Creeks & Communities: A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural justice and a constructive approach to negotiating with stakeholders Jill Howieson.
Advertisements

An instrument developed for the PathFinder By the Consensus Building Institute Consensus Building and Conflict Resolution toolkit Presentation prepared.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
MAKING PLACE BASED AGREEMENTS WORK: LEADERSHIP SOLUTIONS Kent Executive Leadership Programme
Copyright © 2009 First Steps Training & Development, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2008 First Steps Training & Development, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Partnership Way: Blueprint Development Session Joanne Cashman Director, The IDEA Partnership At NASDSE Luann Purcell Executive Director, CASE Stacy.
Collaborative Skills Enhancement South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Session 1 Wednesday, January 21, 2004.
The Many Approaches to CBPR: Learning from the Differences Linda Silka, Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center University of Maine.
Interpersonal skills & Communication Edina Nagy Lajos Kiss Szabolcs Hornyák.
Context for Public Health Nutrition Practice: Cultural Competence Coalitions/Collaboration Community-based.
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT a quick overview Elizabeth Trybula, Watershed Information Specialist Indiana Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts.
The Chaplain as Spiritual Guide in Ethics Consults 2006.
Sustaining your Community Strategies & Structures Fran Butterfoss Coalitions Work Tim LaPier CDC’s Healthy Communities Program.
A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management Creeks and Communities.
Interest-Based Bargaining
1.05 Managing Team Conflict 1.05 Understand concepts of teamwork.
 Problem solving is important for maintaining a healthy balance between the dimensions of a person’s well-being.  If problems are not resolved then.
Managing Team Conflict
Building Human Resource Management Skills National Food Service Management Institute 1 Dealing with Conflict in the Workplace Objectives At the completion.
Develop your Leadership skills
Community Action for Development Dr. C. Krishna Mohan Rao, Ph.D Centre Head, Research &Training AMR-APARD.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Techniques in Civic Engagement Presented by Bill Rizzo Local Government Specialist UW-Extension Local Government Center
Transboundary Conservation Governance: Key Principles & Concepts Governance of Transboundary Conservation Areas WPC, Sydney, 17 November 2014 Matthew McKinney.
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
ENHANCING LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS.  Transferring knowledge to application by learning and applying problem-solving strategies to real world, unpredictable.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.
Leading in a Collaborative World. Collaboration n. 1.The act of working together; united labour. 2.The act of willingly cooperating with an enemy, especially.
Creating Meetings that Matter: A global challenge Beatrice Briggs Director, International Institute for Facilitation and Change.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Collaboration. Definitions of Collaboration Collaboration is “a process through which parties who see different aspects of a problem can constructively.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.
Striving For Personal Wellness Making Healthy Choices and Decisions.
Collaborative Leadership National PTA Diversity Committee.
Presented by: Steve Litke, Fraser Basin Council Winnipeg, Manitoba June 18, 2012 Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Governance – Lessons from BC.
What is Negotiated Rulemaking? Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolution The University of Texas School of Law.
Lean In Negotiation. Agenda for today  7.30 – 8:00 - Lean In and meet  Lean in overall objective, Educational meeting and Negotiation.
INTEREST BASED PROBLEM SOLVING UniServ Academy October 2007.
 People with goals succeed because they know where they are going. ~ Earl Nightingale.
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
Adaptive Management and the Delta Plan “Include a science-based, transparent, and formal adaptive management strategy for ongoing ecosystem restoration.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
CREEKS & COMMUNITIES Laura Van Riper – Social Scientist National Riparian Service Team.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 4 Managing Conflict and the Art of Negotiation.
People Working with People Toward Riparian Understanding Janice Staats National Riparian Service Team.
PLANNING CYCLE An Overview. CONTENT Expected achievements Expected achievements Why IWRM Planning? Why IWRM Planning? Why a strategic approach? Why a.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Interest Based Problem Solving 1/9/2016 Prepared by Best Practices referencing and adapting materials from Restructuring Associates Inc. 1 Quick Reference.
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Interest-Based Bargaining.  Interest-based bargaining involves parties in a collaborative effort to jointly meet each other’s needs and satisfy mutual.
The Power of Grassroots Groups to Foster Wellness Vital Aging Network September, 2015 Nico Pronk, Ph.D. VP and Chief Science Officer HealthPartners Adj.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Collaborative Leadership.
Trialogue Session (Session 1.3.1) About Trialogues.
Consulting Guidelines.  This is not your business!  You can only make recommendations based on the consulting agreements objectives  You may recommend.
Building Consensus C&S 563. BAD Consensus n Those who oppose do not speak up at meeting. n Everyone nodding in unison but not really agreeing with the.
Better Health. No Hassles. Making Healthy Choices and Decisions Striving For Personal Wellness.
Lecture “6” Manage Project Team
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 1: Introduction to the TDA/SAP Process.
Collaborative Decision Making: What, When, Why, How?
Managing the Human Footprint. Planning, Policy, and Management  Key elements in the process of identifying problems and their possible solutions  Essential.
Presented by The Solutions Group Decision Making Tools.
Conflict Management – I Weeks Jan Brouwers Types of Conflicts and options to manage them.
Chapter 3: Strategy and Tactics of Integrative Negotiation
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Mediation and Related Approaches as Tools for IA
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Conflict.
Presentation transcript:

