Predicting and Connecting Literacy Skill of the Month September 9, 11, 12 Presenters: Sue MessagliaSamantha Reda Location: Library 204BLocation: Room 147.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding American Citizenship
Advertisements

ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
The Evolution of the “NEW DEFINITION” of Reading of the 1980s to Close and Critical Reading of the 21 st Century Michigan Reading Association Summer Literature.
Common Core & PARCC. The NJ State Board of Education on June 16, 2010 adopted a resolution calling for New Jersey’s curriculum standards to be aligned.
Module 2 Text Comprehension
OSSE CSSS Educator Leader Institute Secondary English Language Arts July 31 st to Aug 3 rd, 2012 Day 1 Facilitated by Heidi Beeman.
Respect Responsibility Resourcefulness. Common Core Math Overview.
Common Core State Standards
Family Literacy Night. Why revise? Align with Common Core State Standards Reflect the current Reading and Writing Workshop philosophy as well as the Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Snapshot of TALL-IL 2.0 Planning for Learning through Curriculum Design based on ACTFL Standards and text "The Keys to Planning for Learning.
Close Reading Preparing for the arrival of Common Core Standards in Social Studies.
Literacy-in-CTE Julie Anderson Sal Cassaro Sherry Cole Kristin Gunson Jennell Ives Steve Shilling Mark Wreath CTE Literacy Leadership Team.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: Diverse Formats & Multiple Texts.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Using Primary and Secondary Sources to Dig Deeper into Understanding
English Language Arts in Illinois
“I’m ready for my close- up Mr. DeMille!” CLOSE READINGS By: Kimberley Cooper.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Saluda County Schools  Will CCSS cause a shift in administrator behaviors?  Will CCSS cause a shift in teacher behaviors?  Will CCSS cause.
UNDERSTANDING AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP A partnership between Orange County Department of Education and University of California, Irvine History Project.
Michigan Common Core Standards
Keeping KUD’s Concise What do your students need to KNOW, UNDERSTAND and DO to master unit content?
Welcome to Implementing the Common Core State Standards
Student Centered = Student Engaged BY: CATHY GAMBEL & SHANTEL WOMACK TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL SYSTEM.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON CORE STANDARDS 1.2 Reading Informational Text Students read, understand, and respond to informational text—with emphasis on comprehension,
Betsy Dobbins and Kevin Sheridan John Glenn Middle School (ISD622) Maplewood, MN.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Common Core National State Standards Math Language Arts Science, Social Studies, and other subject areas. Two foci: Reading and Writing.
OWL: Oswego Works for Literacy Oswego Community School District #308 Secondary Reading Comprehension Program.
Welcome Parents Thank you for coming! Grab a 6 th Grade Standards Handout. Sit wherever you would like.
Meeting the Challenge of Common Core: Planning Close Reading CFN 604 October 21 st, 2014.
Common Core ELA Hamblen County Dept of Instruction November 6, 2012.
Implementing the Common Core Literacy Standards for History/Social Studies May 12,2011 Don Gifford History/Government/Social Studies Consultant Kansas.
ERIKA LUSKY JULIE RAINS Collaborative Dialogue in the Classroom
Close Reading of Complex Texts in the 3-8 Modules
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
FACILITATOR SARA OVERBY COORDINATING TEACHER FOR SECONDARY LITERACY Performance Tasks: An Integrated.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
THE KAPLAN MODEL DEPTH AND COMPLEXITY IN LITERATURE By April Payne.
Health Sciences Alignment to English Language Arts and Mathematics Common Core State Standards Lori Matyjas CT State Department of Education November 12,
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
Common Core Reading Standards for Social Studies.
Bradley Introducation to the Common Core Standards.
©2014 IPDAE. All rights reserved. All content in this presentation is the proprietary property of The Institute for the Professional Development of Adult.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
MAISA READING UNITS ROLLOUT AUGUST 8,
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
Professional Development Plan EQ: What is close reading?
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Connecting “Caldecotts” with the Common Core March 27, 2014March 27, 2014 Dr. Lee-Anne Spalding & Dr. Elizabeth HoffmanDr. Lee-Anne Spalding & Dr. Elizabeth.
Amy Jo Southworth Bay Shore High School Library Common Core wiki: bshscommoncore.wikispaces.com.
A guide to help your students achieve deeper comprehension in order to align with the Common Core State Standards. Jacob’s Ladder Reading Comprehension.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
 The abbreviation for Common Core State Standards “Educational standards are the learning goals for what students should know and be able to do at each.
Applying the Reading Anchor Standards: Spring 2016 Instructional Leadership College and Career Ready Standards for Literacy.
CLOSE READING TEACHING OUR STUDENTS TO READ LIKE A DETECTIVE.
Common Core Strategies with Primary Texts
Professional Development Early Release Day
May 12,2011 Don Gifford History/Government/Social Studies Consultant
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Balanced Literacy How our instructional practices will support the implementation of Common Core.
Michigan Reading Standards
Engaging Students With Primary Sources
Passage Types Question Types
Your Standards TODAY’S FLOW MORNING: Standards & 1st Unit Curriculum
What to Teach: Anchor Standards
Presentation transcript:

Predicting and Connecting Literacy Skill of the Month September 9, 11, 12 Presenters: Sue MessagliaSamantha Reda Location: Library 204BLocation: Room 147 Extension: 2253Extension: 2307 District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

 How familiar are you with the Common Core College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Reading?  Are the strategies of predicting and connecting used in your Content Area?  What do they look like?  How do they apply to your discipline? Examining Disciplinary Literacy in your Content Area Frequency of Use High Moderate Limited Degree of Importance High Moderate Limited District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

Goals  Ultimate Goal for My Students (one sentence) Think for themselves Independent problem solvers  Think critically and come up with more than one solution to a problem.  Be a successful, productive citizen!  Good Choices and live long healthy lives  Ultimate Goal  Empower students to become college and career ready!  Empower Faculty with CORE strategies 1.Familiarity with ELA Anchor Standards for Reading 2.Assist teachers in making a clear connection between formative assessment data (MAP and Explore, PLAN and ACT) and planning for instruction and assessment. District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

College & Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Reading District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10 Key Ideas and Details: 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. 2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. 3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, or ideas develop and interact over the course of a text. Craft and Structure: 4. Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone. 5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole. 6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text. Integration of Knowledge and Ideas: 7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence. 9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take. Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity: 10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.

R.CCR.1 Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. In Other Words:  Read the text  Explain what the text says  Explain what you can reasonably guess is true based on what’s in the text  Point out the parts of the text that make those guesses “reasonable,” as opposed to “wild.”

R.CCR.2 Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. --In Other Words:  Determine the theme of the text.  Analyze how the theme is developed.  Summarize the supporting details.

R.CCR.3 Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of the text. --In Other Words: The ability to ask, “And then what happened?” The ability to explain, with each answer, how what’s happening “now” is related to what happened “then.” Without this ability, texts make no sense; they’re just a bunch of words jumbled up on paper.

R.CCR.4 Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone. --In Other Words: Figuring out the function of words within a text. This includes understanding that words are not always used in a single, literal way. How the choice of a specific word affects the meaning of a passage or its tone.

R.CCR.4 Analyzing the Author’s Specific Word Choice  Everyone interprets and expresses things differently so analyzing an author’s specific word choice is important in understanding the author’s intended meaning or tone.  Students have to interpret words and phrases at both a literal and a connotative or figurative level.  A word or phrase can change the entire meaning of a text.

R.CCR.4 Connotative Vs. Denotative Denotative or Literal-Think dictionary Connotative or Suggest-Think beyond the literal meaning. For example, enraged, furious, livid, wrathful, and irate all basically share the same denotative meaning—angry. Wrathful carries associations of an all-consuming God-like anger, while irate implies intense frustration. Authors word choices give us clues for interpreting the texts meaning and tone.

R.CCR.4 Tone and Meaning  The author’s choice of words can thus imply a sense of expression that is humorous, serious, instructive, and so on.  Word choices can also reveal possible biases the author may hold toward the subject.  If students can analyze the word choice in order to access the author’s attitude, they are better equipped to decode the author’s tone and intended meaning and will be able to critique the text within its rhetorical context.

R.CCR.5 Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text relate to each other and the whole. --In Other Words:  The relationships among the parts of a text like the chapters and sections and between the whole text often play a role in the meaning of the text as a whole.  The ability to analyze a text’s structure provides information about the type of text it is and where to find certain information, like the solution to a mystery.

R.CCR.6 Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text. --In Other Words:  The point of view from which a text is told & its purpose both affect the content and style of a text.  Point of view & purpose shape choices like what is told, what is left out, & what order events unfold.  Understanding point of view & purpose helps readers reveal bias in a text & predict what information is missing.

R.CCR.7 Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse formats and media, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words. --In Other Words:  Pay attention to drawings, graphs, tables, and other forms of media in a text.

R.CCR.8 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence. --In Other Words:  Explain the argument presented  Point out the points  Decide if the logic is legitimate  Evaluate whether the proof can pass for the individual claims and the argument as a whole.

R.CCR.9 Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take. --In Other Words:  Students need to be able to compare and contrast texts on the same subject.

R.CCR.10 Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently. --In Other Words: Read a variety of texts and understand them, even if the text is tedious or difficult. No prior experience with the information in the text should be needed. Students must be able to understand different texts independently.

“In general, the conscious processing that is excellent reading begins before reading, continues during reading, and persists after reading is completed” (p.57). Michael Pressley (2006) Predicting and Connecting Research based strategies that foster student independence- Reading for meaning, compare & contrast, Inductive & multiple document learning, circle of knowledge, provisional writing, vocabulary (From The Core Six) District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

Previewing text 1.Organization- Going over the framework/structure of the materials students will be using. Textbooks, websites, journals, articles, webisodes, vodcasts 2.Activating prior knowledge and starting the connection process Predicting District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

Creating & monitoring predictions A step in making logical inferences (R.CCR.1)  Generating Pre-reading questions, statements \ revisiting these statements throughout the unit Focusing in on the topics, helps eliminate extraneous information  Using evidence to support, revise, abandon predictions strategies Predicting District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

Making basic & multilevel Connections (text to text, self, world)  Necessary step in analysis  Vocabulary- Root words, Sounds like, looks like  Context clues- figurative language Making Connections activities Connecting District Goal 1 CCS ELA 3, 4, 10

Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3 rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. References