Urban Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Public and Charter Schools Presenters: Stephanie Wood-Garnett, Executive Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Collaborative Leadership: One Districts Story David Hehl, Executive Director of Student Services Teresa Polson, District Coordinator Erica Ekstrom, District.
Elementary School Counselor
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
OKLAHOMA SIG SCHOOLS State Profile – Cohort 1 Tier I SIG Schools: 8 – Cohort 2 Tier I and II SIG Schools: 3 Total SIG Schools: 11 Total Funding Awards.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Durham Public Schools: District Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Jennifer Snyder November 13, 2006 NASDSE Conference Williamsburg, VA.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
The Schoolwide Applications Model (SAM) An RtI-Driven Approach to School Reform Shannon O’Connor & Givanna Hymel Recovery School District (RSD) New Orleans.
Summit County’s Changing Demographics Hispanic Population3262,4064,207 Total County Population15,51829,73636,100 Hispanics as percent of.
AGENDA Welcome! 3:10 Meeting Expectations: Be Present Engage
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
Meeting the Needs of English Learners With Reading Difficulties Through a Multitiered Instructional Framework OSEP Project Directors’ Meeting July 2014.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Avery’s Creek Elementary School. What is Title I? United States Federal Government’s largest education program to support public schools. The Purpose:
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
 Overview of Upper Darby School District  District Goals  RtII – Behavior  RtII - Academic.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
In what ways do you contribute to students’ learning in mathematics? What do you think is the role of the district in improving math achievement?
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
AWMLP BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2014 MIKE HUBERT.
Student Support Teams Training: March 7, 2006 Stephanie Wood-Garnett Executive Director State Improvement Grant District of Columbia Public Schools.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 WELCOME! Pocatello/Chubbuck District #25 SIOP Coaches Training.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Building Inclusive Schools Boston Public Schools Department of Special Education and Student Services.
1 Handout #1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Language Arts)  Performance Indicator Progression  Scope and Sequence  Instructional Guide  Language.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Dr. Wanda Bamberg, Superintendent of Schools June 29, 2010 The Road to Broad.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Positive Behavior Support (PBS) in St. Vrain Valley School District.
RUSD’s Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Stakeholders Meeting #1 April 13, 2015 Initial Overview.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.
How North Clackamas Has Implemented RTI September 30, 2010 at the Eugene Hilton  Vivian Garrison, Director of Special Education  Matt McDermott, TOSA.
Mock Board Meeting E. W. Chambliss Elementary School Grades K – 3 Diane Brown, Principal January 12, 2012 Home of The CES Tiger Cubs.
Baltimore County Public Schools’ Office of Equity and Assurance in collaboration with: Department of Professional Development World Languages Special Education.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Demographic Study SER-Niños Charter School BY MARIA ELENA BARTA.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Data Overview Faculty Meeting-October 14,2014 Mission Possible: MOTIVATE, EDUCATE, GRADUATE!!!
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Brown Deer School District
Close Reading and Instructional Rounds
Current Activities to Support Dual Language Learners and Early Education and Care and Out of School Time Staff October 2010.
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Professional Learning Communities Kick-off Day
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
School Improvement Process
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
Presentation transcript:

Urban Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Public and Charter Schools Presenters: Stephanie Wood-Garnett, Executive Director of the State Improvement Grant Frances Harris-Burke, Director School Improvement Support for Charters Director School Improvement Support for Charters Margaret Stephens-Aliendre, Principal Wilkinson ES Angela Maxwell Brown, Coordinator of DC-PBIS

Overview Review why DCPS applied for the State Improvement Grant Review why DCPS applied for the State Improvement Grant Review Implementation of PBIS in the District of Columbia in both public and charter schools Review Implementation of PBIS in the District of Columbia in both public and charter schools Share Lessons Learned Share Lessons Learned Discuss Key Messages & Conclusions Discuss Key Messages & Conclusions Questions Questions

