1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Advertisements

TROPHY TRial Of Preventing HYpertension. High-normal BP increases CV risk Vasan RS et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Incidence of CV events in women.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
1 Efficacy of Testosterone Transdermal System (TTS) for Treatment of HSDD in Surgically Menopausal Women on Concomitant Estrogen Daniel Davis, MD, MPH.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2010.
Anti-TNF-  Strategies in CHF: Data from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials Arthritis Advisory Committee March 4, 2003 Ellis F. Unger, M.D. Office.
Women’s Health Study: Vitamin E in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Julie E. Buring.
OVBIAGELE B, DIENER H-C, YUSUF S, ET AL., PROFESS INVESTIGATORS. LEVEL OF SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE WITHIN THE NORMAL RANGE AND RISK OF RECURRENT STROKE.
1 Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Aliza Thompson, MD Medical Officer Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008.
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Part 1: Efficacy and General Safety Evaluation Clinical Evaluation of NDA ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Part 1: Efficacy and General.
Women's Health Study: Low-Dose Aspirin in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Dr.
NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND PANCREATIC CANCER RISK: A NESTED CASE-CONTROL STUDY Marie Bradley, Carmel Hughes, Marie Cantwell and Liam Murray.
Description of fracture with endocrine therapy use in older breast cancer survivors in a population-based setting Taryn Becker 123, Geoff Anderson 123,
Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Luveris ® New Drug Application ( ) Kate Meaker, M.S. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics II Kate Meaker, M.S. Statistical Reviewer Division.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Clinical implications. Burden of coronary disease 56 millions deaths worldwide in millions deaths worldwide in % due to CV disease (~ 16.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
1 Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene STAR Larry Wickerham, MD NSABP STAR Project Officer.
Oral Bisphosphonate and Breast Cancer: Prospective Results from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Chlebowski RT et al. SABCS 2009; Abstract 21.
ONTARGET Risk factors and outcomes associated with nonadherence Background ONTARGET compared the efficacy of the ARB telmisartan, the ACE inhibitor ramipril,
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
TERIPARATIDE (r-hPTH 1-34) Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Holiday Inn, Bethesda MD July 27, 2001 Bruce S. Schneider, MD CDER FDA.
Pulmonary and Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee January 17, 2002 Pulmonary and Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Gaithersburg, Maryland January 17,
Extended Treatment Effects with Zoledronic Acid Based on Poster 1070 “The Effect of 3 Versus 6 Years of Zoledronic Acid Treatment in Osteoporosis: a Randomized.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Food and Drug Administration Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Drug Products Endocrine and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting - Human Recombinant.
VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA.
1 1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Advisory Committee Presentation Gastrointestinal Drugs July 14, 2004.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting November 29, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting April 12, 2007 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
Arthritis Advisory Committee March 4, 2003 Update on the Safety of TNF Blockers Li-ching Liang, M.D. FDA / CBER/ OTRR Arthritis Advisory Committee March.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
B-1 Pravastatin-Aspirin Combination René Belder, M.D. Executive Director Clinical Design and Evaluation, Metabolics Pharmaceutical Research Institute Bristol-Myers.
Advisory Committee Presentation on Vioxx (Rofecoxib) Discussion on the meta analyses for cardiovascular risk assessment Qian Li, Sc. D.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
C-1 Efficacy of the Combination: Meta-Analyses Donald A. Berry, Ph.D. Frank T. McGraw Memorial Chair of Cancer Research University of Texas M.D. Anderson.
HCV Co-infection is Associated with a High Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures Among HIV Patients Roger Bedimo, MD; Henning Drechsler, MD; Song Zhang, PhD;
FDA Review of Clinical Safety Data Omalizumab for treatment of Allergic Asthma Genentech, Inc. FDA/Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Phase 2 Evaluation of Intravitreal Bevacizumab for DME Sponsored by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
Zelnorm ® (tegaserod) Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Gary Della’Zanna, D.O., M.Sc., F.A.C.O.S.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
CON - 1 Conclusions C David R. Parkinson Vice President, Global Head, Clinical Research and Development Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Zometa for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases Protocol 039 Amna Ibrahim, M.D. Oncology Drug Products FDA.
Re-fracture risk in older patients prescribed bisphosphonates Chiara Sorge Rome, 15th October 2012.
Safety, Efficacy and Duration of Effect of RT002, a Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection, to Treat Glabellar Lines: The Phase 2 BELMONT Study Authors:
Carina Signori, DO Journal Club August 2010 Macdonald, M. et al. Diabetes Care; Jun 2010; 33,
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, /NEJMoa R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신.
Premature deaths due to Prostate Cancer: The Role of Diagnosis and Treatment Appathurai Balamurugan MD, MPH S William Ross MD Chris Fisher, BS Jim Files,
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Reducing Tobacco Intake Lowers Risk of Lung Cancer in Heavy Smokers Slideset on: Godtfredsen NS, Prescott E, Osler M. Effect of smoking reduction on lung.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2008; 134 :688–695 소화기내과 R4 이 재 연.
MA.17R: Reduced Risk of Recurrence With Extending Adjuvant Letrozole Beyond 5 Yrs in Postmenopausal Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer CCO Independent.
Statins The AURORA Trial Reference Fellstrom BC. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360. A.
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
Presentation transcript:

