Alexis Zubrow 1, Chris Allen 2, and James Beidler 2 1 1. EPA OAQPS and Region 1; 2. CSC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alexis Zubrow1 BH Baek2 Harvey Michaels3
Advertisements

Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
October 29, 2013 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason, Alexis Zubrow Glacier Bay, Alaska, June 2013.
US Carbon Dioxide Motor Vehicle Emissions Resolved Hourly at a 1 km Resolution Daniel Mendoza 1, Kevin Gurney 1, Chris Miller 1 1 Department of Earth and.
Impact of MOVES2014 on Emission Inventories from On-road Mobile Sources Alexis Zubrow, Darrell Sonntag, Harvey Michaels, David Brzezinski, Alison Eyth.
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
EPA’s 2007 and 2008 v5 Emissions Modeling Platforms Alison Eyth, Rich Mason, Alexis Zubrow U.S. EPA Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group Office of Air.
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.
SEE (Spatial Emissions Estimator): A New Tool for Estimating Link & Zone Emissions with MOVES Presentation for Southeast Texas Photochemical Modeling Technical.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
Mobile Source Inventories for SIPs Matt Laurita Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section EPA Region 4.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
Fuel Economy in Harris County-2007 Graciela Lubertino, PhD.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model TPB Technical Committee June 5, 2009 MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator.
National VMT Development Procedure Highway Information Seminar October , 2012 Patrick Zhang, PE
Improvements in Emissions and Modeling of OC and SVOC from Onroad Mark Janssen – LADCO, Mike Koerber – LADCO, Chris Lindjem – EVIRON, Eric Fujita – DRI.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Kip Billings, P.E. Andy Li, Phd Wasatch Front Regional Council October 14, 2010.
October 29, 2014 Alison Eyth, Alexis Zubrow, Rich Mason EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
1 ON-ROAD AND NON-ROAD SOURCES Melinda Ronca-Battista and Angelique Luedeker, ITEP/TAMS Center.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Sunil Kumar and Eulalie Lucas MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG August 18, 2009 Development of Inputs, Outputs, and Procedures for EPA’s Draft MOVES2009 Model.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
It’s Easy to Quantify Changes in GHG Emissions from Cars and Light Trucks – Right? Presented to: SACOG Panel Discussion April 16, 2009 Presented by: Bob.
Using the EMF for Emissions Sensitivities and for CMAQ Alison M. Eyth Alexis Zubrow Qun He UNC Institute for the Environment October, 2008.
1 Part 4 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data Computation. Additional Columns 2  Ucode=if(urban_code=99999, “Rural”, “Urban”)  VMT=(end_point-begin_point)*AADT.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
1 Integration of Criteria and Toxic Pollutants in SMOKE Madeleine Strum, OAQPS Collaborators: Marc Houyoux, MCNC/EMC Ron Ryan &
A state and national data system consisting primarily of:
October 6, 2015 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason (EPA OAQPS EIAG*) Alexis Zubrow (Volpe, DOT) * Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
WRAP Emission Inventory Status For the Attribution of Haze Project Workgroup Presented by Jeffrey Stocum Oregon DEQ Emissions Inventory Specialist as a.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
O NROAD S OURCES Angelique Luedeker, ITEP. 2 Onroad Emissions Emissions from vehicles Exhaust Brake and tire wear Evaporation.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
Moves 2010 Midwest Traffic Model Users Group September 30, 2010 Ames, Iowa Mark Filipi, AICP PTP Manager, Transportation Planning Services Metropolitan.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
WRAP SCC Temporal and Speciation Profile Improvement Project Status WRAP Regional Modeling Center Carolina Environmental Program November 4, 2003.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
November 16, Retrospective Analysis of Ambient and Emissions Data and Refinement of Study Hypotheses –Task 1: Review of Available Emissions Data.
Sunil Kumar MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG January 19, 2010 Review of MOVES2010 Local Data Inputs.
Use of IM & NEI Data Trends to Improve Vehicle Emissions Models IM Solutions Salt Lake City April 2014 Jim Lindner.
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Guoyuan Wu, Peng Hao, and Matthew Barth
Impact of New North American Emissions Inventories on Urban Mobile Source Emissions for High-Resolution Air Quality Modelling Junhua Zhang, Qiong.
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Project Purpose Compare the criteria pollutant emission estimates and related data contained within three emission inventories/modeling platforms EPA 2001.
VISTAS Use of CEM Data and CEM Cross-Referencing Activities
Overview of Emissions Processing for the 2002 Base Case CMAQ Modeling
B.H. Baek, Alejandro Valencia, and Michelle Snyder
Development of 2016 Alpha Version Activity Data
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
Updates to 2014NEIv2 Onroad Mobile Emissions
B.H. Baek, Rizzieri Pedruzzi, and Carlie Coats UNC at Chapel Hill, USA
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
SMOKE Improvements in version 2.0
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
2016 Nonroad Collaborative Work Group
Presentation transcript:

Alexis Zubrow 1, Chris Allen 2, and James Beidler EPA OAQPS and Region 1; 2. CSC

 What do temporal profiles do? ◦ Generally:  distribute emissions annual -> month, month -> day, day - > hour  the “when” of emissions ◦ Onroad (i.e. SMOKE-MOVES):  distribute vehicle miles traveled (VMT) from month-> day, day->hour  impacts rate-per-distance (RPD) processes, i.e. emissions from on-network  impacts total emissions: how much VMT vs what is the temperature at a specific hour  Problem: previous onroad diurnal profiles vary by road only 2

