How Principals Build Organizational Capacity to Improve Student Learning Presentation to the Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council January 2015 By:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
School Leaders Shaping Professional and Student Learning AIS Executive Conference October 2011 Professor Helen Timperley The University of Auckland.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
MINNESOTA P-16 EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP January 28, 2009 Overview of Potential Future P-16 Partnership Initiatives to Strengthen Teacher Effectiveness.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
PLT Professional Learning Teams Weaver Elementary School January, 2013.
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
Research, evidence and engaging learning Profiling the influence of school librarianship Penny Moore
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leadership Through An Instructional Lens Dr. Krista D. Parent Oregon Leadership Network Institute April 22, 2009.
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
The new role of the principal 1. Leadership is key to improving teaching & learning “Leadership is second only to classroom instruction among all school.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Effective Instruction in a Turnaround School- Instructional Focus REL Appalachia Featuring Ms. Kathy Fields Lead Instructional Administrator Jessamine.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Learning Together to Develop More Effective Principal Supervisors Will Miller President, The Wallace Foundation Principal Supervisor Initiative Bidders’
Impacting Teacher Practice to Ensure Student Learning at Discovery Middle School.
Principal Learning Teams Research & Evaluation. The Secretariat’s Strategy Demonstrate a commitment to research and evidence-based inquiry and decision.
Adamsville Elementary January A Culture of Learning and professional Learning Communities The new way of doing business.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Southern Regional Education Board Florida Leadership Academy for Innovation and Improvement US DOE Communication Hub Meeting Albuquerque, NM September.
What makes great teaching? An overview of the CEM/Durham University/The Sutton Trust paper (published October 2014)......making... Capturing... promoting...
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The Relationship between Principals’ Leadership and Student Achievement Sutan S. Berkadia Associate Professor Halia Silins.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
Session #4 March 2014 preparation policy practice Key Leaders Network.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
OR…………………….NOT EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP. NOT WITH... TUSIGA POSSIBLE KATH POSSIBLE KYM POSSIBLE GRACE POSSIBLE GUS POSSIBLE SONIA POSSIBLE.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Office of Service Quality
Amy Bobak Angelina Saloom Kimberly Carthy-Pierre Tina Pavy.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
STRONG FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS CENTRAL TO EFFECTIVE SCHOOL REFORM Jan Patterson and Ann Bliss Smarter Schools National Partnerships Key Reform.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Situating Your Data Within Cycles of Inquiry, Linking These Cycles to Phases of Change Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
Redefining Leadership for Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The Role of Higher Education Brian A McNulty Ph. D.
DRAFT Click to Add Title Key Strategies for the P-3 Leader St. Paul 8/10/2016.
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Leadership For Student Learning What It is and How It Works
Data-Driven Instructional Leadership
Resource Alignment and Improved Literacy
Becoming a High-Quality Teacher in a Changing World
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

How Principals Build Organizational Capacity to Improve Student Learning Presentation to the Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council January 2015 By: Shelby Cosner Associate Professor University of Illinois at Chicago

My Background Research on the work of principals and teacher leaders (individually, collectively) to improve schools and student learning Particular attention on how leaders build school-wide capacities that support the improvement of student learning Principal preparation, development, evaluation Former principal and district-level leader

Overview Build from Dr. Michelle Young’s November ISLAC Presentation Examine the Highly Complex Work of School Principals (post NCLB); Work of Principals of Consequence for Improving School-wide Student Learning How Principals Build Capacity to Improve School-wide Student Learning Consider What this Suggests for the Preparation and Development of School Principals

Leadership Is Key To Improving Teaching & Learning “ Leadership is second only to classroom instruction among all school related factors that contribute to what students learn at school.” -- How Leadership Influences Student Learning, Leithwood, et al, 2004 “Six years later we are even more confident about this claim.” -- Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning, Louis, et al,

Leadership Impact on Student Learning Administrative Leadership Instructional Leadership TEAM Distributed Teacher Leaders Organizational Resources Teaching/ Instruction Student Engagement and Learning Cosner, 2005; Cosner, et al., 2015 drawing from the work of Bryk et al., 2006; Gamoran, Secada, & Marrett, 2000; Hallinger & Heck, 1998; Leithwood & Jantzi, 2005

Robust Meta-Analysis: Domains of Principal Work with Moderate to Strong Impact on Student Learning Robinson, Lloyd, & Rowe (2008)  Meta-analysis, five broad domains of leadership practice were inductively generated and tested for effects on student outcomes. Three domains evidence a moderate to strong impact on student outcomes: a) goal setting and planning b) promoting and participating in teacher learning c) planning, coordinating, and evaluating teaching and the curriculum

Goal Setting and Planning Low-performing, struggling, or stalled schools typically are weak in the enactment of this stream of work. (Finnigan, 2010; Finnigan & Stewart, 2009; Hallinger, 2005; Harris, 2002)

This is Complex Work! Understanding what this work entails and what the work “looks like” when it is done in ROBUST fashion is critical. Today a quick overview.

