Predicting Estrogen Receptor Binding within Categories Rick Kolanczyk Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Groups.
Advertisements

1 Sequential Screening S. Stanley Young NISS HTS Workshop October 25, 2002.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry, Microbiology.
UNEP Advisory Group Meeting Geneva, Switzerland December 12, 2014
IQF Framework for QSAR 1. Identify Plausible Molecular Initiating Events 2. Design Database for Abiotic Binding Affinity/Rates 3. Explore Linkages in Pathways.
Chemistry for Changing Times 12th Edition Hill and Kolb
Jürgen Sühnel Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Jena Centre for Bioinformatics Jena / Germany Supplementary Material:
National Pesticide Program A New Toxicology Testing Paradigm: Meeting Common Needs Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office.
Organic Chemistry Study of molecular compounds of carbon.
Structure-based Drug Design
Organic Chemistry Larry Scheffler Lincoln High School 1 Revised September 12, 2010.
1 Dr Nahed Elsayed. Learning Objectives Chapter six concerns alcohols and phenols and by the end of this chapter the student will:  know the difference.
Computational Techniques in Support of Drug Discovery October 2, 2002 Jeffrey Wolbach, Ph. D.
Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) September
Chapter 9 – Compounds of Carbon. Bonding in Carbon Compounds Carbon’s electron configuration is 1s 2 2s 2 2p 2. It is in period 2, group 14 of the periodic.
Office of Pesticide Programs 21st Century Screening Assessment of Pesticides – A Regulatory View Vicki Dellarco, Ph.D. Senior Science Advisor Office of.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
Optimizing Target Interactions
Applying Adverse Outcome Pathway Concepts to ER-mediated Effects Pat Schmieder US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National.
CZ3253: Computer Aided Drug design Lecture 3: Drug and Cheminformatics Databases Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
1 Innovative Science To Improve Public Health EDKB: Endocrine Disruptors Knowledge Base at the FDA Huixiao Hong, Ph.D. Center for Bioinformatics Division.
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor December 12th, 2012 Biological Sequence Analysis course.
Designing a QSAR for ER Binding. QSAR Xenobiotic ER Binding Altered Protein Expression Altered Hormone Levels, Ova-testis Chg 2ndry Sex Char, Altered.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Chemistry XXI The central goal of this unit is to help you identify the structural and environmental factors that can be used to control chemical reactions.
Ligand-based drug discovery No a priori knowledge of the receptor What information can we get from a few active compounds.
Dose-Response for Reproductive Effects of ER Binders P. Schmieder R. Johnson.
An Introduction to Organic Chemistry. Orgins Originally defined as the chemistry of living materials or originating from living sources Wohler synthesized.
0 Focusing on the Adverse Outcomes of ER-mediated Pathways Rodney Johnson ORD/MED McKim Conference September 16-18, 2008.
Risk Assessment 1 Thanks to Paul R. Harp, Ph.D., NH Department of Health & Human Services, US EPA Air Quality Planning & Standards Division, and the DOE.
Virtual Screening C371 Fall INTRODUCTION Virtual screening – Computational or in silico analog of biological screening –Score, rank, and/or filter.
South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority Articulating aesthetics Monday 24 August 2015 Andrew Pruszinski.
Toxicological Knowledge Base (a Definition) Response Dose “ An in computero aggregated set of the most germane literature citations and biological activity.
LSM3241: Bioinformatics and Biocomputing Lecture 6: Fundamentals of Molecular Modeling Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology
T. W. Schultz Presented at the McKim Conference September 17, 2008.
Introduction to Organic Chemistry Section Organic Chemistry The chemistry of carbon compounds Not including metal carbonates and oxides Are varied.
Barcelona April, 2008 Overview of the QSAR Application Toolbox Gilman Veith International QSAR Foundation Duluth, Minnesota.
Organic Chemistry New Way Chemistry for Hong Kong A-Level Book 3A2 2 Course Name: Organic Chemistry for Medical Students Course Code : CLS 232 Instructor.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 16-18, 2008 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
Chemistry is a Physical Science.  Chemistry is the study of the composition, structure, and properties of matter, the processes that matter undergoes,
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development QSAR Application Toolbox -filling data gaps using available information- McKim Conference, September.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
Molecular Modeling in Drug Discovery: an Overview
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
IUPAC nomenclature.
Lecture 10: Organic compounds: Functional groups and the molecules of life SPRING 2017 Course lecturer : Jasmin Šutković 26th April 2017.
West Valley High School
Lecture 9: Organic compounds: Functional groups and the molecules of life SPRING 2017 Course lecturer : Jasmin Šutković 26th April 2017.
Introduction to Chemistry
Aromatic hydrocarbons
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
Background This is a step-by-step presentation designed to take the first time user of the Toolbox through the workflow of a data filling exercise.
Potential Role for Endocrine Disruptor Expert Systems in Investigating ‘Endocrine System-Epigenome’ Interactions P. Schmieder EPA, ORD, NHEERL, MED-Duluth,
Organic chemistry part II
APPLICATIONS OF BIOINFORMATICS IN DRUG DISCOVERY
OAK CREEK Toxicology & Risk Assessment Consulting
Chapter 9 – Compounds of Carbon
Organic Chemistry Mrs. Rose Marie Capanema Mansur.
Dnyanasadhana College, Thane. Department of Chemistry T. Y. B. Sc
Virtual Screening.
CARBON Organic compounds
Carbon.
Information Sources Day 1.
Organic Chemistry An Introduction.
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
Ovanes Mekenyan, Milen Todorov, Ksenia Gerova
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
Presentation transcript:

Predicting Estrogen Receptor Binding within Categories Rick Kolanczyk Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Mid-Continent Ecology Division Duluth, MN

Estrogen Receptor Toxicity Pathway Need is derived from Food Quality Protection Act – “estrogens” Chemical binding to ER is known to cause adverse effects –Toxicity Pathway Diverse chemicals bind to ER Drug bioassays for ER binding are not relevant – drug-design assays optimized for high affinity binders –environmental hazard may come from low affinity binding

Development and use of a QSAR requires clear Problem Definition The purpose of the QSAR application must be well-defined (e.g., priority setting for testing, and chemical-specific risk assessment are two very different purposes) The chemicals of regulatory concern must be defined to develop a database of tested chemicals (training set) for QSAR development EPA Office of Pesticide Programs: Food Use Inerts & Antimicrobials – Get ‘lists’ – Characterize structures – Assess coverage of existing data (training sets, TrSets) – Select chemicals for testing to strategically expand structure space to maximize information gained from every structure tested

Defining the Problem: EPA Office of Pesticide Programs Food Use Inerts List - Structures List from OPP/RD included: 893 entries = 393 discrete chemicals non-discrete substances (44% discrete : 56% non-discrete) 393 discrete chemicals include: 366 organics (93%) 24 inorganics (6%) 3 organometallics (1%) 500 non-discrete substances include: 147 polymers of mixed chain length 170 mixtures 183 undefined substances

Defining the Problem: EPA Office of Pesticide Programs Antimicrobials/Sanitizers - Structures Lists from OPP/AD included: 299 = 211 discrete chemicals + 88 non-discrete substances (71% discrete : 29% non-discrete) 211 discrete chemicals include: 153 organics (72%) 52 inorganics (25%) 6 organometallics-acyclic (3%) 88 non-discrete substances include: 25 polymers of mixed chain length 35 mixtures 28 undefined substances

In-lab Testing = Training Set The Issue: Assay protocols optimized to increase confidence in quantifying activity of low potency compounds Compare EPA Office of Pesticide Programs chemical structures to existing ER data The assays: 1)ER binding – standard competitive binding assay optimized for low affinity binders Rainbow trout liver cytosol (rtER) 2) Gene Activation trout liver slice - vitellogenin mRNA Endogenous metabolism

Data Example – Pos. Binding; Pos. Gene Activation rtER Gene ExpressionrtER Binding

Building a Decision Tree with Categories

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Non binder (RBA< ) No

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines No

Alkylbenzsulfonic acids msrd 3.56 calc calc calc.6.15 calc calc. Bis-Anilines 3.15 calc calc. Sorbitans Sulfonic acids dyes 0.61 calc.2.45 msrd Isothiazolines AYE calc. RAC 0.08 calc. SYE calc. FUI AMI FUI calc calc. Imidazolidines calc calc msrd

