Radiation Monitoring at the Undulator System Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader Presented at Wednesday, March 7, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Radiation Physics Beam Tests J. Bauer, J. Liu, L. Nicolas, S. Rokni, M. Santana ESTB Workshop 2011 March 17, 2011.
January 24, 2008 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator BLM PDR Review 1 Undulator BLM PDR Review Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
ICRS-11 / RPSD-2008 Mario Santana Leitner FLUKA SIMULATIONS of the radiation damage of permanent magnets M. Santana Leitner,
June 19, 2008 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS LCLS Magnet Damage Management 1 LCLS Magnet Damage Management Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC.
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
LCLS Undulator Magnet Irradiation Sensitivity Workshop Thursday June 19, 2008 Jeff Dooling 1 SLAC Redwood Room A/B, SLAC Thursday, June.
October 30, 2007 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Physics Issues 1 Undulator Physics Issues Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS.
1 Zachary Wolf 1 Undulator Tuning Status June 9, 2009 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
1 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn 1 BFW Results June 2009 FAC BFW Results Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader June 9, 2009.
Overview of Proposed Parameter Changes Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
April 16, 2007 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Physics Issues 1 Undulator Physics Issues Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS.
UCLA The X-ray Free-electron Laser: Exploring Matter at the angstrom- femtosecond Space and Time Scales C. Pellegrini UCLA/SLAC 2C. Pellegrini, August.
J. Pflüger / DESY - Radiation Damage Workshop Stanford June 19, 2008 Radiation Damage Study at FLASH using the Diagnostic Undulator J. Pflüger, J. Skupin,
1 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn 1 Undulator Plans June 2009 FAC Undulator Commissioning Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader June.
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
USING A MICRO FABRICATED UNDULATOR TO BRIDGE THE FOUR DECADE GAP BETWEEN REGULAR PURE PERMANENT MAGNET UNDULATORS AND INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING SOURCES.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Undulator Working Group Summary Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – Alexander Temnykh Presented at Friday, March 9, 2012.
Dark Current Measurements and Simulations Chris Adolphsen 2/4/15.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
Radiation Test Facilities G. Spiezia. Engineering Department ENEN Radiation tests facilities  Radiation test in the accelerator sector  External facilities.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-Induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
F. Regis, LINAC4 – LBS & LBE LINES DUMP DESIGN.
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
LCLS-II Physics Meeting, May 08, 2013 LCLS-II Undulator Tolerances Heinz-Dieter Nuhn LCLS-II Undulator Physics Manager May 8, 2013.
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Initial Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders University of Tokyo, November 2013 Bruce.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
EAR2 Beam Line Report on the Status C. Weiss EAR2 Beam Line - Report on the Status1.
Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
FLUKA Meeting Milan Jul 2010 Work in the frame of the LHC Phase II Upgrade Previous work was dedicated to the study of the.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Shielding Calculations for NSLS2 Accelerators P.K. Job Radiation Physicist Peer Review 2007 March
Update on radiation estimates for the CLIC Main and Drive beams Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto CLIC OMPWG.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Radiation Damage Studies for Solid State Sensors Subject to Mrad Doses
TI8/WIC Incident & UJ87/UA87 Radiation Levels & Analysis
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Undulator Tolerances for LCLS-II using SCUs
Bubble Chamber Planning Meeting
CLASSE & CHESS Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
Undulator Line Design Liz Moog, Advanced Photon Source April 24, 2002
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader May 14, 2009
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Monitoring at the Undulator System Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader Presented at Wednesday, March 7, 2012

LCLS Undulator Radiation Damage Magnet Damage Experiment T-493 at SLAC LCLS TLD Radiation Dose Monitoring LCLS Undulator Damage Monitoring 2

