Aerospace Modeling Tutorial Lecture 2 – Basic Aerodynamics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Open Source Field Operation and Manipulation
Advertisements

Lakshmi Sankar Module 3.3 Panel Methods Lakshmi Sankar
Lift Theories Linear Motion.
Determination of HGA aerodynamic indicial responses for unsteady flow computation Somprasong Saowjoo King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi Mechanical.
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 7: INVISCID FLOWS
Least squares CS1114
1 Using ANN to solve the Navier Stoke Equations Motivation: Solving the complete Navier Stokes equations using direct numerical simulation is computationally.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 15 3-D (Finite) Wings Part I.
AeroAcoustics & Noise Control Laboratory, Seoul National University
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Performance Prediction and Design Optimization
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
Flow Over Immersed Bodies
1 ERIC WHITNEY (USYD) FELIPE GONZALEZ (USYD) Applications to Fluid Inaugural Workshop for FluD Group : 28th Oct AMME Conference Room.
Analysis of Blade Performance in Compressible Flows P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Enhanced Effects due to Flow with Snestive.
Tamed Effect of Normal Stress in VFF… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Negligible Bulk Viscosity Model for Momentum.
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
Michael DeRosa Master of Engineering Final Project
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
Wing Embedded Engines For Large Blended Wing Body Aircraft
Ch9 Linearized Flow 9.1 Introduction
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS Compressible Flow Over Airfoils: Linearized Subsonic Flow Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
CFD Pre-Lab 2 Simulation of Turbulent Flow around an Airfoil Seong Mo Yeon, and Timur Dogan 11/12/2013.
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Incompressible Flow over Airfoils
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
IIT-Madras, Momentum Transfer: July 2005-Dec 2005 Perturbation: Background n Algebraic n Differential Equations.
Panel methods to Innovate a Turbine Blade-1 P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Linear Mathematics for Invention of Blade Shape…..
Airfoil Design for a Helicopter rotor blade Oct Han Gil Chae.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
Pharos University MECH 253 FLUID MECHANICS II
1 Chapter 6 Flow Analysis Using Differential Methods ( Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow)
Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (AE 2402) Presented by IRISH ANGELIN S AP/AERO.
Compressible Frictional Flow Past Wings P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Small and Significant Region of Curse.
Thin Aerofoil Theory for Development of A Turbine Blade
1 Chapter 6 Elements of Airplane Performance Prof. Galal Bahgat Salem Aerospace Dept. Cairo University.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #1 October 3, 2000.
Steps in Development of 2 D Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Classical Method Recommended by Schlichting.……
Incorrect Non-Physical Explanation of the Magnus Effect Björn Borg's revolutionary open stance topspin forehand with body facing forward. The explanation.
External flow over immersed bodies If a body is immersed in a flow, we call it an external flow. Some important external flows include airplanes, motor.
Panel methods to Innovate a Turbine Blade -2 P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Linear Mathematics for Invention of Blade Shape…..
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 28, 29,30-Unsteady aerodynamics 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Mathematics to Innovate Blade Profile P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Also a Fluid Device, Which abridged the Globe into Global.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
The concept of the airfoil (wing section)
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department
AERODYNAMICS.
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
Aerofoil Theory : Development of Turbine Blade
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
Panel Methods.
Parallelized Coupled Solver (PCS) Model Refinements & Extensions
Master Thesis in Mechanical Engineering
WING LOADING (W/S), SPAN LOADING (W/b) AND ASPECT RATIO (b2/S)
CFD – Fluid Dynamics Equations
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Purdue Aeroelasticity
VALIDATION OF A HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL WITH THE NREL UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC EXPERIMENT James M. Hallissy and Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California.
Part 5:Vorticity.
12. Navier-Stokes Applications
Section 8, Lecture 1, Supplemental Effect of Pressure Gradients on Boundary layer • Not in Anderson.
AE/ME 339 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) K. M. Isaac 7/24/2019
Presentation transcript:

Aerospace Modeling Tutorial Lecture 2 – Basic Aerodynamics Greg and Mario February 2, 2015

Our system dynamics: 𝑝 𝑛 = 𝑅 Τ 𝑣 𝑏 𝑣 𝑏 = 𝐹 𝑏 𝑚 − 𝜔 × 𝑣 𝑏 𝑟 11 𝑟 12 𝑟 13 𝑟 21 𝑟 22 𝑟 23 𝑟 31 𝑟 32 𝑟 33 = 0 𝜔 𝑧 −𝜔 𝑦 −𝜔 𝑧 0 𝜔 𝑥 𝜔 𝑦 −𝜔 𝑥 0 𝑟 11 𝑟 12 𝑟 13 𝑟 21 𝑟 22 𝑟 23 𝑟 31 𝑟 32 𝑟 33 𝑝 𝑛 = 𝑅 Τ 𝑣 𝑏 𝑣 𝑏 = 𝐹 𝑏 𝑚 − 𝜔 × 𝑣 𝑏 𝐽 ∙ 𝜔 = 𝜔 × 𝐽 ∙ 𝜔 + 𝑇 𝑏 𝑇 𝑏 𝑝 𝑛 , 𝑣 𝑏 ,𝑅, 𝜔 =? 𝐹 𝑏 𝑝 𝑛 , 𝑣 𝑏 ,𝑅, 𝜔 =?

Our model

Navier Stokes Equations

Solving Navier Stokes - CFD Computationally demanding Not suitable for real time simulation Not suitable for dynamic optimization

How to simplify things?

Thin airfoil theory Assumptions: 2-dimensional flow Inviscid flow Incompressible flow Solve simplified NS (just Laplace’s equation) with flow tangency condition

Thin airfoil theory Results: 𝑐 𝑙 =2𝜋𝛼 (Lift= 1 2 𝜌 𝑣 2 𝑆𝑐 𝑙 ) Advantages: Easy to compute Fits well to data Drawbacks: Predicts 0 drag Real wings aren’t 2-dimensional

xfoil viscous solution in the boundary layer Inviscid outside gives parasitic drag still 2d

Prandtl lifting line theory Still inviscid, incompressible Model flow field as a sum of horseshoe vortices Solve for circulation of each 2-d section 𝐶 𝐷𝑖 = 𝐶 𝐿 2 𝜋𝐴𝑅𝑒 𝐶 𝐿 = 𝐶 𝑙 𝐴𝑅 𝐴𝑅+2 Still need to account for wing- tail interaction Ignores spanwise viscous flow

Vortex lattice Model the wing as a panel of ring vortices Can handle arbitrary shapes Disadvantage: intrinsically computational, no handy formulas

AVL – Athena Vortex Lattice (Mark Drela) popular code, includes parasitic drag Inputs: geometry, alpha/beta/airspeed Outputs: force/moment vectors + derivatives w.r.t. omega Strategy: sweep alpha/beta, fit curves for all coefficients

Our model

Homework 1: 2-dimensional model Starting from [0,-10,10,0], fly as far as possible in 10 seconds, in the x direction Starting from the same place, fly as long as possible (maximum time) 𝐶 𝐷 = 𝐶 𝐿 2 𝜋𝐴𝑅 +0.01 State: 𝐶 𝐿 =2𝜋𝛼 Control input: α Mass 2 Aspect ratio 10 Sref 0.5 Gravity 9.8 Altitude must always be positive!!

Homework 2 (optional): 3 dimensional model Implement the full aerodynamic model, using coefficients from https://github.com/ghorn/rawesome/blob/master/rawe/models/betty_conf.py (There is also a reference model there) R(0) = eye(3) p(0) = [0,0,0] v(0) = [15, 0, 0] ω(0) = [1, 0, 0] Do something like, R(5.0)=eye(3), w(5.0) = [0,0,0], vy(5.0) = 0, minimize u^2 Probably best to simulate first to validate model