Goal Setting and Planning Setting goals Designing and enacting plans (strategy) for achieving goals Cultivating collective understanding and commitment to the goals (and strategy associated with goal)

Typical Goals and Goal Strategy School: Within-school problems Strategy Why are we working SO HARD and seeing no improvement? Using strategies from former schools, piggybacking on existing work (that has evidenced little progress), latest book or what our neighbors are doing

Within-school Improvement of Student Learning School: Within-school problems Strategy selected and designed to address within- school problems It starts with finding and solving problems! Oftentimes, there have been longstanding problems that have failed to be found/solved.

The Importance of Cycles of Inquiry 1.Identify Root Cause Problems (Instructional Practice) and Instructional Practice Changes 2. Select Instructional Improvement Strategies and Plan for Strategy Enactment 4. Enact Strategy Action Plan (Yearlong Plan for Teacher Learning) Use arrow to show multiple location 3. Set Process and Outcome Goals and Plan for Goal Assessment 5. Diagnose Process and Outcome Progress and Adjust as Needed

Finding and Solving Instructional/Adult Practice Problems Administrative Leadership Instructional Leadership TEAM Organizational Resources Teaching/ Instruction Student Engagement and Learning Cosner, 2005; Cosner, et al., 2015 drawing from Gamoran, Secada, & Marrett, 2000; Bryk et al., 2006, Leithwood & Jantzi, 2005

Root Cause Problem Investigation Instructional Problems (Problems that relate to teaching or between teachers and students) Areas for Instructional Practice Change Student Behavior, Engagement and Learning Problems Practice/Instructional Practice Changes

Common Core/Math School Common Core/ Literacy Illinois Education Policy Context

Instructional Problems: Internal/External Instructional Problems (Problems that relate to teaching or between teachers and students) Areas for Instructional Practice Change Student Behavior, Engagement and Learning Problems CC Instructional Practice Changes

Cultivating Collective Understanding and Commitment Improvement sense-giving builds understanding and commitment: Must understand instructional problems Must understand improvement strategy’s theory of action (what must happen for strategy to impact student learning; what must teachers learn and do) Must understand practice changes, plan for learning and practicing practice changes

The Importance of Cultivating Leadership and Organization as Capacities that Support School-wide Improvement Administrative Leadership Instructional Leadership TEAM Distributed Teacher Leaders Organizational Resources INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE CHANGES Student Engagement and Learning Cycle of Inquiry helps us to identify.

The Importance of Cultivating Leadership and Organization as Capacities that Support School-wide Improvement Administrative Leadership Instructional Leadership TEAM Distributed Teacher Leaders Organizational Resources INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE CHANGES Student Engagement and Learning NCLB has pushed attention towards the last box and away from the other boxes (particularly away from organization and leadership)

Thinking About Leadership as a Capacity that Supports the Improvement of Student Learning Leadership: Developing distributed leadership (for cycles of inquiry work; instructional improvement work) Leadership Teams Teacher Leaders Presence but also nature and quality!

Leadership Teams Leadership Team Purpose is Critical: Leading cycle of inquiry and supporting cycle of inquiry work throughout the year should be central work of school’s leadership team.

Leadership for All Facets of the Cycle 1.Identify Root Cause Problems (Instructional Practice) and Instructional Practice Changes 2. Select Instructional Improvement Strategies and Plan for Strategy Enactment 4. Enact Strategy Action Plan (Yearlong Plan for Teacher Learning) Use arrow to show multiple location 3. Set Process and Outcome Goals and Plan for Goal Assessment 5. Diagnose Process and Outcome Progress and Adjust as Needed

Thinking About the Organizational Capacities that Supports the Improvement of Student Learning Organization School as Learning Organization Robust PD and Teacher Learning Teams Trust (Administrative, Collegial) Instructional practice changes create the need for teacher learning and School as Learning Organization.

Root Cause Investigation Instructional Problems (Problems that relate to teaching or between teachers and students) Areas for Instructional Practice Change Student Behavior, Engagement and Learning Problems Practice/Instructional Practice Changes

Connecting Teacher Learning to Necessary Instructional Practice Changes Teacher Learning Through 4 Key Mechanism: Professional Development Team Learning Peer Coaching Clinical Supervision Changes/ImprovedT eacher Decision- making and Planning, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Curriculum and/or Assessment Practices Improved Student Learning

Strengthening Teacher Learning in Your School: 2 Interacting Mechanisms November 2014 June 2015 What dates and times are available from Nov to June?

Connecting Teacher Learning to Instructional Practice Changes Which LEARNING MECHANISMS (PD, teams) will we engage as spaces for Teacher Learning? What should be the CONTENT of Teacher Learning that is necessary to support Practice Changes? What PROCESSES/LEARNING EXPERIENCES will be used to support TEACHER LEARNING? Some of the Key Learning Routines Reading Discussion of Reading for Meaning Making (Collaborative) Modeling w Deconstruction (Collaboration) Application/Creation (Collaborative and Individual) Practice (In Classroom) Making Early Practice Public for Help Seeking (Collaboration) Effective TL provides a COMBINATION of processes/learning experiences to cultivate understanding and practice change

Closing Thoughts Certain work of principals is of particular consequence to the school-wide improvement of student learning. This work is complex; typically not enacted robustly (particularly in struggling or stalled settings) Preparation must focus on cultivating understandings AND PRACTICES Ongoing principal development must be strengthened particularly in areas of principal work that are of consequence to improving student learning llinois Performance Standards for School Leaders/Rubric for Evaluating Principal Practice (50%)