3 LCLS Undulator Irradiation Experiment (T-493) The LCLS electron beam is stopped in a copper dump, and 9 samples of magnet material are positioned at different distances from the dump. The layout to get a range of doses is calculated with FLUKA. The absorbed radiation will be measured by dosimeters. Magnetization will be measured before and after exposure. The integrated beam current will need to be recorded to 10% accuracy. The LCLS electron beam is stopped in a copper dump, and 9 samples of magnet material are positioned at different distances from the dump. The layout to get a range of doses is calculated with FLUKA. The absorbed radiation will be measured by dosimeters. Magnetization will be measured before and after exposure. The integrated beam current will need to be recorded to 10% accuracy. July/August 2007

4 Use 12 Spare LCLS Undulator Magnet Blocks Photo courtesy of S. Anderson Material: Ne 2 Fe 14 B Manufacturer: Shin-Etsu Type: N32SH B r : T H ci : 21 kOe H cb : 11.6 kOe Block Thickness: 9 mm Block Height: 56.5 mm Block Width: 66 mm Material Density: 7.4 g/cm 3 Block Volume:33.6 cm 3 Block Mass: g Curie Point: 310 °C Material: Ne 2 Fe 14 B Manufacturer: Shin-Etsu Type: N32SH B r : T H ci : 21 kOe H cb : 11.6 kOe Block Thickness: 9 mm Block Height: 56.5 mm Block Width: 66 mm Material Density: 7.4 g/cm 3 Block Volume:33.6 cm 3 Block Mass: g Curie Point: 310 °C

5 Near Hall Far Hall SLAC LINAC Undulator Tunnel Injector Endstation A T-493 Linac Coherent Light Source

6 T-493 Components installed in ESA Beamline ESA Beamline with copper cylinder and magnet blocks. Photo courtesy of J. Bauer BEAM

7 Magnet Block Assembly (Top View) Beam Direction Copper Cylinder Magnet Blocks r z Top View Heat Shield 4 Magnet blocks in forward direction 5 Magnet blocks in transverse direction M4 M3M2 M1 M8 M5 M6 M7 M9

8 Magnet Block Assembly (View in Beam Directions) y r View in Beam Direction Heat Shield Copper Cylinder Magnet Blocks M1-M4 M7M8 M6 M9 M5

9 Magnet Block Utilization The magnetic moments of all twelve blocks have been measured. Nine blocks were mounted next to the beam and have been irradiated. Three blocks have been kept in the magnet measurement lab as reference. The magnetic moments of all twelve blocks have been measured. Nine blocks were mounted next to the beam and have been irradiated. Three blocks have been kept in the magnet measurement lab as reference. jSerial No.rz [cm] reference reference reference

10 Predicted Deposited Power [Gy g/cm 3 ] after receiving 57 Pe FLUKA Simulations by J. Bauer Magnet Block Locations in Simulation. NOT identical to mounting location

11 Predicted Neutron Fluence [n/cm2] after receiving 57 Pe FLUKA Simulations by J. Bauer Magnet Block Locations in Simulation. NOT identical to mounting location cm

12 Number of Electrons Delivered to Copper Block Integrated electron number in units of electrons (Peta-Electrons) Magnet Irradiation Experiment T-493 ran for 38 shifts from 7/27-8/09/2007

13 Measured Electron Energy

14 Delivered Power Delivered power levels alternated between about 125 W during Day and Swing Shifts and 185 W during Owl Shifts. During Day and Swing Shifts the experiment ran parasitically with LCLS commissioning. Delivered power levels alternated between about 125 W during Day and Swing Shifts and 185 W during Owl Shifts. During Day and Swing Shifts the experiment ran parasitically with LCLS commissioning.

15 Tunnel Temperature Profile The temperature in the ESA tunnel stayed between °C during the entire 12-day data collection period. The plot shows diurnal cycle fluctuations. Energy deposited in the blocks was insufficient for significant average temperature increase. The temperature in the ESA tunnel stayed between °C during the entire 12-day data collection period. The plot shows diurnal cycle fluctuations. Energy deposited in the blocks was insufficient for significant average temperature increase.

