1 Management verifications Examples of good practice José FERREIRA DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
Advertisements

BUDGETING Training Unit 13.2 Principles and financial rules of mobility.
EN Regional Policy - Finance & Budget EUROPEAN COMMISSION Annual Meeting with managing authorities of crossborder programmes Brussels - 25 Octobre 2011.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
European Union Cohesion Policy
“Train the trainers” seminar
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission.
1 Managing Authority Conducting a self assessment 10 June 2008 A. Badrichani – DG Regional Policy – Audit Unit J3.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
European Union Cohesion Policy
1 Responsiveness of the implementation system Jana Trost European Union Cohesion Policy Train the trainers European Commission seminar for managing and.
PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION nodus working group KICK-OFF MEETING Financial & Administrative issues 1 Barcelona, 16th-17th June 2008.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 
FINANCIAL REPORTING Rules and Regulations
ESPON 2013 Programme 3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010.
1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Financial management Management and control systems Training for Programme Operators March 2012.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
EQUAL Community Initiative Programme for Malta Conference co-financed by the EU: European Social Fund (ESF) Co-financing Rate: 75% EU Funds;
DG Research - Directorate B - Unit 03: “Research Infrastructures” Brussels, 12th of November NOT LEGALLY BINDING - Page n°1 Presentation made by.
Financial reporting Elise Oukka, Head of Finance, FMO Riga.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
EuropeAid 1 Delegation Agreements: 2011 templates “Regards Croisés” on Aid Effectiveness Practitioners’ Network for European Development Cooperation -
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Audit of the Cohesion Fund Lena.
SeaDataNet Pan-European infrastructure for Ocean & Marine Data management An Integrated research Infrastructure Initiative (I3) Kick-off Meeting June 8-10.
1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Monitoring Information System Greece Working Group Meeting Brussels, June 2000 STRUCTURAL FUNDS
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
GREECE CSF III MONITORING INFORMATION SYSTEM (MIS)
EQUAL Community Initiative Programme for Malta Conference co-financed by the EU: European Social Fund (ESF) Co-financing Rate: 75% EU Funds;
29 March 2011 Audit Authority Audit Department Ministry of Finance 1.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
Closure of the Programming Period ESF TWG Luxemburg 2 nd December 2015.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 DG Regional Policy’s evaluation of the compliance assessment process for the programming period COCOF.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
1 Fraud indicators for ERDF, ESF and CF Leif HÖGNÄS, DG Regional Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.
Simplified Cost Options Impatto della semplificazione sulle attività dei controlli Francisco MERCHÁN CANTOS Direttore Audit DG EMPL Firenze, 21 novembre.
S&E and BMW Regional Operational Programmes 14 – 20 Training for Local Authorities involved in DUCGS projects, 21st April 2016 REPORTING, DATA COLLECTION.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Get ready for EC reporting
  EXPERIENCE OF SLOVENIAN AUDIT AUTHORITY WITH FRAUD SUSPICON CASES Nataša Prah Prague, 3. November 2016.
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Update on (draft) implementing acts (IA)
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
data to be recorded and stored in computerised form (DA)
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
ESF Training Seminar Reinforced role for the Audit Authority
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

1 Management verifications Examples of good practice José FERREIRA DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities 17 June 2010

2 Background  The implementation of OP substantially delayed, in many cases;  The Commission’s audit work concentrated on the work done by AA;  The National auditor’s work concentrated on Systems Audit of programs/systems, that in general, had not yet produced expenditure;

3 Good practices presented in 2008  Registering, in a structured way, the weaknesses found during the on-the-spot visits (important too for the administrative verifications) allows MA to always be ready for reporting to the CA and the AA, and contributes to a better identification of the risks (and also has other associated benefits).

4 What’s new ?  The Commission selected 3 IT tools, from 3 MAs from 3 MS in order to gain a better understanding and comparison;  By the end of September one opinion about what is a good IT Tool for management may be available;  But, in the meantime………

5 The content of a good system Legal framework –compulsory use of the legal account system and project account –Multi-annual projects – expenses declaration and physical data to be submitted by the end of each calendar year; IT tool – NO PAPER - applications, and expenditure declarations (intermediary and final) input by beneficiaries directly into the system via internet; – financial and physical information on each project;

6 Financial As usual, calculated by action, course, activity, etc Information requested by the system Physical indicators –activities – hours by course – When – Where – Who – Whom Name of the trainer (aggregations, number hours planned) Name of participants

7 List of expenses –Ref. of document –Type of document –Provider –Nature of the expense –Total Amount of the doc. –Amount charged to the project –Apportionment factor –Date of payment Expenditure declaration Physical indicators –activities –hours by course –When –Where –Who Name of the trainer (aggregations, number hours planned) Name of participants It’s possible to establish a link between the expenditure declared and the activities and Evaluate the eligibility of certain types of expenditure, from the point of view of the trainer (not eligible if not in possession of one aggregation)

8 Checking justifications All justifications for a certain number of items should be requested from the beneficiaries (covering not less than 15% of the expenditure and all types of expenditure – participants, personnel, etc.)

9 THANK YOU