EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

Mission Statement Benedictine Values The Business Division
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
The Influence of the University/College/Department Mission How your university and department’s missions influence your engineering degree requirements.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT FIRST SEMESTER 2014/2015 Medical Equipment Department November 2015.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
AL Maaref University The Road Ahead FBA Student Induction Day Hussin Jose Hejase, PhD March 4, 2016.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
Links between Mission Statement, PEO, PO and CO
Presentation transcript:

EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria Rogers, ABET

Outline ABET 2000 assessment process Program Educational Objectives (POE) – 2011 Version UT Mission Statement UT COE Mission Statement Key Points pertaining to POEs Sample POEs EECS POEs

Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate For an explanation of the different elements, click on the mouse to advance through the model.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Assessment planning begins with the institutional mission statement. The institutional mission statement describes the communities that are served, institutional purposes and other characteristics that define the institution.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Educational objectives are statements that describe the expected accomplishments of graduates during the first few years after graduation—usually 3- 5 years. These objectives should be consistent with the mission of the program and the institution.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Educational objectives need to be assessed and evaluated periodically. This is generally done through alumni, employer, recruiter, and/or advisory board assessment. The objectives should be evaluated on a systematic basis to determine their continued relevance to the needs of constituents. This evaluation should be done every 3-5 years.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Learning outcomes are statements that describe what students are expected to know and/or be able to do by the time of graduation. If students have achieved these outcomes, it is anticipated that they will be able to achieve the educational objectives after graduation.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Performance criteria are those statements which define the learning outcomes. These criteria are high level indicators that represent the knowledge, skills, attitudes or behavior students should be able to demonstrate by the time of graduation that indicate competence related to the outcome.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Understanding the alignment between educational practices and strategies promotes efficient and effective assessment practices. This can be accomplished by mapping educational strategies (which could include co-curricular activities) to learning outcomes.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Strategies for data collection and analysis need to be developed that are consistent with the assessment question, resources available, appropriate validity and utility of findings.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate Evaluation is the process that is used to determine the meaning of the assessment results. This includes the implications of assessment results related to program effectiveness and recommendations for improvement. Evaluation should include those who can implement improvement strategies.

Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation of Evidence Assessment for Quality Assurance Educational Practices/Strategies Constituents Learning Outcomes © 2003 Gloria Rogers - Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Educational Objectives Assess/ Evaluate The feedback process is critical to creating and maintaining a systematic quality assurance system. When successfully implemented, all elements of the quality assurance process interact with one another.

ABET Criterion 2. Program Educational Objectives (2011) Program educational objectives are broad statements that describe what graduates are expected to attain within a few years of graduation. Program educational objectives are based on the needs of the program’s constituencies. The program must have in place published program educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution, the needs of the program’s various constituencies, and these criteria. There must be a documented and effective process, involving program constituencies, for the periodic review and revision of these program educational objectives.

UT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of The University of Toledo is  to improve the human condition;  to advance knowledge through excellence in learning, discovery and engagement; and  to serve as a diverse, student-centered public metropolitan research university.

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MISSION STATEMENT In our unique role as the comprehensive engineering school in Northwest Ohio, the University of Toledo College of Engineering provides outstanding undergraduate and graduate programs to educate the leaders of tomorrow. We are committed to leadership in the creation and transfer of new knowledge and technologies through the efforts of a diverse faculty, staff and student body. Source: COE Strategic Plan (cited April 2009)

Program Educational Objectives Key Points Attainable within a few years of graduation Measurable Separate for BSEE and BSCSE degree programs Definition revised for 2011 and beyond by ABET Samples following are NOT necessarily compliant with the new definition.

PURDUE – EE & CE The objective of the BSEE and BSCmpE degree programs is to prepare graduates who will be successful in their chosen career paths. Specifically, graduates of these programs will be capable of achieving success in post-undergraduate studies as evidenced by: – satisfaction with the decision to further their education – advanced degrees earned – professional visibility (e.g., publications, presentations, patents, inventions, awards, etc.) – international activities (e.g., participation in international conferences, collaborative research, employment abroad, etc.) and/or success in their chosen profession as evidenced by: – career satisfaction – promotions/raises – professional visibility (e.g., publications, presentations, patents, inventions, awards, etc.) – entrepreneurial activities – international activities (e.g., participation in international conferences, collaborative research, employment abroad, etc.)

UCLA – CS & CSE Educational objectives are as follows: For CS—make valuable contributions to design, development, and production in the practice of computer science and related engineering or application areas, particularly in software systems and algorithmic methods. For CS&E—make valuable contributions to design, development and production in the practice of computer science and computer engineering in related engineering areas or application areas, and at the interface of computers and physical systems. Demonstrate strong communication skills and the ability to function effectively as part of a team. Demonstrate a sense of societal and ethical responsibility in all professional endeavors. Engage in professional development or post-graduate education to pursue flexible career paths amid future technological changes.

OSU – Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering Program Educational Objectives (updated 4/3/07) Graduates can apply electrical engineering principles to solve engineering problems and to address the technological challenges of the future based on a solid foundation in circuits, systems, electromagnetics and devices. Graduates can apply modern electrical engineering techniques, tools, and practices to create and apply technologies to meet the needs of society. Graduates have developed an appreciation for, and an ability to engage in their life-long learning process. Graduates are also well prepared for graduate school to further their education. Graduates become effective engineers in the workplace of the future or otherwise use the foundation of their technical education to progress in their career.

OSU – Computer Engineering Computer Engineering Program Educational Objectives (updated 4/3/07) Graduates can apply computer engineering principles to solve engineering problems and to address the technological challenges of the future based on a solid foundation in circuits, systems and computer hardware and software. Graduates can apply modern computer engineering techniques, tools, and practices to create and apply technologies to meet the needs of society. Graduates have developed an appreciation for, and an ability to engage in their life-long learning process. Graduates are also well prepared for graduate school to further their education. Graduates become effective engineers in the workplace of the future or otherwise use the foundation of their technical education to progress in their career.

University of Toledo - EECS Electrical Engineering Program Objectives Upon completion of the University of Toledo's Electrical Engineering program: 1.Graduates have the ability to engage in a successful professional career in Electrical Engineering. 2.Graduates are equipped for lifelong contribution to the electrical engineering profession. Computer Science and Engineering Program Objectives Upon completion of the University of Toledo's Computer Science and Engineering program: 1.Graduates possess a strong foundation in computer science and computer engineering. 2.Graduates are employable in the computer science and computer engineering professions. 3.Graduates perform professionally and ethically in the workplace. 4.Graduates are well prepared to pursue graduate studies.