16 Detailed FLUKA model of the experiment 13.7 GeV electron beam impinging on the copper dump Computation of total dose, electromagnetic dose, neutron energy spectra Quantity scored using a binning identical to the one used for the mapping of the magnetization loss Beam M3 M2 M5 M4 M6 M7 M1 M8 M9 Courtesy of J. Vollaire

17 Integrated Dose Calculation rz Dose non EM Dose Neutron Fluence Demag.Demag/DoseDemag/Flu [cm] [kJ][kGy][J][10 13 cm -2 ][%][%/kJ][%/(10 13 cm -2 )] Mag Mag Mag Mag Mag Mag Mag Mag Mag Dump76,600

18 Damage Gradients M3 M1 M2 M4 M3 M1 M2 M4 Threshold Estimates for 0.01 % Damage SourceDeposited EnergyDose Neutron Fluence T kJ0.70 kGy0.070 MRad0.64×10 11 n/cm 2 Threshold Estimates for 1 % Damage SourceDeposited EnergyDose Neutron Fluence T MJ70 kGy7 MRad6.4×10 12 n/cm 2 FLASH Experimental Result: 20 kGy cause 1% Damage

19 Field Map Measurements Grid Size: 26 x 31 Points = 806 Points; Point Spacing: 2 mm; Method: Hall Probe Reference Magnet SN16673

20 Field Map Measurements for M1 M1 M2 M3M5

21 Dose Mapping for the 4 Downstream Samples Courtesy of J. Vollaire

22 Neutron Fluence Mapping for the 4 Downstream Samples Courtesy of J. Vollaire

TLD Monitoring Results Jan 2009 Before Installation of First Undulator On Girder Outside of Undulator Storage Box On Top of Slide Motor 1 On Top of Slide Motor 1 Evidence for Beam Loss Event Evidence for Beam Loss Event [Rad] 23

Top Chamber Hit (Z= m; y’ = 465 µrad) FLUKA SIMULATIONS Courtesy of Mario Santana Fluences in Top Magnets Fluences in Bottom Magnets 24

LCLS Undulator Rad. Protection and Monitoring Phase space reduction (6D) of the linac beam using collimation system RFBPM based trajectory monitoring keeps beam center within 1-mm radius relative to chamber center Beam Loss monitors catch unexpected radiation events, quickly TLD program monitors long-time exposure Periodic undulator measurements for early damage detection No further beam losses observed 25

Dose During Initial FEL Operation e-folding length 8.7 m Increased TLD Readings are predominantly low energy synchrotron radiation, not to cause significant magnet damage [rad] 26 Girders 13-33

27 Damage Mechanisms Damage is expected to be caused by neutrons and hadrons that are predominantly generated inside the magnet blocks, themselves, from high energy (MeV) photons. See for instance Asano et al., “Analyses of the factors for the demagnetization of permanent magnets caused by high-energy electron irradiation.” J. Synchrotron Rad. (2009) 16, Since neutrons and hadrons are not detectable outside of the magnets, radiation monitoring focuses on high energy photons.

Use Pb to Filter Low Energy SR Component Actually used: 1.6 mm 28

2010 Girder Radiation Monitoring Each TLD mounted in 1.6-mm thick Pb-casing to suppress photons below ~200 keV 3/16/2010 – 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 – 9/24/2010 9/24/2010 – 1/19/2011 3/16/2010 – 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 – 9/24/2010 9/24/2010 – 1/19/2011 Thermo-Luminescent Dosimeters LCLS radiation level control works well. External neutron doses are very small: (U01: rad/week; U33: ~0 rad/week) 29

