None of us is as smart as all of us when we decide to be smart together APPR Think Tank.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
S/CDN Meeting March 2013 Laurie Hedges.  Essential Elements of Instruction (ITIP)  Differentiated Instruction  21 st Century Skills  Brain Friendly.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Session Materials  Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Today’s website:
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Innovation Fund Project Improving Teacher Effectiveness Through Standards and a Comprehensive Teacher Evaluation System 1.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Martha Thurlow and Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes CEC Preconvention Workshop #4 April 21, 2010.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
The Next Chapter of Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as described in the April 15th Draft Regulations.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Annual Professional Performance Review and YOU! Is the road to hell paved with good intentions?
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: District Updates: New Teacher Forum & Mentoring
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

None of us is as smart as all of us when we decide to be smart together APPR Think Tank

APPR THINK TANK

True or False APPR stands for Accountability, Professionalism, and Program Reform There are no changes worth noting in the APPR revisions NYSED has clarified all issues that APPR suggests 60 / 20 /20 is a new News show on CBS TIP and PIP were on Saturday Night Live this past weekend There is only one way to implement the new APPR revisions

True or False APPR stands for Accountability, Professionalism, and Program Reform – FALSE ?? There are no changes worth noting in the APPR revisions – FALSE! NYSED has clarified all issues that APPR suggests – FALSE! 60 / 20 /20 is a new News show on CBS – FALSE! TIP and PIP were on Saturday Night Live this past weekend - FALSE There is only one way to implement the new APPR revisions FALSE!

The APPR Think Tank Rich Bernato Ed.D. Assistant Dean Dowling College School of Education (opportunity to engage school change) You?

Begin With the Ends in Mind After our four think tank sessions together, at minimum we will have; A consistent understanding of all APPR expectations Recognition of the implementation issues associated with both the letter of the APPR expectations and more importantly, its spirit Developed short term action plans to effectively put the APPR in place ???

Possible End Product in May Goal Identify How Local 20% may best Be developed StrategiesPersons Responsible TimetableObstaclesResourcesCriteria For Compeletion BenchmarkPrincipalJune ‘11Inconsistent Expectations Time Develop standards for local exams Chair

Session I Goals Organization Communication Information Collaboration Prioritization Cross Pollinating

Organization Meeting Dates February 7 March 7 April4 May 2 ROLES ME and WE Who is / are the experts? Facilitative Role! MUTUAL EMPOWERMENT so WE can all do the right thing Contribute, brainstorm, Carry premises back to the farm Replicate kinds of think tank activities that best apply

Communication addresses please forward yours to me for list serve ! This will be the ongoing “construction base”

Information APPR Questions and Answers: Performance Evaluations for Teachers and Principals New York State Teaching Standards Education Law 3012c "Building a Better Teacher", New York Times Magazine, March 2, 2010Building a Better Teacher Northwest Evaluation Association Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching Richard Elmore - Harvard Graduate School of Education Richard Elmore Instructional Rounds Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards for School Leaders 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium New York State Common Core Standards THIS IS WHERE WE CAN ADD INFORMATION TO THE WIKI!

INFORMATION:Changes to APPR Criteria for evaluating teachers must include but not be limited to Content knowledge Preparation Instructional delivery Classroom management Student development Student assessment Collaboration Reflective and responsive practices AND A NEW CRITERION IS …

Student Growth “Student growth is a positive change in student achievement between at least two points in time, taking into consideration of the unique abilities or disabilities of each student including English Language Learners.”

Information: Principal / Teacher Rating System 4 – Highly Effective 3 – Effective 2 – Developing 1 – Ineffective Via a 60 % 20 % 20 % formula

INFORMATION:60 Per Cent i.e. locally selected measures developed through collective bargaining concerning teacher evaluation systems. An observation model such as Danielson’s Frameworks for Teaching is often cited but is not necessarily the appropriate measure.

INFORMATION: This will require Supervisors will need to be trained in a model prior to this system’s implementation!

INFORMATION: 20 Per Cent Based on locally selected measures of student achievement determined to be rigorous and comparable …

INFORMATION: 20 Per Cent Based on student GROWTH data on state assessments …. This is called the value-added growth model A set of guidelines is expected for implementation in September 2014

INFORMATION: Evaluations “shall be a significant factor for: employment decisions including but not limited to Promotion Retention Tenure determination termination Compensation …”

INFORMATION: Therefore the process will involve Requires that school districts Identify needed areas of improvement

INFORMATION: The new system “expedites” teacher removal processes (but not necessarily ) Also specifies an appeals process where teachers

INFORMATION: The new system “expedites” teacher removal processes (but not necessarily ) Also specifies an appeals process where teachers

INFORMATION: Evaluations “shall be a significant factor for: employment decisions including but not limited to Promotion Retention Tenure determination Termination Compensation …”

INFORMATION:  Requires that school districts  Identify needed areas of improvementneeded areas of improvement  Provide a timeline for achieving improvement  Identify the manner in which improvement will be assessed  Classroom observation  Videotape observation  Self review  Peer review  Portfolio review  Provide differentiated activities to support the improved area(s)

INFORMATION: Includes Identification of multiple resources to help the teacher; e.g. MENTORS

INFORMATION:  The new system “expedites” teacher removal processes (but not necessarily )  Also specifies an appeals process where teachers may challenge the evaluation process  To be negotiated locally  Substance of evaluation  Adherence to standards and methodologies for review  Adherence to Commissioner’s Regulations  Compliance with applicable locally negotiated procedures  Issuance and / or implementation of terms of a TIP or PIP

INFORMATION: What ifs generate..  Provisions must be made for among other issues  Student composition e.g.  Would a teacher in an Inclusion class be held to the same yardstick as an Advanced Placement teacher for student growth?  English Language Learners?  Socioeconomic factors?  ??? This will require sophisticated assessment techniques that take such variables into account

GROUP WORK I CROSS-POLLINATE School / District Choice “stay internal” for special needs or Cross School / District Groups Exchange assess points of view and ideas from near and far This is where the ideas will grow Regroup with your own school Decisions about local actions and Follow through

Group I - Tasks Isolate the issues you perceive Project their consequences Prioritize their importance

Re-Collect / Synthesize Develop Consensus re issues for resolution / implementation Develop Consensus re priorities

Generate Action Groups Data Usage Legal Issues Supervisory Models (T) (P) IP Plans ???

Homework! Visit and contribute to the Wiki Post up comments Post up additional information Communicate with your action group Develop strategies for sharing these developments with your school and District

See You Real Soon Thank you.