2D velocity benchmark – EAGE 2004 Frédéric Billette BP EPTG - Advanced Imaging Team 501 Westlake Park boulevard Houston, TX 77079 - USA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Well-Seismic Ties Lecture 7 Depth Time Synthetic Trace SLIDE 1
Advertisements

Seismic Reflections Lecture Shot Receiver Seismic Record
Rune Hagelund, WesternGeco Stewart A. Levin, Halliburton
SEG Post-Convention Workshop SEAM Phase 1: Initial results Technical and Operational Overview of the SEAM Phase I Project Michael Fehler.
Wedge Modeling HRS-9 Hampson-Russell Software
Introduction to SIRDAS.Net Slides for workshop with Statkraft March 10, 2011 Espen Halsaa Albrektsen
Survey Planning & Illumination with NORSAR-3D
UNLOCKING THE SECRETS HIDDEN IN YOUR DATA Part 3 Data Analysis.
Think & Solve Problems Chapter 26
Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
University Physics: Waves and Electricity Ch15. Simple Harmonic Motion Lecture 2 Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
Properties of Waves Chapter 12 Section 3.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
Supergranulation Scale Solar Surface Convection Simulations Dali Georgobiani Michigan State University Presenting the results of Bob Stein (MSU) & Åke.
Seismogram Relation between seismic trace and geology Wavelets
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman Radar Meteorology M. D. Eastin.
Waves and Sound Ch
SEG 3-D Elastic Salt Model
Waves.
Call for poster We offer a poster sessions on the break. The organizing committee is pleased to invite you to present a poster at the workshop. Poster.
Cross-over Seismology : Blurring the line between passive and active source experiments Diego Quiros Cornell University.
Frequency domain Finite Difference Modelling : Examples.
BP AIT D velocity benchmark
READING QUIZ Sound waves can travel in air but not in outer space
Bell Work: Left figure shows strobe photographs taken of a disk moving from left to right under different conditions. The time interval between images.
Q.iMPACT WebEx Session #4: Getting help, where, who & when Scott Haimerl, Mettler-Toledo Q.i Product Manager July 17, 2008 Batching Productivity with:
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
Objectives  Develop position-time graphs for moving objects.  Use a position-time graph to interpret an object’s position or displacement.  Make motion.
The Experimental Comparison of Conventional and Differential Semblance on several data sets Jintan Li Rice University.
1 Animations from: Wikipedia and WAVES Antonio J. Barbero, Mariano.
What is the graph about? Is it linear? AMSTI-Bouncing Balls.
BP AIT D velocity benchmark Frederic Billette – AIT Houston Copyright s BP America Inc. - No release, transfer, license, sell, trade or otherwise.
Author: Holly Clark Date: May 2015 Supporting Authors: Ralph A. Stephen, Gopu R. Potty, James H. Miller Wave Propagation in Muddy Sediments using Time.
PMO Advisors, LLC PMO Advisor © Release 2.1. The PMO Advisor Portal The PMO Advisor is a gateway to Project Management tools. This portal has two primary.
University Physics: Waves and Electricity
V f λ.
1. Calculate the distance the wave travels in 3 minute if the velocity is 9 m/s and the wavelength is 6 m.
WAVELET TUTORIAL GENERATION OF DESIGNATURE OPERATORS.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management SMT Update To AMWG March 22, 2016.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Papia Nandi-Dimitrova Education Rice University, PhD Geophysics 2012-Present University of Wyoming, MS Geophysics2005 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
Buy Kitchen Appliances Online - Eastwest INTL
Speed Formula - Waves.
R. G. Pratt1, L. Sirgue2, B. Hornby2, J. Wolfe3
Top Best Rice Cookers in 2017
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Multi-dimensional depth imaging without an adequate velocity model
Sisgbee2b / Data Release
17-Nov-18 Parallel 2D and 3D Acoustic Modeling Application for hybrid computing platform of PARAM Yuva II Abhishek Srivastava, Ashutosh Londhe*, Richa.
Characteristics of Waves
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Seismic-Well Tie Flow-Chart
Comparison of Seismic and Well Data
Measurements In Time and In Depth
Typical Vertical Resolution
24.2 Speed of Waves.
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
How Local Is the Local Field Potential?
Powerpoint Jeopardy! Wave Basics Types of Waves
Equations and Problem Solving
This Poster Template is Provided By ICLS2019
This Poster Template is Provided By ICLS2019
Depth-Time Graphs – Higher – GCSE Questions – AQA
Presentation transcript:

2D velocity benchmark – EAGE 2004 Frédéric Billette BP EPTG - Advanced Imaging Team 501 Westlake Park boulevard Houston, TX USA Tel.: Fax: With a team of: Sverre Brandsberg-Dahl, John Etgen, Carl Regone & Ganyuan Xia - BP EPT Houston

Complex velocity model building benchmark Goal: snapshot of the state of the art in complex velocity model building. Results will have the opportunity to be presented during the next EAGE meeting in Paris, June Model and data are wholly owned by BP and the attached data release agreement must be signed and returned Data are available for ftp download (7 < 2Gb files) as well as on 3590E or DLT4 tape (contact for details). Data are in SEGY format and total file size is ~ 14Gb.

Data modeling 2D dataset (all Y=0) Finite difference acoustic modeling (variable velocity & density) Free surface (surface-related multiples are present) Vertical derivative of the pressure is recorded. Frequency peak is 27Hz and data can be whitened up to 54Hz The wavelength is causal and has not been 0 phased (see typical trace below), time delay can be estimated considering the zero offset traces.

Data acquisition 1348 shots (200 x 6 files x 1 file for ftp) First shot X = 50m Last shot X = Shot interval = 50m Source depth = 12.5m 2001 time samples - Sample rate = 6ms - First sample = 0ms 1201 receivers First shot: First receiver X= m First shot: Last receiver X = 50m (0 offset) Receiver interval = 12.5m Receiver elevation = 0m S1S2 S1348 Simulates a boat pass from left to right (towards increasing X) Note: there is a –10 scaler noted in the SEGY headers (XYScaler=-10) for the source and receiver X and Y (meaning positions are in cm). The source depth is an integer in the SEGY file: Zsource = 12m but is in reality 12.5m X

Model used to generate the data Origin X = 0m Number of X logs = X increment = 6.25m Origin Z = 0m Number of samples = 1911 Sample increment = 6.25m First or last traces are duplicated as many times as needed when the receiver spread is outside the model X Z

Deliverables described in the next page and any questions should be directed to: Frédéric Billette BP EPTG - Advanced Imaging Team 501 Westlake Park boulevard Houston, TX USA Tel : (1)

Deliverables by April 9 th, 2004 A short abstract describing the methodology and the results. A velocity model in SEGY format as described below: X Z Origin X = 0m Number of traces = 5399 Trace increment = 12.5m Origin Z = 0m Number of samples = 1911 Sample increment = 6.25m Velocities in meter per second

Participation to the workshop Authors will have the opportunity to show their results on a poster during the EAGE workshop (W8) Estimation of accurate velocity macro-models in complex structures (Monday June 7, am – 16.00pm). Authors will be notified of abstract status by May 1 st. During the workshop, results may be compared but only without mention of the author (Model A, Model B, …).