Formal Observation Administrator schedules and conducts one Formal Observation (50 Minutes). Administrator uses the Formative Classroom Analysis form to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
PORTFOLIO.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
So, What IS a Standards-based
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 2 March 15, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure your.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 School Counseling Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY11-12
Differentiated Supervision
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 1 February 22, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Process Studying the Standards Marlo Mong
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 Guidance Services Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
+ Literature Review: Domain B Authors: Nancy Safer & Steve Fleischman Title: How Schools Improve, “Research Matters / How Student Progress Monitoring Improves.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
CLASS KeysTM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010
Georgia Department of Education
CLASS Keys™ Strands and Elements
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
GA Association of School Personnel Administrators
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Formal Observation Administrator schedules and conducts one Formal Observation (50 Minutes). Administrator uses the Formative Classroom Analysis form to provide feedback on many of the elements. 1 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys

Post-Observation Feedback Written post-observation feedback should be provided to the teacher for all formal (and informal observations) within five working days of the observation. All feedback should be related to the teacher’s performance on the twenty-six elements of the CLASS Keys and the GTDR. Post-Observation Conferences are required for the formal observation. 2 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys

TIMELINE 3 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys

Triangulation with an Array of Evidence over Time Multiple Sources of Data Multiple Performances Multiple People 4 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 12/4/2008

In the CLASS Keys Evaluation System, the collection of evidence for the 26 elements could be viewed as a “filling of buckets” over time. The Annual Evaluation Conference addresses how full each “bucket” has become during the entire year. 5 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 12/4/2008

The Annual Evaluation The evaluation of performance occurs at the ELEMENT level. Elements scores are aggregated to form STRANDS rating. To be Satisfactory, ALL STRANDS must be “Emerging” or higher. 6 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 12/4/2008

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Annual Classroom Analysis Form Teacher: Evaluator: NE=Not Evident, EM=Emerging, PR=Proficient, EX=ExemplarySchool: School Year: CURRICULUM and PLANNING - A system for managing and facilitating student achievement and learning based upon consensus-driven content and performance standards. Prior Eval. Date: Current Eval. 2/15/09 Situational or contextual factors: Comments on this form reflect the current annual evaluation. Curriculum and Planning Teacher Standard 1: The teacher makes decisions about planning that demonstrate a deep understanding of content knowledge, pedagogy, and GPS implementation. CP 1.1 The teacher plans instruction that reflects strong knowledge of both content and effective instructional delivery. EX CP 1.2 The teacher demonstrates a clear understanding of GPS by appropriately planning for what students are expected to know, understand, and do in the grade level and content area. EM CP 1.3 The teacher plans instruction that is interdisciplinary and makes connections to the real world. NE Curriculum and Planning Teacher Standard 2: The teacher uses appropriate tools and strategies for planning that will help all learners master the GPS and meet district expectations for learning. CP 2.1 The teacher utilizes the GPS as reflected by the written school curriculum, including the learning framework, scope and sequence, maps, units, and guides, to plan instruction and assessments. PR CP 2.2 The teacher uses an organizing framework for instructional planning to support standards-based instruction. EM CP 2.3 The teacher plans assessments to measure students’ progress toward and mastery of the GPS. NE Comments: NE=Not Evident2 x 0 =0 Strand Performance Key: EM= Emerging2 x 1 = = Exemplary PR= Proficient1 x 2 = = Proficient EX= Exemplary1 x 3 = = Emerging Strand Total Points = Not Evident Strand Performance Level EMERGING 7 9/10/2008 7

CLASS Keys AL 1.1 The teacher uses diagnostic assessment strategies to identify individual and class strengths, misconceptions, and areas of weaknesses in order to inform planning. NE AL 1.2 The teacher uses formative assessment strategies to monitor student progress and to adjust instruction in order to maximize student achievement on the GPS. EM AL 1.3 The teacher uses a variety of summative assessments strategies to evaluate student status relative to mastery of GPS. PR AL 2.1 The teacher uses assessment data in a timely and systematic manner to design and implement appropriate interventions that enable continuous improvement for all students. EX 0 pts 1 pts 2 pts 3 pts ASSESSMENT for LEARNING STRAND

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Strand Performance Key: pts = Exemplary 6 – 9 pts = Proficient pts = Emerging 0 – 1 pts = Not Evident 6 Total Points for the entire Assessment Strand

