2013 Monitoring Activities: Summer Water Quality Conditions Technical Committee Meeting October 8-9, 2013 Agenda Item # 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Water Pollution
Advertisements

SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
The MWRA outfall monitoring program. What we measure and what we have observed so far.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Kristy Morris PhD, Senior Scientist Council for Watershed Health Regional Watershed Monitoring Programs Examples of Community Involvement.
Nutrient Monitoring on the Ohio River: Balancing Information Needs.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Management Issues in the Lake Michigan Basin  Aquatic invasive species  Nutrient enrichment  Beach Health  Contaminants – in Sediments, Fish and Drinking.
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
FGD MONITORING PROJECT ORSANCO Technical Committee Meeting June 4, 2013 Item 8a.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control
Spills/Incident Management Monitoring, Mapping and Contingency Planning Jerry Schulte, Manager Source Water Protection and Emergency Response for ORSANCO.
Water Quality ESI Stream Water Mass after collecting by filtration Evaporate water after filtering, determine mass of residue TDS by conductivity since.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 Monitoring Plan Mike Mickelson and Ken Keay Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
2010 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2009 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.
1 State of San Lorenzo River Symposium Nicole Beck, PhD 2NDNATURE April San Lorenzo Lagoon A Decade of Dry Season WQ Monitoring.
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee. Conference Call Meetings July 8 and August 19 Mercury Discharges – Utility Request to Address Permit Requirements for.
OHIO RIVER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT Program Overview.
2015 Monitoring Activities: Summer Water Quality Conditions Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015 Agenda Item #5.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
USEPA Regional Source Water Protection Program Briefing Ohio River Source Water Protection Program Thank you for your patience. This webinar will begin.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Main Creek Water Quality Report Sandy Wingert UDWQ PRWC October 8,
Pollution and Monitoring
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
FY14 Technical Programs Program & Finance Committee Meeting April 3, 2013.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015 Agenda Item #9.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Water Quality Observations 2009 Algae Blooms. Upper River Taste and Odor Reports  Initial report to ORSANCO on June 1, 2009  Complaints from:  Toronto,
2015 Subcommittee Report. Macroinvertebrate Program Incorporated into ALU Assessment 2 Methods collected at all sites Macro Index (ORMIn) est
305B REPORT Biennial Assessment of Ohio River Water Quality Conditions.
Source Water Protection Efforts Organics Detection System & Spill Notification Technical Committee Meeting, February 10-11, 2016 Covington, KY.
The Bear Creek Watershed Association protects & restores water & environmental quality within the Bear Creek Watershed from the effects of land use. Bear.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Speciation and Bioavailability of Mercury in Ambient and Wastewater-Influenced Water Samples: A Preliminary Study Rob Reash American Electric Power, Columbus,
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
In pairs… Discuss and write down ways you think we can detect pollution in: – Air – Soil – Water.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
NPDES SUBCOMMITTEE BIOLOGICAL SUBCOMMITTEE MONITORING STRATEGY FY 14 Program Recommendations.
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Using IDEM’s Fixed Station Data
Module 24 Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Water Quality Control Commission Hearing June 8, 2015
Assessing PA’s Lake Erie Tributaries
Public Meeting February 3, 2010
YO SYSTEMS STUDENTS! QUIZ (FRIDAY MAY 23rd) – HYDROSPHERE Syllabus Details A-J.
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

2013 Monitoring Activities: Summer Water Quality Conditions Technical Committee Meeting October 8-9, 2013 Agenda Item # 6

MayJuneJuly August September Summer 2013 Monthly Precipitation Relative to Normal

Average Monthly Streamflow May – September 2013

Clean Metals Sampling 3 thallium detections in 2013, all greater than WQC 0.24 ug/L Mercury violations occur at high flows

FGD Monitoring Hg Results Final discharge does not show the mercury content of the FGD WW Percent methyl mercury is equivalent to Ohio River ambient waters

Broad Scan Results Two Rounds Collected, 3 Locations, High and Low flows: Similar results in both rounds: – 123 Analytical tests, 19 Detections – No WQC Violations – No Detections at all: Pesticides, VOCs, Semi VOAs, PAHs, Radiation – All detections from Ions and Metals, all of them routinely monitored

MeHg BAF Study Early Results Monthly samples collected just upstream of Hannibal L&D No WQC violations (>12ng/L) All methyl mercury detections from high flows

MeHg BAF Study Early Results Collected 12 Fish Tissue Samples for MeHg – 6 in Fall 2012 & 6 in Spring 2013 – Directly below Hannibal L&D (~mi 127)

