University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOUG SODEN Manager, Product Planning LEXUS AUSTRALIA.
Advertisements

2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
and Products C4  Engines and ProductsBY Bertil Albing Regional Manager Western Europe.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001 Seth MillhornDon Hancock Shawn KimbleyHeber Lemmon Zack BeelerJeremy Staab Patrick HessPhil Auth Karen DenBraven Making.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Bachelor Degree in Maritime Operations (BMO)
Wendigo 2014 – An Arctic and Antarctic Snowmobile Presented by Cyrille Goldstein Dante Filice March 6, 2014 McGill Electric Snowmobile Team.
University of Minnesota – Duluth Design Presentation 2006 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
Eric Buddrius Amanda Bolland Ian Lootens Greg Hilbert STEALTH CAT’S.
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
K.Hirose OICA/JAMA Geneva 02/02 Hybrid ; Clean and Fuel Saving Technology for the Current and Future Vehicles OICA/JAMA Hirose Katsuhiko/Toyota Motor.
 Turbodiesel engine with unprecedented specific output › Displacing 1.5 liters on three cylinders, the engine.
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
TECHNICAL SEMINAR ON HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES PRESENTED BY:Sanjib ku.Dey Adm no:27I&E/2K.
Page 1 May 2010 © Siemens AG 2010 Industry / Drive Technologies Innovative Hybrid Drive Systems for Commercial Vehicles Industry – Drive Technologies Innovative.
CHAPTER Fuel Cells and Advanced Technologies 43 Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRICAL AND ENGINE PERFORMANCE.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
HEVs as Environmental Friendly Vehicles The 4th FEALAC Working Group
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge.
“You want it, we got it!”.  mile range  - 45 minute Quick Charge  mph in 5.6 seconds  mph top speed  - More cargo space than.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Mobile Source Control Division September 25, 2003 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Board Hearing California Air Resources Board Control Measure to Reduce.
2006 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team Members: Steve Battaglia, Brian Belmont, Dan Bughbee, Kevin Gastle Mike Ide, Kelly McRory, Eric Peckham, Dan Sweeney,
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
North Dakota State Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Steve Miller Danika Gieske Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge  Design Goals  Specifications  Ergonomics and Emissions  Drive System  Motor/Motor Controller  Battery choice.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
University of Waterloo 2014 Clean Snowmobile. Strategy Four-stroke engine Weber MPE 750 Turbo (2 cyl) Lightweight cross-country chassis Better control.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Clarkson University Electric Knights E54
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Iowa State Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
2018 IC Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Overview Project Management Base Sled Selection Engine Management
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
Clean Sheet Design – Metallic Tubular Chassis
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
ATT Conference Barcelona, October 1-3, 2001
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presentation
2019 SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE DESIGN PRESENTATION
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Last Year’s Foundation
Presentation transcript:

University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation

Design Considerations: Market Survey  Survey in Fall 2003  75 student riders  Customers Want:  Acceleration  Agility  Historical Best Sellers  Ski-Doo Rev Platform  Polaris 600 XC SP  Top speed not given high priority Fall 2003 Survey (Experienced Riders) 75 Students Surveyed

Engine Selection  Engine emissions from 2002 and 2003 CSC and current commercial snowmobile engines  Ski-doo SDI system reduces two stroke emissions by 50% 1  Polaris Liberty engine has lowest emissions of commercially available engines HC g/kW-hr CO g/kW-hr NO x g/kW-hr Two-stroke average (SwRI 2002) Idaho four-stroke (CSC 2003) Idaho four-stroke (SwRI 2002) Arctic Cat 660 (4s) (SwRI 2002) Polaris Liberty (4s) (SwRI 2002) : * SwRI 2002 (Leda, White) Snowmobile Engine Emissions Testing

Powertrain Enhancement Unique Hybrid Electric Design Increases performance without need for larger engine Motor mounts to custom student machined chaincase Measured Performance Increase Improves acceleration from km/hr Does not increase top speed of the snowmobile

Hybrid Energy Storage  48 Volt Battery Pack  4 Johnson Controls Inspira Batteries  6.5 Amp-hour capacity  Sufficient for 30 seconds of peak power  Designed to assist the engine during acceleration  Makes the sled “feel more powerful” without added fuel consumption and emissions

Emissions Reduction

CSC 2004 Emissions Results High CO and HC emissions at WOT Found to be open loop at WOT Single catalyst used in 2004

Emissions Reduction Improvements for 2005 Closed loop at WOT Dual Catalyst System Removed Secondary Air Injection

Emissions Reduction 2005 Emissions Testing Results 94% reduction from stock 86% reduction from 2004

Sound Testing

Sound Pass By Testing Contributions of Components to Overall Noise Hood BarrierTrack Skirt

Frequency Analysis of Sound Engine 1 st order Track 2 nd order Track

Sound Reduction  Two Stage Muffler System  Catalysts  Three Chamber Broadband Muffler Engine Track Tunnel Stiffeners Direct Sound Barrier

Resonance of Tunnel

Total Sound Reduction  Predict Sound Power Level of dBA sound power based on Pass by Testing  43% reduction (2.5 dBA) in sound power level from 2004 Bucky 800 HD

Additional Features  Electronic Throttle  Cruise Control  Traction Control During Launch  Evaporative Emissions System  Reduces HC Emissions from thermal cycling of fuel tank

Projected Cost ITEM UW-Madison Bucky 800 HD 2003 Polaris Frontier Classic Base sled cost with 784 cc Liberty Four-Stroke $5,899 SLED MODIFICATIONS$60 None Electric Motor and Controller $283None Hybrid Battery and wiring $151None Catalyst$40 None Total:$6,433 $5,899  Only $500 higher cost than stock  Based on 5000 sleds per year  Difference between 700 and 900cc 2 stroke Polaris Snowmobiles  $900 for a 15% increase in power

Questions?

Hybrid Layout

Drivetrain Torques

Motor Performance

Motor Controller

Battery Construction

Emissions Testing Modes Engine Speed (rpm)Torque (N-m)Power (kW) Mode 1 (WOT) Mode 2 (85%) Mode 3 (75%) Mode 4 (65%) Mode 5 (idle)

Emissions

Emissions