Capital Community College Demographic Data for Remedial Cohorts 2002, 2003, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LACCD Strategic Plan Internal Scan A. Enrollment Trends and Student Characteristics.
Advertisements

Community College Technical Center MIS Race/Ethnicity (R/E) Final Guidance for i mplementing OMB Race/Ethnicity.
Project to Assess Climate in Engineering (PACE): PACE Findings PACE Meeting at AAAS March 17 & 18, 2010 Funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Northwest Area Demographics Drug Overdose Deaths *Data retrieved from the office of the Salt Lake County Medical Examiner.
Diversity Demographics United States and University of Washington Compiled by UW Department of Anthropology Diversity Committee.
Changing Demographics and Enrollment Trends Ken Esbenshade Associate Dean and Director of Academic Programs College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North.
We Have A Plan Integrating Achieving the Dream with your Strategic Plan Joan Marchessault Capital Community College February 6th, 2008.
Student Demographics Current Native American1.47%1.11%0.96%0.75%0.60% Asian2.53%1.17%1.02%0.99%1.05% Pacific Islander0.41%0.13%0.20%0.26%0.30%
SBVC Student Equity Plan A Update and Historical Overview James E. Smith, Ph.D. Dean, Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
Summary of Emerging Trends in Higher Education Spring 2011.
1 Basic Skills Summer Institute August BSI Success Rates Do you know how many basic skills students succeed in basic skills classes? And why should.
Presenters Rogeair D. Purnell Bri C. Hays A guide to help examine and monitor equitable access and success Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact.
Demographics of Unemployment: Ethnicity & Unemployment: Key: Green – African American – 15.3% Yellow – Latin/Hispanic American – 11.6% Blue – Caucasian.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
Helen Burn Student Achievement Database: Exploring Precollege Mathematics Achievement Helen Burn, Ph.D. Department of Mathematics Highline.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Merritt College’s plan based on the principles Improve student access to college programs and services. Increase and balance student equity and diversity.
Mobile County Public Schools is the Largest System in Alabama.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
Ethnicity CategoryFall 2009 Cohort (2 Years) Fall 2008 Cohort (3 Years) Fall 2007 Cohort (4 Years) Fall 2006 Cohort (5 Years) Fall 2005 Cohort (6 Years)
Student Equity Plan Tables Submitted 12/18/2015 in the SCC Student Equity Plan Katherine Zoloty SSSP & Student Equity Research Analyst.
SAMPLE REPORT. Introduction A team of Administrators, Registrar, and Counselors teamed up with a representative from the Riverside County Office of Education.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Faculty Demographics Faculty Demographics Table 8 Faculty Demographics Prof. Ed. Faculty in Initial Teacher Preparation Programs*
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH FAST FACTS ACADEMIC YEAR Source:
With Institutional and Program Level Data
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Data Highlight: Student Debt
Buckeye Central Local Schools
Capital Community College
Point in Time January 22, 2016 Results.
U.S. Levels of Educational Attainment by Race
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Dental Hygiene Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools,
Dental Laboratory Technology Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Closing The Achievement Gap Task Force
Dental Assisting Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Dental Laboratory Technology Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
UNTHSC Fall Enrollment by Program: Asian/ Pacific Islander
Dental Assisting Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Our Students March 15, 2012.
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
Seniors' Practice Location, 2015, 2016, and 2017
Engagement Survey Results: Demographics
University of Washington Tacoma School of Engineering & Technology Student and Faculty Demographics.
Report Prepared by Santa Ana College Research
Characteristics of All Students (N=20,822) Fall Census 2016
Graduate Ethnicity by Gender
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2017
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2015
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Dental Hygiene Total Enrollment by Race, to (1 of 2)
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009

Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Presentation transcript:

Capital Community College Demographic Data for Remedial Cohorts 2002, 2003, 2004

Three Years of Data Cohorts consist of first-time entering students Numbers by Year:

Four Groups Were Constructed 1. Group one consisted of students who entered the college and were required to take no remedial courses. 2. Group two consisted of students who had to take one or two remedial courses. 3. Group three consisted of students who (potentially) had to take three or four remedial courses. 4. Group four consisted of students who (potentially) had to take five or more remedial courses.