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Yes No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines No

R 394 E 353 H 524 B B A A Schematic representation of ER binding pocket (LBD), with 3 sites of interaction shown (A, B, C), and ER protein a.a. involved in the interactions which chemical ligands. C C T 347 C C J. Katzenellenbogen

R 394 E 353 H 524 C C T 347 HO OH CH 3 H HH H A A B B A_B Interaction Distance = 10.8 for 17  -Estradiol

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete V Yes No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines No

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site V Possible Low Affinity Binder Yes No Yes No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes

Additional 46 chemicals tested as non-binders with LogKOW below 1.3

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site Type “A” Contains Phenol Fragment V Possible Low Affinity Binder No Yes No II Yes No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes

R 394 E 353 H 524 C C T 347 HO A A B B “A_site only” Interaction CH 3

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site Type “A” Contains Phenol Fragment V Possible Low Affinity Binder Alkyl Phenols Alkoxy Phenols Parabens Salicylates Belongs to known Active class Potency Rules / Equations No Yes No II Needs testing Yes No Yes Belongs to known Inactive class Fully-hindered Alkyl Phenols Belong to untested class with possible Type A low affinity Yes Non binder (RBA< ) Mixed Phenols No Yes No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes

3.20 msrd 5.16 calc. Alkylphenols 3.57 msrd3.40 calc msrd 5.43 calc. Parabens 2.55 msrd4.63 msrd5.06 calc. Salicylates 3.31 msrd4.06 msrd

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site Type “A” Contains Phenol Fragment V Possible Low Affinity Binder Type “B” Contains identif. Type B Fragment Alkyl Phenols Alkoxy Phenols Parabens Salicylates Belongs to known Active class Potency Rules / Equations No Yes No II Needs testing Yes No Yes III Belongs to known Inactive class Fully-hindered Alkyl Phenols Belong to untested class with possible Type A low affinity No Yes Non binder (RBA< ) Mixed Phenols No Yes III No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes

R 394 E 353 H 524 C C T 347 A A B B “B_site only” Interaction H3CH3C NH 2

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site Type “A” Contains Phenol Fragment Alkyl Anilines Phthalates Branched Phenones Cyclo Phenones p-subst Cyclohexanols p-subst Cyclohexanones ring subst (o-CH3, tri-CH3) Benzoates V Possible Low Affinity Binder Type “B” Contains identif. Type B Fragment N-alkyl Phenones Non ring subst Benzoates Alkyl Phenols Alkoxy Phenols Parabens Salicylates Belongs to known Active class Potency Rules / Equations Potency Rules / Equations No Yes No II Needs testing Yes No Yes Belongs to class with possible Type B low affinity under investigation Belongs to known Inactive class III Belongs to known Inactive class Fully-hindered Alkyl Phenols Belong to untested class with possible Type A low affinity ring subst p-CH3 Benzoates Thiophosphate Esters Mixed Organics Cyclic Alcohols (not p-subst hexanols) Cyclic Pentanones/Others Br, I halobenzenes No Yes Belongs to known Active class Belong to untested class Needs testing Non binder (RBA< ) Mixed Phenols No Yes III Non binder (RBA< ) No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes

5.12 calc msrd1.96 msrd Alkyl Anilines 2.47 msrd 6.82 msrd 2.83 msrd 4.91 msrd Phthalates 3.07 calc.3.00 msrd2.73 msrd Branched Phenones

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Special Rule Classes Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site Type “A” Contains Phenol Fragment Alkyl Anilines Phthalates Branched Phenones Cyclo Phenones p-subst Cyclohexanols p-subst Cyclohexanones ring subst (o-CH3, tri-CH3) Benzoates V Possible Low Affinity Binder Type “B” Contains identif. Type B Fragment N-alkyl Phenones Non ring subst Benzoates Alkyl Phenols Alkoxy Phenols Parabens Salicylates Belongs to known Active class Potency Rules / Equations No Potency Rules / Equations No Yes No II Needs testing Yes No Yes Belongs to class with possible Type B low affinity under investigation Belongs to known Inactive class III Belongs to known Inactive class Fully-hindered Alkyl Phenols Belong to untested class with possible Type A low affinity ring subst p-CH3 Benzoates Thiophosphate Esters Mixed Organics Cyclic Alcohols (not p-subst hexanols) Cyclic Pentanones/Others Br, I halobenzenes No Yes Belongs to known Active class Belong to untested class Needs testing Non binder (RBA< ) Mixed Phenols No Yes III Non binder (RBA< ) No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones IV Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes DDT-Like Tamoxifen-Like Multi-Cyclohydrocarbons Alkyl Chlorobenzenes