Fish Tissue Contaminants 75 Samples (River wide & some KY tributaries) PCBs Total & Methyl Mercury Chlordanes DDTs Pb, Cd, Se PBDEs Support fish consumption advisory decisions Support 305(b) use attainment decision making (methylmercury) Now have >=2 species of Trophic Level 4 & TL 3 from each pool since 2010 Complete KY SEP project Collect 40 MeHg samples from KY pools and some tributaries ( )

Probabilistic Pool Survey Sites 15 randomly determined 500m sites per pool Fish Community Macroinvertebrate Community Instream & Riparian Habitat

Water Chemistry Sediment Chemistry Additional Data Collection 500m sites (random + targeted) Fish Community Macroinvertebrate Community Instream & Riparian Habitat 30 sites for macroinvertebrates & chemistry

Fixed Stations Fish Community Fish Tissue Contaminants

HOBO Data Loggers Hourly measurements for 2 years (1 year to go) Temperature Conductivity

Aquarium Displays

National Rivers & Streams Assessment

Nuisance Aquatic Species

Bacteria samples are collected April 1 through October 31. Samples are collected at an upstream and downstream location in Pittsburgh, Wheeling, Huntington, Cincinnati, Louisville and Evansville. Five rounds of sampling are completed monthly for each urban community sampling location and analyzed for E. coli using Membrane Filtration. Those five samples are then used to produce a monthly Geometric Mean which shall not exceed 130CFU/100mL and shall not exceed 240CFU/100mL in any single sample. Contact Recreation Monitoring Percent Exceeded April-September 2013 Pittsburgh* based on 3 monthsWheelingHuntingtonCincinnatiLouisvilleEvansville Monthly Geometric Mean33%67%33% 17%50% Single Sample Max27%47%17% 30%

At four extra sites in Cincinnati we also analyze for Enterococci using Enterolert and for E.coli using Colilert. Special Projects Buffalo Trails Multisport Racing (Maysville) Louisville Triathlon* Louisville Ironman Cincinnati Triathlon The Great Ohio River Swim * Public was notified bacteria levels were elevated Contact Recreation Monitoring

Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Monitoring Dissolved oxygen and temperature is monitored by the United States Army Corp of Engineers, electric utility/hydropower agencies or ORSANCO at 9 Ohio River stations. These stations are monitored in hourly, 30-minute or 15- minute increments to obtain temperature and dissolved oxygen data for the assessment of aquatic life water quality criteria. The average D.O. concentration shall be at least 5.0mg/L for each calendar day. (Graphs to follow) The allowable temperature varies each month and Period Averages range from 68°-84°F. Smithland had 5 days where they exceeded the Period Average of 84°. (Graphs to follow)

Algae/Nutrients Program No algae blooms reported or detected Largest concentrations detected in May (typically August) Community dominated by diatoms all summer (typically shifts to Blue-Green algae in late summer)

Algae/Nutrients Program High flow conditions through July Algae blooms require long residence time and high light penetration

Wabash Monitoring Project Three year project starting 1/22/2012 Annual report submitted April 2013 Samples collected every two weeks – Nutrients, BOD, TSS, algae, chlorophyll Datasonde takes readings every 30 min

Wabash Monitoring Project A lot of this Not so much of this

Dissolved Oxygen Number of days with Average DO <5mg/L = 2 Number of days with any measurement <4mg/L = 0

Biochemical Oxygen Demand Identified as a contributor to low DO in the Smithland Pool. One detection on the Ohio River (Smithland Pool) Similar to previous years

Organics Detection System Sites Big Sandy R.

Organics Detection System Operations Overview January - August ,272 River Water Samples were analyzed by the ODS Between January and August % Utilization = (# of River Water Samples Analyzed) / (# of Days X 15 sites) = 89.8% Utilization.

Year# Raw Water Samples% Utilization 2013 (Jan. – Aug.)* % 2012 (Jan. – Aug.)* % 2011 (Jan. – Aug.) % 2010 (Jan. – Aug.) % * The addition of 2 ODS sites at Ashland, Ky. and Midland, Pa. brought the total # of ODS sites up from 13 to 15 sites. Organics Detection System Operations Overview

Pittsburgh Water- The Pittsburgh Water ODS site has made improvements in their utilization of the ODS. This has helped to raise ODS utilization to 89.8%. ODS Upgrade We have enhanced the capabilities of the ODS by installing GC/ Mass Spec instrumentation at American Water (Huntington, WV) and at Evansville Water. We have also installed a process GC at Wheeling Water that will work around the clock to screen the Ohio River water for volatile organics.