Fire Investigation And Prosecution Process Map THE ROLE OF THE CPS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigating Deaths at Work
Advertisements

“You have amongst you many a purchas’d slave, Which like your asses, and your dogs and mules, You use in abject and in slavish parts, Because you bought.
POLICE BODY WORN CAMERA: DISCLOSURE AND IDENTIFICATION ISSUES
Prosecuting Stalking Fiona Gray Trial Advocate Office of the
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Criminal Court Process.
Magistrates Courts Powers and procedures. Magistrates’ powers  They can sentence a person for up to 6 months for a single offence and 12 for two sentences.
Intro to the courts & Magistrates’ Court Jurisdiction
Explains with some clear reasoning and relevance CPS requirements for charging suspects.
Outline Procedure to Trial To be able to describe the procedure from charging the accused to the start of his trial To be able to describe the procedure.
Definition Any act committed or omitted that violates the law, is against the community and is punishable by the state to commit a crime, a commission.
ELS BAIL. Bail Bail is the release from custody, pending a criminal trial, of an accused on the promise that money will be paid if he absconds. The decision.
Topic 12 Attempts Topic 12 Attempts. Topic 12 Attempts Introduction If a defendant fully intends to commit a crime but for some reason fails to complete.
Prosecuting Disability Motivated Hate Crime Dale Simon Director of Public Accountability and Inclusion Crown Prosecution Service.
Unit 2 – Criminal Law Revision DON’T FORGET YOUR ASSESSMENT TODAY!!!
The Criminal Courts: Procedure and Sentencing
Magistrates Courts Powers and procedures. Magistrates’ powers  They can sentence a person for up to 6 months for a single offence and 12 for two sentences.
Pre-trial Procedure and CRIMINAL CASES Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised Chapters 12 and 13 of ‘The English Legal System’ by J.
The criminal courts; procedure and sentencing
Topic 7 The courts system: criminal courts Criminal courts.
Civil and criminal courts
Criminal Courts by Lisa Incledon. Key Feature of Criminal Trials Criminal offences are offences against the state or society as a whole. Therefore the.
Topic 7 The courts system: criminal courts Criminal courts.
Criminal Courts Criminal Courts and Lay People © The Law Bank The Criminal Courts and Lay People The Outline of Criminal Courts 1.
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
Bail.
English Legal System Criminal Litigation Remands, adjournments and Bail Mode of trial proceedings Committal from the Magistrates’ Court.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
Crown Prosecution Service. Introduction  Responsible for prosecuting people in England and Wales who have been charged with a criminal offence.  It.
The Importance of Sanctions The company as “economic man” Defining the objectives of prosecuting Tactical decisions The role of the prosecutor.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
The criminal courts: Procedure and sentencing Sentencing.
Comparative Law Spring 2001 Class 38 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April 21, 2002.
Annex A ASBOs are a powerful tool for protecting victims and stopping anti-social behaviour. Much effort goes into getting the ASBO by the agencies involved.
Chapter 8 Lecture 2: Defences Reaching a Verdict.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
Pre-Trial Procedure in Criminal Cases … Produced by Mrs Anna Lindley. Edited by and copyright of Dr Peter Jepson.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Describe the structure of the court system, and the role and significance of each level of criminal.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
START OF COURT PROCEEDINGS. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS, OFFENCES AND BAIL  Criminal proceedings start because of an arrest, summons, charge or warrant – the.
Unit 1 The Criminal Courts September /12/20152 Aims and Objectives…. Our aim is to understand the structure of the criminal courts by:- Investigating.
Criminal Courts Produced by Mrs Anna Lindley Edited by and copyright of Dr Peter Jepson.
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Criminal Courts System. Re-cap – What are the three types of criminal offences? Summary Offences – relatively minor, triable only in Magistrates’ Court.
Procedure to Trial. Principles Behind Criminal Procedures Criminal cases should be dealt with justly which means: Acquitting the innocent and convicting.
Criminal courts Topic 7 The courts system test: criminal courts.
Paper 2 – Court Procedures Questions. Possible Questions Court Procedures: Outline the procedural differences between an either-way and an indictable.
PROSECUTION AND CRIMINAL TRIAL PROCESS TRIAL PROCESSES.
A Day in a Criminal Court Unit 10. Criminal law Criminal law the part of law concerned with the punishment of offences defined as crimes by the law. Offences.
CATEGORY OF OFFENCE PLACE OF TRIAL EXAMPLES OF OFFENCE Summary Magistrates’ court Driving without insurance; Criminal damage £5,000 Common assault Triable.
 Hierarchy of courts of England and Wales  Civil courts  Civil procedure.
CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES. WHAT EXACTLY ARE CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES?  Processes and procedures that occur before a trial or hearing commences.
Law LA1: The Criminal Process The Criminal Process Unit 1 -AS.
Domestic Violence Jeanette Smith Senior Crown Prosecutor.
International Congress of the Brazilian Judges’ Association
Victorian Courts Mapping the Court Process
Classification of Offences
The Criminal Process Criminal Courts
Rules and Theory of Criminal Law Criminal Process
Courtroom Participants
INVESTIGATION PROCESS AND TECHNIQUE
Sanctions and Outcomes
Criminal Law and Justice
Steps in a Criminal Case
Magistrates – Their Work and Evaluation
Bail. What is bail? Bail is being given liberty until the next stage in the case. Bail is being given liberty until the next stage in the case. Remand.
The Role of Crown Prosecution Service
Presentation transcript:

Fire Investigation And Prosecution Process Map THE ROLE OF THE CPS

INTRODUCTION The Criminal Justice System demands that we get it right first time. There are increasingly fewer opportunities during the lifetime of the case to remedy defects that occur.

