Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comparison of Digital Elevation Models to Accurately Predict Stream Channels Spencer Trowbridge Papillion Creek Watershed.
Advertisements

The Effects of Different Resolution DEMs in Determining Overland Flow Regimes Stacy L. Hutchinson 1, J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 2, Ik-Jae Kim 1, and Philip.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
Linking watershed characteristics and land use to lake water quality using GIS presented by Brian Block ESR Limnology instructed by Dr. Mark Sytsma.
Assessment of Flow Paths in Upland Areas and Vegetated Buffers August 2, 2004 I.J. Kim, S.L. Hutchinson, and J.M.S. Hutchinson* The department of Biological.
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping to Inform Land-use Management Decisions in an Altered Climate Muhammad Barik and Jennifer Adam Washington State University,
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan DUE Office of Educational Innovation & Technology Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Using the Maryland Biological Stream Survey Data to Test Spatial Statistical Models A Collaborative Approach to Analyzing Stream Network Data Andrew A.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.
FE Watershed Analysis Lecture 1a - Overview Finn Krogstad UW Forest Engineering
Concept Course on Spatial Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Application of GIS in Watershed Analysis Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Institute of Water and Flood.
Some Potential Terrain Analysis Tools for ArcGIS David G. Tarboton
Flow modeling on grid terrains. DEM Representations TIN Grid Contour lines Sample points.
Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam Hands on training on surface hydrologic analysis using GIS Dr. A.K.M. Saiful Islam.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Why calculate slope and Aspect? Study the flow of water Identify the habitats of plants Identify potential sites for urban growth Drainage patterns on.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
Community-wide urban stormwater planning utilizing LiDAR, the WinSLAMM model and GIS Dan Murphy Rebecca Gronewold UNI GeoTREE Center April 4, 2013.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
GIS2: Geo-processing and Metadata Treg Christopher.
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Development of the Flash Flood Potential (FFPI) The Flash Flood Potential Index for Central NY and Northeast PA by by Jim Brewster WFO Binghamton, NY Moneypenny.
Benjamin Blandford, PhD University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center Michael Shouse, PhD University of Southern Illinois.
1 GIS in Hydrology Watershed management Definitions Algorithms Watershed delineation Automatically delineating watersheds Flow length Raster to vector.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
Advanced Topics in GIS. Natural Hazards Landslide Susceptibility.
Models in GIS A model is a description of reality It may be: Dynamic orStatic Dynamic spatial models e.g., hydrologic flow Static spatial models (or point.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Objective: Have a working knowledge of the relationship between the vegetative cover in a watershed and water yield and water quality.
Sarah Giles Holly Kuestner Steven Orr Qi Zhang. 1.Impervious Surfaces’ Effects on Flow Accumulation (Holly) 2.Variable Source Area (Holly) 3.Catchment.
Role of Spatial Database in Biodiversity Conservation Planning Sham Davande, GIS Expert Arid Communities Technologies, Bhuj 11 September, 2015.
Extent and Mask Extent of original data Extent of analysis area Mask – areas of interest Remember all rasters are rectangles.
Introduction to Spatial Calculation Estimation of Areas Susceptible to Flood and Soil Loss.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Creating Watersheds, Stream Networks and Hydrologically Conditioned DEMS Steve Kopp Dean Djokic.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Reading Assignment: Bolstad Chapters 10 & 11 Spatial Analysis (Raster)
Understory Growth Dynamics following High Severity Burn in a Mixed-Conifer Forest Daniel Wilcox, Space Grant Intern Dr. Shirley A. Papuga, Faculty Advisor.
NR 322: Raster Analysis I Jim Graham Fall 2008 Chapter 7.
Impacts of Landuse Management and Climate Change on Landslides Susceptibility over the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Muhammad Barik and Jennifer.
Statistical Surfaces, part II GEOG370 Instructor: Christine Erlien.
Effects of timber harvest on baseflow yield in the Mica Creek Experimental Watershed Wes Green, Will Drier, Tim Link (College of Natural Resources), John.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
1 Application of SDI in hydrology for assessment of hydropower potential of small streams Subija IZEIROSKI Bashkim IDRIZI Sotir PANOVSKI Igor NEDELKOVSKI.
Raster/Map Algebra/Hydrology
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE DEGRADATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Spatial Models – Raster Stacy Bogan
Predicting species distributions for New England invasives
Distributed modelling
InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) Water Purification: Nutrient Retention Host Institution/URL
Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM) in Hydrology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
TOPMODEL and the role of topography and variable contributing areas in runoff production Learning objectives Be able to describe the topographic wetness.
May 18, 2016 Spring 2016 Institute of Space Technology
Problem: Interpolation of soil properties
Prediction of Channel Response Areas due to Wildfire Disturbance using GIS and TauDEM Karen Williams GIS in Water Resources.
Environmental Modelling with RASTER DEMs: Hydrologic Features
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Presentation transcript:

Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang

A little about me…. Native West Virginian – Pocahontas County B.S. in Forest Resource Management Seeking M.S. Forestry Very interested in Forestry and GIS Analysis!

