JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Office of Special Education Services Instructional Leaders Roundtable Oct. 16, 2014 John R. Payne, Director.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
MPRRC U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Special Education Technical Assistance Resources for Charter Schools.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
California IDEA Reauthorization Summit California Department of Education Committed to Improving Results Alice D. Parker, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
The IEP Process MAASE New Administrators Workshop October 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) Bidder’s Webinar.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Elizabeth Evans Getzel Virginia Commonwealth University
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Research Program Strategic Plan
Guam Department of Education
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
SPR&I Regional Training
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Roles and Responsibilities
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Getting Everyone Together:
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5, 2007

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction ISES Purpose Bring together California stakeholders to learn and discuss the update to the State Performance Plan (SPP) and the Annual Performance Report (APR).

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Meeting Outcomes Stakeholders will be… 1.Knowledgeable regarding the SPP/APR information and provide targeted recommendations on the SPP/APR improvement activities to CDE. 2.Aware of new federal grant activities and obtain an update on the current State Improvement Grant (SIG2) training and technical assistance activities.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Our Continued Work Stakeholder roles and responsibilities remainsignificant Our work outcomes are… –Improve outcomes for students with disabilities –Ensure qualified staff –Continue our required general supervision activities as a state

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction ISES – Improvement Process ISES is a unified planning and improvement process with stakeholders Continue bi-annual meetings ISES combines the activities of several diverse planning groups to address a variety of state needs based on data… Personnel Development Accountability Monitoring Continue our work with many partners

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction SPP/APR Review Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2004 Required… State Educational Agency (SEA) to annually provide measures and reports on specific outcomes to the United States Department of Education (USDOE) on 20 Indicators Established the State Performance Plan (SPP) –Describes how the state will meet these new requirements –Six year plan Established the Annual Performance Report –Describes how the state met those outcomes described in the SPP –Based on those outcomes, OSEP made status determinations of California (“state IEP”) All state level planning in special education tied to the SPP and State Improvement Grant (SIG)

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Today 1.Update on what’s happened in California – OSEP’s Determinations 2.Hear new information about the State Performance Plan and Annual Performance Report data 3.Hear about what we have learned from the data 4.Hear about some of our targeted activities and overarching and connected improvement activities 5.Spending late morning and the afternoon in workgroups for examining, discussing, and providing recommendations to CDE 6.Hear the top 3 recommendations from each of the workgroups

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Changes New format for the APR improvement activities –Completed –Continuing –Added Streamlined Reduce redundancy of activities Targeted likely relatedness to indicator Identified Indicators that are cross- cutting, overarching

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Partners in Improvement Cross-walk matrix with Indicators and partners of projects, grants, contracts Selected Acronyms Everyone in the room is our partner in improvement

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Turn Around Leadership Michael Fullan 1.Explicit & relentless focus on raising the bar and closing the achievement gap 2.Investment in capacity building strategies at all levels 3.Availability & transparency of data at all levels 4.Investment of financial resources 5.Evolving positive pressure 6.Clear understanding that it is the quality of teachers, individually, how they work together & commitment

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Instructions for Workgroups Workgroup AM Session Select a recorder Select a reporter Review Indicators & Required Measurements Review Benchmarks/Targets Review data/discuss- Q & A

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Instructions for Workgroups Workgroup PM Session Review the improvement activities (completed, continuing, added) Examine, discuss activities Begin your recommendations (record) Use Questions (1-6) “Litmus Test” Select top 3 recommendations to report back to the group

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Today’s Workgroup Topics 1.Strategic Plan for Recruitment, Preparation & Retention of Special Education Professionals 2.Indicators #9 & 10 Disproportionality By Ethnicity & Overall 3.Indicators #6 & 7 Preschool Assessment & Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 4.Indicator #5 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 5.Indicator #8 Parent Involvement 6.Indicators #13 & 14 Transition Goal & Post Secondary Outcomes 7.Compliance Indicators #16 - Complaints #17 - Due Process #18 - Hearing Requests #19 - Mediation

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Organizing Workgroup Ideas & Recommendations Responses and recommendations could address… Policies, procedures, structural changes Inservice Training - Professional Development Recruitment and retention of qualified staff Focused Monitoring and Technical Assistance Data Analysis Research

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Brainstorming to Develop Recommendations for Improvement Strategies Think …What could California … –Complete? Delete? Why? –Continue? For how long? –Scale up?In what way? –Add?Who, what when where and why? Do the strategies address the indicator and required measurement? Is there a likely capacity for the strategies to have obtainable data sources? (describe)

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction “Litmus Test Questions” 1.How is the recommendation aligned to the indicator as being one with a high likelihood of making an impact across the state? Describe 2.How is this recommendation addressing existing needs/gaps based on data? Describe 3.How feasible is this recommendation to implement? Explain. 4.Is this recommendation cost effective? In what way? 5.Is this recommendation linked to and/or leveraged with existing state activities that could supplement/or expand in California? 6.What mechanism(s) are needed to determine whether the recommendation works? (e.g. is there research, evidence-based practices, etc.).

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Prioritize Use dots or other methods to select the most important top 3 recommendations Select the recommendations based on agreement (you can live with it) Record recommendations on flip chart and post Reporter will share wkgroup’s top 3 to larger group

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Reflection & Review 1.Strategic Plan for Recruitment, Preparation & Retention of Special Education Professionals 2.Indicators #9 & 10 Disproportionality By Ethnicity & Overall 3.Indicators #6 & 7 Preschool Assessment & Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 4.Indicator #5 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 5.Indicator #8 Parent Involvement 6.Indicators #13 & 14 Transition Goal & Post Secondary Outcomes 7.Compliance Indicators #16 - Complaints #17 - Due Process #18 - Hearing Requests #19 - Mediation

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Next Steps 1.Please complete & turn in meeting evaluation today 2.Meeting evaluations compiled & placed on CalSTAT website 3.Recommendations compiled & Placed on CalSTAT website Next ISIS Meeting When:June 3, 2008 Where:1500 Capitol Mall Time: 8:30 AM – 3:00 PM

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Thank you Stakeholders!!! See you June 3, 2008