Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Best Laid Plans: EOC Projections, Results and Consequences Best Laid Plans: EOC Projections, Results and Consequences

Brief History Projections: Districts, Teachers, Students Results: Impact on Districts, Teachers, Students Consequences: Districts, Teachers, Students

Voluntary EOC ca Required EOC ca Required TAKS Voluntary EOC Required EOC with 15% requirement 2012 Suspended 15% requirement 2012, 2013 Removed 15% requirement 2013 Removed cumulative score 2013

Legislation Decisions STAAR 15% Moratorium on 15% Live tests Release of EOC results EOC to TAKS bridge study EOC as part of 2013 Accountability

Live Tests Release of EOC results Bridge Study Release

EOC as part of 2013 Accountability AYP? Removal of 15% Removal of cumulative score Snapshot change-Summer to Spring testers Retesters count over multiple years Released test items in 2012, 2013

Mandatory Sampling Data file (who will test) Sending Receiving Live testing mixed with mandatory sampling Makeup testing

Storing Student EOC Information: Multiple Retakes Which Passing Standard? 4x4 Graduation Plan vs. HB 5 Students who took Algebra I out of state Field Test Results with Other Test Results

Accelerated Instruction: District required to provide for all students not achieving Level 2 on EOC How to notify student in a timely manner? How can we remediate with students when we do not yet receive detailed results? TEA: “Sufficient funding exists”

EOC MathTAKS Math Obj_score_m ath1 raw_score_m athm_obj1m_raw EOC math Obj_score_m ath1 Pearson Correlation **.315 **.503 ** Sig. (2-tailed).000 N Obj_score_ math7 N raw_score_m ath Pearson Correlation.793 ** **.582 ** Sig. (2-tailed).000 N TAKS Math m_obj1Pearson Correlation.315 **.369 ** ** m_rawPearson Correlation.503 **.582 **.687 ** 1 Sig. (2-tailed).000 N **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

District and State Results: EOC StateHumble Students Average Scale Level I not min 9.8% 4.3% Level I minimum 7.5% 4.3% Level II 66.0% 68.6% Level III 16.7% 22.7%

9 th grade 8 th grade Level II % 99.4% Level II % 99.3% Level III % 46.3% Level III % 45.1%

State (all students) Failing TAKS 10% but 17.3 % below Level II District (all students) Failing TAKS at 2.4% but 8.6% below Level II

June 2013© Moak, Casey and Associates22 Source: TEA, Target = 50Target = 5 th Percentile Target = 55Target = 75

Index 1: All students 50% at Level II Index 2: Top 95% of campuses have students that make progress Index 3: Lowest 3 groups in 2012 are at 55% in 2013 Index 4: Final Level 2+Grad>150

EOC Algebra: part of Index 1,2,3,4 MS Algebra success—eliminated HS success?

Increased phase in standards New EOC teaching materials Accelerated instruction each time Accountability by class period Value-added model: teacher name to student

June 2013© Moak, Casey and Associates27 Source: TEA Accountability Manual

High stakes in middle school? Summer school/Accelerated instruction Additional testing Graduation type: 4x4 vs. HB 5

AYP, State Accountability HS Math courses: how many, which? Money-Summer school/accelerated instruction budget

Contact information Warren Roane, Director of Accountability Mary Kay Gianoutsos, Assistant Director of Data Quality

PowerPoint Information