2011 Repetition Rate increased to 120 Hz Each TLD mounted in 1.6-mm thick Pb-casing to suppress photons below ~200 keV 3/16/2010 – 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 – 9/24/2010 9/24/2010 – 1/19/2011 1/19/2011 – 6/29/2011 3/16/2010 – 5/26/2010 5/26/2010 – 9/24/2010 9/24/2010 – 1/19/2011 1/19/2011 – 6/29/2011 Thermo-Luminescent Dosimeters LCLS radiation level control works well. External neutron doses are very small: (U01: rad/week; U33: ~0 rad/week) 30

SN32 Radiation Damage Check ParameterJan 09May 10DifferenceTolerance Installed in Slot30 Beam Time [Months]10 1 st B y Integral [µTm] ±40 2 nd B y Integral [µTm 2 ] ±50 1 st B x Integral [µTm] ±40 2 nd B x Integral [µTm 2 ] ±50 RMS Phase Shake ° Xray Cell Phase Error ±10° Xray K eff (goal ) (at the same X and 20.00° C)  K/K × × × (rms) 15×10 -5 (rms) NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FIELD PROPERTIES 31

SN02 Radiation Damage Check ParameterJun 09Oct 10DifferenceTolerance Installed in Slot1 Beam Time [Months]12 1 st B y Integral [µTm]-5 0±40 2 nd B y Integral [µTm 2 ] ±50 1 st B x Integral [µTm] ±40 2 nd B x Integral [µTm 2 ] ±50 RMS Phase Shake ° Xray Cell Phase Error ±10° Xray K eff (goal ) (at the same X and 20.00° C)  K/K × × × (rms) 15×10 -5 (rms) NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FIELD PROPERTIES 32

SN16 Radiation Damage Check ParameterMay 09Jul 11DifferenceTolerance Installed in Slot16 Beam Time [Months]20 1 st B y Integral [µTm]-4-5±40 2 nd B y Integral [µTm 2 ] ±50 1 st B x Integral [µTm] ±40 2 nd B x Integral [µTm 2 ] ±50 RMS Phase Shake ° Xray Cell Phase Error ±10° Xray K eff (goal ) (at the same X and 20.00° C)  K/K × × × (rms) 15×10 -5 (rms) NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN FIELD PROPERTIES 33

Changes in Undulator Properties After Beam Operation 34

Undulator Properties After Beam Operation 35

36 Live Time Estimates At LCLS, rms tolerance for  K eff /K eff is 2.4× Measured radiation levels at 120 Hz are about 5 rad/week or less. Estimated equivalent dose required for a block demagnetization of is about 70 krad. (This level should still would not affect undulator performance) These 2 numbers give an optimistic lifetime estimate of 14,000 weeks or more than 100 years. For NGLS, K tolerances might be similar to those of LCLS but the repetition rate is 8300 times larger (,i.e. 1 MHz) and the undulator gaps are smaller. Using the same numbers as above (,i.e., ignoring the gap reduction), we get an estimated time of 1.7 weeks, which sounds quite serious. In this case, knowing details of the radiation fields and damage patterns is much more important. In-vacuum undulators might provide lower vacuum pressure (<0.2 µTorr), which will reduced Bremsstrahlung. Demagnetization levels are too conservative, much larger magnet damage amplitudes are likely to be acceptable depending on the patterns at which damage occurs.

37 Final Remarks A figure of merit for radiation damage was established experimentally by exposing spare LCLS Nd 2 Fe 14 B permanent magnet pieces to a well defined radiation pattern and using FLUKA simulations to connect damage levels with exposure amplitudes. Damage is expected to be caused by neutrons and hadrons that are predominantly generated inside the magnet blocks, themselves, from high energy photons. Radiation monitoring focuses on high energy photons outside the magnets. A rough correlation factor have been established. At LCLS, undulator radiation protection is achieved through a collimator system and through the machine protection system. Based on the measured radiation levels, measurable damage is not expected for many years even at 120 Hz repetition rate. Undulators are re-measured on an on-going bases. No damage detected so far. Due to much higher projected repetition rates radiation damage is expected to be a much more severe problem for NGLS.

End of Presentation