Navy QDR 4 December Overall brief classification: Unclassified C5ISR Conference

2 This QDR is Different… 1 st Term Administration –Driving change Accelerated timeline –Fiscal Year 11 (FY-11) budget Fiscal environment –Worldwide economic slowdown –Defense spending flat at best –Rising military personnel costs SECDEF –Signaled change with FY-10 budget Other Reviews –Nuclear Posture Review –Space Posture Review –Missile Defense Review But the same… –New people –Differing OSD views

3 Confluence of Events SECDEF Foreign Affairs Article Nuclear Posture Review Missile Defense Review Roles & Missions PR-11 CS21CS Maritime Strategy Supplemental Funding Naval Operations Concept Posture HearingsPOM-10 (amended) Space Posture Review National Defense Strategy Quadrennial Defense Review Confluence of Events

4 Products of QDR Key results Navy seeks to influence National Security Defense Strategy Force Planning Construct –Number, timing, duration and type of conflicts military should be prepared to address – Decisions will reflect constraints of projected budget Budget topline Additionally, QDR may direct specific changes to a limited number of major defense acquisition programs Success based on: 1. DoD leaders agree with Navy and maritime strategy 2. The resulting force structure supports the strategy

5 Adversaries of greatest concern are pursuing new capabilities and concepts Scale and Scope COIN/CT/Stab OpsConflict w/ “High-End” Adversary “Provide maximum flexibility against the broadest range of plausible threats.” - Secretary Gates IW Symmetric, Force-on-force High-End Asymmetric

6 Global Posture –Directed issues PACOM growth Training in Pacific Korea C2 changes Fighter laydown EUCOM Force req Carrier homeporting Cost Drivers –Healthcare savings –In-sourcing –Logistics Cyber –USCYBERCOM Energy / Climate Change Initial QDR Issue Areas Irregular Warfare –Improve Cooperative Security and Capability –Improve U.S. Offensive capability High End threats –Address capability vs threats Nuclear armed Anti-access Cyber WMD Civil Support –Prevention of homeland attacks –Provide consequence management and border security

7 QDR Analytic Process HLD/CS QDR Strat. Environment Pakistan, OIF/OEF MCOs Assess the Programmed Force Gather insights regarding gaps in capability & shortfalls/overages in capacity Develop Force Planning Construct cases QDR will analyze mid- long term supply and demand for forces Insights Scenario Sets A B C GDF Phase I (Survey & Analyze) QDR Force Structure Building Blocks QDR Selected Scenarios Force of Record Phase II (Develop & Analyze)Phase III (Inform and Analyze) National Defense Strategy Analysis

8 Establishment of N2N6 Organization CNO’s Vision for Navy Information –Information becomes a Main Battery of U.S. Navy warfighting capability –Navy is Prominent and Dominant in the fields of ISR, Cyber Warfare, C2, Information & Knowledge Management Navy’s Information Transformation –Every platform carrying multiple sensors –Every sensor and processor adaptively connected to the network Goal –Achieve unprecedented agility and innovation in the development and integration of information capabilities –Information Dominance over potential adversaries –Decision Superiority for our commanders, operational forces, and coalition partners

9 QDR issues ISR –Hi vs Low –Reassessment of efficiency Cyber –Modeling UAS –C2 / Autonomy –Sense and Avoid –Power / Propulsion Space –Federation –Comms denial Cyberspace Space

Year Unmanned Systems Roadmap SCAN EAGLE VTUAV IOC BAMS IOC LBS-Gliders IOC LBS-AUV IOC MCM UUV-N IOC N ISR Comms Relay Possible N-UCAS IOC Strike ISR SEAD SUW STUAS IOC ISR MDA ISR MIW ASW Comms SUW MDA STUAS-Lite IOC ISR MDA ISR SMCM IOC MCM LCS MCM MP MCM BULS IOC ID/Track MCM Ocean Surveys Maritime UAS DEMO ISR SABER FOCUS OPS DEMO RMS MCM LCS MCM MP Potential IOC in FY12-13 MCM USV DEMO MCM LCS MCM MP ASW USV DEMO ASW LCS ASW MP MUSCL DEMO NSW ISR N-UCAS DEMO Sea Stalker DEMO Penetrating ISR SAHRV ID/Track LDUUV INP DEMO ISR ASW MCM

11 Questions