Creeks & Communities: A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management

Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR 2003 Lots of creeks look like this We know they can be better

Dixie Creek NV 1989 Dixie Creek NV 1995 Why isn’t it happening in more places?

Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000 In part, it’s about having a common understanding of how streams work. And it requires working with people on their lands and their issues.

Lawsuits and regulatory approaches often leave out the people who must implement solutions and who are typically most affected by their management

Creeks & Communities Creeks connect people, science and communities. They must work together and individually for restoration and improvements on a large scale.

Awareness Understanding/ acceptance Agreements Monitoring Adjust Common Purpose ACTIONS

Good Science is Important: and seldom enough Conflicting Science “Good Science” changes over time. Science from somewhere else. Socio/Political factors important

Our society is literally awash today in data, information & knowledge (science). And yet in many places our creeks are failing to produce the values they offer when healthy. What is often lacking is fully understanding what it all means, and then having the wisdom to apply what we know in ways that best meets the needs of people and the ecosystem. (Dee Hock 1999)

Understandable to stakeholders with a range of scientific backgroundsUnderstandable to stakeholders with a range of scientific backgrounds Seen by all parties as legitimate and valid (believable), relevant and trustedSeen by all parties as legitimate and valid (believable), relevant and trusted Used to identify the costs/benefits and risks/tradeoffs of alternatives, not to make the decisionUsed to identify the costs/benefits and risks/tradeoffs of alternatives, not to make the decision Useful Scientific Information

Creeks & Communities By focusing on stream health, we help to create a common vision of what is possible and what is needed for management and/or restoration

Focus on Function Vegetation Soil, Landscape Water

“Information does not resolve social conflicts, people do.” (Duane 1997)

Working Together for Creeks and Communities Given that the situation is complex, fraught with conflict and views polarized, how can people work together for common solutions?

If you bring together the right people, in constructive ways, with good information, they will produce:  Better decisions  Improved relationships  Sustainable communities and landscapes

Build Ownership & Commitment

Working Together for Creeks and Communities Bring affected interests together Create learning environments, build relationships/trust Build community information base Empower people

Working Together for Creeks and Communities Bring Affected Interests Together - Has an interest or concern (self-identified) - May be needed to implement the outcome - May try to undermine the effort

Working Together for Creeks and Communities Create Learning Environments –Safe atmosphere –Explain basic ecological processes in a way everyone can understand. –Listen to everyone for new possibilities and approaches

Working Together for Creeks and Communities Build community information base –Common vocabulary –Understanding of physical function –Time, risk and cost –Individual and watershed choices

Integrating Science into Collaborative Decision-Making Joint Fact Finding Structure the conversation

*Figure adapted from Consensus Building Institute, 2002 Return to any step above as appropriate Implementation, monitoring & program adaptation to meet objectives Parties reach agreement (i.e., recommendations or proposals) Parties generate options, alternatives or packages for mutual gain Parties initiate JFF process to handle scientific & technical complexity Convener initiates collaborative process (situation assessment prepared) Convener & stakeholders decide whether to proceed (agree on process)

Working Together for Creeks and Communities Empower people to Create Change (Community & Individuals) –Improved relationships –Trust –Technical know how and support –Financial support