Christina M. Cloidt, NBCT Special Education School Improvement Specialist (SESIS) Special Education Technical Assistance Support Center (SETASC) Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classroom Walkthrough with Reflective Practice
Advertisements

A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
A Guide to Implementation
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume IX Monitoring Systems for Quality Curriculum and Instruction.
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Multiple Measures for Teacher Effectiveness
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Differentiated Supervision
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Walkthrough Process  Office of Special Education has an accountability system  RV is continuing the Special Education Walkthrough process.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Marketing UpdateBoard of Directors Meeting – July 2008 Classroom Walkthrough version 3.0 An Introduction to.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Curriculum Focused Visit In Search of Standards. People’s minds are changed by observation and not through argument. (Will Rogers) What gets monitored.
Classroom Walk-throughs: Improving learning… NAESP Annual Convention April 11, 2010 Sherri Goffman, Deputy Superintendent, Mineola UFSD JennMaichin, Special.
Walkthrough Process  Office of Special Education has an accountability system  RV is identified as a District in need of assistance in the.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Learning Walks: Creating Opportunities to Browse, Borrow, and Build Based on Lauren Renick’s work, University of Pittsburgh – Presented by Christina Steinbacher-Reed.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Attleboro High School Attleboro Public Schools moved to a new evaluation in the school year The district evaluators were given significant.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Cobb County Classroom Walk-Through Overview.
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
APS SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS August, District Goal By June 2015, APS district and schools will cut the achievement gap in one-half for all students.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Data Driven Instructional Coaching: Feedback for Improvement
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Deliberate Practice PGP
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Christina M. Cloidt, NBCT Special Education School Improvement Specialist (SESIS) Special Education Technical Assistance Support Center (SETASC) Coordinator

 VESID has an accountability system  RV is identified as a District in need of assistance in the category of Dropout for SWDs  QIP: Quality Improvement Process Plan  A document that consists of activities that enable a district to improve in its targeted areas  Created by a team (administrative, teacher, etc)

“Unlike a classroom observation which provides a view of a single classroom, a walk through creates a school-wide picture made up of many small snapshots.... It’s a strategy for providing a school, not an individual teacher, with feedback about what it’s doing or not doing....” “Walk throughs are a way of collecting data about the school’s success in achieving its goals…. They provide a way for the principal to determine what additional support teachers need in order to achieve the school’s goals.” Richardson, J. (2001). Seeing through new eyes. Tools for Schools.

 A process and a set of tools that have a specific focus  A way to provide the school with continual feedback about what’s working and what’s not working  A way to build a professional learning community at a school  A way to improve student achievement  A way to focus on effective instruction  A tool to enhance classroom visits

 Effective data-gathering strategies  Reflective analysis of Curriculum  Reflective thinking strategies Classroom walkthroughs are not part of the formal evaluation process

 Developed by a team  VESID Quality Indicators were used as the benchmark  Each QI has corresponding ‘Look Fors’ Look Fors:54321 Physical Environment matches student need for visual, auditory and tactile stimulation. Classroom routines are evident and predictable Cues for routines/schedules are designed to support individual student needs Instructional materials are available in multiple formats Assistive technology is used as necessary to support learning Indicator Observed: Indicator Met: Yes No Not Observed The instructional environment is designed to support individual student needs. Indicator Observed: Indicator Met: Yes No Not Observed The instructional environment is designed to support individual student needs.

Focused PlanningCollecting Data Analyzing Data Reflecting on Data Identifying Appropriate Action Application of Action Reflection and Evaluation of Action

 Prior to the Walkthrough  The Indicator(s) that is the main focus will be discussed and decided  Teams will be assigned to their walkthrough rooms

 This occurs during the walkthrough  Each person walking through will look for the ‘look fors’ for the targeted Indicator  For each ‘look for’, a rubric scale number will be assigned  There is also a comment section for additional noteworthy comments to be added

Reflection is “…the ability to look back and make sense of what happened and what you learned. But it’s also the ability to look forward, to anticipate what’s coming up, and what you need to do to prepare.” York-Barr, J., Sommers, W. A., Ghere, G. S., & Montie, J. (2006). Reflective Practice to Improve Schools.

 After the walkthrough, the teams will gather for debriefing  This will be where the discussion will take place within and between the teams  Strengths in the program will be showcased  Gaps in the program will be identified

 After analyzing and reflecting on the areas of strength and need appropriate action will be suggested for example:  Showcasing best practice  Determining professional development needs

 After the Activities/Actions occur the teams will reconvene and discuss effectiveness  Discussion will also occur surrounding next steps

 At this time:  Gather names of volunteers for the walkthrough  Provide training for Initial Teams  Conduct Walkthroughs  Reflect on process and protocols  In September:  All Special Education Programs will be included in the walkthrough process