Photonics Workshop Summary (IceCube style) Taking steps to address baseline change - Adopted forward-looking approach - Deliverables and milestones defined.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Project Management 6e..

Advertisements

Linked to ORCA/PINGU J. Brunner. Calibrations Main stream External input Simulation Reconstruction.

Defining the Project CHAPTER FOUR Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.

Ciro Bigongiari. Schematic View 17/05/2011Ciro Bigongiari 2 Photon Path Optical Beacon Optical Module Sea water.

Defining the Project Chapter 4.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Defining the Project (modified for 2015) Chapter 4.

TSS Project Update WRAP Technical Analysis Forum San Francisco, CA October 11, 2007.

Kapi’olani Community College Art 128 Interface Programming 1 In-class Presentation Week 13B.

Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups

Section 4.0 Project Implementation. Factors that Ensure Success  Update the project plan  Stay within scope  Authorized change implementation  Providing.

Figure Figure 18-1 part 1 Figure 18-1 part 2.

Interface Programming 1 Week 15. Interface Programming 1 CALENDAR.

KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,

Conquering Complex and Changing Systems Object-Oriented Software Engineering Art for Chapter 11, Project Management.

Chapter 4 Defining the Project.

Defining the Project CHAPTER FOUR PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.

Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.

SIUE Injury Tracking System Project Plan. Team Members: Robbie Marsh Robbie Marsh –Project Manager/Webmaster Ken Metcalf Ken Metcalf –Lead Programmer.

Antares simulation tools J. Brunner CPPM. Software scheme Calibrations Main stream External input Simulation Reconstruction.

Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.

IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.

TSS Project Update WRAP Technical Analysis Forum San Francisco, CA October 11, 2007.

Status of gravitational lens paper Internal note: Results of the optical properties of sea water in the ANTARES site with the OB system.

Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.

GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareCore review, Jan. 17, 2001 Review of the “Core” software: Introduction Environment: THB, Thomas, Ian, Heather Geometry: Joanne.

R. Coniglione, VLVnT08, Toulon April ‘08 KM3NeT: optimization studies for a cubic kilometer neutrino detector R. Coniglione P. Sapienza Istituto.

IceCube simulation with PPC Photonics: 2000 – up to now Photon propagation code PPC: now.

Photonics Tables Bin Optimization Kyle Mandli Paolo Desiati University of Wisconsin – Madison Wuppertal AMANDA Collaboration Meeting.

Simulation Status and Problems for SiPM/APD Pico-Second Timing Simulation Workshop University of Chicago, Chicago, USA December 12, 2006 Alexandre Vaniachine,

POINT SOURCE ANALYSIS WITH 5-LINE DATA SUMMARY AWG PHONE CALL Juan Pablo Gómez-Gozález 20 th April

NPI-NILU tasks Further development of fast simulation tool for UV radiation (Fastrt) Applications of fast simulation tool for quality assurance of UV.

Jan 7, 2002E. Gallas/Trigger Db1 Trigger Database and Trigger Configurations and Trigger Issues Elizabeth Gallas, Jeremy Simmons (Fermilab - Computing.

Review of Ice Models What is an “ice model”? PTD vs. photonics What models are out there? Which one(s) should/n’t we use? Kurt Woschnagg, UCB AMANDA Collaboration.

GPU Photon Transport Simulation Studies Mary Murphy Undergraduate, UW-Madison Dmitry Chirkin IceCube at UW-Madison Tareq AbuZayyad IceCube at UW-River.

SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.

IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison, 2010 effective scattering coefficient (from Ryan Bay)

Follow-up to SFT Review (2009/2010) Priorities and Organization for 2011 and 2012.

Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.

THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray Eric W. Larson PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama Defining the Project Chapter.

Project Management 6e..

Project Management 6e..

Light Propagation in the South Pole Ice

FIGURES FOR CHAPTER 1 GETTING STARTED

Chapter 4 Defining the Project.

Project Management -- Defining the Project

IceCube Collaboration Meeting Ghent, October 9, 2007

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

Simulation and Reconstruction code using Mathematica

2nd edition Amasim and Photonics Stephan Hundertmark

Simulation in IceCube Science Advisory Committee Meeting Paolo Desiati

Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Optimization studies of a tower based km3 detector

Defining the Project Chapter 4.

Where We Are Now. Where We Are Now Defining the Project (100) Step 1: Defining the Project Scope Step 2: Establishing Project Priorities Step 3: Creating.

Erik Strahler UW-Madison 4/27/2008

MUPAGE: A fast muon generator

Photonics Implementation

Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data

Parametric and Polar Curves

Root dictionary ROOT interactive or scripts (+RALICE)

Summary of yet another Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005.

Peak-Fitting This slide show presents a Step-by-Step view of a simple peak-fit We first define the number of “data” points to define the end points Then.

Outcome and achievements resulting from the 1st Alignment workshop (June 25-26, 2015, Lund) - Management feedback [part 2] - R. Garoby 30 August 2016.

Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005 Going the last mile…

Studies of the Time over Threshold

Optimization of tower design

Wendy Taylor STT Meeting Fermilab September 28, 2001

TFEIP projections expert panel

Internet of Things (IoT) Work Group

Presentation transcript:

Photonics Workshop Summary (IceCube style) Taking steps to address baseline change - Adopted forward-looking approach - Deliverables and milestones defined - Need to front-load work schedule - Earned value peak in Y2004M03 - Low on FTEs - SOWs (verbal)

Photonics Workshop Agenda Status reports –Stephan: AMASIM interface, testing –Thomas: PSI – Photon Simulation Interface –Peter for Daan: NN table parametrization –John P.: Hit constructor Discussion & Planning –Assignments: who’s doing what, why not –Action items: what to do, homework –Schedule: do it now

AMASIM interface testing (Stephan H.) New photonics tables (infinite muons) Photonics shower tables Look at mean photon amplitudes as function of - distance - impact parameter - OM orientation as defined in figure ►

Photonics mimicking PTD Message: AMASIM interface works; Shower tables debugged PTD photonics impact parameterdistance

PTD/photonics ratios With PTD settings (educated guess)With favored photonics settings Sensitive to efficiency settings (glass, gel, QE, etc.) Message: photonics = PTD if efficiencies same

Photon table interface (Thomas B.)

Action Items Debug muon tables- Stephan Parameter impact matrix- Stephan Update AMASIM- Stephan Photonics web portal- Kurt, Paolo ( UW page) Table inspection tools- Thomas Parameter selection- Paolo Table production- Paolo Parameterization –NN fits: include in PSI (Thomas), Peter/Thomas/Daan talk –Memory mapping- Adam investigates –Angular binning- John Code maintenance, coordination (I3)- Jenni Testing- ???