Issue Sedimentation – Soil movement can cause lots of damage especially when its moving into water resources. – Pollution of streams, Raise flood levels, Raise stream temperatures, Degrade site/stream quality and Productivity, and reduce navigational abilities. Sediment created from Silvicultural Operations is the issue at hand.

Project Description Problems: – Soil Movement, specifically sedimentation, is very detrimental to streams and forested sites. Pollution to Water Resources Site Degradation-Both Environmentally and Aesthetically Habitat and Productivity Loss-Both Onsite and Downstream – Assess Best Management Practices (BMP) Functionality GOAL: FIND SIGNIFICANT SOIL MOVEMENT CONTRIBUTORS and IDENTIFY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WATERSHEDS

Project: Study Area Two Watersheds located in Tucker County, WV Both Similar in Geologic and Physical Makeup. Slopes Elevations Land-cover etc…

Project Description Study designed to evaluate soil movement and it’s relation to logging. Two Watersheds (Control and Treatment) Silt-fence Installed around all Streams Material Removed Once a Year Extensive Mapping Procedures Classification/Regression Trees to Model and/or Predict Sedimentation

Silt-fence Installation

Data Collection and Recording

Total Oven-Dry Material Oven Dry and Burn Pour off and discard Place in water (Mostly Mineral) Manually separate predominantly mineral from predominantly organic Mineral associated with predominantly organic fraction Apply average percent to predominantly organic fraction weight Burn sub-samples, calculate average percent mineral (Mostly Organic) Mineral associated with predominantly mineral fraction Total Sediment

Methods Use GIS to identify Landscape elements in each watershed that contribute to soil movement. (i.e. Disturbance, Moisture, Slope, Soil Types, etc…) Calculations: Derived From Digital Elevation Map – Slope, Aspect, Flow Direction, Flow Accumulation, Moisture Index, Distance Grids (from road, from stream, etc.), Soils, Land-cover, etc… Many Variables! Analysis Performed Using Various Extensions of the ESRI ArcMap 9.1 GIS program. As well as the newly developed 3-Meter DEM and Aerial Photography from the WV GIS Tech-center. Statistical Method-Classification Trees – R Statistical Package

Spatial Analysis Toolbar Slope Grid Raster Calculator Moisture Index Hydrology Tools Flow Direction Flow Accumulation Stream Networks Digital Elevation Map (DEM) 3-Meter Resolution Distance Grids Aspect Grid Curvature Inputs ---Tools --- Output Grids ---

Sediment a function of… Sediment Reaching Silt-fence= F (Slope, Distance From Silt-fence, Distance From Disturbance, Distance From Slope Breaks, Moisture, Aspect, Accumulation, Soil Type, Vegetation, Land-use, ) Very Dynamic Subject

Ecological Land Units (ELU) Moisture Index This index assumes that the relative moisture in a particular area (in this case a grid cell) primarily depends on two factors; – How much water is flowing into the area and how fast the water can flow out of the area. Ln [(catchment area + 1) / (slope + 1)] The created index is a relative one so the numbers don’t represent any type of units. – Higher Positive Numbers are Wetter – Lower Negative Numbers are Drier Strager (2006)

Analyses Performed Also: – Classification Tree Modeling Technique – Statistical Analyses (S-plus and R Statistics Systems) Future Analyses – Stream Loading-Sediment – Refining of Classification Tree Modeling Key to possibly modeling the soil movement or sedimentation

Results According to the Statistical Modeling: R – Slope is the most important variable 21.58º Followed by: Moisture (Range -4.3 – 7.6) Aspect- 141º – Combined Grids Using Raster Calculator Model Refinement to Include more Variables Coming Soon!

Conclusions 3-Meter DEM much higher accuracy! 1:4800 scale aerial photography gives great visual representation! – Leads to more thorough analysis. – Detailed 3-D Representation. Hydrology Tools Very Influential Upon Completion of Analyses: – Identify Contributors to Soil Movement Order there level of Importance – Assess current Best Management Practices (BMP) – Model/Predict Soil Loss

Thank You Any Questions?

References (Grayson et al. 1992; Mitasova 1996; Moore, I. D. et al. 1988; Boer et al. 1996, O’Loughlin 1986, Parker 1982) Strager 2006