Background The District of Columbia Public Schools Board of Education under its "State" function was awarded a five-year State Improvement Grant (SIG) by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs in The District of Columbia Public Schools Board of Education under its "State" function was awarded a five-year State Improvement Grant (SIG) by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs in The DC-SIG focuses on instruction, behavioral support, and family engagement as the most critical areas to the improvement of both general and special education services within DCPS. This includes the necessity to (a) increase the capacity of special and general education staff to support the academic and behavioral needs of all students, (b) improve outcomes for students, and c) offer opportunities for families to obtain information/training that supports the needs of their children. The DC-SIG focuses on instruction, behavioral support, and family engagement as the most critical areas to the improvement of both general and special education services within DCPS. This includes the necessity to (a) increase the capacity of special and general education staff to support the academic and behavioral needs of all students, (b) improve outcomes for students, and c) offer opportunities for families to obtain information/training that supports the needs of their children.

Overview of DC Schools 55,000 traditional public school students (146 schools) 55,000 traditional public school students (146 schools) 19,000 charter school students (51 schools on 71 campuses) 19,000 charter school students (51 schools on 71 campuses) Demographics: Demographics: African Americans % African Americans % Hispanics - 9.4% Hispanics - 9.4% Whites - 4.6% Whites - 4.6% Asian Americans - 1.6% Asian Americans - 1.6% Other - 0.5% Other - 0.5% Free or Reduced Meals Eligibility - 66% Free or Reduced Meals Eligibility - 66% 112 different home languages 112 different home languages 138 different nationalities 138 different nationalities 12% of the student population belongs to a language minority group and another 12% of the student population belongs to a language minority group and another 7.7% are classified as Limited English Proficient (LEP) on Non English Proficient (LEP/NEP) learners 7.7% are classified as Limited English Proficient (LEP) on Non English Proficient (LEP/NEP) learners

Special Education Population was Growing as Total Student Population was Declining

DCPS Disability by Number (2005) Source: SETS February 18, 2005

Where We Serve our LD & ED Students Emotionally Disturbed Learning Disabled

Who is Placed Outside of DCPS

- Nicholas Hobbs

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making 4 PBS Elements

What does PBIS Implementation look like in the District of Columbia? 47 schools 47 schools 3 cohorts 3 cohorts Varying rates of progress based on their capacity Varying rates of progress based on their capacity Complexities in implementation Complexities in implementation  Leadership  Data Collection and Interpretation  “Initiative Fatigue”

What does PBIS Implementation look like in the District of Columbia? PBIS in the Charter Schools PBIS in the Charter Schools Dr. Frances Harris-Burke, Director School Improvement Support for Charters PBIS in a DCPS School PBIS in a DCPS School Dr. Margaret Stephens-Aliendre, Principal Wilkinson Elementary School

Lessons Learned Process vs. Program Process vs. Program Role and availability of Administrators Role and availability of Administrators Norms and Expectations Norms and Expectations Student/Staff knowledge of expectations and number of positive interactions Student/Staff knowledge of expectations and number of positive interactions Communications systems Communications systems Data Decision Making Data Decision Making

KEY Messages Flexible approach to the adoption of PBIS Flexible approach to the adoption of PBIS Enhance facilitation skills of staff Enhance facilitation skills of staff Improve knowledge of and usage of data Improve knowledge of and usage of data

Conclusions Framework for basic components for PBIS Framework for basic components for PBIS roll-out must be provided roll-out must be provided Additional Time/Training for Buy-In and staff agreement Additional Time/Training for Buy-In and staff agreement Rate and content of sessions must be modified Rate and content of sessions must be modified Data/systems /process Data/systems /process charters have few systems in place charters have few systems in place systems support may be shaky or nonexistent systems support may be shaky or nonexistent Leadership Teams and scaling up varies Leadership Teams and scaling up varies Staff turnover (equalization, and timing) Staff turnover (equalization, and timing)