No Remedial Courses 1-2 Remedial Courses 3-4 Remedia l Courses 5 or More Remedial CoursesTotal (3.7%) 92 (67.6%) 20 (14.7%) 19 (14%) 136 (9.5%) (9.3%) 230 (33.3%) 199 (28.8%) 197 (28.6%) 690 (48.2%) (11.6%) 203 (33.6%) 162 (26.8%) 170 (28.1%) 605 (42.3%) Total 139 (9.7%) 525 (36.7%) 381 (26.6%) 386 (27%) 1431 Numbers by Group by Year

Race and Gender of Entire Group MaleFemaleTotal Race Unknown 2.0%7.8%9.9% American Indian.2%.4% Asian/Pac. Islander 2.0%1.8%3.8% Black/ African American 11.3%25.6%36.9% Hispanic/Latino 6.4%16.9%23.3% White/Non-Hispanic 8.4%17.3%25.7% Non-Resident Alien.0%.1% Total 30.3%69.7%100.0%

Race and Gender by Cohort % in cohort populationGroup 1 No Remedial Group Remedial Group Remedial Group 4 5 or More Males – Asian/Pac. Islander3.6% 1.7%.8%2.8% 2.0% in General Population Females – Asian/Pac. Islander4.3%.8%2.6%1.6% 1.8% in General Population Males – Black/African American 4.3%10.1%12.3%14.5% 11.3% in General Population Females – Black/African American18.7%22.1%29.1%29.3% 25.6% in General Population

Race and Gender by Cohort % in cohort populationGroup 1 No Remedial Group Remedial Group Remedial Group 4 5 or More Males – Hispanic/Latino 9.4%6.1%5.2%6.7% 6.4% in General Population Females – Hispanic/Latino5.8%14.9%18.9%21.8% 16.9% in General Population Males – White/Caucasian 15.8%11.6%6.0%3.6% 8.4% in General Population Females – White/Caucasian23.7%21.9%14.7%11.4% 17.3% in General Population

Ethnic Group Findings Asian students either need no remedial courses (over-represented) or they need 3 or more. African American students are under- represented in the groups needing 2 or less remedial courses and over-represented in the groups needing 3 or more courses. White students are over-represented in the groups needing 2 or fewer remedial courses and under-represented in the groups needing 3 or more courses.

Ethnic Group Findings Hispanic/Latino males need fewer remedial courses as a group than Hispanic/Latino females. Hispanic/Latino males are over-represented in the groups needing 2 or less remedial courses and under-represented in the groups needing 3 or more courses. Hispanic/Latino females are grossly under- represented in the group needing no remedial courses and over-represented in the groups needing 3 or more courses.

Age Group by Cohort Year 20 and Younger Years Years > 40 Years Total 2002 Number Percent 25.7%51.5%14.0%8.8% 2003 Number Percent 50.1%29.9%13.7%6.3% 2004 Number Percent 52.2%29.6%13.0%5.2% Total

Age Group of Cohorts (% in Population) No Remedial Courses 1-2 Remedial Courses 3-4 Remedial Courses 5 or More Remedial Courses Percent Of Total 20 and Younger (48.7%) 64 (46.4%) 216 (41.3%) 204 (53.8%) 210 (54.5%) 694 (48.7%) 21 – 30 Years (31.9%) 47 (34.1%) 183 (35%) 116 (30.6%) 108 (28.1%) 454 (31.9%) Years (13.4%) 22 (15.9%) 89 (17%) 36 (9.5%) 44 (11.4%) 191 (13.4%) > 40 Years (6%) 5 (3%) 35 (6.7%) 23 (6.1%) 23 (6%) 86 (6%) Total 138 (9.7%) 523 (36.7%) 379 (26.6%) 385 (27%) 1425

Age Findings Your students under the age of 21 over- represent those potentially needing 3 or more remedial courses. Your students over-represent those needing 2 or fewer remedial courses Your students 40 and over are under- represented in the group needing no remedial courses and evenly spread across the other three groups.

Type of Courses Needed by Group No Remedial Courses 1-2 Remedial Courses 3-4 Remedial Courses Five or More Remedial Courses Remedial Math 088%91.3%100% Remedial English 08%49.1%72% Remedial Reading 015.8%86.6%99.5% Total Number

Course Findings Most all students have to take remedial math. For those who have to take only 1-2 remedial courses – math is their major issue. For those who have to take 3 or more remedial courses – reading is their major issue.

Impact of Reading on Student Success When students miss the concepts in English or math – they have missed skills (grammar, punctuation, fractions, ratios, etc.). These skills can be easily learned (if you never knew them) or remembered (if you knew them and forgot them). But what about reading? If you can’t read above the 3 rd grade level, what have you missed? Can this be recovered in one semester of reading?

Interventions What needs to be done to impact these remedial students whose main issue is reading? Do students who have to take 3 or more remedial classes ever complete degrees?

Interventions If we are going to focus interventions on certain students we consider “at-risk,” who should we recruit first? What ages? What races? What gender? What other characteristics?