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT - Student Achievement Standard 1: The teacher has a positive impact on student learning and academic achievement. Prior Eval. Date: Current Eval. 2/25/09 Situational or contextual factors: Comments on this form reflect the current evaluation. Student Achievement Teacher Standard 1: The teacher has a positive impact on student learning and academic achievement. SA 1.1 Students taught by the teacher demonstrate GPS-related academic achievement progress on measures of student learning including state- mandated achievement tests or other measures as determined by the school system (e.g. teacher- developed assessments, department or district common assessments, benchmark tests, student work samples, portfolios, etc.). ? SA 1.2 Students taught by the teacher of content areas not addressed by the GPS demonstrate academic achievement progress on measures of student learning as determined by the school system (e.g. teacher-developed assessments, department or district common assessments, benchmark tests, student work samples, portfolios, etc.). 10 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 10

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Student Achievement Teacher Standard 1: The teacher has a positive impact on student learning and academic achievement. SA 1.1 Students taught by the teacher demonstrate GPS-related academic achievement progress on measures of student learning including state-mandated achievement tests or other measures as determined by the school system (e.g. teacher-developed assessments, department or district common assessments, benchmark tests, student work samples, portfolios, etc.).  Not Evident  Emerging  Proficient  Exemplary Continuum of Improvement There is no quantifiable evidence that student achievement has increased, based on pre- and post- assessments using measures identified by the school district. There is quantifiable evidence that student achievement has increased, but has not met the established benchmark identified by the school district. There is quantifiable evidence that student achievement has met the benchmark based on pre- and post- assessments using measures identified by the school district. There is quantifiable evidence that student achievement has exceeded the benchmarks based on multiple measures of student learning including pre-and post- measures identified by the school district. 11 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 11

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys STRANDANNUAL RATING Curriculum and PlanningPROFICIENT Standards-Based InstructionPROFICIENT Assessment of Student LearningPROFICIENT Student Achievement EMERGING ProfessionalismEMERGING

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities (GTDR) Mark Y if performance is satisfactory. Mark N if performance is unsatisfactory. Mark NA if data is not assessed at this time. YNNA 1. Models correct use of language, oral and written. YNNA 10. Demonstrates ethical behavior. (See PSC Code of Ethics in the Appendix.) YNNA 2. Provides adequate information, plans, and materials for substitute teacher. YNNA 11. Works cooperatively with school administrators, special support personnel, colleagues, and families. YNNA 3. Enforces regulations concerning student conduct and discipline. YNNA 12. Attends and participates in faculty meetings and other assigned meetings and activities according to school policy. YNNA 4. Assumes responsibility for supervising students in out-of-class settings on campus and while away from the building on school related activities. YNNA13. Reports to work as assigned. YNNA 5. Follows system and/or school-prescribed assessment strategies and procedures. YNNA 14. Interacts in a professional manner with students, family members, staff, and school leaders. YNNA 6. Maintains accurate records to document student performance. YNNA 15. Complies with conditions as stated in the teacher's contract. YNNA 7. Assumes responsibility for the safety and good order of the total school program. YNNA 16. Mitigates deficiencies through an Improvement Plan. YNNA 8. Maintains confidentiality of students and students' records. YNNA 17. Implements a Professional Growth Plan (PGP) each year. YNNA 9. Maintains accurate, complete, and appropriate records and submits reports as required. YNNA Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities (GTDR) Comments: 13 CLASS Keys 13

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Greater understanding of standards-based practices More feedback for teachers Greater focus on instruction by administrators Better direction for professional learning Better direction for school improvement Better teacher-administrator relationships Frequent common assessments 14 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys CLASS Keys will leverage other changes.

9/10/2008CLASS Keys 15 A common understanding of key concepts (such as differentiation and formative assessment) is shared by our leaders and instructional staff. Our school has adopted/developed an assessment infrastructure that can be used for periodic monitoring of student achievement and teacher accountability. A culture of high expectations and collegiality exists in which adults collaborate and model continuous learning. Is our school ready for the CLASS Keys?

CLASS Keys 16 I have an understanding of the School Keys. I understand effective instructional practices. I have experience using rubrics. I have experience observing and assessing staff. I have experience giving feedback to teachers. I have effective conferencing skills. Am I ready for the CLASS Keys?

9/10/2008CLASS Keys 17 Reviewing/Studying the elements to come to a common understanding of what they look like in practice. Using the elements as “LOOK-FORs” during walkthroughs. Using the elements for peer observations. Developing common assessments. How some are preparing for the CLASS Keys

Bobby Smith Karen Wyler Beth Johnston Lois Landy Susan McGlohon

CLASS Keys Region 1 Beth Johnston Region 2 Lois Landy Region 3 Karen Wyler Region 4 Bobby Smith Region 5 Susan McGlohon Contact Information 19 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Veta New Director Teacher Quality Diane Bradford, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent Education Support and Improvement