POLIMI: technical expertise and people in Dep. 1 Researchers: –Umberto Spagnolini.
Ali Al-Saihati ID# Ghassan Linjawi
Semi-Blind (SB) Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Channel Estimation Aditya K. Jagannatham DSP MIMO Group, UCSD ArrayComm Presentation.
Sphere Decoding Algorithm for MIMO Detection Arslan Zulfiqar.
Presented by: Sohaib Malik.  A radio whose functionality can be changed by changes in only the software  Key feature: ◦ Reprogramability ◦ Reusability.
Effect of Noise on Angle Modulation
Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Study of Broadband Postbeamformer Interference Canceler Antenna Array Processor using Orthogonal Interference Beamformer Lal C. Godara and Presila Israt.
ITERATIVE CHANNEL ESTIMATION AND DECODING OF TURBO/CONVOLUTIONALLY CODED STBC-OFDM SYSTEMS Hakan Doğan 1, Hakan Ali Çırpan 1, Erdal Panayırcı 2 1 Istanbul.
A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration Zhengyou Zhang Sung Huh CSPS 643 Individual Presentation 1 February 25,
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
A Semi-Blind Technique for MIMO Channel Matrix Estimation Aditya Jagannatham and Bhaskar D. Rao The proposed algorithm performs well compared to its training.
Digital Communications Chapeter 3. Baseband Demodulation/Detection Signal Processing Lab.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. January 2013 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for the Next Generation WLAN Date:
Space Time Codes. 2 Attenuation in Wireless Channels Path loss: Signals attenuate due to distance Shadowing loss : absorption of radio waves by scattering.
Doc.: IEEE hew Submission March 2014 Submission Zhanji Wu, et. Al. Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity with RBD pre-coding MU-MIMO Date:
Precoder Matrix Detection: Description Primary User Cooperative Mobile Relay eNodeB Aim: Reception of MIMO signals by a secondary receiver that acts as.
V- BLAST : Speed and Ordering Madhup Khatiwada IEEE New Zealand Wireless Workshop 2004 (M.E. Student) 2 nd September, 2004 University of Canterbury Alan.
Spectrum Sensing In Cognitive Radio Networks
Friday 23 rd February 2007 Alex 1/70 Alexandre Renaux Washington University in St. Louis Minimal bounds on the Mean Square Error: A Tutorial.
研究生: 指導教授: Student : Advisor : LRA Detection 魏學文 林忠良 Harmoko H. R. Prof. S-W Wei Presentation Date: April 16, 2009.
Presentation : “ Maximum Likelihood Estimation” Presented By : Jesu Kiran Spurgen Date :
Techniques to Mitigate Fading Effects
Space Time Codes.
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Space-Time and Space-Frequency Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter Diversity Techniques King F. Lee.
LECTURE 10: DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS
Recent Advances in Iterative Parameter Estimation
Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN
CSI Feedback for Closed-loop MIMO-OFDM Systems based on B-splines
Rate 7/8 (1344,1176) LDPC code Date: Authors:
CORRELATION ANALYSIS.
Space Time Coding and Channel Estimation
Robust Multipath Channel Identification
Chapter 2 Minimum Variance Unbiased estimation
CONTEXT DEPENDENT CLASSIFICATION
Whitening-Rotation Based MIMO Channel Estimation
LECTURE 09: DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ac
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ah
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity with RBD pre-coding MU-MIMO
Channel Estimation for Orthogonal Time Frequency Space (OTFS) Massive MIMO Good morning everyone! I am very glad to be here to share my work about channel.
Presentation transcript:

FIM Regularity for Gaussian Semi-Blind(SB) MIMO FIR Channel Estimation Aditya K. Jagannatham DSP MIMO Group, UCSD DRAFT

MIMO Channel Estimation CSI (Channel State Information) is critical in MIMO Systems. Number of training symbols increases with transmit antennas resulting in Bandwidth inefficiency. Low SNR in MIMO systems aggravates the problem. Channel estimation holds key to MIMO gains. DRAFT

FIR-MIMO System r = #receive antennas, t = #transmit antennas (r > t) H(0),H(1),…,H(L-1) to be estimated. #Parameters = 2.r.t.L (L complex r X t matrices) D + x(n) H(1) H(2) H(L-1) y(n) H(0) DRAFT

