Diplomas Now i3 Site Recruitment. I3 School Recruitment Goal 10-11 New i3 Middle School Partners 12+ New i3 High School Partners.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries

Advertisements

The DN OPS Team: Balancing Collaboration and Organizational Priorities.

2012 Summer Institute THE ROLE OF DN IN EDUCATION POLICY.

Priority School (SIG) TA Session Cohort IV

RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.

OKLAHOMA SIG SCHOOLS State Profile – Cohort 1 Tier I SIG Schools: 8 – Cohort 2 Tier I and II SIG Schools: 3 Total SIG Schools: 11 Total Funding Awards.

FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.

ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Supporting Quality After School Programs for Our Students Tuesday, September 23, 2014.

The School Improvement Grant Program: Analysis of Performance in America’s Great City Schools Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015.

Strategy, Organizational Design, and Effectiveness.

Do Now On a post-it please write the following: One challenge or emergency that you are nervous about handling.

Presenters Bud Jacobs, Executive Director CIS LA Andrew Glazier, Chief of Staff CY LA Sissy O’Reilly, Principal Clinton MS Regina Marquez-Martinez, Field.

Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together

Tier I in Diplomas Now Collaborating around The Big Push.

1 WSWC and DN Similarities and Differences WSWC and DN Similarities and Differences Program Manager Similarities Vision and tone setting for the team Team.

Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.

1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner.

NCI’s Cancer Information Service Program Mary Anne Bright Office of Cancer Information Service, NCI June 25, 2007.

Changing... Leading... Learning... WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE 1.

Do Now On a post-it please write the following: Veteran PMs: One challenge or emergency that you encountered during your year First Year PMs: One challenge.

CALI Professional Development (paid) Balanced Scorecard Periodic District Data Reviews Leadership & Learning Center Consultant Support Accountability,

Ashley Briggs, Ed.D., case study lead Felix Fernandez, Ph.D, implementation lead ICF International 1 July 8, 2015.

Department of Grants and District Initiatives 1 San Antonio Independent School District Department of Grants and District Initiatives The purpose of the.

DIPLOMAS NOW SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-9, 2011 BOSTON, MA Welcome to Day 2!

SUMMER INSTITUTEJULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK Collaborative Fundraising DNSI 2015 Executive Track.

Every student. every classroom. every day. Re-establishing Community and Stakeholder Relationships After State Receivership Jody London, Director, Board.

© 2010 Copyright KrasnePlows Nonprofit Collaborations Social Impact Exchange Conference Thursday, June 17, 2010 New York City.

WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.

Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.

REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.

1 Diplomas Now / Talent Development Secondary Footprint – School Year Seattle 2 schools Los Angeles 3 schools San Antonio 2 schools Baton Rouge.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN Chicago Overview: Steve Kimball, SMHC/CPRE/Univ. Wisconsin Panel: Hill Hammock & Monica Santana Rosen, Chicago.

Development of the Strategic Vision and Where We Go From Here? Dan Dooley Vice President.

Qua lity Special Education Programs in the School Turnaround Context: Focused Programmatic Improvements Lauren Morando Rhim September 16, 2015.

HR Practices For I/T Success. THIS REPORT PRESENTS I/S HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICE RESEARCH FINDINGS WITH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE Understand HR practices.

NELA Professional Growth Plan: Growth Analysis C. Miller-Walker Cohort 3.

 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.

2012 Summer Institute THE PIVOT FROM RECRUITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION.

WVDE System of Support Michele Blatt Office of School Improvement.

ACCOUNTABILITY AND MONITORING IN HEALTH INITIATIVE PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAM Capacity Building Consultation 5 – 7 June, 2012 Istanbul, Turkey.

JANUARY 12,  My Voice Staff Survey Results: % in agreement StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I feel valued for my unique skills and talents5042 School is.

 Things We Do Together  Things We Do Separately  Changing Practice  Pushing the Envelope  Assume: This is work that must be done together.

Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.

Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.

Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.

Prepared by the Justice Research and Statistics Association SUSTAINING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.

Federal Programs Unit Division of Learning Services Jayne Green and Kyron Jones.

Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 5, 2015 California County Offices of Education Attendance.

Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.

Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.

Math 20/20 NEW WAYS OF TEACHING REQUIRED! IMPORTANT QUESTION How are you preparing teachers and their leaders for math standards implementation?

Credit Suisse Americas Corporate Citizenship Lalita Advani, Director of Community Engagement.

A Collaborative Mixed-Method Evaluation of a Multi-Site Student Behavior, School Culture, and Climate Program.

Human Resources Partner

Getting Started Your Grant Journey Begins

Waste Diversion Planning

External affairs August 23, 2018.

Differentiated Supports in Special Education

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT

Planning for Dramatic Improvement Part B

Office of Student and Family Support

The Program Plan Problem/needs statement Develop _____ and objectives

DREAM Developing Reading Education with Arts Methods

Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist

Year of Instruction 2.0.

STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018

Lewis central Superintendent Search

Presentation transcript:

Diplomas Now i3 Site Recruitment

I3 School Recruitment Goal New i3 Middle School Partners 12+ New i3 High School Partners

District-level Observations from Diplomas Now i3 recruitment AcceleratorsBarriers Strong central district turnaround office with authority over school planning, budgets and principals Programmatic buy-in from Superintendent thereby opening up different funding options Large numbers of turnaround schools and district acknowledgement of scope of problem Desire for collaboration (openness to external partners) Decentralized structure (principals create their own SIG plans or choose partners without district support or leadership) SIG timing and process (late identification in schools, lack of district strategy or openness to partnerships) Districts utilizing partial support models (district or external partners) or SIG funding for components as opposed to comprehensive turnaround Incomplete understanding of DN as supplemental service provider as opposed to whole school turnaround Random assignment for i3 evaluation and inadequate funding

Organizational Observations from Diplomas Now i3 recruitment OpportunitiesChallenges Leveraging organization/district relationships to integrate Diplomas Now into larger partnerships Existing relationships with superintendents, city and state education leaders Strong partnership with sites and DN National team to support district engagement and follow up Creative financing using i3 and other district funds (not explicitly tying DN to SIG) Leveraging supportive DN principals Inconsistent messaging or understanding by districts of the model as more than simply, CY, CIS or combination Upselling from tiered intervention to comprehensive turnaround Working through the district bureaucracy from the bottom up The School Improvement Grant timeline and process

Site Categories Mega districts that did not participate in cohort 1 (Phi, NY, Chi, Detroit) Smaller districts that did not participate in cohort 1 (Columbia, Seattle, Columbus, San Antonio) Cohort 1 Partners (EBR, LA, Boston, Miami, DC)

Questions to Discuss 1.What worked in your district for i3 recruitment? 2.What did not work? 3.Are you aware of any district strategic initiatives that i3 could fit into? 4.How can the national Diplomas Now team best support you? 5.Are there other strategic partners that can be helpful (e.g., United Way)?