Natural Resource Damage Assessment Basics; Applicability to Compacts with FSM and RMI Michael Fry Environmental Contaminants Coordinator U.S. Fish and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 A National Law By: Jordan Conger.
Advertisements

Irish Coast Guard Local Authority oil spill Contingency Plans.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Contingency Management in Wetlands Paul R. Krause, Ph.D. Knowledge Management Program Sensitive Ecosystem.
MISSION: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
Nyanza NRD Trustee Council U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Overview Which IMO measure should you choose? Use of four real world examples Factors to consider in choosing an IMO measure Summary of potential difficulties.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Aligning Methods for Assessing Wetland Ecosystem Services Anthony Dvarskas NOAA Assessment and Restoration Division/IMSG CNREP 2010 New Orleans, LA.
Establishing a Protocol for Coral Reef Damage Assessment for the Turks and Caicos Islands By: Judith Campbell & Tatum Fisher.
Chapter 9 review Lucas Collins. Section 1 Species are becoming extinct 1,000 times faster than when modern humans first arrived. But by the end of the.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
1 Presented By: Matthew Duchesne Office of Environmental Compliance Office of Environmental Management Department of Energy 2010 Long-Term Surveillance.
Wildlife and Fisheries: A Commons to Trust Ross Saxton.
Oil Spill Effects on Environment and Wildlife
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT UPDATE CPRA Meeting September 15, 2010 Presented By: Karolien Debusschere Deputy Coordinator Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator’s.
Update on BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Erin Fougères Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Team Meeting September 16, 2010.
GULF OIL SPILL UPDATE October 12, 2010 Phil Wieczynski, Division of Law Enforcement Florida Department of Environmental Protection 1.
AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS 13.1 & How much do we know? We have explored about 5% of the earth’s global ocean and the world’s interconnected oceans.
1 Natural Resource Damages (NRD) – James Woolford Director – Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office/OSWER NGA – Federal Facilities Task Force.
MARINE UNDERWRITERS OF SAN FRANCSICO, INC. Marine Seminar Wednesday, April 29, 2009.
Part 3: Chronic effects of decade-long contamination of key shoreline habitats and indirect interactions are important.
WP3: identifying & quantifying the main driving forces of ecosystem changes influencing the aquaculture sector and developing the appropriate environmental.
CONFIDENTIAL Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund July 2015.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The RESTORE ACT and other Economic Opportunities 4 September 2013 Alabama Section American.
MMS Alternative Energy Program November 28, 2007.
Deepwater Horizon: Claims for Impacts to Oyster Industry/Resources under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 Oyster Advisory Committee Meeting October 15, 2010.
March 16, 2011 Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) Update Photo Credit: NOAA.
What will it take to change our destructive ways before it is too late?
Oil Spill Restoration Planning – Part 1 (RESTORE Act, NRDA, SEPs) Kyle Graham Deputy Executive Director CPRA 8/22/2012 committed to our coast.
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) CPRA Update January 26, 2011 restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research.
1990 AMENDED IN DECEMBER. 29, 2000 TULLY BURGOON Oil Pollution Act (OPA)
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Fish and Fisheries Working Group John Hayse North Aleutian.
Human Impact on Ecosystems
Natural Resources Damages under the Oil Pollution Act Opportunities for Creative Restoration.
Minerals Management Service *MMS manages the oil and gas development of Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lands, about 1.5 billion acres. *OCS produces about.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
NRDs 101 Vicky Peters Colorado Attorney General’s Office.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
Module 9: Natural Resource Assessment and Damages (NRD)
NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES FUNDAMENTALS Joan P. Snyder Stoel Rives, LLP Presented to Oregon Association of Environmental Professionals October 9, 2003.
Impact Analysis 2. Impact Prediction. Environmental Impacts The change in an environmental parameter, which results from a particular activity or intervention.
Coral Reefs.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
NATURAL RESOUCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND RESTORATION Shelly Hall – Assistant Solicitor Branch of Environmental Restoration Branch of Environmental Restoration.
NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT CPRA Meeting July 28, 2010 Presented By: Samuel W. Plauché Plauché & Stock, LLP Stephanie C. Morris Special Counsel.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
DEEPWATER HORIZON $1B EARLY RESTORATION AGREEMENT Governor’s Advisory Commission May 11, 2010.
OPRC Level 3 Spill Response Objectives and Policy Issues.
It’s More Than Just A Spill By: Joseph Leonard and Maren Harding.
Patterns and Processes in Human Coastal Development** **Presentation based on: Bookman, C.A., T.J. Culliton and M.A. Warren Trends in U. S. Coastal.
GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.
Presented by: William H. Hyatt, Jr. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP One Newark Center Newark, New Jersey
OPRC Level 3 Termination of Response. OPRC Level 3 2 Outline Reasons for clean-up Options for clean-up Factors affecting the decision to terminate operations.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Legal Issues in Connecticut: Environmental Issues 2006 Connecticut Commercial Real Estate Conference November 9, 2006 Andrew N. Davis, Ph.D., Esq.
Natural Resources Damage Liability and Litigation
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA)
Determining and Scaling Habitat Services
Minerals Management Service
Washington State Department of Ecology
Environmental Protection Agency
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA)
The Oil Pollution Act (1990)
Hydrographic awareness and the benefits of hydrography
APES Legislation Project
Ricketts Point Human Impact
Presentation transcript:

Natural Resource Damage Assessment Basics; Applicability to Compacts with FSM and RMI Michael Fry Environmental Contaminants Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Honolulu, Hawaii

Natural Resource Damage Assessment  Federal Authorities  Oil Pollution Act of 1990, Section 1006 (b) 15 CFR Part 990 (OPA).  OPA Goal – Make the environment and the public whole for injuries to natural resources and services resulting from an oil release.  OPA not written into Compacts

OPA Goals  Action 1-restore injured resources to baseline (e.g. # dead animals, acres of wetland, restoration of coral).  Action 2-compensate public for interim lost services (e.g. # lost days to tourism, loss of food chain source).

Phases of an Natural Resource Damage Assessment  An OPA incident has occurred  Agency -“Determination of Jurisdiction”  No exclusionary criteria apply (e.g. military emergency, public vessel)  Trust Resources of agencies are at risk as a result

Spill Responders-Gather Initial NRDA Data NRDA 3 Phases 1. Pre-assessment-ephemeral data. 2. Restoration A. Injury Assessment B. Cost Valuation C. Restoration Planning 3. Restoration Implementation

Identifying Resources at Risk  Circumstances of the incident –location, condition of the vessel or facility, environmental conditions  Characteristics of the discharge – type of product, source, time, duration, and volume of release

Resources at Risk  Characteristics of the natural resources – species and habitat types, sensitive life stages, unique ecological components  Potential for injury – exposure, pathways, causal mechanisms, and availability of procedures and data

Potential Data To Be Collected During a Spill  Injured resources  Response injuries  Lost services  Short-term impacts  Long-term impacts

Injured Resources  Commercial Fisheries  Oiled birds  Lost recreation  Coral Reef and habitat  Fish  Forage for birds

Response Injuries  Added damage to coral  Introduced invasive species  Salvage debris

Example M/V Cape Flattery Grounding  Initial grounding scar and broken coral heads.  Response injury- towing cable destruction anchor scar

Calculating Damages and Funding Restoration  Responsible Party has obligation to compensate the public for injuries, both economic and natural resource losses.  Several methods to value damages: –Economic losses –Lost use of resources –Habitat Equivalency Analysis –Costs of restoration

% Services Time Incident Baseline Quantification of Lost Services Natural Recovery Permanent Injury

Sum of Lost Services

Restoration Action Funding Restoration with RP Settlement Funds

Calculated Restoration Benefit Using Settlement to Benefit Natural Resources