Epistemology, Part I Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing Innate ideas Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Knowledge as JTB Someone S has knowledge of P IFF: 1. S believes P 2. S is justified in believing P 3. P is true.
Rationalism and empiricism
SED 509 – SUMMER 2011 RON GRAY Introduction to Learning Theories.
Innate ideas Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Locke v. Leibniz on innate knowledge
Empiricism Part I John Locke ( CE) George Berkeley ( CE)
Empiricism All knowledge of things in the world is a posteriori (that is, based ultimately on experience). Purely mental (i.e., a priori) operations of.
 Assumes we are born as if with a blank slate or white paper. All knowledge is learned from experience.  No innate knowledge  Ergo., no a priori necessity.
Knowledge innatism Michael Lacewing
Views of Knowledge- Rationalism. Rationalism Rationalism- The belief that reason, without the aid of sensory perception, is capable of arriving at some.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
Rationalism and empiricism: Key terms.  You will learn the meaning of various key terms related to rationalism and empiricism.
 Heavily influenced by Aristotle and Descartes  Empiricists around his time: › Berkeley, & Hume (all Brits including Locke)  Rationalists around his.
Locke’s Epistemology Empiricism: Epistemological school that maintains that, ultimately, all knowledge is rooted in sense experience. John Locke Seventeenth.
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Chapter 3: Knowledge Innate Ideas and the Empiricist Theory: John Locke Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding John Locke.
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
1 Introduction.
Rationalism and empiricism: Concept innatism
Seeing the “story” of ideas….
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Rationalism and Empiricism
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Philosophy Review Terms/People/Ideas we’ve studied.
1 The Rationalists: Descartes Rational Truth, God (the return), and the Cartesian Circle Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Can you learn this? You have 2 minutes. Then you will try and write it down word for word “if you can conceive it to be possible for any mixture or combination.
So, you think you know your philosophers?
Consultancy Project Experiential Learning MGT529 Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal.
Views of Epistemology- Empiricism. Empiricism Empiricism- the belief that all knowledge about the world comes from or is based in the senses (experience)
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Realism and Idealism Direct/naive from perceptual from from hallucination & from time lag Veridical perception.
EMPIRICISM:. JOHN LOCKE  RECOGNIZED AS THE “FOUNDING FATHER” OF WHAT WE NOW UNDERSTAND IS THE “SCHOOL OF EMPIRICAL PRACTICES.”  ADVOCATED THE CONCEPT.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7a Gettier
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1 By David Kelsey.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
 What constitutes genuine knowledge as opposed to opinion or belief?  What is the criterion for knowledge?  What are the sources or origins of such.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Epistemology  One of the ‘pillars of philosophy”  Explores the nature, scope, limits and origin of human knowledge  Touches on all branches of philosophy.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Epistemology TIPS 1. What is Truth & Knowledge? 2. How can one determine truth from falsehood? 3. What are the pre- suppositions to knowledge?
An Empiricist Theory of Knowledge Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Lecture 6.
Knowledge and Skepticism
Rationalism Focus: to be able to explain the claims of rationalism, looking in particular at Descartes To begin to evaluate whether Descartes establishes.
The Origin of Knowledge
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
11th September 2013 P1 AS (Yr 12) Mr Jez Echevarría
Concept Empiricist Arguments against Concept Innatism
Empiricism.
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
HISTORY OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY
Rationalism.
Introducing Epistemology
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
Empiricism All knowledge of things in the world is a posteriori (that is, based ultimately on experience). Purely mental (i.e., a priori) operations of.
JOHN LOCKE ( ).
Introduction to Learning Theories
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Powerpoint Highlights
What is Epistemology?.
A Brief Intro to Philosophy
Presentation transcript:

Epistemology, Part I Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang

Introduction to epistemology Definition Three major questions of epistemology 1. What is knowledge? 2. How do we acquire knowledge? 3. To what extent can we have knowledge?

Question 1: What is knowledge?

Different types of knowledge The standard view Gettier challenge

What is knowledge? Smith has applied for a job, but, it is claimed, has a justified belief that “Jones will get the job” instead of him. He also has a justified belief that "Jones has 10 coins in his pocket". Smith therefore justifiably concludes that, “The man who will get the job has 10 coins in his pocket.” In fact, Jones does not get the job. Instead, Smith does. However, as it happens, Smith (unknowingly and by sheer chance) also had 10 coins in his pocket. So his belief that “the man who will get the job has 10 coins in his pocket” was justified and true. Edmund Gettier (1927- )

Question 2: How do we acquire knowledge?

Background The debate To what extent do we depend on sensory experience to arrive at knowledge of the external world? The positions o Rationalism o Empiricism

Background Important vocabulary o Propositions o Ideas/concepts o A priori vs. a posteriori knowledge

Rationalism Definition Common beliefs among rationalists o Innate knowledge or concepts o A priori knowledge Plato ( BC)Descartes ( ) Spinoza ( ) Leibniz ( )

Rationalism Plato’s argument in the Meno (P1) Arriving at answers (to a problem in math or philosophy) requires recognizing when the answer has been discovered. (P2) Humans could not recognize when they have found the answer (to a problem in math or philosophy) if they were born with no knowledge whatsoever. (P3) Yet, humans can recognize when they have found the answer (to a problem in math or philosophy) Therefore, (C) Humans must have been born with some knowledge.

Rationalism Never experienced perfection argument (Descartes) (P1) We have never experienced in a circle, triangle, God, etc. in their fullness and perfection. (P2) Yet we still have a concept of a circle, triangle, God, etc. Therefore, (C) Our concepts of circle, triangle, God, etc. must be innate.

Rationalism Leibniz’s necessary truths argument (P1) We recognize that some truths such as the Pythagorean theorem are necessary truths. (P2) It is impossible for experiences, regardless of how numerous they may be, to establish the universal necessity of a necessary truth (e.g., Pythagorean theorem) Therefore, (C) Experience cannot be the source of our knowledge of necessary truths (e.g., Pythagorean theorem).

Empiricism Definition Common beliefs among empiricists o A posteriori knowledge o Mind as a blank slate (tabula rasa) at birth Locke ( )Berkeley ( ) Hume ( )

Empiricism John Locke’s famous tabula rasa “Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we may say, white paper, void of all characters, without any ideas: - How comes it be furnished? […] To this I answer, in one word, from experience. In that all our knowledge is founded: and from that it ultimately derives itself.” John Locke ( )

Empiricism Locke’s first argument against innate ideas Locke’s assumption o If knowledge is innate, there would be universally accepted beliefs o The question Are there beliefs that enjoy universal acceptance?

Empiricism Locke’s first argument against innate ideas (P1) If knowledge is innate, there would be universally accepted truths. (P2) There are no beliefs that are universally accepted. Therefore, (C) Knowledge is not innate.

Empiricism Locke’s second argument against innate ideas Can a person born blind and deaf have concepts of color? Sound? Shape? Mathematics? Helen Keller ( ) Note: Keller was not born deaf and blind, but was inflicted by deafness and blindness before the age of 2.

Empiricism Locke’s second argument against innate ideas (P1) If knowledge is innate, a child kept in isolation would still have ideas of specific colors, sounds, shapes, etc. (P2) It is obvious that such a child would not have any concepts of these ideas. Therefore, (C) Knowledge is not innate.

Empiricism John Locke on acquiring knowledge “[A]ll born into the world, being surrounded with bodies that perpetually and diversely affect them, variety of ideas […] are imprinted on the minds of children. Light and colors are busy at hand everywhere; sounds and some tangible qualities fail not to solicit their proper senses and force and entrance into the mind.” John Locke ( )