Sources of Self Efficacy By: Matt Hull and Courtney Pieper.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confidence in sport Sue Young
Advertisements

Bandura Competitiveness in Children Quantitative theories and Qualitative themes.
What is today’s topic??. WHAT IS TODAYS TOPIC?
Building Confidence in young people
Albert Bandura: Social / Observational Learning
By: Kurtis Baker Kelli Fuentes.  Born in 1925 in Alberta, Canada  Grew up in a small town  Enrolled in University of British Columbia  Enrolled an.
SELF CONFIDENCE (2 nd of the 4 C’s) “The most consistent difference between elite and less successful athletes is that elite athletes possess greater self-confidence”
Social Cognitive Theory Sean Dalton H /30/14.
ALBERT BANDURA. “What people think, believe, and feel affects how they behave. The natural and extrinsic effects of their actions, in turn, partly determine.
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory ( Bandura)
Micro Teaching #2 Teaching Educational Psychology using Children’s Literature Copyright July 2014 – Narmada Paul and Susan Strayer This work is licensed.
Self Confidence, Participation and Self- Esteem… Mr. P. Leighton Mental Preparation for Sport Sports Psychology.
Bandura’s Social Learning Theory Observational Learning and Model Behavior By: Brigid Callahan.
Albert Bandura "A theory that denies that thoughts can regulate actions does not lend itself readily to the explanation of complex human behavior." From.
Bandura’s observational model of learning Social learning Theory Jordan Palmer.
Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory By Mary Quinn And Kym Malone.
By: Lisa Thomas and Jenny Johnson. Biographical Information Born in 1925 in Alberta, Canada Grew up in a small town Attended the U. of British Colombia.
By Reneé Yackley and Mary Defilippis. Albert Bandura Born in 1925 in Canada Graduated from the University of British Columbia with the Bolocan Award in.
Self Efficacy.
Bandura’s Self-Efficacy
1 Myron Eighmy, Ed. D. Tom Hall, Ed. D. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Made by team Slovakia: Anna Maslíková Katarína Fúrová Veronika Piknová
Chapter Twelve Motivation. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved Overview The behavioral view of motivation The social-cognitive.
Objectives -Understand the term self-efficacy and self-confidence. -Know how a coach can help develop these. -Understand the term learned helplessness.
Self Confidence and Self-Efficacy
Social Learning theory From modeling to Self efficacy.
 Course Administration  Syllabus questions  Assessment Questions  Self –Efficacy Discussion  Break  Class Exercises.
Andree Ory. *Born 1925, Alberta Canada *Majored in psychology at University of Iowa *Currently a Professor at Stanford University *President of American.
Albert Bandura Self-Efficacy in Competitive Swimming Kate O’Brien.
GABY MARTIN Albert Bandura: A Study on Self-Efficacy.
ALBERT BANDURA SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY. Biography He was born on December 4, 1925 in Mundare, Alberta, California. At the age of 24, he received his BA.
Drew Hickman and Justin McGee University of Dallas.
Albert Bandura Biography Born in the province of Alberta, Canada. Attended the University of British Columbia, Vancouver Took psychology because.
Observational Learning. Learning by observing others.
Gender and IT Education Conference, Indiana University, 2007 Gender & IT Education Being The Same Isn’t Enough Impact of Male and Female Mentors on Computer.
LESSON 1.2: SELF-CONCEPT Unit 1: Mental Health. Do Now  Write down 5 words or phrases that describe you or represent who you are  Rank the 5 words or.
By Melissa Farris. ALBERT BANDURA BIOGRAPHY  Born 1925 in a small town in Canada. Moved to USA for Graduate School.  Enrolled in his first Psychology.
Educational Psychology, 11 th Edition ISBN © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Social Cognitive Views of Learning and Motivation.
A LBERT B ANDURA By Jhoana H. Michelle G. Rayana B.
Social Cognitive Learning Theory: Self Efficacy Expectations
Chapter 5 Self-Understanding: How We Come to Understand Ourselves.
Caritas Francis Hsu College General Education PHI1011 Individual and Society Lecture 2: Self 1.
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY CONTEMPORARY LEADERSHIP BY: LIZ LEVIN HTM491 MARCH 29 TH, 2013.
Contemporary Leadership Theory Christina Jones. Definition The social learning theory emphasizes the importance of observing and modeling the behaviors,
Terje Manger Beate Buanes Roth In co-operation with Arve Asbjørnsen, Ole Johan Eikeland, and Lise Jones Bergen Cognition and Learning Group University.
Powerful Learning Environments. Making Learning Fun Grab their interest with music! Grab their interest with visuals!
International Forum on English Language Teaching, University of Porto Ana Fernández Viciana University of Oviedo.
Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory By: Austin Conyers & Trent Hedlund.
THERE ARE SOME THEMES, SOME SUBJECTS, TOO LARGE FOR ADULT FICTION; THEY CAN ONLY BE DEALT ADEQUATELY IN A CHILDREN’S BOOK. - Philip Pullman.
Background  Born on December 4, 1925 in a small town in the province of Alberta, Canada.  Received his bachelor’s degree in Psychology from the University.
Born: December 4, 1925 in Mundare, Alberta, Canada Contributed in these fields of Psychology:  Social Cognitive Theory  Therapy & Personal Psychology.
+ Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory By Katie & Matt.
Albert Bandura Self-Efficacy Gabby Drong and JP Fasone.
Albert Bandura By Alec and Dylan.
May 1, 2017 By: Kim Zamora and Mary Lindberg
A study based on the theories of Albert Bandura
Personality, Perception, and Attribution
The Influential Mind Of Albert Bandura
Cognitive Learning Theory
Sarah Radvansky Natalie Clay Nikki Knight Tishanna Jackson
Bandura’s Self-Efficacy
By Katelyn Lazarek & Jackie Landry
UWE L&T Conference Self-Efficacy: Chris Baker
Personality, Perception, and Attribution
Ethnocentrism & Stereotypes
2.Personality And Attitude
Building Confidence in young people
Albert Bandura Born: December 4, 1925 Grew up in Alberta, Canada
Social Cognitive approach
Presentation transcript:

Sources of Self Efficacy By: Matt Hull and Courtney Pieper

 Introduce Bandura  Define Self-Efficacy and it’s Sources  Present and Interpret Our Data

 Born December 4, 1925 in Alberta, Canada  He received his bachelor’s degree in psychology at University of British Columbia and his PHD from University of Iowa in 1952  He is currently president of the American Psychological Association and Works at Stanford University

o observational learning "Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do. Fortunately, most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action." ~ Bandura

 What people believe they are capable of doing and how well they think they can do it  These ‘judgments’ of oneself are called self efficacy appraisals  Influences how people think, feel, behave, and motivate themselves

Self concept- the idea or mental image one has of oneself and their strengths, weaknesses, status, etc.; also called self image Self esteem- a realistic respect for oneself or favorable impression of oneself  Self efficacy refers only to one’s capabilities on a given subject rather than generalities

1. Actual Performance 2. Vicarious experiences 3. Verbal persuasion 4. Physiological cues

 The most influential source of knowledge and the most effective way of creating a strong sense of efficacy  Repeated success increases our sense of efficacy  Repeated failure decreases our sense of efficacy

 If we observe others, who we believe have roughly the same abilities as we do, succeed at a task, we infer that we can do it too and our sense of self efficacy increases.  In the same way, if we see others fail who we feel are as capable as us, our self efficacy will be lowered

 When someone convinces us we can perform a task, we usually do better and exert more effort on it  ‘pep talks’  Often easier to lower self efficacy than raise it with this appraisal

 The interpretation of emotional and physical reactions  Examples: adrenaline running, butterflies in your stomach, fatigue, your mood or attitude

 Is self efficacy related to performance and interest in subject matter?  Which sources of self efficacy have the most influence?  Do the sources of self efficacy differ between age and gender?

 Students will like the class they are best at and will spend the most time working on classes they like the most  Actual Performance will be the most influential source of self efficacy  Girls and boys will have different sources of self efficacy but the fifth and second graders will show similar results

Who? Sixteen 5 th graders and eighteen 2 nd graders What? A survey with 19 questions concerning the sources of self efficacy When? During their regular school hours Where? In their classrooms How did we interpret the data? Awarded points for answers to questions positively pertaining to self efficacy

Second grade:  11 out of 18 said that their favorite class was the class they were best out  3 of the 18 spent the most amount of time working on that class Fifth grade:  11 out of 16 said that their favorite class was the class they were best out  10 of the 16 spent the most amount of time working on that class

 Overwhelming amount of data that we had a hard time interpreting  Our physiological cue questions are inconclusive  We were unable to compare the sources of self efficacy  Some kids were unable to finish the survey  A survey may not have been the best means of determining self efficacy

Vicarious experiences has a greater influence than we realized Actual performance didn’t play nearly as large of a role as verbal persuasion