 2011NEI: first time EIS accepted MOVES inputs  32 S/L/T provided MOVES inputs for 2011NEI v1  Individual submissions consisted of series of county databases (CDBs)  Each CDB consisted of set of tables ◦ e.g. VMT, VPOP, speed distributions, age distributions, I/M programs, etc. ◦ dayvmtfraction – distribution VMT within week ◦ hourvmtfraction – distribution VMT within day ◦ Not all tables were updated by S/L/T 3

 Data mining opportunity ◦ 1,363 CDBs ◦ 1,839,097 hrvmtfraction records (non default) ◦ 1,013,853 dayvmtfraction records (non default) ◦ Flagged “bad” profiles ◦ Consolidated duplicate profiles  627,550 day profiles  89,304 hour profiles ◦ Developed scripts to average across various dimensions and to create LOTS of plots  Focused on diurnal profiles  Day of week profiles were unchanged 4

 1-to-many mapping  SCCs have more road types, but may not be useful to differentiate to this level 5 roadTypeIDroadDesc 2Rural Restricted Access 3Rural Unrestricted Access 4Urban Restricted Access 5Urban Unrestricted Access SCC_roadscc_tier4 110Rural Interstate: Total 130Rural Other Principal Arterial: Total 150Rural Minor Arterial: Total 170Rural Major Collector: Total 190Rural Minor Collector: Total 210Rural Local: Total 230Urban Interstate: Total 250Urban Other Freeways and Expressways: Total 270Urban Other Principal Arterial: Total 290Urban Minor Arterial: Total 310Urban Collector: Total 330Urban Local: Total MOVES SMOKE

 many-to-many mapping ◦ Overlapping definitions source type (MOVES sourceTypeID) and vehicle type (SMOKE SCC7) ◦ Complicates comparison of MOVES and SMOKE temporal profiles  Plan to revise SCCs for MOVES2013 to make mapping 1- to-1 6 sourceTypeIDsourceTypeName 11Motorcycle 21Passenger Car 31Passenger Truck 32Light Commercial Truck 41Intercity Bus 42Transit Bus 43School Bus 51Refuse Truck 52Single Unit Short-haul Truck 53Single Unit Long-haul Truck 54Motor Home 61Combination Short-haul Truck 62Combination Long-haul Truck SCC7Description Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles (LDGV) Light Duty Gasoline Trucks 1 & 2 (M6) = LDGT1 (M5) Light Duty Gasoline Trucks 3 & 4 (M6) = LDGT2 (M5) Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles 2B thru 8B & Buses (HDGV) Motorcycles (MC) Light Duty Diesel Vehicles (LDDV) Light Duty Diesel Trucks 1 thru 4 (M6) (LDDT) Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles (HDDV) Class 2B Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles (HDDV) Class 3, 4, & Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles (HDDV) Class 6 & Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles (HDDV) Class 8A & 8B Heavy Duty Diesel Buses (School & Transit) MOVES SMOKE

7 LDGV urban restricted, weekday HHDDV urban restricted, weekday

 Previous diurnal profiles varied across road type and day only  MOVES based profiles could vary across: ◦ Vehicle type ◦ Road type ◦ Day (weekday vs weekend) ◦ County 8

9

 When should we use submitted profiles for “self”?  Criteria: ◦ At least as much variability as the previous SMOKE profiles ◦ Vary by road type and/or vehicle type  Minor transformation from MOVES ◦ Averaging over source type to get SCC7 (SMOKE vehicle type)  NJ example: ◦ Varies by county, road, and vehicle (for most counties) ◦ Doesn’t vary by weekday/weekend ◦ Used county specific profiles for all weekday profiles 10

 What should we do for states that didn’t submit or for S/L/T that didn’t satisfy our criteria?  Options: 1.Use historic SMOKE profiles 2.Map counties to similar counties 3.Develop national profiles from subset of S/L/T profiles 11

 Using S/L/T profiles to create national profiles  Criteria: ◦ Varies by road ◦ Varies by vehicle ◦ May or may not vary by county ◦ Treat weekday and weekend separately  Process: ◦ Develop state average profile by vehicle/road/weekday or weekend ◦ Average state profiles to develop national profiles 12

 It’s like cooking… 13

14 NJ, average HHDDV urban restricted, weekday PA, average HHDDV urban restricted, weekday

15 National LDGV urban restricted, weekday National HHDDV urban restricted, weekday

16 National LDGV urban restricted, weekend National HHDDV urban restricted, weekend

17

 AQ sensitivities  For later versions of 2011 platform ◦ Outreach to S/L/T on specific questions about submissions ◦ 2011 NEI v2:  Outreach to S/L/T on potential uses of MOVES inputs  Specific outreach to update temporal related tables ◦ Incorporate temporal profiles from specific studies  For 2014 platform ◦ New SCCs simplify process (MOVES 2013) ◦ Continue with outreach to S/L/T on need for this data 18

 Dave Brzezinski and Harvey Michaels (OTAQ)  Alison Eyth, Marc Houyoux, Rich Mason, Norm Possiel, and Brian Timin (OAQPS)  Vernon Hughes (ARB)  Click and Clack 19

20

21

22

23

24 National LDGV rural restricted, weekday National HHDDV rural restricted, weekday

25 National LDGV rural restricted, weekend National HHDDV rural restricted, weekend

26 National LDGV rural unrestricted, weekday National HHDDV rural unrestricted, weekday

27 National LDGV rural unrestricted, weekend National HHDDV rural unrestricted, weekend

28 National LDGV urban unrestricted, weekday National HHDDV urban unrestricted, weekday

29 National LDGV urban unrestricted, weekend National HHDDV urban unrestricted, weekend

30