TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indinavir/Ritonavir 800/200 mg bid based regimen in multi-experienced HIV positive patients with extensive drug resistance. A.Vincenti1, L. Vatteroni2,
Advertisements

Switch to RAL-containing regimen - Canadian Study - CHEER - Montreal Study - EASIER - SWITCHMRK - SPIRAL.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
De Luca A 1,2, Bracciale L 1, Doino M 1, Fabbiani M 1, Sidella L 1, Marzocchetti A 1, Farina S 1, D’Avino A 1, Cauda R 1, Di Giambenedetto S 1 Safety and.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV infections in Taiwan, revised in 2002 by Infectious Diseases Society of the ROC and Taiwan AIDS.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
INTRODUCTION Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients Starting Antiretroviral Therapy During Hospitalization Leigh E. Efird, PharmD 1, Manish Patel, PharmD 1,
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
HIV-1 dynamics Perelson et.al. Science 271:1582 (1996) Infected CD4 + lymphocytes Uninfected, activated CD4 + lymphocytes HIV-1 t 1/ days t 1/2.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Design of the RESIST Study Program Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Sequencing cohorts Open-label Design W8 W12 ≥ 18 years
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE (FTV) IN HEAVILY PRETREATED HIV INFECTED PATIENTS. Zala, C.; Patterson, P.; Coll, P.; Bouzas, M. B.; Kaufman, S.; Gun, A.; Pérez, H.; Cahn, P. Fundación Huésped, Buenos Aires, Argentina. RESULTS: From July 00 to Jan 01, forty two (42) consecutive patients (8 women) received a prescription for LPV+AMP (19) and LPV+FTV (23). Twenty seven (64%) had prior AIDS defining illness. Median plasma HIV RNA at BSL was cps/mL (5,55 log10) with no significant differences between the AMP and the FTV pts. Median BSL CD4 T cell count was 93/mm3 (2-383). Prior number (mean) of prescribed PIs was 3 per patient. By June 01, one FTV patient died due to lymphoma. Seven patients (3 AMP and 4 FTV) discontinued therapy due to GI intolerance and/or poor adherence. Twenty five (25) patients have completed 48 weeks follow up. Median plasma HIV RNA decline from baseline was 3,0 log 10. Twenty (20) out of 25 patients (80%) had HIV RNA reductions from BSL greater than 1 log10 (7/10 (70%) AMP, 13/15 (86,7%) FTV). Proportion of patients with pVL <500 cps/mL (ITT, nc=failure) at 48 weeks follow up was 31% (4/19 (21%) AMP, 9/23 (39,1%) FTV). Four patients experienced Grade III/IV increase in cholesterol and/or triglycerides levels. No treatment limiting toxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONES: Within this cohort, a double boosted PI regimen including Lopinavir/r in addiction to either Amprenavir or Fortovase allowed to rescue one third of patients experiencing multiple treatment failure with no significant toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of a dual boosted PI regimen including Lopinavir/r (LPV) plus Amprenavir (AMP) or Fortovase (FTV) in heavily pretreated HIV infected patients. METHODS: Prospective, open label, observational cohort study of patients referred to a single HIV clinic for prescription of a salvage regimen. Eligible patients for analysis are those who failed 3 drug classes and consented to receive LPV (3 capsules BID or 4 BID if a concomitant NNRTI was prescribed) plus either AMP or FTV dosaged at 750 and 1000 mg BID respectively. Second PI (AMP or FTV) was prescribed according to patients and physician preferences. Backbone nucleosides and/or NNRTIs were prescribed according to patient drug history. Plasma HIV RNA, CD4 cell count and safety lab were measured at regular intervals. Tolerability and compliance were evaluated on monthly basis. PATIENTS CHARACTERISTICS AMPFTVTOTAL n Age (median yrs) 38,736,437,4 Male 13/19 (68%)21/23 (91%)34/42 (81%) Prior AIDS 14/19 (74%)13/23 (57%)27/42 (64%) NADIR CD4 cell count (median) 27/mm340/mm339,5/mm3 BSL CD4 Cell count (median) 90/mm396/mm393/mm3 BSL pVL (median) (5,49) (5,60) (5,55) Corresponding author: Carlos Zala, MD. AMPFTVTOTAL Prior exposure to PI’s (mean) 3,3 (1 – 5) 3,0 (1 - 4) 3,2 (1 - 5) Prior exposure to NRTI’s (mean) 5,0 (4 – 6) 4,5 (3 – 6) 4,7 (4 – 6) Prior exposure to NNRTI’s (mean) 1,3 (0 – 3) 1,0 (0 – 2) 1,1 (0 – 2) Prior exposure to hydroxiurea (mean) 9/19 (47%)6/23 (26%)15/42 (36%) Pts. off therapy at BSL 9/19 (47%)15/23 (65%)24/42 (57%) THERAPY DISCONTINUATIONS AMP n=19 FTV n=23 TOTAL n=42 DEATH* ADVERSE EVENT GI INTOLERANCE POOR COMPLIANCE VIROLOGICAL FAILURE THERAPY D/C9817 Backbone NRTI’sAMPFTVTOTAL ABACAVIR STAVUDINE LAMIVUDINE DIDANOSINE ZIDOVUDINE Backbone NNRTI’s EFAVIRENZ NEVIRAPINE PATIENTS DISPOSITION AMPFTVTOTAL SCR BSL W W W W W 48* FASTING TRIGLYCERIDES Normal Range: 0,7 - 1,7 mmol/L FASTING CHOLESTEROL Normal Range: 3,9 – 5,2 mmol/L HIV RNA CHANGE AT WEEK 48 (ITT) PROPORTION OF PATIENTS WITH HIV RNA <500 cps/mL (ITT) *2 deaths before BSL *17 patients d/c therapy n – – 4 - 9n n – 22 BSL – 19 WEEK – 17 WEEK – 13 – 16 WEEK – 12 – 16 WEEK – 10 – 15 WEEK 48 n – 22 BSL – 19 WEEK – 17 WEEK – 13 – 16 WEEK – 12 – 16 WEEK – 10 – 15 WEEK 48