Channel Estimation Schemes Training based Estimation: H(z) Training inputs Training outputs Blind Estimation: ‘Blind’ data inputs ‘Blind’ data outputs H(z) DRAFT

Channel Estimation Schemes Training Increasing Complexity Decreasing BW Efficiency Blind Semi-blind schemes trade off BW efficiency for algorithmic simplicity and complete estimation. How much information can be obtained from blind symbols ? In other words, how many of the 2rtL parameters can be estimated blind ? How does one quantify the performance of an SB Scheme ? DRAFT

Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) Let p(ω,θ) be the p.d.f. of the observation vector ω. The FIM of the parameter θ is given as Result: Rank of the matrix Jθ equal to the number of identifiable parameters, or in other words, the dimension of its null space is precisely the number of un-identifiable parameters. DRAFT

SB Estimation for MIMO-FIR FIM based analysis yields insights in to SB estimation. Let the channel be parameterized as θ2rtL. Application to MIMO Estimation: Jθ = JB + Jt, where JB, Jt are the blind and training CRBs respectively. DRAFT

Blind FIM, JB Let the input-output blind symbols be stacked as Gaussianity on input symbols, X(k) ~ N(0,IPt) The blind likelihood Lb is given as, where The blind FIM JB is given as, DRAFT

Rank Properties Null space of JB can be shown to be given as It can then be demonstrated that for MIMO-FIR channels, rank(JB) is given as where r= #receive antennas, t = #transmit antennas. DRAFT

Implications for Estimation Total number of parameters in a MIMO-FIR system is 2.r.t.L . However, the number of un-identifiable parameters is t2. For instance, r = 8, t = 2, L = 4. Total #parameters = 128. # blindly unidentifiable parameters = 4. This implies that a large part of the channel, can be identified blind, without any training. How does one estimate the t2 parameters ? DRAFT

Training FIM, Jt The t2 indeterminate parameters have to be estimated from pilot symbols. How many pilot symbols are needed for identifiability? Again, answer is found from rank(Jθ), total SB FIM. Jθ = JB + Jt, is full rank for identifiability. Let xp(1), xp(2),…, xp(Lt) be Lt transmitted pilots. Jt, the training FIM is given as DRAFT

Training FIM, Jt (Contd.) Jt(i) can be shown to be given as If Lt is the number of pilot symbols, Lt = t for full rank, i.e. rank(Jθ) = 2rtL DRAFT

SB Estimation Scheme The t2 parameters correspond to a unitary matrix Q. H(z) can be decomposed as H(z) = W(z) QH. W(z) can be estimated from blind data [Tugnait’00]. The unitary matrix Q can be estimated from the pilot symbols. This requires a ‘Constrained’ Maximum-Likelihood (ML) estimation procedure. DRAFT

Constrained Estimation Let xp(1), xp(2),…, xp(Lt) be Lt transmitted pilots. In addition, let Xp be orthogonal, i.e. XpXpH =k I. The ‘Constrained’ ML cost function is given as The ML estimate of Q is given as DRAFT

Semi-Blind CRB Asymptotically, as the number of data symbols increases, semi-blind MSE is given as Denote MSEt = Training MSE, MSESB = SB MSE. MSESB is prop. to t2 (indeterminate parameters) MSEt is prop. to 2.r.t.L (total parameters). Hence the ratio of the limiting MSEs is given as DRAFT

Simulation r = 4, t = 2 (i.e. 4 X 2 MIMO system). L = 2 Taps. Fig. is a plot of MSE Vs. SNR. SB estimation is 32/4 i.e. 9dB lower in MSE DRAFT

End FIM based analysis provides framework tool to study SB estimation of FIR-MIMO channels. The blind indeterminacy in a FIR-MIMO system corresponds to a unitary matrix of t2 parameters. The unitary matrix has much fewer parameters and is estimated through a constrained ML procedure. References A. K. Jagannatham and B. D. Rao, “Semi-Blind MIMO FIR Channel Estimation: Regularity and Algorithms”, Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. A. K. Jagannatham and B. D. Rao, “FIM Regularity for Gaussian Semi-Blind MIMO FIR Channel Estimation”, Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2005. DRAFT