European Strategy Session of Council The European Strategy – report to the RECFA meeting in Sofia Will cover – very briefly - the following selected topics:  The European Strategy Session of Council in March, plans for the next months  The most significant Strategy Session Meeting is in September  EU projects, application results 2009, calls in /5/101

European Strategy Session of Council Agenda March Council Strategy Session The Strategy Sessions of Council agendas are at: yDisplay.py?categId=1697 (papers normally open after the meeting) yDisplay.py?categId=1697 8/5/102

European Strategy Session of Council Strategy Secretariat activities In addition to the Meeting in the Strategy Secretariat and discussions in the SPC (November/December/March two points should be mentioned: 1) A Directors Meeting early February where the work on Scientific Enlargement was presented, in particular in view of involving the national labs in discussion towards the Strategy Update. Also the timescale for the Strategy update was presented and discussed. 2) Role of ECFA wrt strategy – this was discussed in the RECFA meetings in Moscow in October and at CERN in December. Some roles are already discussed in Council documents in and are well established : ECFA has a key role related in incubation of ideas – ECFA studies and workshops, Various review committees (example SuperB in 2008), Community/personnel reviews, Country visits – and report directly to the Strategy Session of Council about them, ECFA members to be involved in the Strategy Upgrade Preparation Group when we get to that phase. New initiatives:  Status Report from the Working Group for coordination of detector R&D for LC and other projects (Y. Karyotakis). It has the purpose of reviewing R&D projects that are not covered by existing programme committees – mandate will be drawn up for the next meetings.  Status Report on establishing possible way to help coordination of neutrino activities (K. Long) As a first step receive and review IDS-NF IDR and EUROnu interim design report.  Use P-ECFA/R-ECFA meetings to review specific areas – example from November 2009 being the neutrino area and flavour physics, to be continued in the PECFA meeting in Frascati in July. 38/5/10

European Strategy Session of Council CERN-EC Memorandum of Understanding  Signed in July 2009  Very important recognitions of the role of CERN Council as responsible for definition and follow up of the European Strategy for Particle Physics  The European Commission is represented in the European Strategy Sessions of Council – from September 2009  A numbers of important point to point contacts between the Particle Physics area and EC, annual meetings to monitor progress  Future development of the MoU (an “action plan for ”) approved in Council meeting in March:  Covers a numbers of common activities ranging from research infrastructures, e-infrastructures and international co-operation to technology transfer, open access, careers and mobility, science communication, etc 8/5/104

European Strategy Session of Council ApPEC and the European Strategy for Particle Physics  Maurice Bourquin is the representative of the ApPEC Steering Committee in Council  Christian Spiering as leader of the ApPEC Peer Review Committee (now the Scientific Advisory Committee) is the contact to the Secretariat  ECFA chair and the Scientific Secretary, and CERN with the Research Director, invited to ApPEC Steering Committee meetings  Focus on the potential future large projects in this field such that our next Strategy Update can be more precise with respects to such projects  Will now prepare workplan with ApPEC concerning common activities, examples:  Common CERN-ApPEC theory programme  Common R&D calls and more generally CERN participation in ASPERA activities (CERN is a partner)  Use of testbeams and other facilities relevant for projects of common interest  CERN/ApPEC common outreach activities  CERN participation in possible future EU projects in these areas More organisational discussions:  Cross-representation (already established but possibly to be expanded)  Discussion of ApPEC’s role in the forthcoming Strategy Upgrade  ApPEC’s involvement in the Scientific Enlargement discussions over the coming 2 years  More formal links between CERN and ApPEC? For example an MoU where the responsibilities in the areas of Common interests are specified … 8/5/105

European Strategy Session of Council The European Strategy Update – presented to Council  The update should not happen more often than every 5 years. Usually 2011 was assumed, but it is too early to have LHC results (and in as planned today in the middle of the long run)  Given the status and plans for LHC data-taking in , followed by a long shut-down in 2012 and preparation work in several major areas (e.g. sLHC, Linear Colliders, Neutrinos, Astroparticle Physics, Accelerator and Detector R&D), the Strategy Secretariat believes that the next Strategy Update should be concluded by the middle of  If the provisional timescale for the conclusion of the Strategy Update by the middle of 2012 is confirmed the Strategy Secretariat would prepare the proposed remit and composition of the European Strategy Group, together with those of the Preparatory Group, for approval by the European Strategy Session of Council in March  The exact timescale will need to be confirmed in the second half of 2010 in the light of the progress of the LHC and any other relevant new information at that time.  The composition of the extended Strategy Group including Preparation Group that need to be set up to prepare the Strategy Update is described in the Council documents from (Secretariat, members from SPC, ECFA, Director’s Meeting and Member State Representation).  In addition to these actors, the remits and detailed compositions of the forthcoming Strategy Group and Preparatory Group, will also need to accommodate the involvement of the European Commission, ApPEC, NuPECC, FALC, ESFRI, Observers, Associate Members and non- Member States ….. 8/5/106 Showed this in Brussels, Council concurred

European Strategy Session of Council Some key topics later in the year  General report on the follow up of the European Strategy in September  Missing in our preparation: Relationship to Nuclear Physics and Theory  Expect ECFA report in September including community review paper  ESFRI update during this year  EU-CERN MoU Work Plan follow up  Further EU FP7 projects and planning (ongoing, new projects, future planning)  Scientific Enlargement (ref. Brussels meeting – presented there), longer timescale  First ideas about the remit for the Strategy update  ApPEC workplan as mentioned in the slide above  SuperB follow up  The SuperB project has been discussed several times in Council the last year and Council will continue to follow the progress of this project during the TDR phase 8/5/107