5.87 calc msrd Multi-Cyclic Hydrocarbons 4.94 calc calc calc calc. Alkyl-Chlorobenzenes 6.89 calc.4.03 msrd Tamoxifen Like 6.53 calc. DDT Like

Setting Priority for Further Testing: Food Use Inert and Antimicrobial Lists Lower Priority if: -Chemical belongs to a class where testing showed no evidence of ER interaction (RBA < ); -LogP <1.3, or meets other class specific LogP cutoffs General characteristics of these chemicals: -Acyclic (e.g., no benzene rings) -Cyclic but does not contain a likely H-bonding group; RBA = relative binding affinity; (a ratio of measured chemical affinity for the ER relative to 17-beta-Estradiol = 100%) Log P = log of octanol/water partition coefficient (also known as Log Kow); is an indicator of lipophilicity

Setting Priority for Further Testing: Food Use Inert and Antimicrobial Lists Higher Priority if: -Chemical belongs to class with evidence of ER interaction, and: -LogP > 1.3 (or other class-specific cutoffs) General characteristics of these chemicals: -Contains at least one cycle (e.g., benzene ring); -Contains a possible H-bonding group;

Inactive Classes – Lower Priority Inactive ClassesFIAM Acyclics Alkylbenzenesulfonic Acids 78 3 Sulfonic Acid Dyes 9 1 Sorbitans 7 0 Monocyclic Hydrocarbons 7 0 Cyclic caged Hydrocarbon 1 0 Pyrrolidines 3 0 Furans 3 0 N-chain Phenones 1 0 Oxazoles 0 3 Triazines 1 13 Isothiazolines 3 7 Imidazolidines 0 8 Cyclic Inorganics 0 3 Fully-Hindered Alkylphenols 1 0 Cyclic Pentanones/Others 2 0 Inactive ranges in Otherwise Positive Classes Cyclic Hexanones of LogP< Cyclic Hexanols of LogP< Chlorobenzenes of LogP<4 1 0 Inactives in Mixed Functional Grps/Heteratom Classes Mixed Phenols 4 1 Mixed Organics Organometallics 0 1 Total Inactives

1.50 msrd 1.97 msrd 2.47 msrd 3.65 msrd 3.20 msrd Classwise Differences in Lower LogKow Cutoff p-n-Alkyl Phenols AlkylAnilines 0.90 msrd 3.05 msrd 1.96 msrd 2.40 msrd 1.39 msrd p-n-Alkyl Anilines 2.84 msrd 4.41 calc calc calc. p-n-Alkyl Chloro benzenes 1.23 meas n-Alkyl Cyclo hexanols 2.32 calc.3.37 calc.

Active Classes – High Priority Active Classes FIAM Alkyl Phenols 4 9 Parabens 3 0 Salicylates 1 0 Phthalates 3 0 Actives in Mixed Functional /Heteratom Classes Mixed Phenols 1 6 Mixed Organics 1 0 Total Positives 13 15

Classes – Under Investigation Classes FI AM Mixed Phenols(?) 3 2 Mixed Organics(?) 7 16 Organometallics(?) 2 3 Thiophosphate Esters(?) 1 0 Total Under Investigation 13 21

Inventory Status – September 20, 2007 Food Use InventoryAntimicrobials 393 Total Chemicals (94%) Lower Priority 175 (82%) 13 ( 3%) Higher Priority 15 ( 7%) 13 ( 3%) Under Investigation 21 (10%) Summary of Current Findings Food Use Inert and Antimicrobial Lists

