The importance of tackling discards: A fisheries policy perspective Luke Warwick – Defra, Environmentally Responsible Fishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fisheries management; problems - solutions Sarah B. M. Kraak University College Cork Marine Institute Ireland.
Advertisements

EAFM & Risk Assessment Prioritizing Assessments Prof. Dr. Sahar Mehanna Head of Fish Population Dynamics Lab.
The Magnitude and Impact of By-catch Mortality by Fishing Gear Robin Cook FRS Marine Laboratory Aberdeen UK.
Supporting the seafood industry for a sustainable, profitable future Landings Obligation EIA John Anderson Senior Economist.
Jerry Percy Common Fisheries Policy Reform. CFP Reform – A Brief History 30 + years of mismanagement – Twin Aims Green Paper 2009 Original Commission.
SSC Report to the CFMC on its November 12,2014 meeting December 9, 2014 St. Thomas, USVI.
The Scottish Conservation Credits Scheme Moving fisheries management towards conservation Dr Richard Dixon / Louize Hill WWF Scotland.
How fishing gears affect the ecosystem
CFP Reform Implementation of the Landings Obligation: Context and Process.
FAO, Fishing Operations and Technology Service (FIRO)
1 Full Accounting for Catches An increasing necessity for sustainable fisheries management.
Key approaches that will inform the development of the research include Chai (1991), Casey (1996), Harley (2000), Dingsør (2001), Palsson (2003), McBride.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Danish reflections on Right Based Management Mogens Schou BS RAC 15. january RBM as a way to economic efficiency 2.RBM as a.
Mary McAllan Scottish Government – Marine Directorate Sea Fisheries Management BUILDING A CULTURE OF COMPLIANCE Mary McAllan Scottish Government – Marine.
Swedish Board of Fisheries
Environmentally harmful subsidies – a real threat to biodiversity Policy Dialogue Brussels, 11 th January 2010 Fisheries Subsidies Where are the benefits?
Are pelagic fisheries managed well? A stock assessment scientists perspective Mark Maunder and Shelton Harley Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
The material in this slide show is provided free for educational use only. All other forms of storage or reproduction are subject to copyright- please.
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
Developing a Socio-Economic Dataframe AIM: Construct, test and refine a framework for the collection and management of socio- economic fisheries data Make.
2nd Meeting of the MariFish Bycatch and Discards Scientific Committee Madrid, 5-6th October 2009 Work Package 7: Collaborative Research Programmes Thematic.
The Directorate of Fisheries in Iceland. D I R E C T O R A T E O F F I S H E R I E S Directorate of Fisheries Fisheries Marine Research Institute Institute.
Coral Triangle Initiative FAO-GEF Project REBYC II – CTI Strategies for Trawl Fisheries Bycatch Management Petri Suuronen (FAO) Coral Triangle Fishers.
European sea bass management Lisa Readdy, Cefas. 18/09/2013.
Fishing on a Postage Stamp From ticklerchain to pulse Why How by Whom When North Sea RAC Demeral Working Group 21 February 2013 Pim Visser, VisNed bald.
The Swedish fisheries administration – an overview Maria Hellsten, head of executive staff unit.
Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing: the economics of Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing and the impact of IUU Fisheries on ACP.
Recent work in England (Cefas) on discarding issues ( ) Future planned work ( ) MARIFISH (NORWICH JUNE 2008) Dr Andy Revill (Cefas, England,
ICES Advice for 2015 – Sea bass Carmen Fernández, ICES ACOM vice-chair For Inter AC Sea bass workshop (Paris, May 26, 2015)
