Military Language Testing at the National Defence University and the Common European Framework BILC CONFERENCE 2006. BUDAPEST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTO EUROPE The Speaking Handbook by Ildikó Csépes & Györgyi Együd
Advertisements

Dávid Gergely: Building a Case for Euro Examinations or A case study.
Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio Former les enseignants à lutilisation du Porfolio européen des langues.
European Frameworks of Reference for Language Competences Waldemar Martyniuk Language Policy Division, Council of Europe / Jagiellonian University, Poland.
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
How does DIALANG use the CEF?
A Tale of Two Tests STANAG and CEFR Comparing the Results of side-by-side testing of reading proficiency BILC Conference May 2010 Istanbul, Turkey Dr.
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN BADAN PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN DAN PENJAMINAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT.
HONG KONG EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED HKDSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
Evaluating tests and examinations What questions to ask to make sure your assessment is the best that can be produced within your context. Dianne Wall.
How to use the scores achieved by university graduates under CEPAS as reference in hiring the right employees 1.What is CEPAS? 2.CEPAS Statistics.
1 THE INTO EUROPE SERIES IN IN-SERVICE TEACHER TRAINING Presentation by Györgyi Együd ‘Into Europe - European Standards in Language Assessment’ Conference.
Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Waldemar Martyniuk Waldemar Martyniuk Language Policy.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Learning, Teaching, Assessment Nuppu Tuononen Palmenia Centre for Continuing Education
6 th semester Course Instructor: Kia Karavas.  What is educational evaluation? Why, what and how can we evaluate? How do we evaluate student learning?
Raili Hildén University of Helsinki Relating the Finnish School Scale to the CEFR.
INTO EUROPE The Writing Handbook by Gyula Tankó
Challenges in Developing and Delivering a Valid Test Michael King and Mabel Li NAFLE, July 2013.
JSP  To show different aspects taking part in the didactic approaches to language teaching.  To know the.
00 Workshop 2 “Elaboration of educational programmes according to qualifications framework” 16. und 17. February 2011 Georgia, Bakuriani Margret Schermutzki.
1 Seda AKPINAR. 2 Foundation of lectures is grammatical. Aims of the CEF (communicative competence, strategies, discourse recognition etc.) 3.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Assessment tool OSCE AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
1 Use of qualitative methods in relating exams to the Common European Framework: What can we learn? Spiros Papageorgiou Lancaster University The Third.
The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio (ELP): involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process The ELP team.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio (ELP): involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process The ELP team.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
SETTING AND MEETING STANDARDS IN HUNGARY About the Hungarian STANAG 6001 exam Mrs. Ilona Varnaine PhD.
UNIT 7. DIDACTIC APPROACHES
Trinity College London provides respected international qualifications across a range of disciplines in the performing and creative arts, and in English.
Action Plans for Test Development and Administration STANAG 6001 BILC Conference, Mons, SHAPE, Belgium, September 2013 Ludmila Ianovici-Pascal Head, Language.
Using the IRT and Many-Facet Rasch Analysis for Test Improvement “ALIGNING TRAINING AND TESTING IN SUPPORT OF INTEROPERABILITY” Desislava Dimitrova, Dimitar.
Curriculum Framework for Romani Seminar for decision makers and practitioners Council of Europe, 31 May and 1 June 2007 Introduction to the Common European.
Relating examinations to the CEFR – the Council of Europe Manual and supplementary materials Waldek Martyniuk ECML, Graz, Austria.
FCE Resources from Garnet By Andrew Betsis and Lawrence Mamas.
AP French Language and Culture Exam Information Lynn Gouacide.
Competence profiles for vocationally-oriented language learning Work-in-progress report presented by Dr. Karin Vogt University of Education Heidelberg.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
ARE WE TESTING WHAT WE WANT TO TEST? Carole Thomas Bilkent University, Turkey.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Session 2 English Language Proficiency Benchmarks Assessment Primary Professional Development Service.
RelEx Introduction to the Standardization Phase Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages Gilles Breton.
Glyn Jones Product Development Manager Dr John H.A.L. De Jong Director of Test development Pearson Language Assessments, London Linking Exams to the Common.
Regulation of Statutory National Assessments l. Contents ■Ofqual Responsibilities ■Regulation at GCSE ■The Regulatory Framework □Statutory Objectives.
Relating Foreign Language Curricula to the CEFR in the Maltese context
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Introduction to the Specification Phase
ECML Colloquium2016 The experience of the ECML RELANG team
Introduction to the Validation Phase
Dr. Lorraine Harbison1 Dr. Joseph Harbison2
Introduction to the Validation Phase
Training in Classroom Assessment Related to the CEFR
Introduction to the Validation Phase
2nd Annual Faculty e-Learning Symposium 26th May 2016 Mrs E D Joubert
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
RELATING NATIONAL EXTERNAL EXAMINATIONS IN SLOVENIA TO THE CEFR LEVELS
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 11/8/2018.
EALTA MILSIG: Standardising the assessment of writing across nations
Roadmap Towards a Validity Argument
SPEAKING ASSESSMENT Joko Nurkamto UNS Solo 12/3/2018.
Specification of Learning Outcomes (LOs)
From Learning to Testing
Relating Examinations to the CEFR Empowering Language Professionals
RELANG Relating language examinations to the common European reference levels of language proficiency: promoting quality assurance in education and facilitating.
Defence Requirements Authority for Culture and Language (DRACL)
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
English Language Proficiency Benchmarks Assessment
Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio
Presentation transcript:

Military Language Testing at the National Defence University and the Common European Framework BILC CONFERENCE BUDAPEST

General language examination in five languages General language examination in five languages ARMA bilingual military examination in nine languages ARMA bilingual military examination in nine languages NATO STANAG 6001 monolingual language examination NATO STANAG 6001 monolingual language examination

 Interviews with officers and NCOs Hungarian officers and NCOs serving at the NATO headquarters Hungarian officers and NCOs serving at the NATO headquarters Job descriptions of soldiers serving in NATO positions Job descriptions of soldiers serving in NATO positions

OOOObservance of the regulations for the conduct of examinations; CCCContinuous training and observing of testers CCCContinuous pretesting and renewal of items;

COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK

ESL Exams in Hungary University Of Cambridge ESOL University Of Cambridge ESOL Trinity College London ESOL & GESE Trinity College London ESOL & GESE The European Language Certificates The European Language Certificates Pitman Qualifications Pitman Qualifications Österreichisches Sprachdiplom Deutsch ÖSD Österreichisches Sprachdiplom Deutsch ÖSD Goethe-Institut vizsgarendszere Goethe-Institut vizsgarendszere LEXINFO LEXINFO LCCIEB EFB angol üzleti szaknyelv LCCIEB EFB angol üzleti szaknyelv Euro Euro ECL nyelvvizsga ECL nyelvvizsga Bibliai héber Bibliai héber Diplomáciai szaknyelvi vizsga Diplomáciai szaknyelvi vizsga Certifications de l´ Alliance française de Paris Certifications de l´ Alliance française de Paris

Linking Separate Assessments Equating Equating Calibrating Calibrating Statistical moderation Statistical moderation Benchmarking Benchmarking Social moderation Social moderation

Linking Process Selection of appropriate procedures Selection of appropriate procedures Project planning Project planning Coordination of the participants Coordination of the participants Application of the procedures Application of the procedures Recording of results Recording of results

Linking Procedures Familiarisation Familiarisation Specification Specification Standardisation Standardisation Empirical Validation Empirical Validation

Familiarisation Discussion of the Common European Framework levels Discussion of the Common European Framework levels Qualitative analysis of the Common European Framework levels Qualitative analysis of the Common European Framework levels

The Specification Stage

Manual: Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEF)

Specification: Description of the coverage of the examination in relation to the Common European Framework

Content analysis procedures: filling in a number of checklists filling in a number of checklists using relevant CEF descriptors to relate the exam to the categories and levels of the CEF using relevant CEF descriptors to relate the exam to the categories and levels of the CEF

The Aims of the Specification To analyse the content in relation to the relevant categories of the CEF To analyse the content in relation to the relevant categories of the CEF To profile the examination in relation to the relevant descriptor scales of the CEF To profile the examination in relation to the relevant descriptor scales of the CEF To make a claim that an examination is related to a particular level of the CEF To make a claim that an examination is related to a particular level of the CEF

Phase 1: Phase 1: A general description of the examination or test tasks Phase 2: Phase 2: A detailed description of the examination or test tasks A detailed description of the examination or test tasks

Stage 1 General Examination Description Form (A1) What is the overall aim? What are the more specific objectives? What are the principal domains? Which communicative activities are tested? What types of test tasks are used? What information is published for candidates and teachers?

Stage 2 Forms on Different of the Examination Stage 2 Forms on Different Aspects of the Examination The test development process (Form A2) The test development process (Form A2) The marking schemes and scoring rules for different subtests (Form A3) The marking schemes and scoring rules for different subtests (Form A3) The grading and standard-setting procedures for different subtests (Form A4) The grading and standard-setting procedures for different subtests (Form A4) The reporting of results (Form A5) The reporting of results (Form A5) The analysis and review procedures (Form A6) The analysis and review procedures (Form A6)

Form 3A: Marking How are the tests marked? Where are the tests marked? What criteria are used to select the markers? How is accuracy of marking promoted? Are productive or integrated test tasks single or double rated? If double rated, what procedures are used when differences between raters occur?

The Detailed Description of the Examination

Forms for the Communicative Language Activities Listening Comprehension Listening Comprehension Reading Comprehension Reading Comprehension Spoken Interaction Spoken Interaction Written Interaction Written Interaction Spoken Production Spoken Production Written Production Written Production Integrated Skill Combinations Integrated Skill Combinations Integrated Skills Integrated Skills Spoken Mediation Spoken Mediation Written Mediation Written Mediation

Listening Comprehension Which situations, content categories, domains are the test takers expected to show ability in? Which communication themes are the test takers expected to be able to handle? Which communicative tasks are the test takers expected to be able to handle? What kind of communicative activities and strategies are the test takers expected to be able to handle?

After reading the scale for Overall Listening Comprehension, indicate and justify at which level(s) of the scale the subtest should be situated

Forms for the Aspects of Communicative Language Competence  Reception  Interaction  Production  Mediation

Outcome Outcome A narrative description of the examination A narrative description of the examination Completed versions of the relevant forms Completed versions of the relevant forms A graphical presentation of the relationship of the examination to the CEF levels A graphical presentation of the relationship of the examination to the CEF levels

Thank you for your attention