Maricopa Priorities Update Spring 2015. Agenda Overview Strategic Directions Implementation process Categorized Recommendations Preliminary Timeline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Advertisements

Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Risk Management at Harvard – Panel Discussion Harvard IT Summit
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Draft Action Plan Update – Agenda Item No. 5D Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL KICKOFF DATE The Leadership Development and Strategic HR Practice Area is presented by American Express. This Service Grant.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Delivery Business Solutions April 29, Nashville PMI Symposium April 29, 2013 Stephanie Dedmon, PMP Director, Business Solutions Delivery Department.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Moving from money well accounted for to money well spent UK Information Technology Summit May 2005 Helen McDonald A/Chief Information Officer Treasury.
Enterprise Financial System Project Overview & Update Council of Research Associate Deans March 22,
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Charting a course PROCESS.
N “If you bring the appropriate people together in constructive ways with good information, they will create authentic visions and sustainable responses.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Teck's Approach to Sustainability ISID Conference March 30, 2012.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
The Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise Project Management Solution:
OPR100: Overview of Enterprise Project Management & Project Management Maturity Models Melinda Curtis Product Manager, Microsoft Office Project.
March 2010Developed by Agency Human Resource Services, DHRM1 Organization Assessment Example of an Organizational Design Review and Recommendations.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Maricopa Priorities Status Update Fall Maricopa Priorities Basics What it isWhat it’s not A regular, cyclical, bottom-up process to: ▫Evaluate everything.
LeanSigma® Fundamentals
Your Financial Work Defense Finance and Accounting Service DFAS Transformation Update March 2003.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
1 Local Readiness Team Lead Kick-Off Meeting May 16, 2007.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
M & E TOOLKIT Jennifer Bogle 11 November 2014 Household Water Treatment and Water Safety Plans International and Regional Landscape.
New England Association of Schools and Colleges The Accreditation Process A Report Guide.
Introducing Project Management Update December 2011.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
© Lawrie Kirk 2015 Strategic Communication Planning – Day 2 Lawrie Kirk Sessional Academic Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science.
NSDI Future Directions Governance Report Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee June 23, 2005.
INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS (ISPP) 10 year planning outlook10 year planning outlook Monia Lahaie, DCFO and Director General Finance at Statistics.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
Wait Time Project Implementation Strategy. Implementation Plan: Goals 1.To educate and provide clarification around the wait time project, wait time definitions,
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
Seattle Colleges Budget Proposal Fiscal Year
2017/18 SIP Request Process September 2016.
Responds quickly to the business needs
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Presentation transcript:

Maricopa Priorities Update Spring 2015

Agenda Overview Strategic Directions Implementation process Categorized Recommendations Preliminary Timeline

Overview ONE Maricopa: Ten community colleges, one world-class system ONE Maricopa Initiatives: e.g. SSE, SSI, IMOR², SEM Focus on Standardization, Centralization, Consistency ONE Maricopa Initiatives: e.g. SSE, SSI, IMOR², SEM Focus on Standardization, Centralization, Consistency Grassroots ONE Maricopa e.g. Sustainability Efforts – cross-functional, integrated, and system-wide Grassroots ONE Maricopa e.g. Sustainability Efforts – cross-functional, integrated, and system-wide Maricopa Priorities Process begins and ends at the local level, with system-wide integration and impact Maricopa Priorities Process begins and ends at the local level, with system-wide integration and impact

Current Stage Self Assessment Local Task Force Review Local Steering Team Review Feedback and forums Local Champion Appends ONE Maricopa recommendations District-wide Feedback CEC Feedback Final decisionsImplementation

Implementation Framework Mission To realize the benefits of working together as a system by investing our resources strategically Strategic Directions Organizational Effectiveness Eliminate redundancy Address internal competition Share resources Ensure good stewardship of public resources Develop regional solutions where appropriate Student Outcomes Implement best practices at scale Remove barriers to access Remove barriers to success Ensure faculty involvement in instructional decisions Relationships Support industry needs Provide ONE Maricopa infrastructure Address organizational culture Avoid creating “winners and losers” Foundational Make decisions based on evidence  Remain nimble and entrepreneurial  Focus on value Deliver process excellence  Develop accountability measures  Differentiate intentionally Develop collaborative solutions  Drive execution from strategy  Address interdependency

Implementation Responsibilities Chancellor Vice Chancellors Responsible Parties Maricopa Priorities Team Presidents Responsible Parties ONE Maricopa Projects Maricopa Priorities Team assists VCs and designees through implementation process Local Projects Maricopa Priorities Team monitors status, manages interdependencies, and provides support and tools

ONE Maricopa Implementation Process SubstantiationPlanningCharterImplementation Develop project charter, including: Responsible parties Project purpose Background Objectives Measures of success Develop and execute substantiation plan Identify appropriate stakeholders Review collected feedback Summarize collected info and recommend options Approval pointDevelop project plan, including: Action items Risk mitigation Communication and change management Budget Execute project plan Monitor for changes Regularly report status updates Substantiation: To prove the truth of or support with proof or evidence Re-validation of recommendation with current data in current environment

Proposed Local Implementation Process Moving Forward SubstantiationPlanningImplementation Consider making use of templates developed by MP team for consistency Research and substantiate all recommendations before implementing After consulting with HR, discuss any HR actions with affected employees to identify unforeseen consequences Ensure risk mitigation, change management, and communication are incorporated in project activities Identify owners to provide status updates to MP team Proactively monitor for overlap with ONE Maricopa implementations

Project Plan Task 1Task 2Task 3Task 4Task 5 Risk Mitigation Task 1 Risk Mitigation Task 2 Communication Task 1 Communication Task 2 Change Management Task 1 Action Plan Project Management Plans Task 1 Communication Task 1Task 2 Risk Mitigation Task 1Task 3Task 4Communication Task 2Task 5Risk Mitigation Task 2Change Management Task 1 Project Budget Approval Point

Beginning Immediately Preliminary Timeline Starting This Year Projects From Strategic Decisions (TBD) Strategic Decisions Logistics Planning

Beginning Immediately Preliminary Timeline Substantiation Planning Implementation Etc.

Questions?