1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee (GIDAC) Meeting January 23, 2008

2 Overview Cardiovascular Neoplasms Fractures

3 Cardiovascular Safety Post-operative Ileus (POI)

4 CV Risk Factors in Worldwide POI Population CV Risk Factor Alvimopan % (N=2610) Placebo % (N=1365) Mean age57 years58 years BMI ≥ Diabetes1210 Hypertension3943 Smoking810

5 Patients Experiencing Death or Serious Cardiovascular Events Total POI Population Alvimopan N=2610 n (%) Placebo N=1365 n (%) Relative Risk (95% CI) All Cause Death (Total) - Death from CV events 13 (0.5) 4 (0.2) 9 (0.7) 2 (0.2) 0.8 (0.3,1.7) 1.0 (0.2,4.9) Patients with CV events (Total) 51 (2.0)39 (2.9)0.7 (0.4,1.0)

6 Cardiovascular Events Worldwide POI Population Alvimopan N=2610 n (%) Placebo N=1365 n (%) Relative Risk (95%CI) Ischemic events - Fatal 17 (0.7) 2 (0.1) 14 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) -- (0.3,--) Other serious CV events - Fatal 39 (1.5) 2 (0.1) 29 (2.1) 2 (0.2) 0.7 (0.4, 1.1 ) 0.5 (0.1, 3.0)

7

8 Post Discharge Surveillance Worldwide POI Population Time after last dose (days) Alvimopan N=2610 Placebo N=1365 Had follow-up phone call n (%) Anytime1874 (72)1052 (77) (13)164 (12) (56)835 (61) ≥ 1589 (3)53 (4) Had investigator follow-up visit n (%) Anytime416 (16)110 (8) (<1)11 (<1) (14)94 (7) ≥ 1519 (<1)5 (<1)

9 Limitations of POI Study Design Follow-up by phone call only (except 1/9 studies) Important safety endpoints such as 30 day and 60 day morbidity/mortality not collected CV events not prospectively defined nor consistently assessed post exposure Missing data does not imply no CV events

10 Conclusion POI studies were not designed to adequately establish CV risk estimate in this population

11 Cardiovascular Safety Opioid-induced Bowel Dysfunction (OBD) Non-cancer pain studies Cancer pain studies

12 OBD Safety Population (at least 1 dose) Study (Time)PlaceboAlvimopanTotal 011 (6 wks) (12 wks) (12 wks) (12 mos) C217 (phase 2) C304 (phase 2) (3-6wks) 684 (< 2 yrs) Total

13 Patients Experiencing Death or Serious Cardiovascular Events Non-Cancer OBD Population* Alvimopan N=1728 n (%) Placebo N=790 n (%) Relative Risk (95% CI) All Cause Death (Total) - Death from CV events 4 (0.2) 2 (0.1) 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0.9 (0.2, 5.0) -- (0.2, --) Patients with CV events (Total) 21 (1.2)4 (0.5)2.4 (0.9, 6.7) *Studies 011,012,013, 014, 13C217, 13C304

14 Cardiovascular Events Non-Cancer OBD Population* Alvimopan N=1728 n (%) Placebo N=790 n (%) Relative Risk (95%CI) Ischemic events - Fatal 14 (0.8) 1 (0.1) 3 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 2.1 (0.7, 6.9) -- (0.1, --) Other serious CV events - Fatal 8 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 1.8 (0.4, 7.6 ) -- (0.1, --) *Studies 011, 012, 013, 014, 13C217, 13C301

15 Patients Experiencing Death or Serious Cardiovascular Events Study 014 Alvimopan N=538 n (%) Placebo N=267 n (%) Relative Risk (95% CI) All Cause Death (Total) - Death from CV events 2 (0.4) 1(0.2) 2 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0.5 (0.1, 2.8) -- (0.1, --) Patients with CV events (Total) 14 (2.6)0 (0.0)-- (1.8, --)

