Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Rationale N. Macnack¹, J. Kelly², J. Mullock¹, I. Ortiz-Monasterio 3, and W. Raun¹. ¹Plant and Soil Sciences,
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
History of Predicting Yield Potential TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERIA, PESCA Y ALIMENTACION "Wheat yield prediction by using an active sensor.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
N Reflections on Years of Sensor Research Algorithm Development and Jim Schepers.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Sensor research and algorithm development for corn in ND L.K. Sharma, D.W. Franzen, H. Bu, R. Ashley, G. Endres and J. Teboh North Dakota State University,
2  Objective: Improve in-season estimate of yield for winter wheat utilizing profile soil moisture (0-80 cm) obtained from Oklahoma Mesonet data. Lahoma.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Sensor Technology in India R.K. Gupta, B. Singh, P. Chandna, R.K. Sharma, M.L. Jat.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet.
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp Mobile Analysis V2.0.
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
Cotton Research Oklahoma State University. Exp. 439, Altus OK
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
 Several Sensor Based N Rate Calculations exist.  There are two distinct approaches to N rate calculations.  Use of Yield Prediction and Response 
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Evaluation of NUE and WUE on Corn Hybrids With and Without Drought Tolerance in Irrigated and Dryland Production Systems Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock,
John SolieIvan Ortiz-Monasterio Bill RaunCIMMYT Marv Stone Oklahoma State University John SolieIvan Ortiz-Monasterio Bill RaunCIMMYT Marv Stone Oklahoma.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Sensor Based Technologies in Mexico CIMMYT (Dr. Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio ) Oklahoma State University (Yumiko Kanke)
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Effect of Preplant/Early Irrigation, Nitrogen and Population Rate on Winter Wheat Grain Yield Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University,
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Dave Mengel, Kansas State University Multi-State Winter Wheat Sensor Project,
Eric Miller, Jacob Bushong, and Bill Raun NUE Conference August 6 th, 2013.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y E VOLUTION OF N ITROGEN R EFERENCE S TRIPS.
Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.
Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
Exploratory Research in Corn
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Sensor Algorithms.
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
Precision Sensing Extension Workshop January 8, 2008
EFFECT OF DELAYED EMERGENCE ON CORN GRAIN YIELDS
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Irrigated Corn VT VT Irrigated Corn
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University
History of Predicting Yield Potential
REVIEW.
Determining Nitrogen Application Rates with SBNRC and RAMP Calculator
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
REGIONAL NUE WINTER WHEAT TRIAL
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota
Relationship between mean yield, coefficient of variation, mean square error and plot size in wheat field experiments Coefficient of variation: Relative.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Eric Miller August 3rd, 2010 Dr. Camberato & Dr. Nielsen
K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie
Presentation transcript:

Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014

 The 2012 drought, 597 counties in 14 states primary natural disaster areas (USDA, 2013).  $14 billion in crop insurance indemnity payments (Congressional Budget Office, 2013).

Figure adapted from Nielsen, 2007

 Cold shock protein B gene ◦ Called ‘cspB’ ◦ Bacillus subtilis bacterium  Cold shock proteins accumulate  Act as RNA chaperones  Bind and unfold tangled RNA molecules to promote normal function (Castiglioni et al., 2008)

 Express native drought tolerant traits using marker assisted selection (Butzen and Schussler, 2009)

 YP 0 (kg ha -1 ) = 1291exp[(NDVI FP /Cumulative GDD)*2649.9] ◦ GDD = [(T Max +T min /2)–T base ◦ 10 o C and 30 o C are threshold values  RI = NDVI N-Rich /NDVI FarmerPractice  YP N (Mg ha -1 ) = YP 0 *RI  N Rate (kg ha -1 ) = YP N -YP 0 *0.0125/NUE

 Evaluate grain yield potential ◦ Drought tolerant and less drought tolerant corn hybrids ◦ Irrigated and rainfed production systems

LCB Efaw  Established in 2013 and has continued in 2014  3 replicates  4 row plots, 6.1 m long  Soils: ◦ Efaw  Norge: Fine-silty, mixed, active, thermic Udic Paleustolls ◦ Lake Carl Blackwell (LCB)  Port: Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, thermic Cumulic Haplustolls, Oscar: Fine-silty, mixed, superactive, thermic, Typic Natrustalfs

 G enetics ◦ Drought tolerant  Pioneer P1498: Optimum AQUAmax  Monsanto 63-55: Droughtgard ◦ Less drought tolerant  Pioneer P1395  Monsanto  E nvironment x M anagement Photo Courtesy of Jacob Bushong ◦ Rainfed production system  Preplant N rates  0, 67, and 134 kg ha -1  Seeding rate  53,800 seeds ha -1 ◦ Irrigated production system  Preplant N rates  0, 101, and 202 kg ha -1  Seeding rate  75,650 seeds ha -1

 NDVI collected with Trimble GreenSeeker optical sensor ◦ V8 and V10  Grain yield (kg ha -1 ) ◦ Center two rows per plot ◦ Adjusted to 155 g kg -1 moisture eb270/ _6040.html

Main effects and interactions for normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI 660 ) and grain yield at Efaw and Lake Carl Blackwell (LCB), EfawLCB NDVI: V8 NDVI: V10 Grain Yield NDVI: V8 NDVI: V10 Grain Yield Pr > F Irrigation Hybrid N Rate Irrigation x Hybrid Irrigation x N Rate Hybrid x N Rate Irrigation x Hybrid x N Rate

= Current YP0 equation

Drought tolerant

Single degree of freedom contrasts and differences of the means for grain yield (kg ha -1 ) at Efaw and LCB, EfawLCB P > FDiff.P > FDiff. Drought tolerant vs. Less drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer Droughtgard vs. AQUAmax

 Few differences existed between DT and non- DT corn hybrids when predicting potential grain yield  Clear differences were detected between irrigated and rainfed production systems  Potential grain yield was over-predicted

Questions?

Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014

GreenSeeker Trimble Experimental Sensor

36” ¾” GreenSeeker 30” 15” Trimble Experimental Sensor

 Recon or Nomad  vxHpc - hyperterminal program ◦ Reflectance of red and NIR bands individually  Microsoft Access data query ◦ Calculate NDVI ◦ Plot averages

 How does NDVI 660 collected with the Trimble Experimental Sensor relate to GreenSeeker NDVI 660 ? Data collection ◦ 2013 and 2014 ◦ Wheat  Feekes 3 to 9 ◦ Corn  V6 to V12 Photo Courtesy of Jeremiah Mullock

 Overall, good relationship between the GreenSeeker and Trimble experimental sensor  Clear differences between crops ◦ Possible need for a calibration for corn to utilize current algorithms ◦ Further evaluation of high biomass corn data

Questions?