Seafish – Our work in the area of by-catch mitigation and discard reduction Tom Rossiter Research and Development Manager.
EU management – current situation and future actions Kenneth Patterson European Commission Directorate-General of Fisheries and Maritime Affairs.
MARIFISH COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMME THE IMPORTANCE OF TACKLING DISCARDS: A FISHERY MANAGER’S VIEW Concepción Sánchez Trujillano General Subdirector of Fishery.
Intelligent Energy for Europe 2009 Good practice in reconciling onshore and offshore wind energy with environmental objectives GPWIND.
Oceans 11. What is “fishing”? Exploitation of marine organisms for sustenance, profit, or fun. Examples: –Fish- cod, halibut, salmon, redfish, stripped.
Access to data for local authority public health AGW Public Health Network Training Event: Public Health Data, Information and Intelligence 11 th November.
PILLAR 1 – IMPROVING THE INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT.
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
The Landing Obligation in the European Union Common Fisheries Policy
West Atlantic bluefin tuna Executive Summary. Biology Continued progress in knowledge of bluefin biology, but the complex behaviour of this species means.
PILLAR 2 – MANAGING OUR FISHING OPPORTUNITIES TO MAXIMISE PROFITABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY.
1 The effects of implementing technical conservation measures on small fisheries dependent economies Dominique Rommel Pharos Fisheries Consultants Ltd.
Why do we fish? Survival- many costal communities, particularly in developing countries, fish as a primary food source. Recreation- fishing for fun.
Atlantic bluefin tuna Two management units since 1981 Complex spatial dynamics with mixing between both stocks (investigated by BFT-SG since 2001) Spatial.
Georges Bank East Scotian Shelf Grand Banks.
West Coast Groundfish Quota Program Workshop PLANNING FOR A REVIEW OF THE WEST COAST GROUNDFISH TRAWL CATCH SHARE PROGRAM CHUCK TRACY, PACIFIC FISHERY.
Introducing the landing obligation for the COD in the Kattegat, Kenn Skau Fischer, NSAC, Charlottenlund 29 January 2016.
1 Climate Change and Implications for Management of North Sea Cod (Gadus morhua) L.T. Kell, G.M. Pilling and C.M. O’Brien CEFAS, Lowestoft.
Outcomes shark and ray expert meeting Amsterdam, 1-2 February 2016 Irene Kingma – Dutch Elasmobranch Society For NSAC DWG meeting Copenhagen, 9 February.
South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Project Joint ASCLME/SWIOFP Policy and Governance Assessment.
Mixed fisheries issues for North Sea Cod Clara Ulrich, Katell Hamon, (Stuart Reeves) DTU Aqua. National Institute of Aquatic Resources Danmarks Tekniske.
Fisheries Management: Principal Methods, Advantages and Disadvantages
Mixed fisheries issues for North Sea Cod
Mike Mitchell Fair Seas Limited
Technical Measures Proposal
Identifying chokes Stuart Reeves
Sustainable Fisheries in the Black Sea
EMFF Funding opportunities for the environment
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
Potential indicators for fish and fisheries
Feedback received on the establishment of fisheries management measures in Natura 2000 sites (Document 4.1) Exchange information on ongoing activities.
Presentation of modified fishing gear
Leticia Martinez Aguilar DG FISH Unit A2 June 2007
Working Group on Data, Information and Knowledge Exchange
Fisheries Management and the National Marine Plan
The environmental dimension of the EMFF
Ornis Committee, 05 October 2012 Brussels
Health Impact Assessment in NSW
Tracie Wills Senior Commissioning Officer
Candidate Pack Operations Officer.
Presentation transcript:

The importance of tackling discards: A fisheries policy perspective Luke Warwick – Defra, Environmentally Responsible Fishing

Our View on Discarding Discarding is of benefit to no one. It’s not only a waste of a valuable resource but also impacts the health of our fish stocks. Therefore reducing discards is about: - Reducing stock mortality (i.e. not catching or not killing fish) - Not wasting catches (i.e. Marketing) - Reducing impacts on non target organisms (benthos & sensitive species) In the UK our largest discarding problem occurs in demersal mixed fisheries; beam and otter trawling. A solution to this problem requires scientists, policy makers and enforcers to work together. Recently the Commission released a statement on discards and Defra welcome the view to work together with other MS to reduce discards.

Defra has primarily turned its focus on discarding in targeted fisheries. Discarding occurs for different reasons and we consider there to be three types of discarding to tackle in targeted fisheries. Each type requires different solutions depending on the cause of the problem. The UK is committed to taking action now on this issue and is already funding/undertaking a wide range of initiatives to understand and reduce discarding. A solution to discarding will require a range of measures including the development and uptake of selective gears, changes to the management system (CFP) and a behavioural shift from fishermen. Our Approach to Discards Targeted Fisheries Undersize (<MLS) Over Quota High Grading

Gear selectivity is an important component in any policy to reduce discards. Our focus for gear selectivity trials is to reduce the bycatch of unwanted or undersize catch and therefore reduce subsequent discarding. Defra have a number of projects which we are currently funding: - An eliminator trawl trial which is commissioned to start this year. - Gear trials and investigating the survivability of Sharks, Skates and Rays - Two gear selectivity trials in the South West UK beam trawl fishery 50% project (fishermen behaviour social-marketing aspect). Other UK based initiatives include: - Scottish Conservation Credit Scheme - Shetland Cod gear trials - Scottish square mesh trials - Northern Ireland Square Mesh Trials in Nephrops fisheries Gear Selectivity Trials

Survivability of Discards (Sharks, Skates & Rays) From a policy point of view it is desirable to collect more information on species or fisheries for which there are no or only limited data on the survivorship of discards. - To identify skate species discarded in UK fisheries, their condition and discard survival rates. - To improve current estimates on discard mortality so as to improve the assessment of stock status, and inform the development of appropriate mitigation measures, and recommendations of good fishing practice. - To assess the survivability of porbeagle and spurdog and identify the times of year or particular localities where they may be most vulnerable to capture. It is also useful to determine if small modifications to gear can improve survivability of discarded organisms. - Modification reduced the total number of fish discarded by 70% without any loss of commercial species. - Reduced catch weight = increased survival of discarded Rays.

50% Project : South West Beam Trawl fishery This study is looking at improving the uptake of more selective gears by breaking down barriers and understanding discarding behaviours amongst beam trawler fishermen in Devon. The focus of the research is on the need to turn science research into real world outcomes. We realise that new gear modifications by themselves will achieve nothing if fishermen don't use them. This project has used social marketing tools to investigate why fishermen were discarding, find out their views and values and use this knowledge to develop ways to encourage them to take up new gears. Current results are encouraging - not only are gear trials successful, but also we have had 6 vessels voluntarily taking part, and have seen a real change in behaviour and attitude. The Real test will be if the change in behaviour is permanent. Understanding & Changing Discard Behavior

Gear Selectivity Trials Part of the 50% project is to develop technologies which minimise bycatch and subsequent discarding of undersize organisms. The project is working jointly with industry and other agencies to: - Quantify patterns and causes of discards - Evaluate the potential efficacy of newly developed gears It is hoped that this work could facilitate and support an industry shift towards reduced discarding and the uptake of more environmentally- responsible fishing gears.

Two vessels fishing in area VIIe have published results which indicate they have reduced their discarding of juvenile fish (all species) by 60-63%. - A third vessel results will be available soon. However gear selectivity alone is not a complete solution to discarding. We estimate that we can only reduce discarding by ~40% through gear selectivity alone. We therefore need to look at other ways to reduce discarding. For example under CFP we would need to push for other management measures. Gear Selectivity Trials

Recent EU commission statement on the CFP generating discards. Agree that collaboration is necessary between Member States. - Joining up and sharing of research and knowledge. This evidence can inform us what changes we can make to the CFP to reduce discards. We support the Commissions view for Member States to take action now, not simply wait until the CFP reform of Ideally we want to get the balance between incentives, enforcement and penalties right to encourage fishermen to change their behaviours. Interested in the Danish Catch Quota and CCTV trial However, there would still be a need to consider whether other measures such as (moving on provisions, area closures effort control are needed to ensure a further reduction in discarding. We are also interested in learning about other initiatives that offer similar reductions in discards. Discards & CFP Reform

Electronic Monitoring We are interested in the benefits of CCTV monitoring:  Can be used as part of a broader scheme to incentivise uptake of selective gears  Provides high coverage at lower cost (per vessel)  Can be used to reduce undersize, over-quota and high grading discards.  Provide data on bycatch of sensitive species.  Provide evidence that fishermen are not using illegal fishing gears. Defra is planning to further investigate the ability of CCTV monitoring to reduce discarding. Marifish could provide a useful platform for Member States to share and collaborate on investigations into electronic monitoring.

Summary Working together across Europe is the best way to tackle this issue Gear modifications alone will not solve the problem. Industry engagement and more refined management measures will also be needed; A solution to discarding will require a range of measures including the development and uptake of selective gears, changes to the management system (CFP) and behavioural shift from fishermen.