European Strategy Session of Council FP7 projects in  Two key projects submitted in December 2009  AIDA (Integrating Activity addressing the topic: Infrastructures for Detector R&D) 4 years, EU support requested 10 MEURO, 8 MEURO offered  TIARA (invited preparatory phase project from the European Strategy: Infrastructures for Accelerator R&D) 3 years, EU support requested 6 MEURO, 3.9 MEURO offered  Information from Laurent Serin, Roy Aleksan and WEB sites 8/5/108

European Strategy Session of Council 8/5/109

European Strategy Session of Council 8/5/10 10

European Strategy Session of Council 8/5/1011 WEB page at: Timescale 3 years

European Strategy Session of Council 8/5/10 12 The details of these WPs were shown in the RECFA meeting at CERN in November - see spare slides

European Strategy Session of Council TIARA WP structure The main elements of the TIARA FP7 proposal currently being discussed are outlined below. Changes may be made to the proposal as it matures.  WP1: Management of the consortium (includes dissemination and outreach)  WP2: Governance of TIARA Objective: Development of governance models that would allow as many fields as possible to be involved.  WP3: Accelerator R&D infrastructures in Europe Objective: Indentifying, integrating and optimizing the European infrastructures for accelerator R&D.  WP4: Joint R&D programming Objective: Defining a Joint R&D programme in the field of accelerator science.  WP5: Education and training for accelerator sciences Objective: Developing education and training for accelerator research in Europe.  WP6: Involving Industry Objective: Investigating how industry can be involved in the programs, projects and actions carried out by TIARA. 8/5/1013

European Strategy Session of Council Specific WPs  SVET: The CLIC damping ring aims at delivering an e+/e− beam with ultra-low vertical normalized emittance of 5 nm for achieving the required collider luminosity. This corresponds to a geometrical emittance of less than 1 pm at 2.86 GeV. The SuperB e+e− factory aims at comparable vertical emittances of down to 4 pm at 7 GeV. The main objective of SVET is to upgrade the Swiss Light Source (SLS) at PSI to enable R&D on ultra-low emittances.  ICTF: The principal objective of this work package is to deliver detailed design reports of the RF power infrastructure upgrades that the Ionisation Cooling Test Facility at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory requires for it to become the world’s laboratory for ionization cooling R&D. 8/5/1014

European Strategy Session of Council Specific WPs  HGA: An upgrade of the existing S-band Linac of the SPARC Test Facility at LNF-Frascati with high gradient C-band accelerating structures is proposed, in order to reach 250 MeV at the end of the structure. The upgrade will be done with state-of-the art technology, setting up a facility unique in Europe made of S-band and C-band Linacs (a new “hybrid” configuration, never implemented up to now). This work will be carried out at the INFN Frascati National Laboratories in collaboration with the PSI-Zurich and Rome University “La Sapienza”.  TIHPAC: Before launching the construction of EURISOL, the next generation of facility for producing very intense radioactive ion beams (RIB), two major technical issues need to be addressed; namely the development of high power target and low beta superconducting accelerating structures. The objective of this Work Package is to coordinate the design of the corresponding test infrastructures: an irradiation test facility for the high power target developments and a cryogenic test cryostat for testing fully equipped low beta superconducting cavities (SC). 8/5/1015

European Strategy Session of Council Finally: FP7 project calls  New calls expected in July 2010 – with submission Dec 2010  Most relevant for us: Design Studies (bottom up, not targeted)  Integrating Activities (topical but likely less suited for us than last time):  INFRA Research Infrastructures for advanced radio astronomy.  INFRA Research Infrastructures for optical/IR astronomy.  INFRA Research Infrastructures for astroparticle physics: High energy cosmic rays, multi-messenger approach.  New possibility: “To exploit synergies optimising technological implementation, and to ensure a larger harmonisation and interoperability between these research facilities, an EU financial support will be provided, through a targeted approach, to clusters of ESFRI infrastructures for their implementation phase” (for us: SLHC-PP, ILC-HiGrade, Tiara)  Participants is such projects are key representatives of the ESFRI infrastructures that have sufficiently progressed in their preparatory phase and that have ensured a clear commitment for their construction from Member States and International Organisations.  INFRA : Implementation of common solutions for a cluster of ESFRI infrastructures in the field of "Physics and Analytical Facilities". A project under this topic should aim at synergies in the development of key critical components common to the ESFRI Infrastructures in the field of Physics and Analytical Facilities such as, for example, accelerator elements, targets, detectors, or radiation protection and safety components, that are needed for their implementation. 8/5/1016

European Strategy Session of Council The end 8/5/1017

European Strategy Session of Council Scientific and Geographical Enlargement 18 Scientific Enlargement  Main implementation elements suggested during the work of the Enlargement Working Group:  A specific programme for identifying, coordinating and centralising CERN support to/participation in experiments not hosted by CERN within the scientific fields covered by the European Strategy for Particle Physic, including non-accelerator physics projects  CERN could be available to provide the necessary legal framework for implementation of large European infrastructures for future non-accelerator projects  The discussions/concerns in Council focused on maintaining the CERN priorities (LHC and a next machine), possibly too much funding and activities channelling through CERN, the timing of this paper, and the need to address these concerns over a longer timescale and a wider European scope than the CERN scientific programme alone (European Strategy Session of Council)  The suggestion now is that further development of the potential scientific enlargement of the CERN programme:  should be continued in the framework of the European Strategy Sessions of Council within the context and according to the time-scale of the forthcoming update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics, taking into account the various considerations expressed by Council  with a remit extended to include discussion of the roles of other key partners in the implementation of the European Strategy for Particle Physics (for example National Laboratories and the European Commission) 8/5/1018