Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
Advertisements

GIS Data in Real-Time Transit Management Systems 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Conference St. Petersburg, FL, September 14, 2011.
1. Green Lights Program Objectives Improve Quality of Synchronization in a Short Timeframe Noticeable Improvements to Motorists Appropriate Allocation.
Elements of a Microprocessor system Central processing unit. This performs the arithmetic and logical operations, such as add/subtract, multiply/divide,
.nowNAZTEC 1. Overview AGENDA Benefits Algorithm Simulation 2 Case Studies Real-time adaptive traffic control system Adjusts signal timing based on current.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
1. We can’t promise all green lights… …but we can minimize the number of red lights, stops and delays.
ACS-Lite Split Tuning Algorithm. Collect data Correlate data to signal phasing Perform analysis Implement phase split adjustments.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Miroslav Vujic University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 10 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN 8.2. Public Transport Priority and Traveler.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Metro’s Countywide Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
ITS To Streamline Development Review 2012 ITE Western District Annual Meeting Santa Barbara, California June Presented by Chun Wong Transportation.
MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO October 22, 2003.
Euclid Corridor Design TRB BRT Workshop July 21, 2008.
Experience Implementing PORTAL: Portland Transportation Archive Listing Andrew M. Byrd Andy Delcambre Steve Hansen Portland State University TransNow 2.
Advanced Traveler Information System ATIS. What are Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ? The application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics,
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Electronic Fare Collection CEE582. Vehicle-Based Systems (Fixed-Route) Exterior Route and Destination Announcements Electronic Destination Sign Vehicle.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
Peter Koonce TRB Annual Meeting January 9, 2005 Best Practices for Signal Operations Best Practices for Signal Operations – Lessons Learned from the Portland.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
2008 Bicycle Involved Traffic Collisions 1581 Total Collisions* * Reported to the Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System (SWITRS)
Civitas Workshop –Effective solutions for green urban transport 24 April 2012 Athens Alan Lewis, TTR on behalf of: Lars Elgaard Thomsen, Public Transport.
ITS in Urban Transport Projects assisted by JASPERS Budapest – 17 June 2010.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
Bus Management System in SEOUL Metropolitan Area.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Jump Starting ITS Deployment in Los Angeles County using Wireless Communications Lessons Learned.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
BRT in India Delhi Case study. What is Delhi HCBS Delhi HCBS is not a BRT system. It is primarily a road infrastructure project. It was not conceived.
1 Regional Integration Across Jurisdictions and Modes: San Diego IMTMS ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting Palm Springs, CA Session 9 - June 4, 2007.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Southwest Washington ITS Traffic Data Collection & Analysis: A Tale of 3 Projects Jill MacKay ITE Traffic Simulation Roundtable October 4, 2012.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
Oscar Figueroa P. Universidad Católica de Chile Reducing the Impact of Vehicles on Air and Environment Quality in Cities ISSUES AND ACHIEVEMENTS ON TRANSPORTATION.
New York State DOT Statewide Perspective BRT Project Development Lessons Learned from Los Angeles Site Visit.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
1 Adaptive Control Software – Lite (ACS-Lite) Eddie Curtis, P.E. FHWA Resource Center / HOTM NTOC Webcast March 27, 2008.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Real-time Bus Information on Mobile Devices Stuart D. Maclean, Daniel J. Dailey ITS Research Program University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Traffic Signals & ITS to Encourage Walking & Cycling
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Cleveland HealthLine Bus Rapid Transit Kenneth G. Sislak, Associate Vice President; Manager of Transit/Rail.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
Intelligent Transportation System
D Line Station Plan Overview
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
M14A/D Select Bus Service
Erasmus Intensive Program
GREAT TRANSIT RIDER EXPERIENCE
Presentation transcript:

Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Presentation at the ITS America’s 2007 Annual Meeting June 4, 2007

Page 1 Metro Rapid System Map

Page 2 Metro Rapid Program 4 new lines per year Completed Metro Rapid lines (17 corridors) o Wilshire-Whittier o Ventura o South Broadway o Vermont o Florence o Van Nuys o Crenshaw o Soto o Vernon-La Cienega o Hawthorne o Hollywd-Fairfax-Pasadena o Beverly o Lincoln o Western o Reseda o Santa Monica o Long Beach

Page 3 Metro Rapid Program Future Rapid Lines o Sepulveda (north) o Central o San Fernando-Lankershim o Pico o West Olympic o Garvey-Chavez o Manchester o San Fernando (south) o Sepulveda (south) o Torrance-Long Beach With a goal of 27 corridors by end of 2008

Page 4 Metro Orange Line Busway

Page 5 Metro Orange Line Balboa Station

Page 6 LADOT’s Transit Priority System (TPS) A centralized signal priority system Fully integrated with the City’s Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS) Reduce bus delays at signalized intersections with minimal impacts on cross streets – “smart” priority Provide real-time bus arrival information Track bus performance throughout the system

TPS Physical Architecture

Page 8 Bus Detection Selected loop-transponder based on field tests of 3 different technologies Inductive loops placed in the roadway serve as antennas to receive bus transponder identification code Advance (check-in) detector just past upstream bus stop Release (check-out) detector just prior to limit line or within the intersection

Page 9 Bus Transponder Transponder

Page 10 Street Embedded Loop Sensor

Page 11 Sensor Card

Page 12 Model 2070 Traffic Controller

Page 13 Bus Priority Operation EARLY GREEN - Phase is started earlier than normal to minimize delays to stopped or approaching buses GREEN EXTENSION - Phase continues past normal endpoint to help buses pass through critical intersections PHASE HOLD - Phase held in green until bus arrives, typically used for left turns.

Page 14 Normal Cycle

Page 15 Early Green Cycle

Page 16 Green Extension Cycle

Page 17 Central System Architecture 2070 Controller Comm. Network TPS Server (Transit Priority Manager) LAN/WAN TPS Workstation Sensor Input Sensor Input Sensor Input Database Web Server

Page 18 LADOT’S ATSAC Control Center

Page 19 MTA’S Bus Dispatch Center Monitor bus performance Radio communication with bus operators Real time bus data provided by LADOT ATSAC video & camera control access

Page 20 TPS Map Client Software

Page 21 TPS Real-Time Data Collection Signal Priority Real-time Graphical Displays Real-time Data Logging Transit Report And Query (iTRAQ) Web Server Transit Priority Manager (TPM)

Page 22 iTRAQ Web Interface

Page 23

Page 24 TPS Reports

Page 25 Bus Travel Time Analysis

Page 26 TPS Performance Benefits Analyzed more than 2000 bus trips and run time data along the corridors The Metro Rapid Buses achieved a 25% reduction in total travel time Transit Priority System alone contributed to 30% of the total travel time saving Bus delays at signalized intersections were reduced by 33-39% Minimal impacts on cross street traffic

Page 27 Impacts on Cross Traffic Average of 1 second per vehicle per cycle increase in delay to the cross traffic Change was measured over three time periods: AM, midday and PM peaks The Level of Service did not change as a result of the Transit Priority System At some locations timing was changed to provide additional cross street green time

Page 28 Passenger Information System Developed by LADOT Based on bus detection Uses actual travel time Accurate to 1 min

Page 29 Mobile Internet Passenger Systems (MIPS)

Page 30 Mobile Internet Passenger Systems

Page 31

Page 32 Lessons Learned Start with a demonstration project first before full implementation Use proven technologies and keep it simple Design to minimize impacts on cross street traffic Do not underestimate the local controller software work and the interface with existing traffic control systems Be ready to compromise on bus stop locations