16 Cardiovascular Events Study 014 Alvimopan N-538 n (%) Placebo N=267 n (%) Relative Risk (95%CI) Ischemic events - Fatal 11 (2.1) 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) -- (1.4, --) -- (0.1, --) Other serious CV events 3 (0.6)0 (0.0)-- (0.4, --)

17 Patients Experiencing Death or Serious Cardiovascular Events Total OBD Population Non-Cancer and Cancer Studies* Alvimopan N=1888 n (%) Placebo N=860 n (%) Relative Risk (95% CI) All Cause Death (Total) - Death from CV events 24 (1.3) 5 (0.3) 5 (0.6) 1 (0.1) 2.2 (0.9, 5.5) 2.3 (0.4, 14.7) Patients with CV events (Total) 26 (1.4)6(0.7)2.0 (0.8, 4.7) *Studies 011, 012, 013, 014, 13C217, 13C304, 008, 684

18 Cardiovascular Events Total OBD Population Non-Cancer and Cancer Studies* Alvimopan N-1888 n (%) Placebo N=860 n (%) Relative Risk (95%CI) Ischemic events - Fatal 14 (0.8) 1 (0.1) 4 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 1.6 (0.6, 4.6) -- (0.1, --) Other serious CV events - Fatal 14 (0.8) 4 (0.2) 3 (0.4) 1 (0.1) 2.1 (0.7, 6.9) 1.8 (0.3, 11.1) *Studies 011, 012, 013, 014, 13C217, 13C304, 008, 684

19 Time to All Cardiovascular Events Total OBD Population All Studies ≥ 14 Days Days Alvimopan (n=26) Placebo (n=6) 14 or less53 15 to to to or more21

20 Time to All Ischemic Events Only (MI, Angina, CVA) Total OBD Population All Studies ≥ 14 Days Days Alvimopan (n=13) Placebo (n=4) 14 or less11 15 to to to or more11

21

22 Additional Observations No differences in patient demographics or underlying CV risk factors: –Between study 014 and other OBD trials –Within study 014 Study duration of most other OBD studies was 3-12 weeks ; duration of study 014 was 12 months

23 Summary and Conclusions Numerical imbalance of serious CV events in: –Pooled analyses of OBD studies –Study 014 alone – Finding not explained by pre-clinical findings May suggest that chronic alvimopan use can increase risk of serious CV events in OBD population –Implications for short-term use in POI unclear

24 Neoplasms POI Population

25 Neoplasia Events POI Studies Alvimopan N=2610 Placebo N=1365 Burkitt’s lymphoma01 Bladder neoplasm01 Carcinoma01 Chronic myelogenous leukemia 10 Colon cancer metastatic10 Hepatic neoplasm10 Lymphoma10 Thyroid neoplasm10 TOTAL5 (0.2%)3 (0.2%)

26 Summary POI Population Number of neoplasms reported in each treatment group appears to be balanced Study design does not allow for significant conclusions to be drawn Long term effects unclear

27 Neoplasms OBD Population Non-cancer pain studies Cancer pain studies

28 All Neoplasms Non-Cancer OBD Population* Alvimopan N=1598 n (%) Placebo N=732 n (%) Relative Risk (95% C.I.) All Neoplasms 22 (1.4)4 (0.5)2.5 (0.9, 7.0) Malignant Neoplasms 13 (0.8)3 (0.4)2.0 (0.6, 6.5) Benign Neoplasms 9 (0.6)1 (0.1)4.12 (0.7, 25.2)

29 Neoplasms Study 014 Alvimopan N=538 n (%) Placebo N=267 n (%) Relative Risk (95% C.I.) All Neoplasms 15 (2.8)3 (1.1)2.5 (0.8, 8.0) Malignant Neoplasms 7 (1.3)2 (0.7)1.7 (0.4, 7.3) Benign Neoplasms 8 (1.5)1 (0.4)4.0 (0.7, 24.4)

30 Time to Malignant Neoplasm Non-Cancer OBD Population Alvimopan

31 Time to Malignant Neoplasm Non-Cancer OBD Population Placebo

32 Time to Neoplasm Non-Cancer OBD Population Time to Neoplasm Non-Cancer OBD Population

33 Most Common Malignancies Non-Cancer OBD Population Neoplasm Type Alvimopan N=1598 Placebo N=732 Squamous cell carcinoma 40 Breast cancer 30 Lung cancer31