INTRODUCTION Police Investigate Take “no further action” without referral to a prosecutor where an appropriate evidential standard is not met Complete pre-charge reports and prosecution files for referral Refer cases to CPS for a charging decision Provide key evidence and complete action plans required by CPS Ensure that unused material is revealed to the CPS and fulfils other disclosure obligations attributed to the Police Support victims and witnesses through the court process

INTRODUCTION CPS Gives advice to police Authorises charges in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors and the DPP’s Guidance on Charging Prosecutes criminal cases Delivers justice for victims and witnesses Appeals unsatisfactory court decisions in higher courts Makes applications for extradition Has an international role in capacity building abroad Recovers assets where there is benefit from criminal conduct.

THE FULL CODE TEST The Evidential Stage Prosecutors must be satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction against each suspect on each charge. A case which does not pass the evidential stage must not proceed, no matter how serious or sensitive it may be. The finding that there is a realistic prospect of conviction is based on the prosecutor’s objective assessment of the evidence, including the impact of any defence and any other information that the suspect has put forward or on which he or she might rely. It means that an objective, impartial and reasonable jury, bench of magistrates or judge hearing a case alone, properly directed and acting in accordance with the law, is more likely than not to convict the defendant of the charge.

THE FULL CODE TEST The Public Interest Stage It has never been the rule that a prosecution will automatically take place once the evidential stage is met. A prosecution will usually take place unless the prosecutor is satisfied that there are public interest factors tending against prosecution which outweigh those tending in favour. When deciding the public interest, prosecutors consider questions set out in the Code so as to identify and determine the relevant public interest factors tending for and against prosecution. These factors, together with any public interest factors set out in relevant guidance or policy issued by the DPP, enable prosecutors to form an overall assessment of the public interest.

RELEVANT OFFENCES Arson (simple) – S.1(1), 1(3) and 4 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971, Reckless arson – S.1(2) and (3) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 Arson with intent to endanger life – S.1(2) and (3) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971

DECIDING ON CHARGE EVIDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS The prosecutor will have regard to the evidence available, legal guidance, case law and look for evidence of who started the fire whether from CCTV, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, admissions in interview or to others, identification evidence, ANPR, cell-site data and other mobile phone evidence of association. how the fire was caused and it’s consequences – Fire Officer report whether there was any intention to endanger lives or recklessness as to whether life was endangered the financial loss suffered motive or reason for starting a fire

DECIDING ON CHARGE EVIDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS Police investigations can reveal the motive or reason for starting a fire. To get an insurance pay-out To harass another To kill To destroy evidence To get revenge To be re-housed Youthful pranks Anger following an argument Mental health issues Intoxication

DECIDING ON CHARGE EVIDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS The Fire Investigator’s report adds to the quality of evidence. It can set out where and how the fire started, the ignition, type of material burnt, the effects of smoke and whether accelerants were used. A small fire to bedding in an occupied building or a fire to a wheelie bin resulting in extensive damage could show recklessness as to whether life is endangered. A fire by pushing a lighted object through a letter box could show an intent to endanger life. A preliminary report can be of great assistance in deciding on charge and timeliness in sending the full report is essential. At times we also secure more specialist reports. We have used SGS M-Scan for forensic work on clothing to establish whether this has been in touch with petrol resulting in microscopic amounts of petrol being found in the clothing. In that case there were aspects of evidence that pointed to the conclusion that the suspect was one of those residing in the house. However we know that the jury can relate to firm conclusive evidence and the report and evidence was crucial in securing a conviction. A ggof fire investigator’s report followed by a conference assists in providing a clear explanation of issues to a prosecutor including assisting in identifying further lines of enquiry where conclusions do not immediately emerge from the FI’s report. Regarding timeliness the defence may also want to instruct a fire investigator.

DECIDING ON CHARGE EVIDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS A full police and fire investigation can therefore result in charges of arson as well as other charges such as Murder or manslaughter Harassment Perverting the course of justice Fraud

DECIDING ON CHARGE EVIDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS The prosecutor will decide if sufficient evidence exists for a realistic prospect of conviction. The police may be directed to secure further evidence if required. If this is not forthcoming the suspect may have to be released.

DECIDING ON CHARGE PUBLIC INTEREST CONSIDERATIONS The more serious the offence the more likely it is that a prosecution is required. A prosecutor will also assess the level of culpability of the suspect (pre-meditation, planning, offence committed on bail, previous convictions, whether the offence is likely to be continued, repeated or escalated) the circumstances and harm to the victim The age of the suspect (the best interests and welfare of a young person must be considered including whether a prosecution is likely to have an adverse impact on future prospects that is disproportionate to the seriousness of the offending) The impact on the community (the greater the impact the more likely it is that a prosecution is required) Whether a prosecution is a proportionate response

AGGRAVATING FACTORS Intentional / reckless. Motivation – revenge, harassment, insurance, fraud etc. Pre-planned Use of accelerants / firebombs Injury caused Extent of damage Risk of fire spreading Dwelling attacked Public building / school attacked

MITIGATING FACTORS Plea of guilty Lack of previous convictions Defendant’s personal circumstances Mental issues

VENUE OF TRIAL Arson (simple) is triable either in the magistrates’ or crown court based on seriousness, complexity or whether magistrates’ sentencing powers are sufficient. Arson being reckless as to whether life is endangered and arson with intent to endanger life can only be tried on indictment Following summary trial of an either-way offence the magistrates may still send the case to the Crown Court for sentencing if they think their sentencing powers are inadequate.

SENTENCE Section 4 Criminal Damage Act 1971. A person guilty of arson under section 1 or of an offence under section 1(2) shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for life. But, simple arson tried in the magistrates’ court carries a maximum penalty of 6 months or a fine of £5,000.

Arson Prosecutions from CPS Data 2012 - 2014