Review of the implementation in England of the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives Nature Directors 23 May 2012 Robin Mortimer, Defra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL Modernising the Planning Service in Clackmannanshire Stephen Bell Head of Development Services.
Advertisements

The Marine and Coastal Access Bill A New Framework for the Seas JOHN CLORLEY – MARINE CONSERVATION ZONE PROJECT DIRECTOR.
Learning from ELIR: piloting a new approach Thelma Barron, Assistant Director, QAA Scotland.
Infrastructure Planning Commission Workshop 2b Working with the IPC: Guidance and issues for promoters.
Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Dr Chris Boomer Development Plans Manager (DoE Northern Ireland)
A vision for a new national youth work strategy for Wales I want Youth Services to reach out to all young people and.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEA Jamie Byfield SEA Technical Officer HRA & EIA Cara Davidson Policy Manager.
MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION Summary of MSFD Requirements; EU project management arrangements; Descriptors of most.
The Challenge of Managing Marine Resources Industry's role in managing marine resources Peter Barham. Environmental Consultant.
Natura 2000 Funding Opportunities under EMFF Regulation for Damien Clarke Managing Authority – EFF / EMFF
Air Quality and Land Use Planning Land Use Consultants 11 th March 2008 Susanne Underwood.
Managing Marine Conservation Zones Dr Angela Moffat Marine Bill Project Manager Natural England
Shaun Henry Director, Managing Authority (SEUPB) INTERREG VA – Ireland/Northern Ireland/Western Scotland ( )
“Framework for mainstreaming Ireland's experience" Siobhan Barron Director National Disability Authority Ireland.
SEN and Disability Green Paper Update on draft legislation and pathfinder programme.
Reforms to Victoria’s native vegetation permitted clearing regulations.
SNH PERSPECTIVE ON PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Derek Manson Planning Adviser.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
1 CQC – the next phase Alan Rosenbach Special Policy Lead.
Corporate slide master With guidelines for corporate presentations LIVING WALES PROGRAMME Tim Jones.
“Worldwide Review of the Profession” Competition & Regulatory Developments ALAN HUNTER.
Licensing non-native biological control agents: the English way Biological Control in Ireland & Northern Ireland Sarah Hugo 12 th May 2011.
UK Context Devolved arrangements across the UK administrations – marine planning regions. English offshore and inshore regions Scottish offshore and inshore.
Spatially enabling Northern Ireland Dr Suzanne McLaughlin DFP Land & Property Services GIS Ireland Conference 11 th October 2012.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
MAINSTREAMING THE HORIZONTAL THEMES INTO THE SCOTTISH STRUCTURAL FUNDS PROGRAMMES GORDON McLAREN 1.
FUTURE OFFSHORE Update on the Consultation Nigel Peace Licensing & Consents Unit 27 March 2003.
Marine Planning: The role of the MMO and Partnerships Steve Brooker Head of Marine Planning.
An Introduction to the Severn Estuary Partnership: Collaboration and Joint Approaches Paul Parker Severn Estuary Partnership Engagement Officer
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Key principles and effectiveness of EIA.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
European Commission Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in the EU today – Business & Biodiversity Alexandra Vakrou, EC, DG Environment IEF European Roundtable.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
Kavala Workshop 1-2 June 2006 Legal protection of Transitional Waters [in the Cadses area]: A comparative analysis Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Liliana Maslarova.
The Marine Bill. The Bill covers... Marine Management Organisation Marine planning Streamlined marine licensing Nature conservation Improved inshore fisheries.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
Intelligent Energy for Europe 2009 Good practice in reconciling onshore and offshore wind energy with environmental objectives GPWIND.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
ESF Networking in the UK and at the Community level James Ritchie Information Officer – England and Gibraltar ESF programme.
Support and aspiration: A new approach to special educational needs and disability A consultation March 2011.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
The Habitats Directive in BANES A (brief) guide to the most commonly encountered legal issues.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
Revised Approach to the Management of Commercial Fisheries in European Marine Sites Presented by: Robbie Fisher Date: 24 September 2012.
Successful Integration is a result of good governance – getting the wiring right Integrated care as an aspiration is simple, and simplest if one begins.
Conservation Advice - Next steps
Local Asset Management Pilots Scheme
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
Place Matters: The Location Strategy for the United Kingdom
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
UK Marine Planning and the Ecosystem Based Approach
Update of Guidance document on Wind ENErgy and natura 2000
Cross Compliance Implementation & Control in England
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Strategic Appropriate Assessment of Spatial Plans
Update from Marine Scotland November 2018
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
European Marine Strategy
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Guidance on Non-energy extractive industries & Natura 2000
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
Presentation transcript:

Review of the implementation in England of the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives Nature Directors 23 May 2012 Robin Mortimer, Defra

The Habitats and Wild Birds Directives in England In Britain, protections from the Habitats Directive cover 9 plants, 12 individual animal species, + all species of bats, dolphins, porpoises, whales and 5 species of marine turtle Currently 251 Special Areas of Conservation under the Habitats Directive and 84 Special Protection Areas under the Birds Directive in England. In England, protected sites under the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives cover about 6% of land and nearly 23% of English inshore waters. By the end of 2012 over 7% of UK offshore waters will be protected sites. Responsibility for implementing the Directives largely devolved to England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The Review (November 2011 – March 2012) Considered implementation in England Focused on the legislative obligations for authorising development proposals, with a view to: reducing the burdens on businesses while maintaining and where possible enhancing environmental benefits. Aimed to understand what is working well, and where implementation could be improved in a cost-effective way Sought out good practice from other EU Member States, and significant engagement of environment and business groups

The Review’s Key Findings In some cases, often well publicised, costs and delays can occur for developers. These arise for a variety of reasons: o Guidance is complex: not all in one place, and operates at different levels; can reinforce perception of inconsistency and lack of transparency. o Authorisation processes for development can be complex, with responsibilities sometimes falling across many bodies o Data availability can be poor, especially in the marine environment, which can lead to highly precautionary decision making o Culture and capacity of those involved: scope to strengthen customer-focussed collaborative working and improve professional standards In large majority of cases the implementation works well, allowing both development of key infrastructure and the protection of Natura 2000 sites and species.

The measures announced in the Review’s Report To address these concerns, a series of measures were announced in the Report covering 4 themes: 1.Facilitating Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects 2.Improving Implementation Processes and Streamlining Guidance 3.Improving the Quantity, Quality and Sharing of Data 4.Improving the Customer Experience

1. Measures to facilitate Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects New Major Infrastructure and Environment Unit (MIEU) based in Defra, to identify and support resolution of Habitats Directive issues at pre-application stage Clarify the role of competent authorities when several are involved in a single development Consult on, and publish, new guidance on the use of the ‘Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest’ (IROPI) test for major projects. New evidence process for relevant key infrastructure projects introduced from September 2012.

2. Measures to improve implementation processes and streamlining guidance Consult on and publish (by March 2013) a new customer focussed overarching guidance manual to provide clear advice on key legal terms in the Directive. Undertake, by March 2013, a comprehensive stock take of existing guidance. Create a single easily accessible web-based portal for all guidance, by August 2012.

3) Measures to improve the Quantity, Quality and Sharing of Data Establish a Marine Evidence Group to address marine data sharing issues, evidence gaps and ways of improving post construction monitoring. Consult on new consistent standards on the acceptable range and quality of evidence needed to enable statutory bodies to provide their advice. Facilitate, by December 2012, agreement by all involved on a practical plan to share environmental data more widely, while recognising the need to respect commercial sensitivities Statutory nature conservation bodies to publish a new approach to increasing the information on the conservation objectives of protected sites Work closely with environmental NGOs and others to improve existing surveillance of protected species and pilot new approaches

Defra to promote a culture of co-operation, transparency, openness and customer focus in its delivery bodies, via corporate plans and Key Performance Indicators Government encourages statutory bodies, competent authorities and business to establish staff interchange arrangements Stakeholder roundtable in autumn 2012 to discuss progress towards establishing a customer-focussed culture 4. Measures to improve the customer experience

The link to ecosystems An Ecosystems Approach Government will invite the newly established Natural Capital Committee to give early consideration as it develops its work programme to the following issues: o How an Ecosystems Approach can help evaluate any specific choices over mitigation or (ecological) compensation o Extent to which an Ecosystems Approach could help to identify suitable measures to help deliver Favourable Conservation Status; and o The wider role an Ecosystem Approach can play in helping to make strategic choices about mitigation/compensation where a number of projects are impacting on the same area.

Would be interested to hear more about  In your implementation of the Directives, have you encountered any similar issues?  What steps have you taken to improve your implementation of the Directives that we could learn from?  How should we approach this in the review of national implementation in 2013?