34 OBD Studies Cancer Pain Study 008 Extension Study 684

35 Deaths Reported During OBD Studies in Cancer Pain (Studies 008 and 684) Deaths Reported During OBD Studies in Cancer Pain (Studies 008 and 684) Study 008Study 684 (extension study) Studies 008 and 684 combined Placebo N=70 n (%) Alvimopan N=160 n (%) Placebo N=15 n (%) Alvimopan N=50 n (%) Placebo N=70 n (%) Alvimopan N=160 n (%) Deaths1 (1.4)9 (5.6)2 (13.0)11 (22.0)3 (4.0)20 (13.0)

36 Time to All Cause Death Studies 008 and 684 Time to All Cause Death Studies 008 and 684

37 Imbalances in Index Cancer Diagnosis –In study 008, more subjects with head and neck cancers received alvimopan (N=14, 9%) than placebo (N=1, 1%), however Deaths were almost entirely in Gyn, GU, breast cancers (balanced between treatment groups) –In study 684, more subjects with non-small cell lung cancer received alvimopan (N=16, 31%) than placebo (N=1, 7%), and Most deaths occurred in non-small cell lung CA patients

38 Imbalances in Baseline Karnofsky Performance Scores In study 008, Karnofsky Performance Scores appeared balanced between treatment groups. In study 684, there was a higher percentage of patients with lower Karnofsky Performance scores in the alvimopan group as compared to the placebo group, 42% vs. 13% respectively.

39 Other Factors Demographic Characteristics (age, race, gender): –Similar between study 008 and study 684 populations –Balanced between treatment groups within each study Extent of Metastatic Disease: –Similar between study 008 and study 684 populations –Balanced between treatment groups within each study

40 Summary Non-Cancer OBD Population Alvimopan-treated patients had a higher incidence of neoplasia events as compared to placebo Possibly driven by the imbalance in neoplasia events in the only long term safety study for OBD in patients without cancer, study 014 – No obvious reason for the observed imbalance between treatment groups in this placebo controlled study

41 Summary Cancer OBD Population Large discrepancy seen in the death rates between treatment groups in studies 008 and 684 –Some differences in index cancer etiology and patient performance status were noted

42 Fractures POI Population

43 Fractures POI Population One patient with a fracture identified: –Multiple rib fractures secondary to syncope and subsequent fall after BR surgery With only one fracture event reported, no conclusions can be drawn L imited follow-up may not adequately assess fracture risk

44 Fractures OBD Population

45 Fracture Incidence All OBD Non-Cancer and Cancer Population Alvimopan: 1.4% (25/1758) Placebo: 1.2% (10/802) Relative Risk: 1.14 (95% CI: 0.6 to 2.3)

46 Fracture Incidence Study 014 Alvimopan: 3.7% (20/538) Placebo: 1.1% (3/267) Relative Risk: 3.30 (95% CI: 1.1 to 10.4)

47 Fracture Location: All OBD Studies Placebo N= 802 n (%) Alvimopan N=1758 n (%) Vertebra1 (0.1)2 (0.1) Rib2 (0.2)4 (0.2) Humerus0 (0.0)4 (0.2) Wrist1 (0.1) Femur1 (0.1) Patella/fibula/tibia2 (0.2)4 (0.2) Ankle1 (0.1)4 (0.2) Foot2 (0.2)5 (0.3) Total10 (1.2)25 (1.4)

48 Time to Fracture All OBD Studies Time to Fracture (weeks) Placebo N=802 n (%) Alvimopan N=1758 n (%) 1-54 (0.5)2 (0.1) (0.4)5 (0.3) (0.0)5 (0.3) (0.3)6 (0.3) (0.0)6 (0.3) > 451 (0.1) TOTAL10 (1.2)25 (1.4)

49 Time to Bone Fracture Study 014 Time to Bone Fracture Study 014

50 Specific Clinical Findings Majority of fractures were secondary to falls –Etiologies for increased fall risk (dizziness, hypotension, syncope, gait instability, etc) were not apparent Of subjects reporting fractures, the alvimopan group had a higher percentage of women, more individuals ≥ 65 years of age, and a higher average BMI

51 Specific Clinical Findings Baseline demographics well balanced between treatment groups in study 014* as well as total OBD population The mean opioid daily dose was similar between treatment groups * (except higher percentage of patients > 65 years in the alvimopan group),

52 Summary OBD Population –Fractures were not typical osteoporotic fractures, such as hip and vertebrae –Unclear etiology for imbalance in fracture rates between treatment groups in study 014 (alvimopan > placebo)

53 Overall Summary A large, long-term safety study of alvimopan for OBD indication showed potential safety signals in 3 specific areas: –serious cardiovascular events, neoplasms and fractures The POI studies did not show evidence of these safety signals; however, the follow-up of patients was extremely limited