Chemical Inventory Contains Cycle Yes Contains 2 OH, or OH and =0, at Spec. Dist Possible High Affinity, “A-B”; “A-C”; or “A-B-C” type binder Contains some attenuating feature steric?; other? High Binding Affinity “A-B”;“A-C” or “A-B-C” type No Non binder Ex: Progesterone Corticossterone (RBA< ) Special Rule Classes Log Kow <1.3 Low Affinity Binder “A-B”,“A-C” or “A-B-C” type Assess strength of attenuation steric?; other? Some Complete Contains at least one possible H- bonding site Type “A” Contains Phenol Fragment Alkyl Anilines Phthalates Branched Phenones Cyclo Phenones p-subst Cyclohexanols p-subst Cyclohexanones ring subst (o-CH3, tri-CH3) Benzoates V Possible Low Affinity Binder Type “B” Contains identif. Type B Fragment N-alkyl Phenones Non ring subst Benzoates Alkyl Phenols Alkoxy Phenols Parabens Salicylates Belongs to known Active class Potency Rules / Equations No Potency Rules / Equations No Yes No II Needs testing Yes No Yes Belongs to class with possible Type B low affinity under investigation Belongs to known Inactive class III Belongs to known Inactive class Fully-hindered Alkyl Phenols Belong to untested class with possible Type A low affinity ring subst p-CH3 Benzoates Thiophosphate Esters Mixed Organics Cyclic Alcohols (not p-subst hexanols) Cyclic Pentanones/Others Br, I halobenzenes No Yes Belongs to known Active class Belong to untested class Needs testing Non binder (RBA< ) Mixed Phenols No Yes III Non binder (RBA< ) No Belongs to known Inactive class Non binder (RBA< ) Alkylbenzsulfonic Acids Sulfonic Acid Dyes p-Alkyl Fluorobenzenes Bis–anilines Alkoxy Anilines Imidazolidines Isothiazolines Alkyl Benzthiols Pyrrolidiones IV Yes Oxazoles Benzamide Furans Sorbitans Triazines Yes No Yes DDT-Like Tamoxifen-Like Multi-Cyclohydrocarbons Alkyl Chlorobenzenes

Alkyl Anilines Phthalates Branched Phenones Cyclo Phenones p-subst Cyclohexanols p-subst Cyclohexanones ring subst (o-CH3, tri-CH3) Benzoates Type “B” Contains identif. Type B Fragment N-alkyl Phenones Non ring subst Benzoates Potency Rules / Equations Yes Belongs to class with possible Type B low affinity under investigation Belongs to known Inactive class ring subst p-CH3 Benzoates Thiophosphate Esters Mixed Organics Cyclic Alcohols (not p-subst hexanols) Cyclic Pentanones/Others Br, I halobenzenes No Belongs to known Active class Needs testing No Yes III Non binder (RBA< )

3.84 msrd 3.59 msrd 4.15 msrd 4.01 msrd 3.84 msrd Non Ring-subst. Benzoates 3.61 calc msrd 4.14 calc. Ring-subst. (tri-CH 3 ) Benzoates 2.64 msrd 2.75 msrd Ring-subst. (o-CH 3 ) Benzoates 2.75 msrd Ring-subst. (p-CH 3 ) Benzoates 2.47 msrd Phthalate

Summary The decision support system has been coded to perform an automatic classification of discrete chemical inventories. Modifications to the decision tree are made as needed as new inventories are examined which contain new structure/activity classes Decision support system was designed to categorize chemicals with similar activity (ER binding potential) to determine common aspects of structure.

Acknowledgements EPA Mid-Continent Ecology Divivsion-Duluth: Pat Schmieder, Mark Tapper, Jeff Denny, Barb Sheedy, Mike Hornung, Hristo Aladjov Student Services Contractors: Carlie Peck, Beth Nelson, Tori Wehinger, Ben Johnson, Luke Toonen, Rebecca Maciewski, Will Backe, Melissa Dybvig, Megyn Mereness International QSAR Foundation: Gil Veith EPA Office of Pesticide Programs: Steve Bradbury, Jonathan Chen, Jean Holmes, Kerry Leifer, Betty Shackleford, Najim Shamim, Deborah Smegal, Pauline Wagner OASIS software (Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry): Bourgas, Bulgaria – Ovanes Mekenyan