TEACHER AND LEADERSHIP EVALUATION AND LEARNING WALKS Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Stephen Foresi, Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Assessing Students in the 21st Century
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
By Linda Munger and Valerie Von Frank. Principal is the Instructional Leader, yet the sole leader is no longer enough. Current research emphasizes a team.
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
 Iowa Reading Research Center (Superintendents’ Meetings 2014) Iowa Department of Education & Iowa Reading Research Center, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
National Trail Local School District 3 year-District Improvement Plan April 2009.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
ACADEMIC SUPPORT Fifth Grade Parent Orientation April 16, 2015.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Leadership and Technology. Leadership “Most people think of leadership as a position and therefore don't see themselves as leaders.” Dr. Stephen Covey.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
2012: The Year of Education Reform? State Representative Gail Lavielle 143 rd district Norwalk PTO Council January 23, 2012.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.
1 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Identifying Student Errors to Align Teaching and Learning KJ Learning Partners, Inc.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
National Governors Association Policy Academy Building a Foundation for Student Success: State Strategies to Improve Learning Outcomes from Early Childhood.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
 Implementing Best Practice Strategies New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
Highlights of SB 458 Presentation to State Board of Education May 17, 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Early Childhood Workforce. Cabinet Workforce Workgroup Goal: Ensure Connecticut teachers in state subsidized early childhood education programs meet the.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services Getting LTELs Ready for College.
Todays Resources located on Log on the holler. If you have not done so, join the holler and create a user name and.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Implementation of Competency Education in K12 Systems Insights from Local Leaders November 8, 2015 iNACOL Symposium Pre-Conference Workshop.
2015 READY Fall Principals Meeting Empowering Environments to GROW – Oh the Places You Will GO! November 10, 2015 in Asheville Facilitator: Dr. James C.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Alabama Reading Initiative Session 1. Parameters: 1. All participants - no observers. 2. Use time wisely. 3. Stay focused. Please keep sidebar.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Priority Initiative for KSDE Multi Tiered System of Support.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
Network Rounds Oviatt Elementary School Norwalk School District April 10, 2015.
Strategic Plan Presentation to the MTPS Board of Education on 2/16/2016.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Appleton Area School District
How to Grow Administrative Leadership Through Effective Leadership
Welcome to <School Name> School
February 21-22, 2018.
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
RDQ 13 Supporting Classroom PBIS Practices & Systems Discussion Leaders: Brandi Simonsen & Jennifer Freeman, University of Connecticut.
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER AND LEADERSHIP EVALUATION AND LEARNING WALKS Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Stephen Foresi, Director of Human Capital Development

Learning Targets When we are finished you will be able to: Describe the implications of the Education Reform Act on Teacher and Leadership Evaluation and plans to revise the current evaluation process. Explain the purpose and procedure for learning walks.

WHAT ARE THE LEGISLATED PIECES OF THE TEACHER AND LEADERSHIP EVALUATION? Connecticut’s System for Educator Evaluation and Development

An Act Concerning Educational Reform An Act Concerning Educational Reform, goes into effect July 1, The Act contains some substantial reforms based on six key principles. Enhances access to early childhood experiences for Connecticut’s lowest performing schools. Authorizes intensive interventions and supports to turn around Connecticut’s lowest performing schools. Expands access to high-quality school models, including traditional schools, magnets, charters and others. Removes “red-tape” and other barriers to success, especially in high performing schools and districts. Ensures that schools are home to the very best teachers and principals through a system that values skills and effectiveness. Delivers more resources to districts with the greatest needs, provided they embrace key reform efforts.

Why the focus on teacher and leadership effectiveness? Effective Instructional Practices Improved Student Outcomes

Teacher Evaluation Leader Evaluation Instructional Effectiveness Student Learning Outcomes 45% Teacher Practice 40% Parent or Peer Feedback 10% School-Wide Student Learning or Student Feedback 5% Instructional Leadership Student Learning Outcomes 45% Leadership Practices 40% Teacher Effectiveness 5% Stakeholder Feedback 10% Exemplary 4 Proficient 3 Developing 2 Below Standard 1

Who is on the committee to revise the Teacher and Leader Evaluation Plan? Teacher Evaluation Plan Stephen Foresi (Facilitator) Jennifer Bates Christine Carver Wendy Crouse Melissa Delaney Brian Hartley Jodi Klimas Jamie McLaughlin Pamela Muraca Maureen Plourd Jamie Rodriguez Laura Speranza Debra St. Jean Kate Tibbitts Andrea Yukna Leader Evaluation Plan Christine Carver (Facilitator) Luz Antonio Frank Cardona Heidi Florian Stephen Foresi Dorothy Franco-Reed Holly Garavel Mike Gaydos Jill Hinton Sabrina Lavieri Colleen Love Holly Miotke Pamela Muraca Elizabeth Norwell Clare Salerno Jeremy Visone

LEARNING WALKS (classroom observations)

What is the purpose of the learning walks? 1. Develop consistent definition and expectations for effective instruction. 2. Ensure consistency among evaluators when evaluating teachers. 3. Develop a system to monitor and support the implementation of the high yield instructional strategy (DIP –Learning Targets).

Learning Walks What are the expectations for the learning walks and how will I get feedback on my practice?

Instructional Focus Where?Who ?Date/Times Learning Targets Newington High School Group 1 - Christine Carver (Facilitator ), Deb St. Jean, Jim Wenker, Joanne Vasil, Dena Tompkins, Nicole DeRonck, Mike Gaydos, Sabrina Lavieri, and Dr. Collins October 3, :00 to 11:00 Group 2 - Stephen Foresi (Facilitator), Jamie Lussier, Joan Mastrocola, Sheila Houlihan, Terra Piela Enzo Zocco and Wendy Crouse Learning Targets Ruth Chaffee Stephen Foresi (Facilitator), Jeremy Visone, Rick DeBellis, Pamela Muraca and Dr. Collins November 5, 2012 John Paterson Christine Carver (Facilitator), Deb Grainsky, Jen Michno, Wendy Crouse and Sabrina Lavieri Learning Targets Elizabeth Green Stephen Foresi (Facilitator), Jen MichnoNovember 8, 2012 Anna Reynolds Christine Carver (Facilitator), Jeremy Visone Learning Targets John Wallace Stephen Foresi (Facilitator), Kristen Freeman, Luz Antonio, Dorothy Franco-Reed and Sabrina Lavieri December 3, 2012 Martin Kellogg Christine Carver (Facilitator), Dave Milardo, Jason Lambert., Pamela Muraca, Wendy Crouse and Dr. Collins